The New Home Run King
Who?
Barry Lamar Bonds. Yes, a year ago, we heard how he was done, and would be lucky to play another game. He may not even catch Ruth, much less Hank Aaron. He went on to hit twenty-six home runs, and is within a half season, or so, of the Hammer.
What?
The all time career home run record. Yes, the most treasured mark in the history of sports. Nothing compares to this mark. Well, perhaps the single season home run mark, and Bonds did what Aaron never could - set that mark. And with seventy-three in 2001, he may have pushed the mark out where it won’t be approached for the time gaps that made it so treasured. Ruth held the mark at 60 from 1927 to 1961 - 34 years. Roger Maris broke that mark under tremendous pressure in 1961, and held the mark for 37 years. Mark McGwire hit 70 in 1998, and held it for just three seasons. Can Bonds hold the mark for thirty plus seasons or is a younger slugger like Alex Rodriguez or Ryan Howard going to climb over that mark?
When?
Isn’t this what everyone wants to know? The tickets for Giants’ games will be selling like hotcakes as he approaches the mark. The Giants’ home tickets will already be mostly sold, but the away games are going to spike up even more. Last season, the Giants were sixth in road attendance per game, with over 32,800. As Bonds gets close in June and July, road games will be sold out.
But WHEN?
Over Bonds’ career, he has hit a home run for every thirteen at-bats. In 2006, he hit a home run for every fourteen ABs. We are all aware that he had a sore knee the first few months of the season, and he was walked a good deal. Looking at Bonds’ last two months of the season, when he had a good knee, and teams were pitching to him like he was mortal, he hit a home run every twelve ABs. So when pitchers were walking Bonds he hit worse and homered less, and given the Giants lineup, that seems to have been a good approach.
Another thing we know is that Bonds will get some days off. He’s got a new manager, so it’s hard to say exactly when. We can be sure he’ll routinely get games off that are day games after night games. One would think he’d play more home games than away games, but that didn’t happen in 2006 - largely because he will DH in away games at American League parks where he might otherwise get a day off.
In the last two months, when pitchers clearly started pitching to Bonds - his walk rate dropped from 25% in the first four months to 18% in August and 15% in September. Bonds’ batting average and slugging percentage also jumped dramatically in those months. Looking at the games started and the at-bats over that period gives some indication that Bonds was getting about 3.1 at-bats per game. Not plate appearances, but at-bats.
The Giants have twenty-five games in April. Bonds will probably play in twenty-one of them. There are four “day game after night game” that he can take a break on. The Giants have twenty-eight games in May. Bonds played more in May, and not well, with respect to home run rate. Even in 2004, he homered at a lower rate in May than any other month. This May, the Giants have three games at Oakland and four in Colorado. I suspect he’ll miss three of the Giants’ games. June and July look to end up similarly, with a healthy Bonds making it through the first four months missing around thirteen of his team’s 106 games. That’s about 12% of games and would put Bonds on pace for 142 games or so. That may be a bit optimistic, but he’s healthy, knee-wise, and looks to have the desire.
So where does all this lead? It leads to Bonds’ 286th at-bat. Which will happen in the first inning of Bonds’ 93rd game. If Bonds has knee issues, he’ll get to break the record at home against the Washington Nationals on Tuesday, August 7.
If Bonds feels good, that game will be on a nice July afternoon, the 25th, against the Atlanta Braves at PacBell (or whatever). He can splash one down off John Smoltz , giving Smoltz the honor of being the pitcher Bonds has hit the most home runs off of. Get your tickets now.
Chris Dial
Posted: March 07, 2007 at 07:59 PM |
117 comment(s)
Related News:
San Francisco,
Projections
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
So if Bonds ends his career with say, 800 HR, is the fact that he holds the record "bogus"? What about 850 or 900? There's some number where he would have made it either way, meaning his position as record holder would have happened with or without chemical enhancement. The grand total may be, in your opinion, fraudulent, but the position as record holder itself?
Just in time for SABR!
So if Bonds ends his career with say, 800 HR, is the fact that he holds the record "bogus"? What about 850 or 900? There's some number where he would have made it either way, meaning his position as record holder would have happened with or without chemical enhancement. The grand total may be, in your opinion, fraudulent, but the position as record holder itself?
Of course he'll be the new record holder as soon as he passes Aaron. But at that point, since it couldn't have happened without steroids, it'll be bogus, fraudulent, and better hitting through chemistry. Same with his 73, and McGwire's 70. Feel free to disagree; we've been known to do that at times.
Though if he should get to "850 or 900" after having passed the requisite blood tests, you can have your secretary get in touch with my secretary, and we'll talk about it over lunch. At 850 I may even buy you the first drink, and at 900 I'd probably be in the mood for a good stiff belt of Kool-Aid.
This was more or less settled for MLB in the Ferguson Jenkins case. An arbitrator order him reinstated after Bowie Kuhn had suspended him for being busted. Arrested August 25. Suspended by Kuhn 14 days later and reinstated by an arbitrator September 22.
Oddly enough MLB has informally cited the Jenkins case as proof that Selig could suspend Bonds if he's indicted. I know the devil's in the details and I've never read the full ruling, just a summary. But the arbitrator specifically addressed the "baseball needs to do this to protect the image" argument that Kuhn advanced (and in case it's not clear, rejected the argument emphatically)
And now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go pee on a pH strip, in accordance with the 2007 drug policy. They need the public to know that the sport is above suspicion, and it turns out I once shopped on mlb.com.
They would say that, wouldn't they?
They are generous to Giants old guys. They project Bonds scoring at least 94 runs (passing Ty Cobb) and Omar Vizquel with at least 605 AB.
I am assuming, for the sake of this particular question, that if Bonds ends his career at 756 HR, then it "couldn't have happened without steroids." What total number of home runs would make you satisfied that at least 756 of Bonds's HR were possible without chemical enhancement?
How did this posting get so far off track from when Barry Bonds would break the record, and instead go off on tangents about OJ Simpson, Michael Jackson, child molesters, and "alleged" steroid use???
I thought this was a "Baseball Think Factory"???
Clearly, you are new.
Run away
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main