Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Looking Forward to ... > Discussion
Looking Forward to ...
— BTF's Preseason Previews

Sunday, March 02, 2003

Milwaukee Brewers

In team sports, there's a perfect symmetry between wins and losses. For every winner there is also a loser, thus preventing the dreams of countless members of the media who long for a variety of baseball in which all of the teams finish above .500.

Thankfully, for fans of most National League teams, there are a few teams out there with the courage to take the brunt of the losing. Teams possessed of enough kindness to allow the other teams in the league to collectively be above .500 every year.

One of those teams, of course, is the Milwaukee Brewers and they are slowly discovering that sausage with delicious red sauce of a mystery origin and shiny new architecture doesn't translate into success at the Major League level.

Even as seasons of the post-Molitor/Yount era tend to go, 2002 was one of the worst endured by Milwaukee citizens. Gone were the brief flirtations with contention during Phil Garner's reign as manager, replaced with the the first 100-loss season in Brewer history and the minor relief gained in that the half-game improvement of the 1999 season prevented last year from being the 6th straight declining season for the Brew Crew.

How does 2003 look for the Brewers? Every fall has its bottom and the Brewers will be hard-pressed to sink farther than 106 losses.

The Brewers' changes started in the front office with General Manager Dean Taylor finally being axed, replaced by former Ranger GM Doug Melvin, and Manager Jerry Royster getting his walking papers in favor of Ned Yost. Even fatherhood was overcome this offseason as Wendy Selig-Prieb was removed as team vice-president and CEO with the more business-oriented Ulice Payne Jr. getting the jobs.

On paper, it's hard to see how these moves fail to improve on the previous situation. Taylor was over his head as a decision-maker and while Melvin is the safe choice, he's also at least shown that he's competent at building an offense. Selig-Prieb's only accomplishment as CEO was doing an excellent job at fulfilling her father's wishes that the Brewers put other team's revenues into his pocket.

Ned Yost has unfortunately quoted the tired "fundamentals and defense roolz!" mantra since being hired but Royster did that also and has already proven himself to be hapless at implementing even that minimally-ambitious philosophy. It takes a great deal of effort to do anything as ill-advised as benching the team's most valuable offensive player for a week just to keep him from breaking a negative record.

Now, on to the players.

Infield

The Brewers replaced half of the infield this offseason, to mixed results. Richie Sexson and Eric Young both return, the only significant contributors from last year that will wear a Brewer uniform this year. Sexson, in the 3rd year of a 4-year contract that pays him $5 million in 2003 and $8 million in 2004, didn't come close to matching the 45 homers he hit in 2001, but still hit enough to end up with a perfectly adequate 279/363/504, leading the team in both OBP and SLG. Young didn't play as well as Sexson, hitting an unspectacular 280/338/369.

Keith Ginter also returns to the Brewers but despite probably being the team's best option at either 2nd or 3rd base, enters spring training as merely the easy favorite for the job of 5th infielder, with Rule 5er Enrique Cruz most likely grabbing the other infield backup slot. Former Royal Jed Hansen can contribute but he's unlikely to make the team unless the Brewers give up on Cruz.

Catcher, shortstop, and 3rd base all feature new starters for 2003. Gone and unlamented is Paul Bako, traded to the Cubs for Ryan Gripp. The Brewers have Robert Machado taking over full-time and likely providing a real, if modest offensive and defensive upgrade behind the plate. Signed to minor-league contracts are Keith Osik and Eddie Perez, both career backup catchers. Less likely to make the team is former Twins prospect Javier Valentin.

Over at short and the hot corner are what I believe are two big mistakes by the new regime. The Brewers expect a lot of Wes Helms but he really only looked good compared to who the Braves chose to play at third more often than not, the abysmal Vinny Castilla. Ned Yost has raved about Helms' power potential, but Helms remains a flailer who would be very fortunate to end up with an OBP above the .300 mark.

Royce Clayton takes over for Jose Hernandez (departed to Colorado along with Ronnie Belliard) and this might be the biggest downgrade on the team. When Clayton was one of the top defensive SS in the league and hitting 320/390, he's worthy of a starting job. Declining both offensively and defensively, the case simply isn't there. Clayton's only accomplishment in recent years was a hilarious shot he took at the White Sox after they released him in which he blasted the organization for not having faith in their star shortstop.

Outfield

Nothing quite illustrates the Brewers problems as their starting rightfielder. An injury-prone handy 4th otufielder, Jeffrey Hammonds ended up being the recipient of an unbelievable 3-year, $21.75 contract as a free agent. The Brewers hailed Hammonds as one of the building blocks of a winning Brewer team when Miller Park opened. As expected, Hammonds unable to pretend that Miller Park was Coors Field and has hit what you would expect from a handy 4th outfielder, for only many times the cost the Brewers refused to pay Jose Hernandez. Hammonds at least set a career-high (!) mark for games played, being healthy enough to eke out 128, hitting a mere 257/332/397.

On the other side of the outfield, Geoff Jenkins has, unhappily for the Brewers, turned out to be as injury-prone as Mr. Hammonds and has yet to be healthy enough to prove that his terrific unheralded 1999 and 2000 campaigns weren't mere flukes. A lot, if not most, of the Brewer hopes for improvement rest on Jenkins finally coming back from a series of injuries, most notably his recent ankle surgery. The spring didn't get off to a good start for Jenkins as he already injured his wrist playing against the Cubs yesterday.

In the middle, you have Alex Sanchez. You may shake your head at his unimpressive .343 OBP in the leadoff spot but for Sanchez, that actually represents a major step forward for him. Like Tony Womack as a Pirate and a Snake, Sanchez is that replacement-level leadoff hitter who keeps getting the job year after year for no particular reason.

The other outfield jobs are up for grabs this exhibition season. Brady Clark and John Vander Wal are likely the winners but I wouldn't put it past Ned Yost to carry Scott Podesdnik north instead of one of them, which would be an unhappy turn of events for those who like to see the Brewers score runs. Mark Budzinski also has a shot to make the team but probably will be in AAA to start the year.

Starting Pitching

The top of the starting rotation, Ben Sheets and Glendon Rusch, both return for the 2003 season and can both be reasonably expected to better their 2002 campaigns. Sheets, who still is only 24, appeared to recover pretty nicely from some arm problems and improved as a pitcher in pretty much every department from his rookie season. Rusch doesn't have the upside that Sheets does, being older and generally less talented, but I think that his 2000 campaign represents what he can do if his control comes back a bit and he can cut back on the hanging curveballs a bit.

The rest of the rotation is a mixed bag. Despite protestations to the contrary, the Brewers were hoping that this was the year Nick Neugebauer would break through. He's gone for the year now. Another starting prospect, Ben Diggins, is likely to start in the minors.

Todd Ritchie, while a dreadful pickup for the White Sox, is a much better pickup as a free agent signed to a minor-league contract. He should return to the roughly league-average pitcher he was before his White Sox stint.

The final 2 rotation spots are likely going to free agent signee Dave Mlicki and slimmer (still not slim) Ruben Quevedo, who I still think has a great deal of upside. There's a good shot that neither of these 2 will be starting by midseason, however, as someone like Diggins or Ben Hendrickson could force their way into the rotation at some point this year.

Bullpen

Now we get to a sunnier subject. As happened frequently in the 90s, the Brewers had a bullpen full of unheralded names, depth, and a truckload of performance. With just one notable exception, Jose Cabrera, the Brewers got a lot from their relievers in 2002.

Mike DeJean, who became the closer because of Curt Leskanic's injury, has pretty much locked up the role for good after a 3.12 ERA in closing almost half the team's wins. Leskanic is back and so is his velocity, and will be a key to the bullpen's continued success.

Valerio de los Santos takes over as the head lefty after Ray King's departure after what everyone hopes was his breakthrough 2002. The second lefty role (if Yost wants one, which is likely) is being fought over by John Foster, acquired in the Ray King trade and Shane Nance, a strikeout machine in the minors who will have to overcome the stigma attached to being a short pitcher.

Also returning are Jayson Durocher and Luis Vizcaino, who combined to through 129 1/3 innings in 2002 with a sub-3 ERA.

Of the pitchers left that can make the bullpen out of spring training, the most intriguing is long-time Baseball Primer favorite, Brooks Kieschnick. While teams were always disappointed that he didn't develop into the superstar he looked to be in college, even the 220/295/405 he hit in the majors (which probably represents the lower end of his ability level) becomes unbelievably intriguing when combined with his new job, relief pitcher. A team with a lot of imagination can make great use out of a player like Kieschnick if he pitches well. The tactical possibilities of having a pitcher, in the era of 12-man pitching staffs, that is also one of the best hitters available on your bench are almost endless.

Summary

In the end, I expect the Brewers to show some modest improvement from their disastrous 2002 season. However, there's simply not enough upside on most of the team to push the Brewers into contention. I can see a 72-90 record being achievable and that's about where I peg them. It doesn't sound like much, but a 16-game improvement is a sizable accomplishment and may even bring a few people back to the Brewers' shiny new digs.

In a way, Brooks Kieschnick and Jeffrey Hammonds are symbolic of the the future and past of the Brewers. Hammond represents the past history of Milwaukee, of failure to evaluate players objectively and put them in roles they can succeed in. Kieschnick represents a possible future in which while not having the highest budget in the league, the Brewers can show imagination and creativity in developing a team.

ZiPS Projections

PO Player        G  AB  R   H 2B 3B HR RBI BB  SO SB CS   BA  OBP  SLG
C  Machado      86 263 27  69 16  0  6  34 18  51  0  1 .262 .310 .392
1B Sexson      151 555 90 153 32  2 33 107 65 152  1  1 .276 .352 .519
2B Young       136 522 77 150 34  3  4  36 43  42 35 11 .287 .342 .387
3B Helms       105 320 36  77 17  3 10  42 18  71  1  2 .241 .281 .406
SS Clayton     123 398 54 102 18  3  8  43 29  77  8  4 .256 .307 .377
LF Jenkins      97 365 64 101 25  2 20  61 30 102  5  2 .277 .332 .521
CF Sanchez     114 418 61 118 14  6  1  31 28  66 32 15 .282 .327 .352
RF Hammonds    111 394 45 104 22  4  9  46 43  81  6  5 .264 .336 .409
c  Osik         50 105  7  22  4  0  2  13 10  23  1  0 .210 .278 .305
if Ginter      136 466 71 118 32  2 14  59 63 129  5  5 .253 .342 .421
if Cruz        139 489 64 121 20  1  5  32 23  72 23 12 .247 .281 .323
of Clark       115 307 47  78 19  2  7  39 35  37  6  4 .254 .330 .397
of Vander Wal  115 335 46  93 22  2 12  54 50 100  5  3 .278 .371 .463
of Podsednik   110 357 46  90 17  3  6  41 30  67 18  9 .252 .310 .367

PO Player          W  L  ERA  G GS  IP   H ER HR BB  SO
SP Sheets         12  9 3.62 31 31 204 197 82 18 57 156
SP Rusch          11 12 4.11 33 33 208 212 95 25 59 151
SP Ritchie        10 11 4.22 30 29 179 190 84 20 49 110
SP Quevedo         7  9 4.53 30 28 173 171 87 25 70 144
SP Mlicki          7 11 5.26 28 23 130 146 76 24 47  80
RP Leskanic        3  4 4.50 71  0  72  67 36  9 39  68
RP de los Santos   2  1 4.43 56  0  61  60 30  7 27  50
RP Durocher        3  3 3.88 53  0  65  55 28  7 34  70
RP Vizcaino        5  3 3.46 67  0  78  68 30  8 26  79
RP Nance           3  4 4.20 37  0  60  58 28  7 26  49
CL DeJean          3  4 3.91 68  0  76  70 33  6 37  62

Note: For minor leaguers, playing time projections reflect a full-time role.

Dan Szymborski Posted: March 02, 2003 at 12:00 AM | 18 comment(s)
  Related News: General

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Andere HUSSEIN Richtingen, Socialist Posted: March 01, 2003 at 09:35 PM (#609065)
Nice analysis, Dan. The Brewers underperformed their Pythagorean projection by five games last year, and by seven games the year before, which suggests even more that a 16 win boost is within the realm of possibility.

The Brewers could easily get good to very good performances from three starters, which would be enough to give them a very big boost.
   2. Damon Rutherford Posted: March 01, 2003 at 09:35 PM (#609067)
Not quite sure this is appropriate, but the ZiPS projection of wins has just 66 W's for the team in just over 1300 IP.

Does the ZiPS projection system restrict the # of wins it spits out to 2,430 total for the two leagues? Or better yet, where can I find information on ZiPS...can't seem to find any via Google.

Thanks.

   3. Dan Szymborski Posted: March 01, 2003 at 09:35 PM (#609069)
Like pretty much all projections systems, ZiPS has the misfortune of not being able to predict player usage. It simply doesn't know that a starter is suddenly only going to get 100 at-bats or Joe Schmoe from AA is going to be called up for 2 starts. As such, you can't just add up the win totals for projections unless you're also going to go out on a limb and predict how every player on the 40-man roster is going to be used.
   4. Dan Szymborski Posted: March 01, 2003 at 09:35 PM (#609070)
King was traded to the Braves for Wes Helms and John Foster. Loretta signed as a free agent with the Padres and will be the starting second baseman.
   5. Dan Szymborski Posted: March 01, 2003 at 09:35 PM (#609072)
Should be will be. The Brewers didn't even make a half-hearted attempt at finding another centerfield option.
   6. Kevin Harlow Posted: March 01, 2003 at 09:35 PM (#609073)
I know the player projections weren't central to your article, but I think you have over-estimated their 2003 performance. Using last season's RA to ERA ratio, your pitching projections are about 729 runs allowed in 1432 IP (last years IP). For the offense if you multiply your projected runs by the ratio of last season's (AB-H) to the projected (AB-H) you get 763 runs scored. 763 R and 729 RA has a .523 pythagorean winning percentage which rounds up to 85 wins over 162 games. Even if you assume the remainder of unprojected performance (and then some) to be replacement level they would still be a .500 team.
   7. Dan Szymborski Posted: March 01, 2003 at 09:35 PM (#609076)
It's not surprising the runs scored and runs allowed don't add up. These aren't playing time projections and if they add up to something representing the predicted W/L record, that's just a coincidence.

For players like Brady Clark and Keith Ginter, those lines represent what could happen if they received a full-time role. Ginter's unlikely to get that much playing time. Budzinski will get more at-bats than 0. What you're seeing is a relic of the process of choosing which players to do projections for; I could swap out Cruz for a better current player who will also get under 100 at-bats like Jed Hansen and because of the nature of the projections, it would wildly change the RS/RA despite the real life 2003 difference being small.
   8. Jason Posted: March 02, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609095)
Dan I'll cut you some slack if your going to be doing 30 of these, but your analysis had some glaring holes. 1) Doug's first player move to trade A-ball Prospect Matt Yeatman for Valentin and Kinney. Yeatman was one of our better prospects, which does actually mean something now, and I'm pretty sure Doug is expecting things from both players. I would be absolutely floored if both failed to make the team. Mlicki is a long shot and Kinney almost a sure shot in the rotation the 5th slot is really up in the air with guys like Quevedo and Franklin being more likely candidates both on merit and based on what Melvin has said.
Someone else pointed out Sanchez was a rookie last year, and isn't getting chance after chance. I've wrestled with him as a player because he was incredibly exciting and mind numbingly stupid all at the same time. He profiles as a Womack, but he appears to have some coachability and maybe more of a Tom Goodwin in his prime. It's hard to expect a player that old to get better, but let's remember he had the D-rays for instruction before being waived.
And I think 72 wins is a bit optimistic, but with the pythagorean projections, and 1 run game records I'm relatively confident we'll not hit 100 losses again.
   9. Michael Posted: March 02, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609100)
I agree, would someone explain what ZiPS is?
   10. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: March 02, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609101)
Fine article, but I have to say that anyone who would put ketchup on a bratwurst probably would prefer Yu-Gi-Oh! to baseball.
   11. Jason Posted: March 02, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609102)
I'm not saying that Doug has turned the team around, but on Mlicki he specifically said he just brought him to take a look, Dan looks like he made the veteran pitcher + bad team logic jump. Sure based on past experience Mlicki would be an automatic part of the rotation, but when interviewed Doug said he would be surprised if Mlicki made the team. As far as not making himself familiar with the prospects those mistakes were made in other arenas with Paul Stewart being inexplicably lost as a minor league FA, and a team that craves Wes Helms passing on Jeff Deardorf because they saw him as more of a 1st basemen. Cheap comments on the Brewers prospects demonstrates poorly on oneself. BA jumped the Brewers this year to 15th in terms of farm systems. A jump made without the benefit of blockbuster for prospect trades or a ton of draft picks.
   12. Dan Szymborski Posted: March 02, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609103)
- I know Alex Sanchez doesn't have years of experience in the majors; I merely did some poor work at the word smithy. Considering I had to crunch his lousy MLEs year after year and had to look at his MLB numbers just to do a projection, I had to know his experience level. And that's assuming I didn't have any knowledge of Sanchez.

- Mlicki's clearly a worse option for the Brewers than Matt Kinney but the Brewers didn't give Mlicki a major-league contract and 750,000 dollars (and well after the market was set) just to give him a spring training lark. Kinney's out of options and I'm betting the Brewers try to trade him or sneak him through waivers; I've heard some rumblings that they're going to use him in relief, but I just don't see that happening unless they do in fact carry 12 pitchers or cut out one of the lefties.

   13. Jason Posted: March 02, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609105)
Umm, Dan the Brewers gave Mlicki a minor league deal worth 750K if he makes the team. I haven't heard any rumblings about Kinney in Relief though it would be better than trying to sneak him through waivers.
   14. Dan Szymborski Posted: March 02, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609113)
I'm fairly certain that I'm right regarding Mlicki's contract. I double-checked, though, and every reference I find for Mlicki is that he signed a straight 1-year, $750,000 contract. Also, Mlicki's on the 40-man roster (which is the definition of a major-league contract) while all the other invitees that signed minor league contracts like Osik, Perez, and Vanderwal, are not.
   15. Dan Szymborski Posted: March 02, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609117)
Hmm, anyone know for sure? I can't find anything else!
   16. The New Gloucester Whaler Posted: March 03, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609144)
Ugh. The 2003 Brewers have made my stomach turn like no other Brewers team in recent memory. The statistical projection at the bottom of your article was particularly depressing. The only two bright spots on the team are Sheets and Sexson and all I can say about them is that they are above average. Doug Melvin, unfortunately, has not inspired much confidence in me. I was never too impressed with Melvin's Rangers teams and this offseason's big move to get in a bidding war to win the frustrating Clayton was pathetic. Then the Rockies sign Hernandez for half of what Clayton costs to make the tradeoff look even worse. Melvin probably did guarantee Mlicki $750,000 for a spring's worth of work before he cuts him.
   17. Dolf Lucky Posted: March 03, 2003 at 09:36 PM (#609150)
I hate the Brewers*. At least they'll always suck.


*Irrational hatred of Brewers stems from the '99 Brewers knocking the Reds out of a playoff spot.
   18. Mike Webber Posted: March 04, 2003 at 09:37 PM (#609181)
Does anyone know anything about Campos, the 30 year old pitcher that they bought from the Mexican league last year? Campos had 4 games at AAA and was effective, and apparently led the Mexican league in strikeouts each of the last four seasons.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.4895 seconds
61 querie(s) executed