Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Gonfalon Cubs > Discussion
Gonfalon Cubs
— Cubs Baseball for Thinking Fans

Saturday, August 12, 2006

The value of a good platoon

Back in March, Dusty Baker put on the anti-rational hat he wears whenever he has eaten breakfast within the past decade and declared that he wasn’t going to platoon Jacque Jones.  I can’t find his exact words, but it boiled down to the fact that he wanted to give Jones an opportunity to show what he could do against LHP in a new league with a new team, that Dusty himself would be working with Jacque to make adjustments, blah, blah, blah. 

In response, even the littlest lass playing rounders in Oxfordshire winced at these vocalizations from our manager.  Jones’s struggles against LHP were about as secret as a CIA agent’s cover in Dick Cheney’s office.  From 2003-2005 Jones hit .238/.295/.363 against lefties - and that was in close to 500 plate appearances.  The evidence of his incompence against southpaws couldn’t be clearer.  However, Dusty obviously pays little attention to such facts and chose to believe the impossible dream.  How have things turned out?  Even worse than could have been expected.  In 100 at bats, Jones has hit .190/.214/.330 against LHP.  He has drawn a grand total of two walks while fanning 24 times. 

What impact has this Mendoza-lite performance had the offense?  I mean, even though the numbers are awful, it’s only 100 ABs, right?  To look at this in more detail, I decided to do some guesswork using Baseball Prospectus’s MLVr, or marginal lineup value rate statistic.  Basically, MLVr estimates the number of runs per game a player is worth offensively to his team if the rest of the lineup is made up of average hitters.  For example, a MLVr of 0.150 would mean that the player adds ~0.150 runs per game.  If he played every game, he’d be worth 24.3 runs above an average hitter (162*0.150) over the entire season.

Calculating MLVr is complex, but some basic comparisons should do a reasonable job.  Jones is batting .314.351/.551 against RHP.  Aramis Ramirez’s overall line is .276/.341/.542 - slightly worse, but pretty similar to Jones’s line against righies.  Ramirez’s MLVr is .174.  So, with Jones’s slightly better numbers, let’s give him a .180 MLVr against right-handed pitching. Using 4 plate appearances per game as an average, and the fact that Jones has ~300 PAs against RHP, we can calculate the following:

300 PA/4=75 games*0.180=13.5 runs

So, Jones’s bat against RHP has been worth ~13.5 runs over an average bat this off-season.  Now, this doesn’t take in to account positional effects (if it did that 13.5 would be lower due to the typical average offense from RF), but since we are comparing apples and apples it doesn’t matter.  What about his value against lefties?  Well, BPro has Jones’ total MLV at 6.9.  6.9 minus 13.5 = -6.6.  So, Jones has been worth ~6.6 runs below average offensively against LHP.  With the season almost three quarters over, if we extrapolate to 162 games, Jones would be worth ~ 9 runs below average against southpaws, or about 1 win.  However, it isn’t hard to imagine that the Cubs could find a right-handed bat to platoon with Jones who could put up above average numbers in RF playing only against lefties.  If he just matched Jones’s output against righties, he’d be worth ~5 runs above average over the course of a full season. 

In conclusion, a rough estimation indicates that Baker’s refusal to platoon Jones will cost the Cubs ~1.5 wins this year.  Of course, with the Cubs at 48-67, I agree that 1.5 wins is meaningless except in terms of draft order next summer.  In addition, it is difficult to know whether Jones would have agreed to a contract with the Cubs (no sarcastic comments from the peanut gallery) if he knew he’d be platooned regularly , so this is conjecture.  Regardless, in a truly weak NL Central Division, 1.5 wins could easily mean the difference between a playoff spot and time at the beach in early October.  If the Cubs look to compete next year, one of the easiest and most cost-effective ways to improve the club will be to platoon Jacque Jones religiously.

Luke Jasenosky Posted: August 12, 2006 at 06:35 PM | 18 comment(s)
  Related News: Chi Cubs

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute Posted: August 12, 2006 at 08:53 PM (#2138586)
Interesting take, Luke. I'm not 100% sure about the methodology here, but there is no doubt that the decision not to platoon Jones has cost the Cubs something this season, and while this doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of things, it is yet another deficiency in Baker's managing.

There is the counterissue about whether Jones would be even worse without Baker, but that's kind of a fool's errand.
   2. Andere HUSSEIN Richtingen, Socialist Posted: August 12, 2006 at 09:14 PM (#2138615)
There is the counterissue about whether Jones would be even worse without Baker, but that's kind of a fool's errand

Well, it would be difficult for Jones to do worse against LHP, and he's doing better than his career rate against RHP.

Even if Jones hit at his career rate against LHP (.608 against LHP) instead of this year's .544, it would have been bad to use him against LHP. Hell, you could credit him .050 for bad luck and it would still be unadvisable.

Pretty much everyone here said that Jones was a fine guy to have, as long as you platoon him. For whatever reason, they didn't do that, and the results are not surprising.
   3. Walt Davis Posted: August 12, 2006 at 10:39 PM (#2138715)
Luke's numbers would seem to be pretty close. Another way to approximate it is:

Brad Ausmus is hitting 233/301/295 overall (about 350 PA) which is a little better than Jones's 190/214/330 against lefties, especially in OBP. Ausmus rates at a 210 EQA and a MLVr of -.27. If we take Jones' 100 PA as 25 games and give him Ausmus' probably better -.27 MLVr that's -6.75 runs.

A better comparison might be Rondell White. He's hitting 225/253/305 with an MLVr of -.39 and using that number Jones' 100 PA has already cost us 10 runs.

Luis Terrero is at 200/238/300 and his MLVr is -.44. Ben Broussard (with the Ms) is at 133/188/333 and his MLVr is -.52. Jorge Piedra is at 169/222/356 and he's at -.38. Jared Schumaker is at 179/256/282 and his MLVr is -.4.

So if anything, Luke's esimate of Jones' crappiness this year against lefties appears to be an understatement.
   4. The First Pitch Express Posted: August 13, 2006 at 02:26 AM (#2138818)
Very interesting stuff, Luke and Walt. I wonder if you could project what a full season of an Angel Pagan/Matt Murton platoon would look like... how many runs do the Cubs lose when Pagan plays?
   5. The First Pitch Express Posted: August 13, 2006 at 02:27 AM (#2138819)
Very interesting stuff, Luke and Walt. I wonder if you could project what a full season of an Angel Pagan/Matt Murton platoon would look like... how many runs do the Cubs lose when Pagan plays?
   6. The First Pitch Express Posted: August 13, 2006 at 02:28 AM (#2138820)
Sorry for the double post! Admin, could you delete #5? (and this one?)
   7. Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute Posted: August 13, 2006 at 04:09 AM (#2138837)
Interesting take, Luke. I'm not 100% sure about the methodology here,

. . . meaning that I probably would've tried to skin the cat slightly differently, but I'd still come out with largely the same result. (In my case, I'd say that the failure to platoon Jones will cost the Cubs 8.6 runs this season (plus the value added by a RH partner) rather than 9 -- no big deal.)

One thing I'd be curious about is his L/R splits on a month-by-month basis. Has Jones been this crappy throughout the season, or did he initially start out ok (when Dusty said he was giving him faith) and then falter?
   8. Walt Davis Posted: August 13, 2006 at 05:22 AM (#2138844)
Has Jones been this crappy throughout the season

I recall he started out truly awful, worse than this. I'm sure the numbers were cited in some of the May disaster threads. He probably has "rewarded" Baker's faith by performing around his career norms for the last 2-3 months.

I wonder if you could project what a full season of an Angel Pagan/Matt Murton platoon would look like

As long as Pagan hits 295/333/474 and runs em down in the field, the Pagan platoon probably doesn't cost us anything of note. Of course there's no reason to expect Pagan to keep hitting like that. His career AAA numbers (600+ PA) are 273/334/403. His best SLG in a season with over 100 PA at any level was 405 at AA in 2004. Prior to this season, I'd guess his projection was something like 240/290/350. That's roughly Brian Anderson/Carl Everett 2006 territory which is an MLVr of around -.2 to -.25. Murton has an MLVr of +.042. Murton does have a mild tilt towards vs. LHP, so as a true full-timer, he might be average (MLVr=0).

So my best guess, and this is the defnition of WAG, is that if the split was 120 g for Pagan and 40 for Murton vs. 120 for Murton and 40 for Pagan, it would be a difference of 15-20 runs or 1.5-2 wins. That makes no adjustment for defense.

Just so everyone's clear, I ain't doing nothing special here. Just going to BPro's VORP page (which lists MLVr and PMLVr) and fishing around (I don't subscribe) until I find players with roughly similar BA/OBP/SLG combinations and assuming that's a good enough estimate. Beats doing all that high-falutin' multiplyin', dividin' and subtractin' that Luke and djf are doin'.
   9. Walt Davis Posted: August 13, 2006 at 05:32 AM (#2138846)
Just noticed that my guess as to Pagan's projection is close to Jones' lifetime numbers against LHP. So giving him about 40 games worth of PA per year has cost his teams about .8 to 1 win a year vs. somebody who could hit league average (much less league average for a corner OF) against lefties.
   10. Thomas Richard Hamilton Nugent Posted: August 13, 2006 at 01:11 PM (#2139000)
I'm not sure about that eyeball Pagan projection. According to his PECOTA card, last season Pagan had a Eqa of .250 and an equivalent line of 268/329/382. In 2004, he put up a 250s Eqa between two levels. Assuming this year's a blip and he really is a 250ish hitter, Brian Anderson / Carl Everett is far too low. He'd be more in the Aaron Rowand / Steve Finley / Coco Crisp range.
   11. Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute Posted: August 13, 2006 at 01:31 PM (#2139034)
Beats doing all that high-falutin' multiplyin', dividin' and subtractin' that Luke and djf are doin'.

Actually, all I did was figure that if Jones's MLVr was roughly .174 against RHP (as Luke analogizes), then it would have to be something close to -.238 against LHP to come out with the actual overall number of .071 (because Jones' has had almost exactly 3 PAs against RHPs as LHPs).
   12. Walt Davis Posted: August 14, 2006 at 03:16 AM (#2139965)
According to his PECOTA card, last season Pagan had a Eqa of .250

I know the talent levels in the NL are supposedly down but there is no way in Hell a 271/333/395 line in AAA equates to a 268/329/382 line in MLB. Is the park factor there 70?

ZIPS projected him as 250/306/335. That is a little better than my guess (240/290/350), but I'm closer to ZIPS than PECOTA is.

Of course this season might suggest PECOTA was a better projection than ZIPS. :-)
   13. Thomas Richard Hamilton Nugent Posted: August 14, 2006 at 10:28 AM (#2140062)
I was actually shocked that PAgan's equivalencies are as good as they are. But then I did some quick and dirty calculations and they pass the sniff test:

According to Szymborski's Weighted park factors, Norfolk has a .84 park factor. So adjusted for park, Pagan's OPS would be in the 790s. Add in a 10% dropoff for the jump between the IL and the Majors and his equivalent OPS is 711. I think the rule of thumb is 15% per level, but I adjusted it a bit because the International League is a tougher offensive environment than the PCL.
   14. Walt Davis Posted: August 15, 2006 at 04:52 AM (#2141393)
According to Szymborski's Weighted park factors, Norfolk has a .84 park factor.

But ZIPS adjusts for all that stuff too. Anyway, I'll let Dan figure this out if he wants to drop by.
   15. Clute Posted: August 15, 2006 at 10:41 AM (#2141468)
Are you guys kidding me about platooning J. Jones? How does a GM go out and sign a player to a 3yr. contract that needs to be platooned, not to mention retarding the development of rookie outfielders. Baker is clueless when it comes to platooning his players anyway. Clueless Manaager, clueless GM and clueless ownership. If the fans and citizens of Green Bay can own the Packers, I'd say we start an investment group from all the disgruntled Cub fans and make a hostile takeover bid for the club.
   16. Walt Davis Posted: August 16, 2006 at 07:23 AM (#2142724)
If the fans and citizens of Green Bay can own the Packers, I'd say we start an investment group from all the disgruntled Cub fans and make a hostile takeover bid for the club.

Not allowed by MLB ownership rules.

But Trib stock should be pretty cheap right now...

Baker is clueless when it comes to platooning his players anyway.

This isn't true. Baker's run plenty of platoons over the years, in SF and Chicago. It's one of the few strategic things I think he does relatively well. Granted, he sometimes platoons guys maybe he shouldn't (Choi).
   17. Clute Posted: August 17, 2006 at 11:23 AM (#2144425)
Walt, you can't be serious. Murton sits repeatedly and Jones hardly ever. Why would Perez ever be in the starting lineup except for a late inning switch. How many times have you seen Baker replace three starters in one game, like the day last week when Prior pitched in Milwaukee. If you want to rotate a player in to get some at bats don't sub for three starters in the same game. And tell me why you call up R. Theriot and have him rot on then bench when he should've been startign everyday at 2nd. He did the same thing last year with Cedeneo. And don't even get me started on his late inning moves with the bullpen. The guy's a complete boob.
   18. Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute Posted: August 17, 2006 at 11:33 AM (#2144433)
I don't think you're addressing Walt's point, Clute. Dusty plays a lot of horrible lineups and gives far too much playing time to chumps, but Walt's point is that Dusty does use platoons -- Choi/Karros and Dubois/Hollandsworth to name a couple.

The fact that he *shouldn't* have platooned those guys is another issue, but the point is that he does use platoons; he just does them when he shouldn't (Choi, Dubois) and doesn't when he should (Jones).
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Offseason thoughts
(18 - 4:25pm, Nov 11)

Quick thoughts on the NLDS
(42 - 11:16am, Oct 01)

Is this the playoff rotation?
(19 - 10:04pm, Sep 26)

Official Venting Thread
(22 - 12:12pm, Sep 15)

Assigning Blame
(49 - 1:41pm, Sep 04)

GID(Lee)P
(34 - 10:12pm, Sep 03)

Wait for it...
(36 - 9:04pm, Aug 22)

Twenty Games over .500
(21 - 6:15pm, Aug 07)

The Cream Rises to the Top?
(33 - 8:30pm, May 29)

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.4573 seconds
62 querie(s) executed