2006 Chicago Cubs
Why do I have this nagging feeling that decades from now I'll be as eager to talk about the 2003 NLCS as Ron Santo is to talk about the autumn of '69? When I walked out of Joe Robbie after Game Four, the Cubs were up 3-1 with Zambrano, Prior, and Wood set to go in the next three games. In the unlikely event the Marlins came back to steal the series, the Cubs still looked stacked with young talent and set to contend for years to come.
Since then, things have slid steadily downhill. Injuries struck Wood and Prior in 2004, and despite an improved offense propelling the team to one more win than in '03, better competition meant no playoff appearance. Management dismissed the broadcast team at the end of the year, and yet somehow 2005 turned out to be worse. Neither Prior nor Wood were able to get healthy and stay healthy and the offense regressed as well. The team finished below .500 and entered the off-season in disarray.
Despite their record, Jim Hendry surveyed the team and concluded that Lee, Ramirez, and the starting pitchers constituted enough front-line talent to build around as the core of a playoff team. He acquired Juan Pierre and Jacque Jones to play outfield, and Scott Eyre and Bob Howry to patch the bullpen. Hendry and Dusty Baker seem to have slotted rookies Matt Murton and Ronny Cedeno for left field and shortstop respectively, and with those peripheral changes the team headed to Mesa to give it a go.
Catcher (2005 OPS .791, #4 in MLB)
Michael Barrett (Age 29, 2006 ZiPS OPS .810)
Henry Blanco (Age 34, 2006 ZiPS OPS .609)
Since being acquired two winters ago for Damian Miller, Barrett has made catcher an offensive strength for the Cubs by posting two very solid (and nearly indistinguishable) offensive seasons. Barrett is a converted shortstop, and although has received generally good reviews for his willingness to work on defense opposing runners continue to have success running against him (25% caught in '04, 23% in '05). By contrast, Blanco consistently catches nearly half of would-be opposition base stealers while hitting like a back-up catcher.
First Base (2005 OPS 1.071, #1 in MLB)
Derrek Lee (Age 30, 2006 ZiPS OPS .980)
From 2000-2004, Derrek Lee often started slow. His average April OPS in that time period was .783, for May it was .732. Each year he'd pick up the pace though, and by season's end his OPS fell between .820 and .887. Wistful Marlins fans (later echoed by their Cub counterparts) would oft be heard saying "If only one year he would start hot...". 2005 they got their wish.
Lee 2005 OPS by Month
April 1.257
May 1.070
June 1.171
July 1.048
August 1.000
September 1.003
It was a year to win over the most die-hard Hee Seop Choi enthusiast. Lee set career highs in nearly every hitting category, led the league in batting average, SLG, OPS, hits, total bases, doubles, and extra-base hits. He won his second Gold Glove, and even tied Corey Patterson for the team lead in stolen bases with fifteen.
Now the question is whether Lee's 2006 will look like 2005 or like the previous five years. ZiPS naturally answers "somewhere in between," and that certainly makes sense, especially after a look at what changed for Lee last year. His batting average on balls in play jumped from .305 and .306 the previous two years up to a career-high .349. While he did manage BABIPs between .325 and .335 in 2000, 2001, and 2002, it is nonetheless likely that this year's number will regress toward the mean. On the other hand, part of the boost in Lee's effectiveness was attributable to a big jump in his power numbers (.327 Isolated Power, .090 higher than his previous career high). Furthermore, it wasn't a case of a handful of doubles sneaking over the fence. Lee bested his career mark in doubles by eleven and in homers by 14.
Second Base (2005 OPS .788, #8 in MLB)
Todd Walker (Age 33, 2006 ZiPS OPS .771)
Jerry Hairston, Jr. (Age 30, 2006 ZiPS OPS .728)
Neifi Perez (Age 33, 2006 ZiPS OPS .641)
The question has been raging all winter and into the spring - why isn't Todd Walker the Cubs' presumptive starter at second base? Cubs management cites his sub-par range, but Walker's bat would seem more than enough to make up for his defense which (as he has pointed out in the press) matters less on a team with a s trikeout-prone staff like the Cubs. Perez, despite a hot April that led to a brief All-Star write-in campaign, was dreadful over the rest of the year and ended with numbers no better than his mediocre career averages. Hairston is better, but his career high SLG of .397 is identical to Walker's career low way back in 1999. The Cubs need substantial improvement at multiple positions to contend this year. A decline at second base would make the task that much tougher, and Walker is the only man likely to keep the Cubs in the top half of the majors at second base.
Third Base (2005 OPS .881, #5 in MLB)
Aramis Ramirez (Age 28, 2006 ZiPS OPS .900)
Despite repeated dalliances with the disabled list, Ramirez has managed to appear in 86% of the Cubs' games during his tenure with the team, and when he has played he has hit. His walk rate and batting average slipped a bit from the highs of 2004, but his power remained excellent. His range remains fair and his fielding percentage worse, but his bat more than makes up for it. The Cubs desperately need him healthy and hitting.
Shortstop (2005 OPS .677, #21 in MLB)
Ronny Cedeno (Age 23, 2006 ZiPS OPS .744)
Neifi Perez (Age 33, 2006 ZiPS OPS .641)
If he plays shortstop instead of second, Neifi's glove is slightly more valuable and his bat slightly more forgivable. Even so, his ZiPS OPS of .641 would be one of the worst in the majors and leave the Cubs in desperate straits. Enter Ronny Cedeno- the youngster has a solid defensive rep and is coming off a breakthrough year (.921 OPS at Iowa, .731 with a .356 OBP in the bigs.) There are two caveats. First, Dusty Baker will be hesitant to turn over the reins to a rookie, particularly with a trusty veteran to choose instead. Perhaps more importantly, Cedeno's offensive numbers were downright terrible in rookie and A ball. He stepped up to a .729 OPS in AA in 2004 and the aforementioned numbers last year, but I'm not overly confident that he's going to jump in the lineup and hit. If he doesn't, You Know Who will be waiting in the wings...
Left Field (2005 OPS .738, #20 in MLB)
Matt Murton (Age 24, 2006 ZiPS OPS .780)
Like Cedeno, Murton is a youngster who has hit increasingly well as he moved through the minors. Unlike with Cedeno, there is no obvious veteran replacement waiting in the wings, so Murton may see playing time even in the event of back-to-back 0-4 games. He was adequate defensively in college and by most accounts in the minors.
Center Field (2005 OPS .643, #29 in MLB)
Juan Pierre (Age 28, 2006 ZiPS OPS .741)
For all the off-season talk, Pierre turned out to be the single biggest acquisition the Cubs would make. The good news is, he need only turn in an average big league center field season to be a big improvement over what the Cubs had in 2005. The bad news is that might be all he is capable of. There are bright spots in his record- he posted OBPs of .361 and .374 his first two years in Florida, and an uncharacteristically low BABIP last year makes 2005 look like a fluke. Still, he has little power and only an average glove. Even his career OBP of .355 would have placed him in just sixtieth place among big league hitters last year, and half of that career was compiled for the Colorado Rockies. Again, this should be an improvement, but Pierre is unlikely to be any better than an average center fielder for the Cubs this year.
Right Field (2005 OPS .746, #25 in MLB)
Jacque Jones (Age 31, 2006 ZiPS OPS .753)
The other significant hitter acquired by Hendry, Jones should hit about as well as Pierre but plays corner outfield, doesn't steal bases nearly as effectively, and shouldn't be on the field against lefties. Also, he's locked into a three-year, $16M deal.
Outfield Reserves
John Mabry (Age 35, 2006 ZiPS OPS .734)
Marquis Grissom (Age 39, 2006 ZiPS OPS .670)
Angel Pagan (Age 24, 2006 ZiPS OPS .641)
Mabry should be a lock, with the final roster spot a toss-up between Grissom and Pagan. Mabry took a step backward with the Cardinals last year, mostly due to his batting average dipping to .240. He still walks and hits for a bit of power, so if he can arrest his decline he could be a passable fourth outfielder. There's talk that Pagan may nab the last spot, but his minor league numbers show no particular promise and Grissom may actually be the better choice. Of course if Grissom's on the roster, the threat of him replacing Murton in left may become all too real.
Starting Pitching
Mark Prior (Age 25, 2006 ZiPS ERA 3.43) and Kerry Wood (Age 29, 2006 ZiPS ERA 3.76)
The playoff hopes of the 2006 Cubs very likely rest on the right arms of two men who haven't looked like themselves since the first half of the 2003 NLCS. When healthy, both have consistently been among the best pitchers in baseball, but the on-going saga of their health has left all but the most optimistic fans cynical and embittered.
And yet, there were still signs of hope. Both men maintained sterling strikeout rates (perhaps the single best indicator of future pitching success). Both were above average in most indicators with the exception of homers allowed. Last year, the Cubs got 66 innings of league average pitching out of Wood, but 168 innings of above average pitching out of Prior. They'll need that much at an absolute minimum, but Dusty has to be counting on getting more. It's anyone's guess if that's going to happen.
Carlos Zambrano (Age 25, 2006 ZiPS ERA 3.40)
On the bright side, there's Z. Zambrano has borne an increasingly heavy workload the last three years, but so far has shown no ill effects. Last year he managed a career-high 223 innings while his K/9 edged up to a career-best 8.14. Furthermore, his splits actually show a slight improvement in his effectiveness as games wore on. He allowed a few more homers than in previous seasons, but his G/F ratio stayed very high at 1.62 (14th highest in the majors) minimizing any cause for alarm. Although there are no sure things when it comes to pitching, Zambrano may be as close as it gets right now.
Greg Maddux (Age 40, 2006 ZiPS ERA 4.14)
Greg Maddux is one of the very best in baseball history, and at 39 last year he remained an effective pitcher. Yet it must be said that over the last four years he's been steadily losing his uncanny ability to mesmerize hitters. His durability and walk rate have stayed as amazing as ever, but his K/9 (never high) has slipped, as has his G/F ratio and with it his homer rate. The five highest homer allowed totals of his career have come in the last six years, with the two highest in 2004 and 2005. He may yet have enough guile to squeeze out another effective year, but the end is going to come sooner rather than later, and maybe as soon as this year.
Glendon Rusch (Age 31, 2006 ZiPS ERA 4.53)
The Cubs stayed in the hunt in 2004 as long as they did largely because Glendon Rusch managed a career year when Wood and Prior were suffering from injuries. He did it with improvements to both his homer rate and his control. In 2005 Wood and Prior were hurt again, but this time Rusch not surprisingly regressed towards his career averages across the board. As welcome as his performance in 2004 was, numbers like last year's are far more likely in 2006.
Jerome Williams (Age 24, 2006 ZiPS ERA 4.36)
Williams had a very good rookie season and although his K/9 has slipped since (and his ERA with it), he still managed league-average performances each of the last two years. He still has age on his side, and if he can get the K-rate back up he's got the potential to improve on his last two seasons.
Ryan Dempster (Age 29, 2006 ZiPS ERA 4.06)
Dempster found a home in the Chicago bullpen last year, with a high K-rate and much improved control, as well as a new-found ability to keep the ball in the park. Normally he might be expected to regress toward the mean, but since the dramatic improvements came with a move to relief it may be that role simply suits him better.
Scott Eyre (Age 34, 2006 ZiPS ERA 3.48)
In Eyre's first seven big league seasons, he managed an ERA under 4.46 just twice (once in 15.2 innings pitched.) Then in 2004 his K/9 jumped from the 5-6 range to 8.37 and his ERA dropped to 4.10. In 2005 the K/9 inched higher still to 8.56, and he cut his walk rate and halved his homer rate. The result was a career year, highlighted by a gaudy 2.63 ERA. The chances of him being that good over the next three years are not great, but it was a gamble Jim Hendry was willing to take as he signed Eyre for $11M over the next three years.
Bob Howry (Age 32, 2006 ZiPS ERA 3.32)
Howry signed for roughly the same money as Eyre, and is a gamble in his own way. Howry has had superb control throughout his career, and he's usually been fair at keeping the ball in the park. The parabola of his career (pretty good, to marginal, to excellent) has mostly tracked his strikeout rate, with the glaring exception of last year. 2005 saw his K/9 plummet from 8.23 to 5.92, even as his batting average allowed fell from .228 to .191. This is extremely unlikely to occur again in 2006, so he'll have to get his K-rate back up to earn his paycheck.
Scott Williamson (Age 30, 2006 ZiPS ERA 3.86)
Another pitcher, another gamble. In previous incarnations, Williamson has been one of the most effective relievers in the game. After Tommy John surgery, he struggled in some late season appearances last year with the Cubs. He has probably the most upside of anyone in the Cubs pen, if only he can return to his pre-surgery form.
Will Ohman (Age 26, 2006 ZiPS ERA 4.50)
Ohman was a distant memory after two Tommy John surgeries, but when he got another chance with the Cubs in 2005 he grasped it with both hands and didn't let go. Despite control problems at times, he managed 43.1 innings of quality work with a sterling 9.35 K/9. With the signing of Eyre, Dusty may free one or both from the constraints of a lefty specialist role.
Michael Wuertz (Age 27, 2006 ZiPS ERA 3.82)
There was no sophomore slump for Wuertz. His K/9 jumped from an excellent 9.31 to a gaudy 10.59, and a higher G/F ratio helped him keep the ball in the park a bit better. He was again far better against right-handed hitters, as his control sometimes deserts him against lefties.
Spare Parts
With Prior and Wood unavailable, one additional pitcher is likely to make the Opening Day roster. Press reports indicate a four-way race between Angel Guzman, Rich Hill, Sean Marshall, and Jae Kuk Ryu. There will likely be an additional bullpen slot as well, with John Koronka and Todd Wellemeyer the leading contenders. Felix Pie, a speedy outfielder who torched AA at age 20 last year, is the only prospect close to blue-chip status. If one of the current starting outfielders falters Pie may be called up sooner rather than later. Ryan Harvey, Brian Dopirak, and Luis Montanez have all faltered in the minors the last few years, and none seems likely to make an impact with the big club.
Conclusion
The Cubs finished 79-83 last year. Assuming it will take at least a 90-72 record to contend for the wildcard, it is hard to see where this club might find the extra eleven wins. Last year's club was inefficient at scoring runs considering their raw offensive output, so perhaps a few wins could be gained with an average performance there. If a miracle occurs and either Wood or Prior manage a relatively full, healthy season, perhaps another win or two. The improvement in center is substantial, and the bullpen and corner outfield slots should see some marginal improvement as well.
On the other hand, Greg Maddux is likely to continue to slide as he hits 40 this year. Derrek Lee is unlikely to repeat his career year, and its hard to imagine getting top-ten production at second if management succeeds in trading or marginalizing Todd Walker. Injuries could hit any team at any time, but this Cubs team is particularly vulnerable. Prior, Zambrano, Wood, Ramirez, and Lee are as talented a top-five as any team in baseball, but the second tier starters and reserves for the Cubs are weaker than many other would-be contenders. If Zambrano hurts his arm, or Ramirez re-pulls a quad, or Pierre comes up lame, there are few good options behind them.
I think this team is too talented to finish with less than eighty wins again. With no unexpected setbacks and no notable injuries they have a shot at contending, but a win total in the mid-80s seems more likely. I'll say 85-77, and a contract-extension for Dusty if they are in it at the All-Star break.
2006 ZiPS Projections - Chicago Cubs
Name P G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB CS AVG OBP SLG
Lee 1b 159 593 104 183 44 2 38 114 84 121 14 5 .309 .398 .582
Ramirez 3b 142 549 83 166 33 1 32 104 45 75 1 2 .302 .359 .541
Barrett c 125 410 47 113 29 4 14 58 37 60 0 3 .276 .342 .468
Murton lf 137 470 64 136 16 4 14 56 42 77 10 5 .289 .350 .430
Sing 1b 121 385 64 92 21 0 20 60 61 109 1 4 .239 .345 .449
Walker* 2b 125 451 60 125 26 3 13 57 40 49 1 2 .277 .336 .435
Pierre* cf 162 676 101 208 24 10 2 71 50 43 52 22 .308 .359 .382
Restovich rf 125 408 70 104 23 2 18 62 36 108 4 3 .255 .319 .453
Cedeno ss 113 345 46 99 15 2 8 40 20 63 13 4 .287 .332 .412
Craig# 3b 108 348 53 88 19 1 14 50 35 84 4 3 .253 .326 .434
Jones* rf 145 541 69 140 26 2 22 78 42 126 11 7 .259 .317 .436
Hairston 2b 98 333 44 91 22 2 3 31 31 39 9 9 .273 .350 .378
Fontenot* 2b 130 454 63 119 23 5 7 43 46 103 10 8 .262 .340 .381
Greenberg* cf 88 321 43 85 11 8 3 41 32 82 12 5 .265 .336 .377
Mabry* 1b 99 224 23 55 12 1 9 31 20 58 0 0 .246 .305 .429
Deardorff 3b 109 385 53 94 15 2 15 52 40 107 5 4 .244 .316 .410
Pie* cf 87 330 59 90 11 5 8 33 20 93 17 10 .273 .319 .409
Grissom cf 110 404 42 103 17 1 11 51 18 71 3 1 .255 .286 .384
Soto c 98 305 35 72 12 0 6 33 33 84 1 1 .236 .312 .334
Lewis 2b 129 439 56 106 21 4 7 38 35 113 8 6 .241 .301 .355
Spears* 2b 109 400 52 99 15 4 4 36 27 80 5 3 .248 .300 .335
Perez# ss 140 482 46 125 25 1 6 47 19 43 5 3 .259 .288 .353
Dopirak 1b 137 503 62 114 21 0 19 65 28 118 2 2 .227 .271 .382
Padgett* lf 127 425 48 96 20 2 11 52 31 134 2 1 .226 .281 .360
Pagan# cf 130 508 69 127 16 6 5 44 40 111 22 16 .250 .306 .335
Hoffpauir* 1b 121 416 48 97 18 2 6 41 28 81 2 1 .233 .286 .329
Ojeda# ss 114 334 45 73 16 0 3 26 34 37 5 5 .219 .309 .293
Blanco c 81 225 22 46 12 0 7 27 15 39 0 2 .204 .258 .351
Kopitzke c 81 251 18 55 7 1 0 16 17 40 1 2 .219 .280 .255
Name W L ERA G GS INN H ER HR BB K
Howry 7 3 3.32 67 0 65.0 55 24 6 17 53
Zambrano 13 9 3.40 32 32 209.0 170 79 15 83 198
Prior 10 7 3.43 26 26 168.0 139 64 18 52 202
Eyre* 3 1 3.48 83 0 62.0 51 24 5 27 57
Wood 9 7 3.76 25 22 146.0 115 61 18 64 177
Wuertz 3 3 3.82 72 0 73.0 57 31 7 38 88
Williamson 2 2 3.86 42 0 42.0 32 18 4 23 50
Miller 11 10 4.01 27 27 155.0 137 69 14 67 139
Dempster 4 3 4.06 58 5 82.0 71 37 4 45 80
Maddux 14 14 4.14 35 35 215.0 228 99 30 36 129
Williams 10 11 4.36 29 28 165.0 164 80 17 62 104
Guzman 3 3 4.39 9 9 41.0 42 20 6 10 28
Ohman* 2 3 4.50 65 0 50.0 39 25 7 30 63
Aardsma 8 10 4.53 41 21 141.0 147 71 18 43 103
Rusch* 7 7 4.53 39 18 139.0 152 70 12 46 102
Novoa 6 6 4.55 63 0 83.0 84 42 10 32 70
Ryu 8 9 4.59 26 26 155.0 167 79 19 46 110
Pignatiello* 7 9 4.73 35 24 156.0 160 82 22 55 130
Hill* 6 8 4.78 30 22 130.0 117 69 21 65 156
Brownlie 6 8 4.91 25 19 110.0 114 60 17 40 83
Reith 3 5 4.94 44 1 62.0 61 34 7 31 47
Bartosh* 2 3 4.98 53 0 56.0 55 31 9 25 52
Koronka* 8 12 5.01 27 24 151.0 155 84 20 67 110
Fox 1 2 5.14 26 0 28.0 24 16 2 22 31
Corey 3 5 5.16 47 0 68.0 77 39 10 24 44
Rohlicek* 3 4 5.23 56 0 62.0 55 36 4 49 57
Wellemeyer 3 6 5.23 33 12 86.0 80 50 11 55 86
Lee 2 5 5.70 51 0 60.0 60 38 9 37 46
Disclaimer: ZiPS projections are computer-based projections of performance.
Performances have not been allocated to predicted playing time in the majors -
many of the players listed above are unlikely to play in the majors at all in 2006.
ZiPS is projecting equivalent production - a .240 ZiPS projection may end up
being .280 in AAA or .300 in AA, for example. Whether or not a player will play
is one of many non-statistical factors one has to take into account when predicting
the future.
Scott Lange
Posted: March 27, 2006 at 09:21 AM |
108 comment(s)
Related News:
Chi Cubs
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
There are many other reasons to be skeptical, yet all we hear is Prior and Wood.
1 in 5 doesn't sound that far off to me.
What I'd like to see for these sims is the win distribution. The only sense we get of that is how often they make the playoffs. If Colorado averages 95 losses and still wins the WC 1% of the time, there is a huge range on that W/L call (which I would expect to reflect reality pretty well).
Welll... the problem is - of those 5 stars, 3 are known gimps, and while a 4th has absolutely astonishingly durable (Z), he's still a pitcher.
Look... what can I say - after the 2005 WS, all the ChiSox fans had a fire sale on their infamous pessimism, so I leased it with an option to buy, DIRT CHEAP!
DMB is often noted for its tendency to under-adjust for injury time.
I also think that 1 in 5 is pretty high for the NL West.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main