Blogpen— Our Blogs and Nothing But Our Blogs
Probably the toughest candidate to get a handle on.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 11, 2003 at 03:56 PM |
26 comment(s)
Related News:
One of our most talked about candidates.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 11, 2003 at 03:55 PM |
14 comment(s)
Related News:
A place to focus in the pros and cons of our top keystone men.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 11, 2003 at 03:52 PM |
16 comment(s)
Related News:
As suggested earlier this week, a place to focus the discussion on some of our top candidates.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 11, 2003 at 03:50 PM |
8 comment(s)
Related News:
Hall of Merit: 1904 Results: Glasscock & Rusie Elected
Jack Glassock and Amos Rusie have been elected to the Hall of Merit. Glasscock was elected easily after finishing at the top non-electee in 1901, 1902 and 1903. Rusie edged Charles Radbourn by 34 points for the other spot, it was Rusie’s first year of eligibility.
The runner-up positions are tightly bunched, 3rd place was separated from 8th place by just 131 points. Radbourn has moved into the top runner-up slot for the second time (he finished 5th in 1898, when four players were elected), he finished directly behind Glasscock in 1901, 1902 and 1903. Hardy Richardson finished 4th, and was the only player besides Glasscock named on all 43 ballots, Pud Galvin passed Joe Start among the returnees, finishing 5th.
Start edged Al Spalding by two points for 6th place and Ezra Sutton finished 8th. Harry Stovey and Sam Thompson rounded out the top 10.
The top newcomers for 1905 include Bid McPhee, Mike Tiernan, Bud Fowler and Ed McKean.
RK LY Player Pts Ballots 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 3 J.Glasscock 850 43.0 16 8 4 5 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
2 n/a A.Rusie 720 42.0 5 5 4 7 8 3 3 2 1 2 1 1
3 4 C.Radbourn 686 42.0 6 5 6 3 3 4 5 3 4 2 1
4 5 H.Richardson 649 43.0 1 4 3 5 4 9 3 4 4 1 1 1 2 1
5 7 P.Galvin 610 40.0 1 3 5 8 4 2 6 2 2 1 3 2 1
6 6 J.Start 589 38.0 5 4 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 2 1 2 3
7 10 A.Spalding 587 38.0 7 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 3 1 2 1
8 8 E.Sutton 555 36.5 2 5 7 3 1 5 1 3 2 3 1 2 1.5
9 11 H.Stovey 517 41.0 2 3 3 4 3 2 5 8 5 1 2 3
10 9 S.Thompson 473 39.0 1 2 2 3 5 2 2 3 2 6 3 3 4 1
11 12 C.Bennett 415 36.0 1 1 4 1 3 5 1 3 3 7 4 1 2
12 13 C.McVey 394 31.5 1 2 2 3 3 2 4 4 3 2 4 1.5
13 15 P.Browning 307 31.0 1 1 1 3 1 5 2 5 7 2 3
14 14 B.Caruthers 273 25.0 2 2 5 1 2 1 2 2 3 5
15 n/a M.Griffin 170 18.0 1 3 1 4 3 1 3 2
16 17 L.Pike 168 18.0 1 3 1 3 1 3 3 3
17 16 E.Williamson 126 15.0 1 2 2 2 2 2 4
18 18 M.Welch 107 12.0 4 1 1 3 2 1
19 20 J.McCormick 102 11.0 1 1 1 2 3 1 2
20 19 D.Pearce 89 8.0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
21 22 T.Mullane 65 7.0 1 1 2 1 2
22 21 F.Dunlap 56 6.5 1 3 2 0.5
23 24 J.Whitney 47 4.5 1 1 1 1 0.5
24 n/a J.Clements 46 6.0 2 2 2
25 23 T.O'Neill 39 3.0 1 1 1
26 n/a B.Nash 26 3.0 1 2
27 n/a B.Joyce 15 2.0 1 1
28 26 D.Foutz 12 1.0 1
29 27T L.Meyerle 11 1.0 1
30 27T B.Hutchison 10 1.0 1
31 29 C.Jones 9 1.0 1
32 30T D.Orr 6 1.0 1
Dropped out: Silver King (25); Denny Lyons (30T), Bobby Mathews (30T), George
Stovey (32).
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 07, 2003 at 07:09 PM |
22 comment(s)
Related News:
I haven’t finished tabulating the 1904 results yet, we’ll get those up a little later, but there’s no reason we can’t get the 1905 discussion going.
I’ll be at the SABR Convention this week, from Wednesday to Sunday, if you’re also there, stop by and say hello!
That will obviously limit my input this week, but I’ll try to check in when I can.
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 07, 2003 at 04:40 PM |
157 comment(s)
Related News:
Hall of Merit: Pennants Added (updated for 1914 ballot)
Using Michael Wolverton’s formulas, I’ve calculated the Pennants Added for all of the candidates on this year’s ballot, as well as already elected HoMers.
I used both WARP3 and Win Shares (when possible) for hitters, just WARP3 for pitchers because Win Shares just have too many issues right now.
The Win Share rankings have some changes, now that I’ve added in Chris Cobb’s NA Win Shares for the players he’s calculated.
With WARP3, I made one modification, using a straight line adjust for the length of the schedule (to 162 games), instead of their formula of (162/scheduled games)^(2/3). This puts players from the 1870s and early 80s on a more equal footing.
The WARP1 numbers are adjusted for season length, but not league difficulty. At some point this week, I’ll run a correlation using birthdate with pennants added. One way to tell the degree of the ‘difficulty adjustment’ (at least the age component) will be to check and see whether WARP3 or WARP1 correlates well with birthdate (another way would be the mid-point of the players career, adjusted for schedule length, but that would take awhile to figure). A weaker correlation would show more balance with regard to the year players were born, which is good in my opinion.
The numbers will be in the discussion link . . .
Joe Dimino
Posted: July 01, 2003 at 04:45 AM |
74 comment(s)
Related News:
This should be the most interesting election yet, the first one that is truly wide-open.
Joe Dimino
Posted: June 30, 2003 at 03:59 AM |
104 comment(s)
Related News:
Page 122 of 129 pages ‹ First < 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 > Last › | Features Archive | Site Archive