2006 Chicago White Sox
Looking Forward to 2006: Chicago White Sox
I’m tremendously proud of my
spot-on analysis of the 2005 White Sox. If you recall, I correctly predicted
that the Sox would destroy their competition en route to the franchise’s first
World Series victory since 1917. Even though Kenny Williams had swapped good
hitters for bad hitters and mediocre relievers, I remember distinctly that I
argued that naysayers should have faith in the organization and see the big
picture. And then I said . . .. hmm? You remember things differently? You
think that I said what? Oh, no, I’m sure that you must be mistaken.
Seriously, please stop saying those awful lies about my preview. Stop it.
Lalalalalalalalalalala . . . . I can’t hear you . . . lalalalalalalala . . .
I’m not listening . . . . lalalalalalalalalala.
WHAT WENT RIGHT IN 2005
What didn’t?
General Manager Ken Williams restructured the team to emphasize
offensive balance, defensive efficiency and solid pitching. His most notable
off-season trade brought in a speedy, left-handed hitter and bullpen help while
saving enough money to allow him to cherry pick other teams’ castoffs and
less-in-demand free agents. His free agent signees added defensive speed to
the outfield and depth for the pitching staff. Fortune smiled so brightly on
Williams that by seasons end, even his minor off-season moves netted huge
dividends in the form of a relief ace and top-ten minor league prospect.
On the field, several players developed with stunning
rapidity and injuries were virtually non-existent. Pitchers Jon Garland, Neal
Cotts, Bobby Jenks and Brandon McCarthy all harnessed their unfulfilled
talents, while veterans Jose Contreras, Cliff Politte and Dustin Hermanson
rediscovered their old skills. The only player who suffered from a serious
injury, Frank Thomas practically carried the team, when he was healthy.
They blitzed the league in the season’s first two months,
building a lead that would stretch to 15 games by August 1st. They
stumbled a bit in August and early September, but then destroyed Detroit and Cleveland
during the final two series to win 99 games, the most by any White Sox team
since 1983.
If anything, they were better in the playoffs than in the
regular season. They swept the Red Sox, beat the Angels four games to one and
then swept the Astros in the World Series. Along the way their pitching staff,
posted four consecutive complete game victories – the first time that this has
happened since the early 1950s.
WHAT WENT WRONG IN 2005
Uh . . . . hold on . . . .give me a minute . . . well, not
much, I guess.
Seriously, nothing really went wrong. I guess several
things didn’t go just as the team would have hoped. For example, Frank Thomas
was hurt for all but one month of the season. Shingo Takatsu began the season
as the team’s closer but was soon supplanted and shipped out. And then there
was the tremendous scare late in the year, when Cleveland reduced a 15 game
deficit on August 1 to 1 ½ games in the season’s last week.
OFF-SEASON PLAYER MOVEMENT
- Re-signed 1B Paul Konerko, C Chris Widger, UT Pablo Ozuna
- Signed P Tim Redding (minors), P Jeff Farnsworth, P
Vladimir Nunez (minors), P Chad Bentz (minors), P Stephen Randolph
(minors), P Javier Lopez (minors), P Pascual Matos (minors), OF Mark Quinn
(minors), OF Ruben Rivera (minors), 1B Ernie Young (minors), 1B Bucky
Jacobson (minors), SS Jorge Velandia (minors) as free agents.
- Claimed IF Tim Hummel in the Rule 5 draft.
- Traded OF Aaron Rowand, P Gio Gonzalez (minors) and P Dan
Haigwood (minors) to Philadelphia for 1B Jim Thome.
- Traded P Damaso Marte to Pittsburgh for UT Rob Mackoviak.
- Traded OF Chris Young (minors), P Luis Vizcaino and P
Orlando Hernandez to Arizona for P Javier Vazquez.
- Traded P Jeff Bajenaru (minors) to Arizona for IF Alex
Cintron
- Traded OF Joe Borchard to Seattle for P Matt Thornton
- Lost DH Frank Thomas, DH Carl Everett, IF Geoff Blum, 2B-OF
Willie Harris, OF Timo Perez, C Raul Casanova, C Ben Davis, C Jamie Burke, P
Kevin Walker, P David Sanders, P Felix Diaz, P Jon Adkins free agency or
waivers.
Cost certainty is the hallmark of the White Sox organization.
In the 2005-2006 off-season the organization structured a team should compete
for the division title for the next two years, while not breaking the bank.
How did they accomplish this? . For twenty years, the Sox have had rather
stringent guidelines about the kinds of contracts that they were willing offer
– notably they refuse to offer a pitcher any contract longer than three years
in length. To make that philosophy work in a market environment where good
pitchers routinely receive four and five year deals for more than $12 million
per annum, the Sox had to get creative. In what I believe is a first in major
league history, the Sox swapped high quality minor leaguers for older major
league talent with the caveat that the trading team ate large portions of the
departing stars’ contracts. So, this past off-season the Sox were able to
pickup Javier Vazquez for an acceptable rate (3 years/$27 million) because they
were willing to part with prime prospect Chris Young. Likewise, they were able
to lessen the risk of acquiring 35-year old Jim Thome, because they were
willing to add an extra prospect in the deal in return for the Phillies eating
a large chunk of the slugger contract. Paying a 35-year old $45 million over
three years is silly, but paying him, $24 million over three years? Well,
that’s doable. It’s a tremendously creative solution to the exigencies of the
market. Ken Williams and the Sox should be lauded for it.
MINOR LEAGUERS
3B Josh D. Fields (ETA 2007)
A first round pick out of Oklahoma State, where he played
third base and quarterback. Fields, 23, is a good athlete with a strong arm,
but, after splitting his time between football and baseball in college, he is
still learning how to play baseball. There is no questioning his power or his
desire to exceed. Thus far, those two attributes have led him to swing at
pitches off the plate much too frequently (hence, the mediocre walk totals and
high strikeout rates). Scouts believe that he has the ability to hit for a good
average, but he’ll have to learn to conquer the strike zone first. The Sox
will continue to rush him ahead in 2006, designating him as the starting third
baseman at AAA Charlotte.
OF Ryan Sweeney (ETA 2007)
Speaking of rushing a guy ahead. Taken in the second round
out of a Cedar Rapids high school, Sweeney never benefited from the a
year-round baseball schedule. Still, after only 29 games in the rookie
leagues, the Sox skipped Sweeney, 21, over Lo-A for the 2004 season. Even
though Sweeney posted only a league average line at Winston-Salem (albeit at a
very young age), the Sox bumped him to AA Birmingham, where he posted a very
similar line to his 2004 campaign. And, now the Sox have bumped him to AAA
Charlotte. Scouts and the Sox believe that Sweeney will develop into a 20
homer guy in the big leagues, but the 6’5” Sweeney has hit only 10 home runs in
over a 1000 minor league at bats thus far. This has led some analysts to
question whether his power will ever develop, comparing him to other line-drive
hitting big men, like Sean Burroughs. Never you fear, though. Even though Birmingham
is a big park in a pitchers’ league, Sweeney still logged 22 doubles despite
playing much of the season with a sprained tendon in his right wrist. He’ll be
just fine.
OF Jerry Owens (ETA 2007)
Owens was snatched from the depths of the Washington
Nationals system in exchange for perennial prospect Alex Escobar (who was out
of options). Owens is the type of player that the Sox love to take a chance on
– very fast low minor leaguer with limited baseball experience – in the hopes
that the organization can bring out the best in him. A college football player
(sense a trend here?), Owens has only been playing baseball full-time for three
years and it shows at times, particularly on the bases and in the field. Still
he has a solid approach at the plate and a nice line drive stroke. At 25-years
old, Owens is battling the clock. He needs to pick up enough complementary
skills to make him a major leaguer before his best offensive years are behind
him. His upside is probably Juan Pierre, but he’s nowhere near that good now.
He’ll start the season as AAA Charlotte’s centerfielder.
LHP Ray Liotta (ETA 2008)
The southpaw Liotta, 23, is a groundball pitcher with good
strikeout numbers and good control. His fastball is only a bit above average
(89-92 mph), but he has the nastiest 12-to-6 curveball you’ll ever want to
see. Scouts worry about his mechanics a bit and he doesn’t yet have a pitch
that will get good right-handed hitters out, but he’s done everything well thus
far.
2B Chris Getz (ETA 2008)
Getz, 22, is a very good defender (possibly good enough to
be a major league shortstop someday), but he’s also a fine hitter. He’ll
never, ever hit for power but in 2005 he hit over .300 in his first year pro
season while drawing 36 walks and striking out only 12 times (!!!) in 238 at
bats. With a background at big time college baseball programs (Wake Forest and Michigan),
Getz will be pushed ahead this season, skipping Hi-A in favor of AA
Birmingham.
C Francisco Hernandez (ETA 2009)
Hernandez, 20, was a deep sleeper last season after he tore
up the Apply League. However, he staggered through a half season at Lo-A
before righting his offensive production in the Pioneer League last season.
Built like Ivan Rodriguez (5’9”, 160 lbs), Hernandez hit for average, power and
drawn walks thus far in his short career. Don’t think of Hernandez as a one-trick-pony
though, since he’s also a good defensive catcher with a strong arm. Still just
20-years old, Hernandez will start the season back in Lo-A Kannapolis, but
expect him to be pushed ahead vigorously if he, as expected, he hits well
there, since he’s the only catcher in the system that has any hope of hitting
at the major league level.
Others
Scouts absolutely rave about SS Robert Valido’s
abilities with the leather. He’s not likely to ever hit too much, but he does
have little pop and a good bit of speed (which he actually knows how to
implement as a base stealing tool). Detroit area prep star 1B Casey
Rogowski, 25, has finally made it to AAA, but he’s not likely to go too
much further. He has a very good sense of the strike zone and has used that to
drive balls much more over the last two seasons (48 extra base hits in 2004 and
52 last season). He’s a good fielder. I love RF Ricardo Nanita. He’s
a wonderful hitter to watch, even though you might not get that impression by
looking at his stat line. Nanita injured his right wrist after the 2003 season
and the injury caused him to struggle when the Sox tried to push him to Winston-Salem
in 2004. Now, finally, in AA Nanita is getting old to be considered a
prospect, but I think that you’ll want him on your big league team in 2008. 1B
Brandon Allen is the best power-hitting prospect in the organization, but
his Pedro Cerrano-esque problems with breaking pitches have caused him to log a
strikeout per game.
On the mound, RH Lance Broadway, 22, jumped
from college to Hi-A ball and held his own. He gave up quite a few hits but,
given his lack of experience, he controlled the strike zone well. RH Sean Tracey,
25, is a tease. He’s got all the tools to be a tremendous sinker-slider
pitcher but he’s still learning to throw enough strikes to get people out
regularly. There is talk around the Sox that his future lies is in the
bullpen, which would be a waste. This spring training RH Charlie Haeger learned
the perils of being a knuckleballer, as he was battered in every outing. Hager
took to the knuckleball only after quitting professional baseball altogether.
He hasn’t missed enough bats over the last two seasons to be very optimistic
about him. LH Tyler Lumsden has a plus arm (he was taken ahead of
Liotta and the since-traded Gio Gonzalez) but missed all of 2005 while
recovering from surgery to remove a bone spur in his elbow. RH Josh L.
Fields, 26, has pitched very well at every level but his “stuff” doesn’t
impress anyone. He’ll need a break to make a major league roster, but, if
history is any indication, he’ll probably perform well once there.
MAJOR LEAGUERS
C A. J. Pierzynski (2005: Pierzynski)
Pierzynski cashed in the one Sox post-championship
generosity, securing a three-year 15 million dollar payday in December. The
deal wasn’t just about good feelings though, there were three sensible reasons
for this signing. For this season anyway, the deal paid A.J. his market value
(Bengie Molina, who is two years older than Pierzynski, got $4.5 million this
season). Additionally, left-handed hitting catchers are a rare breed and the
White Sox have absolutely zero catchers in their system that are ready to start
in the majors anytime soon.
Here’s the problem with the signing though, and it’s a big
one in my book. As you may have heard, catchers age very, very, very poorly
after the age of 30. Add to that, A.J. just isn’t a very good player right
now. He can't run, hit for power, or draw walks and his average has taken a
nose-dive. At this point in his career, he is basically Rich Gedman without
the strike zone judgement. And Gedman posted a 52 (!!!) OPS after age of 28.
Terry Kennedy, a much better hitter than A.J. in during their respective peaks,
held on to a career that was about 70% of his peak into his mid-30s and played
on two pennant winning teams after age-28. So, the outlook for Pierzynski is
rather bleak. Perhaps, the best that the Sox might hope for is that A.J. might
follow the lead of Kennedy, producing a 75 OPS+ and another pennant.
1B Paul Konerko (2005: Konerko)
I was in front of my computer for most the 2005 baseball
postseason. Each time that Konerko hit a homer, which was frequently, a friend
of mine would IM with the message “there’s another million bucks a year for his
contract.” By the time the Sox had secured their first title, Konerko had
raised his value (in a depressed market) by about $5 million per season.
While everyone you heard around here proclaimed that the Sox
shouldn’t bring back Konerko, the outcome should never have been in doubt. Not
only did the move signal that the Sox were serious about remaining in
contention and further validate the Sox dedication to “team players,” but there
were sensible on-field reasons for the signing as well. Contrary to popular
perception, Konerko is an “old player skills” guy. If not for one dreadful half
season in 2003, Konerko would have hit .277 or better for seven straight
seasons. He can afford to lose 20 or 30 points off his average (and he will
before his contract is over) and still be very effective, particularly if his walk
rates continues to climb (as it has for the last three seasons). He is a
legitimate 125-135 OPS+ guy for the next three seasons. No, when he drops back
from that in his mid-30s, he won’t be worth the $15 million that the Sox will
be paying him. But, at that point, if they can find a left-handed rookie first
baseman (not a terribly daunting task) to platoon with PK, then the team should
be just okay.
2B Tadahito Iguchi (2005: Iguchi)
So, who says that amateur analysts don’t know what they are
talking about? Not, Sox G.M. Ken Williams anymore, I hope. Needing a regular
second baseman, Williams signed Iguchi after only reading his stats and seeing
him on videotape. Essentially, any of us could have done the same. What did
Iguchi’s stats suggest that he might do in 2005? ZiPS projected him at .281/.363/.427,
which is nearly a dead-on match for his final stats of .278/.342/.438. Iguchi
was a tremendous bargain for the Sox in 2005, putting up an 830 OPS and
contributing solid defense all for the bargain basement price of $2.5 million.
He should be able to sustain this level of production through 2007, but with
second basemen, you never know.
Aside: Here’s what a world championship does for one’s
reputation. For years, all one heard around Chicago was how bad Ray Durham’s
defense was. And, yet, all you heard from Sox fans last year was how good
Iguchi’s glove was. Guess what? At the same age, Durham was very much better
than Iguchi last season. It’s not even close. On ground balls, on fly balls,
on balls to their left, Durham was all substantially better than Iguchi. What’s
remarkable is that both players have the same flaw in their defensive game –
neither can go to their right. Iguchi did turn the double play a bit better
than Durham though, and there is nothing quite as powerful to the eye that a
good pivot. It’s not a dig at Iguchi to say that, it’s time to pay the Sugar
Bull (how come such an obvious nickname wasn’t foisted upon Durham?) his due.
3B Joe Crede (2005: Crede)
There is a lot of talk the Crede is a breakout candidate.
Forgive me, but I just don’t see it. I know that he hit tremendously in his
last 18 games and then in the ALCS and World Series. I know that there is talk
that he made some kind of changes that spurred that surge. But, I’ve heard
these tunes before. Here’s the thing. Sure, Crede finished the season strong
(.379/.419/.759 in September), but he hit .106 in August. He posted an .893
OPS in July and a .497 OPS in May. This is just who he is. In 2004, he posted
two seasons with an OPS over .833 and three with an OPS under .650. In 2003,
he had a month over 1.000 OPS and two under .603. As for his swing change,
I’ll believe it when I see it. Baseball history is replete with players who
allegedly made some change that was destined to increase their production . . .
only to find themselves in familiar territory when the season ended. Crede is
a good player. As a hitter he is Tony Batista;
overall his value is similar to that of Charlie Hayes --
fine glove man who could hit a bit too. That’s a good player. And for those
of you who wish to see the cup as half-full, take a gander at Hayes’s season
when he was Crede’s age (28). That’ll make you smile.
SS Juan Uribe (2005: Uribe)
With all due respect to Mssrs. Cabrera and Tejada, Juan
Uribe is the best fielding shortstop in the American League. At a minimum of 215
pounds, he’s not built like the stereotypical shortstop and he looks funny
running around the ball in the hole, instead of backhanding it. However, he’s
just astounding on balls in the hole (thanks to the best infield arm since
Shawon Dunston’s heyday) and excellent on balls in the air (witness Game Four
of the 2005 World Series). And, while he wasn’t able to repeat his strong 2004
season with the bat, he’s still just 26 with the potential to an 800 OPS guy
for the next three to five years. Not a bad return for Aaron Miles, no?
LF Scott Podsednik (2005: Podsednik)
I give you Rudy Law, 2005. Like Pods, Law was a very fleet
outfielder and, like Pods, he was mostly impotent with a stick in his hand.
Unlike Pods, Law was a very good centerfielder (although his arm was worse than
Pods’s, as difficult as that might be to believe). Both were high percentage base
stealers. Unlike Law, Pods can coax 50 or 60 walks a season. Unlike most
statheads, I really like 1980s baseball and I really like Pods style of
baseball, but try as I might, I can’t envision a realistic scenario in which
Pods is still in the majors in 2009.
OF Brian Anderson (2005: Aaron Rowand)
I'm not very optimistic that Anderson has the ability to be
a star at the major league level. He’s a solid toolsy prospect who has put up
good or better numbers in three of his four minor league stops despite battling
through wrist injuries and being rushed along. While we should all be
skeptical of offensive numbers generated at Charlotte (due to its 345 foot
power-allies), by my count, Anderson batted at least as well at home as on the
road. His balanced skill set also should help to a longish career since he
might develop any number of skills (batting for average or for power or drawing
more walks) as he ages. I think that he has the potential to be Roberto Kelly
or Shane Mack, (pretty good players for all you young-uns who don't remember
the 1980s).
A year ago, scouts decried Anderson’s abilities in
centerfield, calling him too slow and a poor route runner. Now after a year
playing in a small centerfield next to the range-challenged Rosie Brown he's
considered a good outfielder. How did this happen? It would be ironic if Anderson
proved unable to handle center, after the Sox have dealt away two excellent
fielding centerfielders (Rowand, Reed) whom they didn’t initially think would
be able to handle the position.
RF Jermaine Dye (2005: Dye)
If there is one player that perfectly typifies the 2005
White Sox, it is Jermaine Dye. He hits for a solid batting average with above
average power and doesn’t draw many walks. His defense is solidly respectable
but nothing very exciting any more. He was the only prominent free agent that
Kenny Williams brought in last season and like all of his 2005 teammates, he
was paid a bit under his true value. Dye’s a good teammate and, by all
indications, a good person. In a nutshell, he’s a good player who doesn’t beat
himself while on the baseball diamond – like his team. So, when it was his
solid, respectable, unspectacular single that won the deciding game of the
World Series, I felt that there was a certain karmic peace in the baseball
world.
DH Jim Thome (2004: Carl Everett/Frank Thomas)
With all due respect to the greatest player in the history
of the franchise, what was Frank Thomas thinking? Was he seriously surprised
that the Sox let him go? I mean, really? After reading the provisions of his
renegotiated 2002 contract, didn’t he, like everyone else, know that he would
be cut loose after the 2005 season? I know it stings, Frank, but you should
have been preparing for this for the last four years.
Starting in 2006, Jim Thome should
have two very solid seasons. Assuming, he healthy, he’s a good candidate to
post a couple of 140 OPS+ seasons over the next three seasons. Players always
age much, much faster than nearly everyone thinks that they will and there is
certainly the possibility that Thome will collapse over the next 6-12 months.
But, Thome was a great, great slugger before the injury and is likely to carry
that forward until he’s 37 or so. Side note: While it’s quite possible that
the Sox could have matched Thome’s level of production out of their DH slot if
they had brought back Frank Thomas and then signed Hee Seop Choi or Carlos Pena
to platoon with him (and saved themselves Rowand, two hot southpaw pitching
prospects, and $15-20 million dollars in the process), Thome is the first
stathead-friendly hitter that Ken Williams has acquired in six years, so I’m
going to make too many waves.
BENCH
The White Sox 2006 bench is a much better crew than they
have had in several years. That doesn’t mean that each player deserves his
spot but that, overall, their roles have been well thought out to complement
the team. Acquired for problem child, Damaso Marte, Rob Mackowiak
anchors the bench. Over the winter, the Sox talked about playing Macko all
over the field, but the subsequent pickup of Alex Cintron should limit
him to third base and the outfield. A Chicagoan, Mackowiak has some real
value (flexibility, left-handed bat), but if he’s asked to bat more than 200
times or so, he’s a liability. Picked up in a swap of superfluity, Cintron is
a great bench player. Not only does he play an average shortstop and second
base, but he’s also a switch-hitter in the middle of his prime batting years
and should be able to log a 700 OPS. The White Sox brought Chris Widger back
for an encore. No offense, but Widger is a pretty crappy player. It seems to
me that a team’s backups need to be able to do something to contribute. On a
team with a left-handed, poor defensive catcher, an ideal back up catcher would
have a solid right-handed bat and play good defense. Widger, who hit
.241/.296.383 and allowed 24 of 26 runners to steal, can do neither of those
things. So, why exactly is he back? Pablo Ozuna played everywhere in
2005 and hit superficially well (.299 batting average) in the first half,
making him seem more valuable than he is. In his limited major league tenure,
Ozuna has played quite well at short and third but pretty dreadfully elsewhere
and then there’s the whole problem of allowing him to come to bat. There are
literally 100 players in or around major league baseball that can do Ozuna’s
job, so to guarantee him a million dollars is just silly. And then there’s the
Rodney Dangerfield of professional baseball, Ross Gload. Finally, given
a chance to play in the big leagues somewhat regularly in 2004, Gload hit
.321/.375/.479. But when he started off “slowly” (he got 13 at bats in the
seasons first three weeks), the Sox used his “injured” shoulder as excuse to
leave him in Charlotte for most of the season. Gload torched the International
League to the tune of .364/.416/.657 and hit better away from his cozy home
park than he did in it. Years from now, I’m going to do an oral history of
guys like Gload and Champ
Summers and Roberto
Petagine and Orestes
Destrade and a bunch of other guys and in it every interview will start
“How frustrating was it . . . ?”
ROTATION
Mark Buehrle
I like to compare Buehrle to Tommy Glavine. No, that
doesn’t make me a genius or anything. Buehrle is better than Glavine was at
the same age. He’s better than Jimmy Key was at the same age. He strikes out
more guys that people think he does; he doesn’t walk anybody; he’s got as good
a pickoff move as anyone in the game. He’s pretty dang good. Personally, I
think he has the ability to be one of the great durable lefties of the last
fifty years. Of course, 25 years ago, I thought the same thing about John
Candelaria too.
Freddy Garcia
I am not optimistic about Freddy Garcia. But, then I’ve
never been optimistic about him. Still, Garcia’s strikeout rate dropped alarmingly
last season, from 7.9 strikeouts/game in 2004 to 5.8 per game last season. I
don’t know why this has happened. Perhaps, it’s a conscious choice. Since his
ground ball rate climbed last season, perhaps he’s throwing the two-seam
fastball (the Sox love the two-seamer). But, then again he’s thrown a ton of
pitches over the last five years. All that’s certain about Garcia, it seems to
me, is that he will have an ERA somewhere between 3.50 and 4.50. How’s that
for going on a limb?
With every starting pitcher on the team locked up through
the 2007 season, there is talk that Garcia could be traded to make room for
Brandon McCarthy. I’ll believe it when I see it. Why? Garcia’s wife is the
niece of his manager’s wife.
Jose Contreras
There’s an unconfirmed story floating around that Orlando
“El Duque” Hernandez was rummaging through his home video collection and found
a old videotape of Contreras from his Cuban National Team days, days when he
could do no wrong. Allegedly, that tape helped Contreras rediscover his old
release point and propelled him to a phenomenal second half. I don’t know
whether the story is true, but something certainly clicked for Contreras after
June. Over the last two months of the 2005 season, he was 9-1 with a 2.05 ERA
while walking only 19 and striking out 62 in 79 innings. Recent scholarship
suggests that pitchers who perform well in the mid-30s are likely to hold most
of their value in the immediately succeeding years. The White Sox sure hope
so, since they’ve resigned the 33-year old (cough) Contreras to a three-year
extension.
Jon Garland
Garland doesn’t get any love. All we have heard about for
four years is how Garland, despite his high relative win totals and his
league-average ERA, will never amount to much. He doesn’t strike out enough,
said some. He’s too laid back, said others. He doesn’t have the guts to go
past 100 pitches, said a few. So, Garland goes out and drops his walk rate for
four consecutive seasons while increasing his innings pitched by 30 a year and,
in the process wins 18 with a 127 ERA+. And what do we hear? He can’t do it
again. He’s probably not going to Kevin Brown and he’s not as good as Brandon
Webb is currently, but if he keeps walking two batters a game, he’ll be a solid
winner in this league for another ten years. Maybe then, after he’s won 180
games, people will finally give him some love . . . but probably not.
Javier Vazquez
Is it confidence or hubris? The White Sox believe that they
can take any number pitchers and fix them. Sox pitching coach Don Cooper and
the organization’s scouts might as well be saying, as Oscar Goldman used to say in the
1970s, “Gentlemen, we can rebuild him . . . we have the technology. Better
than he was before, better, stronger, faster. . . .” The Sox have been very
successful at reclamation projects over the last several years, notably helping
Esteban Loaiza and Jose Contreras turn in dominant seasons. Vazquez is the Sox
latest project. But even if Cooper’s reputation is more smoke than fire,
Vazquez is still a good bet to rebound to his career levels. One thing is certain,
with Vazquez has their team’s fifth starter many White Sox fans have become
very confident? Or is it hubris?
BULLPEN
I have yet to use the world luck in this preview, but I’m
tempted to use it when referring to the team’s bullpen in 2005. Last season,
the Sox had three pitchers who posted ERAs that were less than half their
career totals. Dustin Hermanson posted a 2.04 ERA despite season totals
that would have ordinarily exacted a 4.05 ERA. Cliff Politte turned in
a 2.00 ERA despite having a 3.67 expected ERA and Neal Cotts should have
had a 3.33 ERA but instead logged a phenomenal 1.94 ERA. What do they have in
common? Each of them had hit rates far, far below their established norms.
(Additionally, Cotts only allowed homers on 2% of his fly balls, while the
league average is about 10%). So, I think it’s safe to say that the Sox
bullpen will not match their output of a year ago.
Mid-season callup Bobby “Jumbo” Jenks will close
games for the Sox. Jenks’s wild past (both on and off the field) did not
surface during the 2005 season. If he can keep his walks to four per game
(down from his minor league norms of 5.5-7.0 a game) then Jenks will be just
fine. Politte and Cotts are both very solid pitchers, if not the
sub-2.00 gods that came to Earth last season. Cotts is the better of the two.
His stuff is more suited to being a closer that a LOOGY. Politte is a solid
pitcher but has a fastball that is much too straight at times. When he misses
up in the zone, the ball ends up in the seats, but when he’s on he has the
ability to hold opponents scoreless for a month or so at a time (as he did last
season). Brandon McCarthy will pitch out of the bullpen for most of the
2006 season. He won’t stay there for long. Here’s my favorite thing about
stathead arguments. One minute they’ll tell you that ALL young pitchers should
pitch in middle relief, then when a team actually follows that advice, they all
scream about how the team is wasting the young pitcher by using him in relief.
I’m not saying that there should be one rule for all pitchers but it seems to
me that there should be some kind of logical consistency to one’s arguments.
At least, tell me why McCarthy doesn’t need the experience of pitching in
middle relief. Matt Thornton, secured from Seattle for Joe Borchard in
a swap of problem children, is Cooper’s latest reclamation project. Thornton
has plenty of ability, but not any success thus far. Perhaps, he’ll be one of
those lefties that find themselves in their 30s. And then there’s the guy who
was named after two 1950s Midwest infielders, Boone Logan (Johnny Ray
had already stolen their first names). Logan’s story is truly one for the
ages. Nary a grizzled old veteran can remember a similar tale. Literally. Logan
has pitched in the rookie-level Northwest League for the past three seasons and
only last year did he have any success at all. However, when none of the eight
southpaws that the Sox invited to spring training proved satisfactory, the
team’s brass plucked Logan off the most distant of the team’s minor league
practice fields and decided to give him the job. Unheard of. Logan hides the
ball well -- slinging it at batters from ¾ delivery -- and has a decent
change-up, so, if he can throw strikes, he’s likely to do well against
right-handed batters. Unfortunately, he doesn’t have much of a breaking pitch
yet, so it’s likely that lefties will eat him up. Still, he’s a good story.
Still plagued by back woes, Dustin Hermanson is hoping to avoid
retirement this season.
WHAT CAN KEEP THEM FROM WINNING THE DIVISION IN 2005?
Several things:
1) As was a possibility last season, they might not hit enough
to complement their pitching staff and solid defense.
2) Cleveland or Minnesota or Detroit might do to the
division what the Sox did to it last season -- get out to an early lead and
step on its throat.
3) Injuries. The Sox do not have an old team but 30+
players like Konerko, Thome, Dye and Podsednik are all injury risks to one
degree or another.
That said, pitching and defense is still the best way to
build a team, and the Sox still have good amounts of both. So, they’ll be
competitive in almost all their games, which is all any team can ask for at the
beginning of a season. .
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Contrary to popular perception, Konerko is “old player skills” guy.
should read, Konerko is NOT an "old player skills" guy.
Thome is the first stathead-friendly hitter that Ken Williams has acquired in six years, so I’m going to make too many waves.
should read, So I'm NOT going to make too many waves.
There is a lot of talk the Crede is a breakout candidate.
There is a lot of talk THAT Crede is a breakout candidate.
Those are the only sentences that I noticed off-hand that were contrary to my intention, due to typos. The last sentence of the Francisco Hernandez entry is poorly written but not contrary to my thoughts. And, yes, I know that it's the Appy League, not the Apply League.
Man, I think I need to hire Davis Weathers as my editor!
Should this be the other way around? He should be able to get lefties out, but righties will hit him?
Otherwise, solid preview, I think. Much better than last year's (and not just 'cause they won -- I think I complimented you for being thorough at the time and that was it). Though Crede to me looks like a different player.
I didn't finish my thought with Logan. Generally speaking, lefties get righties out with the changeup, but get lefties out with the slider/curve, although these are obviously not truisms. Because Logan hides the ball well from right-handers and because he has a good change-up, he should be more effective to them. Standing on the same side of the plate as Logan's arm, left-handed hitters can see the ball better than righties. Additionally, Logan's lack of a good breaking pitch means that lefties can sit on the fastball or wait on the changeup in.
Though Crede to me looks like a different player.
Yes, he does. And, it should be mentioned that Crede won back-to-back league MVP awards in the A ball and AA ball on his way up. He certainly has the talent to be a much better hitter.
I'm not sure what your implying here. I didn't think 2B aged noticbly worse than other players. I guess there is a higher injury risk b/c of DPs, but I didn't think it was that major....
Regardless, a fine preview of a very interesting team. Good job!
This is a special team....but the media pundits and many fans still don't realize it...
I have picked the winning World Series team by June 1st 5 years in a row due to my observing very simply who si playing the best baseball as a team....I had a run of 7 more prior to my failure in 2000...(yes, I picked the ChiSox....)
So far, I see nothing to disuade me from leaning that way this June 1....
Nice writeup, Anthony. What do you think about Chris Stewart, Charlotte's catcher? He was a little old for his league last year, but put up an .800+ OPS last year, and has been talked up for what he can do defensively. Probably Widger's replacement next year, right? Any more potential besides a career backup?
And, I want to see Thorton a bit more. He made Travis Hafner look pretty bad earlier this year, and in his short time has looked decent, so I'm hoping he supplants the place of Boone Logan as the primary LOOGY.
should read, So I'm NOT going to make too many waves.
Good correction...if you're planning to make too many waves, you shouldn't tell people beforehand.
My sense of him (and I saw him get one at bat today) is that he's not going to hit enough to be a regular. However, his defense is supposed to be quite good, so he should have a career as a backup, at least. Obviously, if he defense is good enough, he will be a regular with what he is likely to hit (~700 OPS peak). He's apparently a good guy and the organization likes him a lot. They hope he will take the backup job next year. It's funny in a way, the system has three potential major league catchers right now (Stewart, Molina and Hernandez), although only Hernandez looks like he's going to hit enough to be a starter.
Don, did you truly pick the 2003 Marlins, who were 26-32 and in last place, 12 games behind the Braves on June 1, 2003?
If so, then Wow!
This one still appears to be a little pessimistic through the eyes of a crazy fan, but that aside, I think it's pretty fair, and you deserve major props for the humility to refers your mistakes from last year.
I still have that thread bookmarked :)
Thanks for all your work!
I saw Chris catch three games in spring training...discounting the fact that one was with knuckleballer Charlie Haeger, when Chris looked lost...his D was solid, and he had a good arm....he is very stiff at the plate, and needs to learn some flexibility to be a good hitter...
I also agree with the assessment on Molina, who just can't hit, and Hernandez, who shows good promise....saw them in bits and pieces this spring, but I agree with the above assessments....
Thank god they didn't lure David Cone out of retirement.
Is anyone else as excited about the Sox start as am...I doubt it!!
1) Vazquez- One potentially interesting data point for Ken Williams (and reason for hubris) might be Mr. Contreras himself, a formerly washed up Yankees "ace" who sucked for that franchise. Vazquez, like Contreras, was the top FA pitcher the year he was signed, and the Yanks gave up on him rather quickly. (Side note: does this make Stottlemyre the worst pitching coach in baseball? His 2 most successful pitchers are infamous for their stubborn refusal to listen to pitching coaches.) I.e., perhaps Mr. Williams thought to himself, well if Contreras = x with the Yankees and x + y with the ChiSox, and Vazquez pre-Yankees > Contreras pre-Yankees, then by the transitive property of ex-Yankees SPs, Vazquez will be a stud.
2) When will someone drop an appropriate Ray Liotta reference? Please do so immediately, before the Sports Guy misappropriates it with his inevitable reference to GoodFellas. My personal preferences, without having given this too much thought yet: Unlawful Entry, and Operation Dumbo Drop (e.g., to describe his 12-6 curveball).
I was so proud of myself for not referring to either Goodfellas or Field of Dreams in consecutive previews. Although, I would have made an Operation Dumbo Drop reference had I thought of it.
On June 1, you need to post your pick here.
-- MWE
Or, alternatively, if Liotta becomes the latest Papelbon SP--> wicked lights-out closer, we could describe the transition from Jenks to Liotta as Op. Dumbo Drop.
I wouldn't say Vazquez is a "project," or that him having a good year would necessarily be a feather in the cap for Cooper. He had very good peripherals last year, and PECOTA (for one) has him with the 4th highest projected VORP of any pitcher in the AL.
I wouldn't say that, either, and a lot of people are giving credit to Orlando Hernandez, not Don Cooper, for Contreras' turnaround, although it was Cooper that convinced him to make the fastball his primary pitch rather than his splitter.
If Cooper can make something useful out of Matt Thornton, I'll be impressed.
The 2003 Marlins were in LAST PLACE when you theoretically picked them, not just to make the playoffs but to win the World Series. They were 8 games behind the wild-card leader and 12 behind the division leader as play opened on June 1st, they were 5 games below .500, and you picked them to win it all?!!
Speaking of reverse-jinxes, thanks for all your hard work on behalf of the White Sox last year, Vaux.
He also picked Ireland to beat Bulgaria, but Krum to get the snitch anyway.
Change that "and" to an "or" and you're more realistic. It's pretty hard to find a starting catcher with a solid bat and good defense.
Depends how you define "solid." I took it to mean "could fill out the other half of the platoon reasonably well."
Yeah, but whom? There are always backup catchers floating around, but I can't think of any off the top of my head that would be a clear upgrade on Widger.
Widger's got a mediocre-at-best arm, but he's otherwise solid on defense. The pitchers seem to like working with him, and if the Sox are counting on the bat of their backup catcher, they're in big trouble.
Not that I'm a particular fan of the Widge, and I probably wouldn't miss him if he were replaced, but I don't think he's enough of a problem that the team needs to cast around for alternative.
I wanted the Sox to take a shot at Miguel Olivo in the offseason.
In my defense, I did say "ideal."
This is very true. He's at $500K, I think, so it's not a big deal. At best, they could have saved $150K. I'd just like to have a backup catcher who contributed something. Of course, my visions of Earl Weaveresque lineups went out the window around baseball with the addition of three extra relievers to every bullpen.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main