Blogpen— Our Blogs and Nothing But Our Blogs
Hall of Merit: 1905 Results - Radbourn and Richardson Elected
Charlie Radbourn and Hardy Richardson have been elected to the Hall of Merit. Radbourn finished first with 706 points and was named on all but one ballot. He is our second posthumous inductee (King Kelly was the first), Old Hoss passed on in February 1897, he was just 42.
Richardson (who was the only player named on all 41 ballots) finished second with 660 points, beating Pud Galvin by 26 points. Richardson’s margin over Galvin was the 2nd closest to date, George Wright beat Jack Glasscock by 21 points in 1901 (Glasscock was elected in 1904).
In 1906 just one new player will be elected and the battle will be tighter than ever. Newcomer Bid McPhee finished 4th, four points behind Galvin, and Al Spalding and Ezra Sutton were tied for 5th, just four points behind McPhee. Both jumped over Joe Start, who finished 7th, but just 29 points behind Galvin.
Harry Stovey held his spot among the returnees and finished 8th with 533 points. Cal McVey jumped over Sam Thompson and Charlie Bennett to finish 9th with 486 points. Thompson rounded out the top 10 with 436 points.
RK LY Player Pts Ballots 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 3 C.Radbourn 706 40.0 9 5 4 2 4 1 7 3 2 1 1 1
2 4 H.Richardson 660 41.0 3 2 5 6 8 7 2 3 1 1 3
3 5 P.Galvin 634 39.0 4 3 5 8 5 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 1
4 n/a B.McPhee 630 39.0 5 3 3 6 3 2 6 3 2 2 2 2
5 7 A.Spalding* 626 37.0 7 6 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 2 1
6 8 E.Sutton 626 36.5 4 10 4 3 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 2.5
7 6 J.Start 605 36.5 6 3 2 6 2 5 2 4 3 1 1 1 0.5
8 9 H.Stovey 533 40.0 3 4 3 4 2 4 6 5 2 3 2 2
9 12 C.McVey 486 33.0 1 3 4 1 7 4 1 3 2 1 2 1 3
10 10 S.Thompson 436 35.5 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 3 4 3 4 0.5
11 11 C.Bennett 423 33.0 1 1 1 1 5 5 2 8 4 3 1 1
12 13 P.Browning 301 30.0 3 3 1 1 6 4 7 4 1
13 n/a M.Tiernan 279 29.5 1 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 1 10.5
14 14 B.Caruthers 223 19.0 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1
15 16 L.Pike 189 19.0 2 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 4
16 15 M.Griffin 170 20.0 1 1 1 3 2 3 6 3
17 19 J.McCormick 136 15.0 1 2 3 1 2 1 5
18 17 E.Williamson 122 15.0 1 2 4 2 3 3
19 18 M.Welch 96 11.0 2 1 1 2 3 2
20 20 D.Pearce 69 7.0 1 1 1 2 1 1
21 21 T.Mullane 55 6.0 1 2 1 1 1
22 n/a B.Fowler 52 4.0 1 1 1 1
23 22 F.Dunlap^ 51 7.0 1 2 2 2
24 23 J.Whitney 51 5.0 1 1 1 2
25 25 T.O'Neill 40 3.0 1 1 1
26 24 J.Clements 27 3.0 1 2
27 26 B.Nash 18 2.0 1 1
28 31 C.Jones 16 2.0 2
29 27 B.Joyce 14 1.0 1
30 -- D.Lyons 13 2.0 1 1
31 28 D.Foutz 12 1.0 1
32 30 B.Hutchison 10 1.0 1
33 29 L.Meyerle 8 1.0 1
34 32 D.Orr 6 1.0 1
Dropped Out: none.
*won 2nd tie-breaker (# of ballots named on, 37-36.5). First tie-breaker was 20-20
(head-to-head on individual ballots)
^won tie-breaker, 7-5 (head-to-head on individual ballots)
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 21, 2003 at 06:21 PM |
9 comment(s)
Related News:
Hall of Merit: Second Base vs. Third Base before 1920
I don’t think I buy into the studies that say that 2B made more plays than 3B and turned almost as many DPs as they do today as evidence that the position was equal to 3B in this time period, in terms of importance.
1B make more plays (in terms of putouts and assists) than anyone on the field. Does that make them more important? The fact that 2B made fewer DPs in the 19th Century is significant, because there were MANY more baserunners, due to all of the errors. As a % of men on 1B, DP are much lower than in post 1920 baseball. Also, while 2B might have (I’m going from memory) 4 or 5 plays per game compared to 2 or 3 for 3B, the 2 or 3 the 3B makes are MUCH more difficult, considering that there was much more speed in the game during this timeframe, and the throw was much longer and the ball was coming at them faster.
Finally, the most convincing evidence is that 2B clearly and easily outhit 3B before 1920 (at about the same level that 3B outhit 2B today). If the positions were defensively equal, managers would have let better hitters play 3B.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 14, 2003 at 05:13 PM |
15 comment(s)
Related News:
The two best hitters of the AA, how much do we discount them?
I think the AA was kind of like the USFL. The USFL had Jim Kelly, Herschel Walker and a few other legit stars (although they were young), and some decent retreads like Brian Sipe, but it wasn’t anywhere near the NFL, yet it was a major league, better than what we’d call AAA and they had really good players. Look at the AFL in the early years, it took them quite awhile before they were able to be truly competitive with the NFL. Even to this day, the AFL squads have won just 10 of 36 Super Bowls (28%), despite making up 38% of the teams from before the merger (not counting TB’s win, which is the only one from a post-1970 expansion team). Almost all of the really big stars were in the NFL/NL. It’s an interesting debate.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 11, 2003 at 04:08 PM |
177 comment(s)
Related News:
WS or WARP3? Whichever one you use will go a long way towards where he fits on your ballot.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 11, 2003 at 03:59 PM |
38 comment(s)
Related News:
Probably the toughest candidate to get a handle on.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 11, 2003 at 03:56 PM |
26 comment(s)
Related News:
One of our most talked about candidates.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 11, 2003 at 03:55 PM |
14 comment(s)
Related News:
Page 121 of 129 pages ‹ First < 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 > Last › | Features Archive | Site Archive