User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 7.1837 seconds
62 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
|
You are here > Home > Gonfalon Cubs > Discussion
| |||||||||
Gonfalon Cubs — Cubs Baseball for Thinking Fans Friday, June 16, 200626-39Carlos Zambrano’s eighth excellent start in his last nine went for naught as the Cubs could only put two runs on the board. A poor throw by Walker in the eighth inning gave the Astros an extra out and they took advantage. One thing that hasn’t been mentoned much since Lee went down is the impact the loss of his glove has had. Walker has been adequate (Fred McGriff he certainly isn’t), but Lee’s splendid defense will be welcomed back with open arms. It’s from a few days ago, but John Sickels has an interesting take on the Tyler Colvin selection. Basically, he thinks the Cubs were going with a super-safe pick who should move up the minor league ladder rapidly, knowing that they wouldn’t be active again until the fifth round. He also reminds readers that Colvin was a “young” junior, and that fact, combined with his vastly improved junior season numbers, are encouraging signs. With the news that Freddie “Boom Boom” Bynum is set to get more playing time in LF, yesterday’s prediction of a hard charge at team-wide base on balls futility looks better than ever. Is it too early to get a “Free Mike Restovich” campaign up and running? Could John Mabry be any more useless? Finally, I was looking at Aramis Ramirez’s numbers and trying to pinpoint anything that would indicate why he has had such a disappointing season to this point. Surprisingly, his power and walk numbers are right in line with what he has done the past two years. The only thing really different about this season is his strikeout numbers - he’s making contact a lot. Over 2004-05, Ramirez struck out in a little over 12% of his ABs. This season, that number has dropped to 8%. He has only struck out 19 times. The pitches he sees per plate appearance are down a bit as well (3.55 versus 3.62 over ‘04-’05), but not significantly. It is hard to say what these numbers indicate, although it certainly seems as if Aramis isn’t hitting the ball with as much authority this season. |
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot Topics |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 7.1837 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
With a Pirates win (and they are currently up 2-0), the Cubs drop into a tie for the worst record in the league, and better than only the woeful Royals in all of baseball. Is this enough to get management to discontinue the "Wait until Lee and Prior get back." line. Babe Ruth and Lefty grove wouldn't help this team reach the playoffs now.
Or not? The last two seasons, 'on contact', Ramirez has hit 354/652. This year he's at 270/498 which is awful. He is not hitting the ball with authority. Or to put that back in overall terms, his BA is down 60 points (maybe "luck") but his ISO also down 60 points (that's a big drop) from where he's been the last two years.
Small sample so no need to panic just yet, but this is a Cubs-wide problem. They've clearly shifted to a "contact" oriented offense -- last in team BB (now 43 behind the Pirates), tied for second-fewest Ks (just 5 more than the Giants). That's exactly where last year's stellar offense was. Last year's offense made it to the middle in RS by hitting the 2nd most HRs; as we know, this year's team is last. A healthy Lee would probably put us around 10th and a productive Ramirez maybe around 8th.
Womack in June: 185/267/296. If we're lucky, they'll bench him because he's drawing too many walks.
This raises a question. If Ramirez' ISO is significantly down, but his ISO per hit is not (significantly down), how should we interpret that? IMO, his power is OK, but he has simply had more BIP caught by the defense, probably mostly due to luck. So, in this type of analysis, I think it's better to look at the ratio SLG/BA instead if the difference SLG-BA.
Boot Neifi for Rich Hill
At that point hope Dusty feels the heat and quits on his own
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main