Blogpen— Our Blogs and Nothing But Our Blogs
Hall of Merit: 1916 Results - Stovey elected in closest voting ever
In the closest balloting in the 19-year history of the Hall of Merit, Harry Stovey was elected, outpointing Joe Kelley 667-665. It was a wild election, 11 candidates received a first-place vote and no candidate was named on every ballot. 44 voters sent in ballots for the 2nd consecutive year. Stovey was in his 18th year of eligibility and will be 60 in December. He’s the 3rd oldest player selected to the Hall of Merit (Joe Start was almost 70 and Cal McVey was a month shy of his 64th birthday when inducted).
The previous closest election was Bid McPhee defeating McVey 751-747 in 1913 (McVey was elected a year later). The only other election decided by less than 10 points was in 1906, when Al Spalding defeated Ezra Sutton by 8.5 points. Sutton was elected in 1908.
Kelley nearly closed a 21-point gap from the 1915 election. Stovey’s two extra first place votes (9 vs. 7) sealed the deal for him, despite his being left off three ballots (Kelley was left off two ballots).
First-year eligible Elmer Flick was right on Stovey and Kelley’s heels, with 651 points. Another first-timer finished 4th, Wee Willie Keeler finished with 619 points.
Charlie Bennett moved from 6th to 5th, moving past Jimmy Collins.
There was a lot of movement this year Joe McGinnity moved up a spot into 7th (he and several others passed Sam Thompson, who dropped off 6 ballots entirely, and fell from 7th to 10th place).
Bob Caruthers vaulted from 14th to 8th place, being named on eight more ballots this year. Frank Grant moved from 10th to 9th (despite dropping from 356 to 352 points) and Thompson rounded out the top 10.
Lip Pike also made a run, moving past Hugh Duffy, Jimmy Ryan and George Van Haltren into 11th place.
Other first-year eligibles to receive votes include Rube Waddell (12th), Addie Joss (21st), Vic Willis (22nd), Cy Seymour (tied for 37th), Deacon Phillippe (42nd) and Ginger Beaumont (43rd).
Rk LY Player Pts Bal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 3 Harry Stovey 667 41 9 4 6 3 3 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 3
2 4 Joe Kelley 665 42 7 3 3 6 2 4 4 3 4 2 2 1 1
3 n/e Elmer Flick 651 40 4 5 4 4 9 3 2 3 1 3 1 1
4 n/e Willie Keeler 619 41 5 5 3 3 2 4 4 3 2 2 3 2 2 1
5 6 Charlie Bennett 586 33 9 8 2 3 1 1 3 2 1 3
6 5 Jimmy Collins 558 39 2 5 5 1 3 4 5 3 2 3 1 4 1
7 8 Joe McGinnity 444 32 1 2 4 4 6 3 2 3 2 3 2
8 14 Bob Caruthers 379 31 2 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 6 3 3 2 3
9 10 Frank Grant 352 29 1 3 4 3 2 3 2 2 2 4 2 1
10 7 Sam Thompson 345 24 1 2 4 4 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
11 13 Lip Pike 320 22 2 3 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 1 2
12 n/e Rube Waddell 311 23 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 1 2 1 1
13 9 Hugh Duffy 303 25 2 3 3 5 3 1 2 3 1 2
14 11 Jimmy Ryan 298 25 3 2 4 1 4 4 2 1 2 2
15 12 George Van Haltren 271 23 1 1 5 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 3
16 15 Jake Beckley 259 24 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 1 3
17 17 Dicky Pearce 244 18 2 1 2 3 2 3 1 4
18 16 Hughie Jennings 236 19 3 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 3
19 18 Pete Browning 200 17 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 1
20 19 Clark Griffith 164 17 1 1 2 2 2 4 1 3 1
21 n/e Addie Joss 112 10 2 2 1 1 1 3
22 n/e Vic Willis 101 13 1 1 3 3 5
23 21 Cupid Childs 94 10.5 1 1 1 2 2 3.5
24 20 Jim McCormick 86 9 1 1 1 1 1 4
25 22 Mickey Welch 69 6.5 1 1 1 2 1.5
26 28 Lave Cross 55 6 1 1 2 1 1
27 24 Charley Jones 45 5 1 2 1 1
28 30 Harry Wright 43 4 1 1 1 1
29 25 John MGraw 42 3.5 1 1 1 .5
30 23 Mike Tiernan 37 4.5 2 2 .5
31 32 Herman Long 29 3.5 1 1 1 .5
32 26 Fielder Jones 23 3 1 2
33 33 Tip O'Neill 21 2 1 1
34 27 Ed Williamson 17 2.5 1 1.5
35 29 Tony Mullane 16 2 1 1
36 31 Mike Griffin 15 2 1 1
37T n/e Cy Seymour 14 1 1
37T 34 Jim Whitney 14 1 1
37T 36 Tommy Bond 14 1 1
40 -- Tom York 13 1 1
41 37 Levi Meyerle 10 1 1
42 n/e Deacon Phillippe 8 1 1
43 n/e Ginger Beaumont 6 1 1
Dropped Out: Jack Chesbro (#35), Bobby Mathews (#38T), Jesse Tannehill (#38T),
Silver King (#40).
Since the last results were announced, two great HoMers of the early 70s have passed away, Ross Barnes, age 64 (February 1915) and Al Spalding age 65 (September 1915).
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 24, 2003 at 12:10 AM |
10 comment(s)
Related News:
I think a separate thread to discuss the likes of Addie Joss, Sandy Koufax and Dizzy Dean is appropriate.
These guys are in a family unto themselves. I suppose if Pedro Martinez were to retire tomorrow, he’d be in the group too, though he’s a notch above those three.
These guys were amazing pitchers, who for one reason or another only had 6-8 years of greatness.
Where should we rank them? I was surprised at how little support Joss received in his first go-round. I didn’t vote for him either, but I think I could easily be convinced to, I’m waiting for my revised Pennants Added numbers before I vote for Joss. Players like Hughie Jennings and Bob Caruthers received much more support, but I don’t see them as being any better than Joss. How can one justify keeping Joss of the ballot, but voting for Dean or Koufax? I’m not saying you can’t, but it’s not immediately obvious, and I have to think Koufax and probably Dean will do much better than Joss did.
You don’t rack up a 142 ERA+ (especially in a low ERA era, where it’s tougher to have an extreme ERA+) over 2300 IP without being a great pitcher. Sure he didn’t pitch an incredible amount of innings every year (in the context of his time), but neither does Pedro, and Koufax was only in the top 10 in the NL 4 times, though he did lead the league twice. Dean was a horse during his 6 year run.
I think these three pitchers are probably the most fascinating candidates we’ll see.
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 22, 2003 at 10:41 PM |
0 comment(s)
Related News:
Hall of Merit: 2004 Hall of Fame ballot discussion
Some of you asked for a thread to discuss the 2004 ballot for the Hall of Fame, while we’re on vacation. Here you go!
It was suggested to run a mock election using our system. If we do so, we shouldn’t just have players on the ballot as eligible. In keeping with our practice, we should consider ALL players not in the Hall of Fame today. Putting together a 15-player ballot with that system would be great.
To make sure no one is missed, we should nominate players for the ballot. I’d immediately nominate the HoMers that aren’t in the Hall of Fame: Ross Barnes, Bill Dahlen, Jack Glasscock, George Gore, Paul Hines, Cal McVey, Hardy Richardson, Joe Start, Ezra Sutton and Deacon White.
I’d also nominate players that have been erased from BBWAA eligibility guys like Bobby Grich, Craig Nettles, Lou Whitaker, Joe Torre, Bill Freehan, Ron Santo and Ron Guidry, to name a few. A composite ballot of these players, and others that I’m not remembering off the top of my head would be fascinating.
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 22, 2003 at 10:15 PM |
40 comment(s)
Related News:
Cy Young and Fred Clarke head the new eligibles.
This election won’t start until January 5, so take your time discussing.
Let me know if you’d like to open any other threads for discussion over the holidays, and a Happy Holidays to all of you too!
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 22, 2003 at 09:41 PM |
125 comment(s)
Related News:
Let the games begin! Interesting ballot once again . . . I hope to update pennants added this week, but I can’t promise anything, busy time of year. I also am not sure if I should just get the thing up to date with adjusting for the FRAA/FRAR issue, so they are updated, and worry about doing the fielding adjustment when I have more time . . .
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 15, 2003 at 03:22 PM |
90 comment(s)
Related News:
Hall of Merit: 1915 Results - Davis, Dahlen Elected
For the first time since 1903 (Cap Anson and Roger Connor), two first-time eligibles were elected to the Hall of Merit, as George Davis and Bill Dahlen, two turn of the century shortstops breezed to election. Davis was named first on 33 of 44 ballots (second on 8 others), Dahlen was named first on 5 ballots and second on 27.
Harry Stovey held his place as the top returning player and finished 3rd. Joe Kelley was the second runner-up again. Jimmy Collins slipped past Charlie Bennett for 5th and Bennett dropped to 6th.
Sam Thompson finished 7th. Joe McGinnity passed Hugh Duffy for 8th and Duffy finished 9th. Frank Grant rounded out the top 10.
Rk LY Player Pts Bal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 n/e George Davis 1011 43 33 8 1 1
2 n/e Bill Dahlen 939 44 5 27 3 5 2 1 1
3 2 Harry Stovey 601 41 2 10 5 5 2 1 3 3 2 2 3 1 2
4 3 Joe Kelley 580 42 6 4 3 6 5 5 1 6 2 1 3
5 5 Jimmy Collins 536 39 2 4 5 5 4 6 6 1 2 1 1 1 1
6 4 Charlie Bennett 523 34 1 1 8 8 4 4 3 1 2 2
7 6 Sam Thompson 415 30 2 3 4 3 3 1 3 4 2 1 1 3
8 8 Joe McGinnity 389 28 2 1 3 1 4 1 3 3 2 1 2 1 3 1
9 7 Hugh Duffy 385 34 1 3 3 4 4 2 1 4 4 2 3 3
10 9 Frank Grant 356 29 1 1 1 8 4 2 2 1 5 3 1
11 10 Jimmy Ryan 349 29 1 2 1 5 5 5 1 3 4 1 1
12 13 George Van Haltren 313 28 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 3 2 3 1
13 11 Lip Pike 293 21 1 2 4 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 1
14 16 Bob Caruthers 278 23 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 3 1 2
15 12 Jake Beckley 259 23 1 2 5 2 3 4 1 1 1 3
16 14 Hughie Jennings 235 21 3 1 1 3 5 1 1 3 3
17 15 Dickey Pearce 221 18 3 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 1
18 19 Pete Browning 197 17 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 2 1
19 17 Clark Griffith 151 15 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 2 1
20 20 Jim McCormick 111 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1
21 18 Cupid Childs 109 12 1 1 1 1 1 4 3
22 22 Mickey Welch 100 10.5 1 1 1 1 2 1 3.5
23 21 Mike Tiernan 82 9 1 1 1 1 3 1 1
24 23 Charley Jones 65 8 1 2 1 2 2
25 27 John McGraw 64 7 2 1 2 2
26 25 Fielder Jones 58 7 4 2 1
27 26 Ed Williamson 48 7 2 2 3
28 24 Lave Cross 44 5 1 2 2
29 30 Tony Mullane 38 5 1 2 2
30 32 Harry Wright 32 3 1 1 1
31 28 Mike Griffin 30 3 1 1 1
32 29 Herman Long 27 3.5 1 1 1.5
33 33 Tip O'Neill 24 2 1 1
34 31 Jim Whitney 15 1 1
35 n/e Jack Chesbro 14 2 1 1
36 35 Tommy Bond 12 1 1
37 37T Levi Meyerle 8 1 1
38T 39 Bobby Mathews 7 1 1
38T n/e Jesse Tannehill 7 1 1
40 nr Silver King 6 1 1
Dropped Out: Deacon McGuire (34), Fred Dunlap (36), Bill Hutchison (37T).
Sorry the results are late, and thanks to John Murphy, Ron Wargo, Patrick W and Eric C for sending along tallys. It’s an enormous help and much appreciated.
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 10, 2003 at 09:24 PM |
10 comment(s)
Related News:
A very strong new class . . .
***1916 (December 21)—elect 1
WS W3 Rookie Name-Pos (Died)
333 96.3 1893 Willie Keeler-RF (1923)
291 82.8 1898 Elmer Flick-RF (1971)
272 57.7 1896 Cy Seymour-CF (1919)
240 67.8 1899 Rube Waddell-P (1914)
293 49.9 1898 Vic Willis-P (1947)
229 49.2 1899 Ginger Beaumont-CF (1956)
191 55.0 1899 Bill Bradley-3b (1954)
191 48.2 1902 Addie Joss-P (1911)
212 40.0 1899 Sam Leever-P (1953)
168 51.0 1901 Freddy Parent-SS (1972)
206 32.4 1899 Deacon Phillippe-P (1952)
146 39.3 1905 George Stone-LF (1945)
148 25.2 1902 Bob Ewing-P (1947)
126 22.5 1905 Orval Overall-P (1947)
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 08, 2003 at 10:52 PM |
186 comment(s)
Related News:
At OCF’s request, and I’ll quote him . . .
At the moment, I only have questions, not answers. It might be nice to reactivate this thread as a place to collect comments. That, or we could create a new thread. What are my questions?
1. The circumstances for pitchers in the 1900’s were very different than those for pitchers in the 1880’s. How should we fairly compare McCormick, Welch, Caruthers and the other leftover pitchers from the 80’s to Griffith, McGinnity, Willis, Waddell, and the flood of others who will come behind them?
2. How does one rank the short-to-medium career pitchers with medium-to-high peaks of the 1900’s against each other? Snippets of systematic comparison have been coming out on ballot discussion threads - the more of that the better. And where will Eddie Plank fit into this?
Selected references from the 1915 Ballot Discussion thread:
Paul Wendt #95
Chris Cobb #106, #130, #148
Marc, #131
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 02, 2003 at 06:37 PM |
87 comment(s)
Related News:
Hall of Merit: WARP3’s systematic flaws with 19th Century players
I’m going to do an overhaul on pennants added this week (hopefully, if you want to volunteer for some data entry, let me know!), including revising for the WARP 2003 numbers (I’ll leave the old ones up, for reference), and adjusting for the overrating of fielding by setting the replacement level too low.
One thing I noticed, that troubles me from the Prospectus glossary:
“FRAR
Fielding Runs Above Replacement. The difference between an average player and a replacement player is determined by the number of plays that position is called on to make. That makes the value at each position variable over time. In the all-time adjustments, an average catcher is set to 39 runs above replacement per 162 games, first base to 12, second to 34, third to 26, short to 38, center field to 30, left and right to 20.” (emphasis mine)
This means that WARP3 systematically overrates 2B and underrates 3B from this time period. It also underrates 1B, who were at least as valuable as LF and RF defensively probably a little more valuable.
If I had the time, I could adjust this defensive spectrum, and re-rate the fielding component for each player, but that ain’t happening any time soon.
What I’d suggest is this: Using the same total of runs 39-38-34-30-26-20-20-12, I’d portion them this way, pre 1930:
39 C, 38 SS, 34 3B, 26 2B, 25 CF, 21 1B, 19 LF, 17 RF.
You could tweak that to your own specifications, but I think I’m being pretty conservative, you could easily make the case that 1B was equal in value to CF, though I won’t.
Doing that, you get an adjustment (using a 9.7 R/W converter) of:
3B: 34-26 = 8; 8/9.7 = +.82 W/season
2B: 26-34 = -8; -8/9.7 = -.82 W/season
CF: 25-30 = -5; -4/9.7 = -.52 W/season
1B: 21-12 = 9; 9/9.7 = +.93 W/season
LF: 19-20 = -1; 1/9.7 = -.10 W/season
RF: 17-20 = -3; -3/9.7 = -.31 W/season
I think that if you do this, you’re going to come out with rankings much more in line with the generally accepted historical rankings, especially with players like Jimmy Collins and Bid McPhee.
I’m not saying that WARP should be eliminated from the tool box when discussing 19th Century players. Just that it needs to be tweaked somewhat.
The mistake that Prospectus is making is that they think (implied by their formulas) that if Jimmy Collins were playing in 1990 he’d be a 3B. But most likely he’dve played 2B, because that’s where the more skilled fielder played after 1930. That’s the only way to explain how 3B outhit 2B after 1945, and 2B outhit 3B before 1920. From 1920-42 they were about even (who cares about 1943-45 :-)
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 02, 2003 at 04:53 PM |
61 comment(s)
Related News:
With six new eligibles reasonable candidates to at least get a vote, and two very strong new candidates on the board, this should be an interesting election. We’re also electing two candidates this year.
I’ll have the Pennants Added thread updated by tomorrow night, maybe tonight, depending on how things go today.
Joe Dimino
Posted: December 01, 2003 at 05:18 PM |
119 comment(s)
Related News:
Page 117 of 129 pages ‹ First < 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 > Last › | Features Archive | Site Archive