Five Down, One to Go
Turn out the lights, the party's over...
Dandy Don Meredith sang it oh so sweetly. With four weeks to play, and a huge lead, I feel completely comfortable patting the Mets on the back.
TEAM W L PCT GB HOME ROAD L-10 STREAK
NYMets 82 50 .621 - 43-23 39-27 8-2 L-1
Philly 67 66 .504 15.5 33-35 34-31 6-4 L-1
Florida 65 68 .489 17.5 35-30 30-38 8-2 L-2
Atlanta 63 69 .477 19 30-35 33-34 5-5 L-1
Wash. 56 77 .421 26.5 31-32 25-45 2-8 W-1
The Mets are playing the best baseball of any team in the NL. Even despite having a big lead, and running the Norfolk pitching staff out there all month. The offense is clicking as David Wright and Carlos Delgado located their strokes. In August, Jose Reyes, Delgado and Beltran all posted OPS marks over 1.000. Endy Chavez (yes, that one) posted a 0.917. It's just ridiculous how good our lineup is. Even Paul LoDuca is hitting well above .300.
Since the All-Star Break, the Mets are 29-14. They have 11 starts from Glavine and Pedro. The team ERA is just 4.35 over that period, and Pedro (5.75) and Glavine (5.18) weren't helping. There were 81 bullpen innings below 2.75 in there. John Maine posted a 2.96 ERA in 45 IP. This team is just very good.
One of the best parts of this team is the youth - David Wright and Jose Reyes both have new contracts and are MVP candidates now and in the future. That's great talent to have.
MVP! MVP!
Carlos Beltran is in a battle with Albert Pujols for MVP. Some want to throw Ryan Howard in the mix, but really - if Pujols is the best first baseman, then RHoward isn't. The bats of Pujols and Beltran are about even at their respective positions, but Beltran is having a great year with the glove as well. Pujols is a good fielder in his own right, but he isn't Beltran.
Beltran should win the Mets first of many MVP awards.
Player VORP RSpt Total
Pujols...65.8.... 1.....66.8
Howard.56.0....-1....55.0
Beltran..64.4... 12...76.4
That's just not particularly close, and I hope some sportswriters start taking notice. Beltran is solidly the MVP - by a full win. The only other NL player up there in VORP is Miguel Cabrera, and he's a big negative with the glove.
Get your head out of a stat book and watch a game!
I love David Wright as much as the next guy, as long as the next guy isn't a particular law professor, but I know he has to work on his defense. He's solidly below average. Yes, he's young and makes some great plays, but after watching and scoring 100 of the Mets games this season, I can visually tell you he's below average.
I also evaluate defense with ZR and a run value calculation of it. Wright's score agrees with my visual perception. Yes, that's not veyr positive, so why bring it up?
Because I was looking at some VORP numbers at the BPro site, and I saw a
Chris Kahrl chat. I scrolled down to a question about King David:
"TheRedsMan (Chicago): David Wright vs. Edwin Encarnacion....is Wright really going to be a much better player?
Christina Kahrl: I think Wright's going to be the much better player, but a big part of that is because Wright's a brilliant defensive player with superstar offensive potential..."
Are you kidding me? I understand not being a Met fan and all, but wooooo, guess that Wright is "about average". Brilliant defensively? That's this week's "GYHOOASBAWAG" Award.
Further down in the chat I read this:
phil44 (Boston): For what it's worth, and I suspect it's worth something, the Fielding Bible ranked Encarnacion as a +5 last year while it had Wright as a -11. That's enhanced plays made above average not runs saved above average.
Christina Kahrl: ... and I'd suggest that every fielding system has its yips, and it's a mistake to get too hung up on what any one of them says. They all have issues, and if they're honest about them, they admit as much.
Sure, Chris, but some are clearly worse than others.
But others want to know:
TGisriel (Baltimore): Are there any fielding stats that you like? I tend to use the Rate and FRAA and FRAA on this site, but I also glance at zone rating.
Christina Kahrl: Depending on your point of view, I dislike or like most of them--Clay's fielding translations, stuff from the Fielding Bible, even Range Factor's interesting to me on some level. I don't have much use for most of the iterations of Zone Rating, since I think that's a matter of trying to fix something that never worked, and I think we should all miss Sherri Nichols' work from way back in the day when it was publicly available
.
Sherri Nichols' work, while spectacular, is a weaker version of MGL's present version of UZR (no park or other adjustments). In fact, MGL's UZR as first published was nearly identical to Sherri's
DA/DR. Then MGL improved on that by switching back to ZR grids instead of Baseball Workshop grids. And now we see a knowledgable interpretation agrees with MGL's UZR.
Either way, like ZR or not, you can watch David play defense and see he has a lot of work to do - and he's far from "brilliant defensively". But I agree with her point - Wright is going to be much better than Encarnacion.
Chris Dial
Posted: September 01, 2006 at 09:52 PM |
24 comment(s)
Related News:
NY Mets
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
LOL. Yet, even I agree with everything you wrote, Chris. I do hope that the seeming slight uptick in his defensive numbers since the ASB is a first sign of a step forward and not just a blip, but that's just a hope, not a real conviction. Tools are wonderful things, and Wright has them -- but they're just not enough. They can fool you when they produce that occasional highlight play that makes you go, "OH!" But they aren't a substitute for actual good defense.
But DW has now lifted his OPS back over .900 after the August slump, and I see a big September lifting him right back into the Silver Slugger mix -- which is probably a good goal to shoot for at this point for 2006.
The biggest things now for the team?
1) Getting the key guys healthy. That means Pedro, Glavine, Floyd, and to a lesser extent El Duque.
2) Making the right decisions on the rotation. I'm going to give the brain trust my confidence on this one -- I have my opinion, but whatever decision they make I'm going to give 'em the benefit of the doubt. I'm assuming that Perez's debacle in Denver eliminated his outside shot, leaving it Pedro, Glavine, Hernandez . . . and either Maine or Trachsel.
Everything else is gravy.
Let's see.
Howard is leading the majors in HR and RBI. Sportswriters love that.
Howard's team has charged back to just .5 games back of a playoff spot. Sportswriters love that.
Howard has been on fire down the stretch while the team fights for a playoff spot. Sportswriters REALLY love that.
You may want to start rooting really, really hard for the Phillies to lose during often the next month...
:P
Methods that use teh same data don't have wide disagreement. You have to seperate PBP and non-PBP. And non-PBP are borderline worthless.
And "refining" is one thing - iterations of ZR (which are the same as DA/DR) are pretty close.
Non-PBP methods are not.
I would say just the opposite has occurred. I score the games, ad expect Wright has made most of his errors in the 7-9 innings. I know of 3 9th inning errors.
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9
2-1-1-1-0-2-2-4-3
Seven errors in the 8th and 9th. So, no, steve, what you suggest isn't close to true, and Wright's errros have been high profile, AFAICT.
Let's see.
Howard is leading the majors in HR and RBI. Sportswriters love that.
Howard's team has charged back to just .5 games back of a playoff spot. Sportswriters love that.
Howard has been on fire down the stretch while the team fights for a playoff spot. Sportswriters REALLY love that.
You may want to start rooting really, really hard for the Phillies to lose during often the next month...
While I agree that Howard has a better chance to win the MVP than we'd like to think, Andruw Jones led the NL in HR and RBI and his team to a division title (that they charged back to) last year and he didn't win it. So it seems that the writers aren't quite in love with that as they used to be.
True, but Jones was a .260 hitter, while Howard is over .300.
That's a good point. But Jones is a great CF while Howard isn't going to be getting any votes over the competition for his defense. They're not exact matches, but they're pretty close.
There's no doubt about one thing: if Ryan Howard wins the MVP award, it will prove beyond any doubt at all that the voters simply do not give a damn about defense. There is simply no way that any voters who consider defense in any meaningful way can give the MVP to Howard over candidates as deserving as Beltran and Pujols, unless something positively seismic happens in September.
Absolutely. That's why I said "any votes over the competition." Because no is getting votes purely for their defense, but if it boils down to Beltran/Pujols, at least some voters are going to go with Beltran because he plays CF.
Well, sure... David Ortiz has been an MVP candidate the last few years, right? :P
Plenty of defensively challenged individuals have won MVP awards. It's an offensive award, with perhaps some secondary consideration given to defense.
Beltran will probably get more off-days this month, if the Mets are smart, so the Mets' big lead will indirectly work against Beltran's chances of an MVP.
I doubt a player as bad defensively as Ryan Howard has ever won the MVP award over hitters as good (and as defensively superior) as Beltran and Pujols. Putting aside the fact they are better hitters on better teams. Of course, when you put ALL those factors together, it begins to suggest that Howard could be one of the worst MVP choices ever.
Go Padres.
My first thought was "maybe Mo Vaugh did." Vaughn beat out Albert Belle and Edgar Martinez. So much for that. And Giambi in 2001? He beat out Frank Thomas.
George Bell beat out Trammell, Kirby Puckett and Dwight Evans in '87.
As for 1993, Griffey finished 5th because his team finished 82-80. So that's distinguishable on a pretty traditional ground (not one I'm saying I approve of, but one we all recognize). The same thing cost Griffey in 1994 (although Thomas, unlike Howard, was a significantly better hitter than his competitors in 1994, thus at least giving rise to a legit offense v. defense debate).
Olerud is a good one, though. Fine defensive player, whereas Thomas wasn't. It's a good comp in some ways -- the greater HR power of Thomas beats out the more broad-based offensive contribution of Olerud. What's really interesting is that the DH Molitor finished ahead of his teammate Olerud (2nd and 3rd) -- which seems awfully strange in hindsight.
George Bell beat out Trammell, Kirby Puckett and Dwight Evans in '87.
George Bell was a much, much better defensive player than Ryan Howard. Howard is god-awful. So I don't think that really matches my claim re. Howard. But that aside, 1987 was a bad choice, too. Trammell was a much more valuable player in 1987 (WARP3: 12.6; Bell: 8.6), and you don't even have to consider quality of defense to see that -- just adjust for positional value and it should have been a clear win for the shortstop.
Ilove him as much as that law professor does. To know know know him is to love love love him, and I do.
Wright's defense needs work.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main