User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3874 seconds
62 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
|
You are here > Home > Gonfalon Cubs > Discussion
| |||||||||
Gonfalon Cubs — Cubs Baseball for Thinking Fans Friday, March 24, 2006Cubs remain utterly clueless about value of the base on ballsMike Kiley has an article yesterday that begins with the following paragraph: “In Gene Clines’ first season as the Cubs’ hitting coach, they led the National League with 1,506 hits. That was tempered, though, by finishing ninth in runs scored and RBI.” Wow! Time for some discussion about the Cubs’ team-wise lack of plate discipline? Of course not. The remainder of the article is full of Clines’ babbling about the “impact” Pierre and Jones are already having: “There’s one key difference, however, that Clines said is showing already. He and former hitting coach Gary Matthews, who now coaches first base and assists Clines with the hitting instruction, are hearing music pleasing to their ears, thanks to Pierre and Jones. ‘A lot of things I’m hearing from these guys around the batting cage, I have been saying for the last three years,’ Clines said. ‘They are saying the same things: Play the game right and check your ego. Don’t worry about yourself. Get the guy over when you have to. ‘That has been such a blessing to have the new guys come in and actually teach some of the other guys about the things they have to do to win games. Check your ego because we are all in this to win, and don’t try to do it all by yourself. That’s the focus this year.’ Left fielder Matt Murton and shortstop Ronny Cedeno will be beginning their first full season in the majors. Clines has noticed Pierre and Jones having impacts on them.” Uh, the last thing in the world Murton and Cedeno need is hitting tips from Pierre and Jones. In fact, I imagine Matt might have some valuable advice for Juan and Jacque (no, we’re not playing in Europe, I promise). Clines also talks about Pierre “hitting for average” but never mentions bases on balls, let alone OBP. The entire article is just more proof that the coaching staff has learned nothing from last year’s failure to score consistently.
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot Topics |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3874 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
We'll see... I'd rather have some walks, bunts, and doubles pile up every game than leaving guys on base like we do hoping for a homer.
Isn't "Runs scored" the most important stat? You can hit a lot, stand on base for 15 minutes, and then head to the dugout all you want. If guys don't head for then white pentagon, it does no good.
No amount of cool stirrup socks or 6 pairs of gloves or sliding wrist braces do a damn bit of good when we just stand there. Might as well put some refreshments out there for the boys.
Actually, I think there used to be more. When I was a kid, "moving baserunners" or "hitting behind the runner" was used as a bizarre and random explanation for all sorts of things. For example, the Houston Astros rode an incredible and dominating pitching staff to a division title in '86, and their offense got worse despite hitting more home runs and drawing more walks than the Astros had in at least a decade. Yet the popular explanation for the Astros' winning, for some reason, was that they were moving baserunners over.
I think that for a while when the home run explosion peaked in the mid- and late-90s, using "moving baserunners" seemed so patently ridiculous as an explanation for anything that it fell briefly out of favor. It seems idiotic to talk about the importance of making good outs when you have five guys in your lineup driving in 90 runs a year.
Offense is down a bit from that time; hits are down a bit, home runs a bit more, walks are way down. I think that's why we're seeing it come back a bit.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main