|
| |||
|
You are here > Home > Looking Forward to ... > Discussion
| |||
Looking Forward to ... — BTF's Preseason Previews Wednesday, March 24, 2004Philadelphia PhilliesI have to admit it. I'm on board. I'm on the bandwagon. I'm a believer. I'm now a Phan. I've been to a good number of Phillies games in the four years that I've lived here but this is the first time that I took the season ticket plunge. I first signed up for seventeen games including the first night game at CitPa (Citizens Bank Park) and the July 5th Fireworks Spectacular. As an aside, the Phillies fireworks games (the 3rd and 5th) are the best fireworks displays that I have ever seen. Anyways, deciding that seventeen games wasn't enough for a surefire pennant contender, I then added three more games. First, I picked the Chicago Cubs and Kerry Wood (or is it the Cubs and Prior, or maybe the Cubs and Sosa), then Andy Pettitte and the Houston Astros and then the World Champion Marlins in October. My not-so-secret hope is that this might be the night the Phillies clinch the division. So is my newfound optimism warranted? A whole lot of folks seem to think so. There was some feeling last year, that the Phillies could challenge the Braves, but that was prior to the Braves offensive juggernaut pulling it all together somewhat unexpectedly. Yours truly thought that the Phillies were a "90-win team" and perhaps better if Marlon Byrd and Jimmy Rollins improved. More on Rollins and Byrd later, but they weren't the problem and this team only won 86 games. Though in self-interest, I will note that their pythagorean won-loss record was 90-72. The most obvious culprits in last year's disappointing season were a miserable season by Pat Burrell (.209/.309/.404) and the closers Bad and Badder. However, one topic that did not receive much airplay was the starting pitching, which was lackluster. Only Vincente Padilla bested a 4.00 ERA, and his 3.62 was barely within shouting distance of the National League top ten. Anyway, enough about last year, new ballpark, new closer, new season. Now last year, I gave the Phillies preview short shrift in order to take a whack at a "GM in a box." Several surly Phillies phans were disappointed with the lack of discussion of the new team, so never fear, I'll do due diligence this year on the Phillies' roster.
LineupIf Dan's Zips are to be believed (assuming he didn't change them on me as part of some sick joke), the Phillies should have a very good on-base offense. Only Jimmy Rollins' on-base percentage falls below a .350 OBP, assuming my David Bell voodoo doll continues working as well as it has the past seven months. Catcher: Mike Lieberthal and Todd Pratt Lieberthal isn't among the premier catchers in the league, but he firmly within the second tier with players like the non-possessed Javy Lopez and Jason Kendall. His backup Todd Pratt (my scoresheet co-owner's favorite backup catcher), is a very useful right-handed club off the bench. While most teams hope for something better than a pitcher's contribution from their backup catchers, Pratt has produced a .400+ OBP and a .450+ SLG each of the last two years in very limited playing time. It kind of makes you wonder if Bowa shouldn't work hard to have a decent emergency third catcher and then use Pratt in more pinch hit situations. He has only had eight pinch-hit at bats the last two years. First Base: Jim Thome Simply "Awesome." According to a friend at a local rag, this is Thome's response to most everything. And the Philly fans feel the same about Thome. Thome fell one home run short of Mike Schmidt's single-season record of 48. And while his 131 RBI's was well short of Chuck Klein's 1938 total of 170 RBI's, it was the most for a Phillie since 1932. Thome was exceptionally good when the chips were down, hitting ten home runs in both August and September. When Thome's bat slows over the next few years, 200 K's seems like a real possibility, but until that time, the Phillies will have one of MLB's top sluggers manning first base. Second Base: Placido Polanco or Chase Utley The plan is for Utley to return to AAA where he has hit for something in the neighborhood of an .850 OPS in 238 games. I know the kids always need more seasoning, but Utley is as ready as he is ever going to get, though a blistering spring holds out hope that Bowa and Wade will come to their senses. While Utley is leading Scranton to a first-division finish, Polanco will be playing second and David Bell will play third. Tomas Perez, then handles the primary infield backup job. There were a lot of Red Sox statheads hoping that Theo Epstein would get Polanco or perhaps Adam Kennedy to play second base. Polanco is 28 and is now in his fourth year as a starter. Most of the defensive metrics agree that he is a very good defensive player both at third and at second. He will never draw a lot of walks, but he has double digit home run pop, and he is now all the Phillies have to show for running Scott Rolen out of town. Shortstop: Jimmy Rollins This off-season he was sent to Tony's "hit-the-damn-ball-on-the-ground camp". This is supposed to turn him into a better leadoff hitter, but he really needs to attend Rickey's "draw-a-few-more-walks" camp, as he has always been below the one walk to ten at bat ratio (that works as a quick rule of thumb between poor and acceptable). In fact his power/speed game brings to mind a Rickey-lite rather than a player hitting it through the five and a half hole a la Gwynn. I had high hopes for Rollins as a rookie. He had exceptional pop for a young middle infield prospect to go along with his great speed. I still think that he could put together a Dick McAuliffe-type season (McAuliffe finished seventh in the 1968 AL MVP voting), but I fear that Bowa and his small ball urgings have gotten too far into his head for that to happen now. Third Base: David Bell There was talk that signing Bell was important part of Thome coming to Philly. I guess it is an ill wind that doesn't blow some good. Bell is very good defensively, but he is now suffering from shoulder tendinitis, after being waylaid by back trouble last year, so that skill set is likely on the decline. When he went out with back trouble, Polanco was shifted to third and Utley filled in at second. Utley's line of .239/.322/.373 was nothing great. A .322 OBP would qualify as the third best of David Bell's career. With three more years on the contract, the pain has only just begun. Left Field: Pat Burrell He was a boobird favorite last year, though Burrell's Girls stuck by their heartthrob through thick and thin. Looking over his stats, he was terrible against lefties, terrible against righties, terrible at home, terrible on the road, terrible on grass, terrible on turf, terrible in April, May, June, July, and only sort of terrible in August and September. He still could explode. He reminds me a bit of Albert Belle. Belle had a strong college career, some good seasons and then he hit it big as a 26-year-old. Burrell is a year behind that schedule, but I like his chances. Just as a reality check, Burrell is slugging .333 in spring training late last week. Center Field: Marlon Byrd Well, Marlon Byrd was quietly solid with a .366 OBP and a .418 SLG. Perhaps all the never-ending admonitions to Jimmy Rollins (just .320/.387) to "hit the ball of the ground" rubbed off on Marlon Byrd, who has a two-to-one groundball-to-flyball ratio. He hit for a good deal more power in the minor leagues, so I think there is some upside here. He was an older rookie, so it isn't a lot of upside. For instance, the most similar players to him are guys like Ken Griffey, Sr. and Billy Sample. A Ken Griffey, Sr. career is a worthy goal. Right Field: Bobby Abreu Good organizations focus on what players can do and not what they can't. About all Abreu can't do is hit 30+ home runs and earn a Gold Glove. He steals bases well and has drawn 100 walks for five consecutive years (a feat matched by teammate Jim Thome) after an 84 walk season his first full season. Much has been made of Abreu disliking batting higher than third in the lineup. However, unless the power returns unexpectedly (not impossible for someone 33), he should be batting second. Byrd, Abreu, Thome were on base 679 times last year. A productive Pat Burrell could drive in 135 runs this year. Starting Pitching: Randy Wolf, Kevin Millwood, Vincente Padilla, Brett Myers, Eric Milton Last year, Wolf, Millwood, Padilla, and Myers all had their moments, but none of them put together a top notch season. After two great seasons, Wolf regressed to a pedestrian 4.23 ERA in 2003. He is certainly a staff workhorse as he has started 64 games the last two years and topped 200 innings each year. Eric Milton adds another lefty to the rotation. Like Billy Wagner, he is a big money addition, but is not likely to be termed a good buy. He is absolutely Blyleven-esque is his home run rate and is among the most extreme fly ball pitchers in the majors. I'm not sure that having Burrell and Abreu in the outfield corners will do him any favors and if the new park plays small, he could be in for a long year. Millwood is looking more and more like a league average pitcher who can occasionally dominate. In his last six years, his ERA+ has been 104, 162, 100, 102, 127, and last year 103. At $11 million, you would like a little bit more from your ace starter. Vincente Padilla and Brett Myers were long-term Joe Kerrigan projects. Myers tends to speed up his delivery and Kerrigan was continually trying to get him to slow down. The advice never really took. Myers models his persona after Curt Schilling. The buzz your teammate in spring training part of the persona and not necessarily the extreme attention to detail portion. Kerrigan was hired with some fanfare after working the Comcast postgame show for a year. Through the all star break, Kerrigan was largely credited with improving the Phillies ERA, but the improvement was short lived as the Phillies only dropped their ERA from 4.17 in 2002 to 4.04 in 2003. As for Padilla, the Phillies were on him repeatedly for his pre-game preparation. Their feeling was that he wasn't properly warming up prior to games. The stats definitely bear this out. In pitches 1-30, Padilla's OPS allowed was over .800 and it dropped well under .700 for the next 45 pitches. When announces call a pitcher's stuff "filthy" this is the type of pitcher they are talking about. When attending Phillies games, my wife notes Padilla's broken bats on her scorecard with little jagged lines. He isn't quite in Mariano Rivera's class, but she often reaches four or five broken bats a game. Bullpen: Billy Wagner, Tim Worrell, Rheal Cormier, Roberto Hernandez, and assorted other guys I would be forced to make something up for. After subjecting the Phans to Jose Mesa for three years, Ed Wade paid top dollar for 80 innings of a 2.00 to 2.50 ERA. Whether that is worth the $8million Billy Wagner is due to receive is not for us to decide in this article, though I could make a pretty strong argument that A-Rod could have been playing in Philly this summer had the front office played its cards the right way. Part of the appeal the last few years of having Mesa in the bullpen was the affect it had on Larry Bowa. Dallas Green and other front office folks had advised Bowa to move up the dugout runway due to his "demonstrativeness" when he felt the need to emote. This meant that during Mesa's appearances Bowa was often no where to be seen. Wagner will without a doubt be an improvement, but he's not infallible and the local media and fans have presented his arrival as the reason to print playoff tickets. He was slowed this spring training with an injured middle finger, but has returned and should be sharp by the start of the season. Tim Worrell is yet another example that moving from generic quality reliever to closer is not that hard as long as you can get guys out. He saved 38 games last year and looked a whole lot like the same reliever who set up Robb Nen the year before. There is no way that Cormier matches his 2003. No way. His periperals were slightly better in 2003 with improved SO and BB rates. However, the difference is not so dramatic as to justify a 1.70 ERA vs. a 5.25 era. Roberto Hernandez? Could give you 60 innings of league average pitching or will be released at the all-star break. There is a significant chance that the Phillies will uncover a tough bullpen arm from their minor league system. Someone like Geoff Geary, Ryan Madson, Dave Coggin, or Josh Hancock could certainly throw 50 quality innings, but it is hard to say which one it will be. Madson is the most highly thought of from this group and has appeared in several top 100 prospect lists. Madson has been used as a starter in the past, but with Eric Milton on board they are looking at him as a possible bullpen arm now. His throwing has impressed Bowa, but like Utley they made send him down to work as a starter. WWWD? Some reclaimed prospects like Bud Smith and Amaury Telemaco are also likely to see time either in long relief or (if they can gain Bowa's trust) as setup men. Minors: Cole Hamels and Gavin Floyd This spring Cole Hamels gave up a home run. It was his first home run allowed since his sophomore year in high school. Early in spring training, he faced the Yankees and struck out Derek Jeter, A-Rod and Tony Clark in order. And he throws lefty. If the Phillies see fit, Hamels and his changeup may be due for a Fernando, Dwight, or Dontrelle moment this summer. Like Hamels, Gavin Floyd was a number one pick as a high school pitcher. He is a level ahead of Hamels, but he doesn't look to be quite as good of a prospect. He still is a consensus top 50 prospect in most top 50 lists. He just isn't one of those crazy, filthy prospects. Manager: Larry Bowa I don't know if this is significant or not, but the local sports talk station was saying that Bowa is presently going through a divorce from his wife of 30 years. I can't imagine that will make things easier for him this year. Also, while Bowa talks a lot about reducing strikeouts, hit and runs, and sacrifice bunting, he really isn't that much of a small ball manager. He puts up with huge numbers of strikeouts from Burrell and Thome and called for only 23 non-pitcher sacrifices last year.
Team Non-pitcher SH COL 28 SFG 28 HOU 28 ARI 28 NYY 24 PHI 23 ATL 22 SDP 22 TEX 21 BOS 21 OAK 21 TOR 11 The New Ballpark I don't have any insight into how the new ballpark will play, but I do know that it is going to make the Phillies a lot of money at least starting out. The Vet which was demolished this past weekend, was not the coziest of major league venues. The outfield upper deck was left open and you would have about 100 people milling around the 10,000 seats sporting assorted signs like Person's People and the Wolf Pack along with the couples making out. The new park won't have any empty sections this year. Phillies Attendance 2000 1.6 million 2001 1.8 million 2002 1.6 million 2003 2.1 million (the year of 81 promotional events) 2004 3.0 million?? (23,000 season tickets already sold)The reviews of the field have focussed on the sightlines and have stated that HOK's retro tendencies have been tempered somewhat. The park should be a joy to watch a game in. Reasonably successful teams like the Orioles and the Mariners saw a half million to one million fan increase in attendance when they opened their new parks. CitPa might surpass them all as last year the Phillies drew fewer than either the Orioles or Mariners did in the final years in their old park. How this will affect their win-loss record? It is hard to say. Without the new park it is unlikely Millwood, Thome, Milton and Wagner would be in Philadelphia. Seattle has averaged 98 wins in the four seasons since their new park opened up. The Orioles had a couple good years in Camden Yards, but only once passed 90 wins. Regardless of how the new park plays, anything less than the playoffs will disappoint all of the team's fans and will almost certainly cost Larry Bowa his job. A local writer noted that former managers Bob Boone and Joe Kerrigan are in the organization and would potentially step in for Bowa should the Phillies falter. Playoffs or no, I'll be traveling south on Broad twenty times this year. Feel free to stop by Section 419 and say hello. Oh...Do you want a bold prediction? 96-66 and a first round playoff loss. 2004 ZiPS Projections Name P AVG OBP SPC G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB CS Thome* 1b .271 .403 .581 155 542 100 147 29 2 45 122 116 169 0 3 Abreu* rf .301 .416 .495 160 588 101 177 45 3 21 93 114 124 25 13 Byrd cf .304 .367 .456 141 542 98 165 32 4 14 73 48 102 12 3 Burrell lf .253 .359 .485 154 565 74 143 35 3 30 97 89 146 1 0 Lieberthal c .297 .363 .446 125 475 55 141 30 1 13 67 37 56 0 0 Utley* 2b .287 .358 .455 146 541 86 155 36 2 17 78 51 97 7 4 Pratt c .234 .384 .391 51 128 14 30 11 0 3 16 26 39 1 0 Polanco 3b .298 .350 .425 137 544 83 162 33 3 10 67 36 40 10 3 Rushford* lf .283 .348 .402 107 403 46 114 22 1 8 49 37 42 2 2 Collier ss .269 .335 .421 110 394 52 106 24 3 10 49 35 91 5 2 Ledee* lf .239 .335 .428 107 243 34 58 17 1 9 34 34 56 1 1 Michaels cf .266 .337 .421 99 271 39 72 16 1 8 36 27 80 3 2 Rollins# ss .276 .337 .401 160 670 94 185 34 7 12 73 60 109 26 14 Bell 3b .243 .323 .394 126 449 59 109 27 1 13 58 47 60 1 1 Perez# 3b .265 .325 .381 110 260 31 69 16 1 4 29 22 46 0 1 Smith lf .251 .303 .426 120 399 45 100 29 1 13 56 27 76 2 3 Wooten dh .270 .328 .387 82 222 22 60 8 0 6 28 17 38 1 3 Budzinski* rf .266 .342 .351 121 436 70 116 23 4 2 38 46 105 10 6 Machado# ss .204 .326 .311 120 431 70 88 19 3 7 74 74 129 33 12 Hinch c .233 .287 .379 82 253 25 59 14 1 7 30 17 53 1 2 Padilla rf .247 .310 .343 93 373 50 92 22 1 4 36 31 58 15 10 Glanville cf .245 .279 .342 124 436 45 107 14 2 8 44 18 59 14 4 Name ERA W L G GS INN H ER HR BB K Wagner* 2.92 4 2 72 0 74.0 54 24 7 22 94 Millwood 3.57 15 9 33 32 199.0 177 79 16 61 169 Alvarez* 3.64 6 7 31 18 126.0 115 51 10 40 89 Geary 3.65 7 5 42 9 106.0 99 43 11 25 81 Giese 3.66 6 4 52 0 86.0 78 35 12 20 79 Padilla 3.71 14 9 33 29 187.0 177 77 16 49 132 Worrell 3.72 5 3 76 0 75.0 64 31 4 32 67 Cormier* 3.76 6 4 61 0 67.0 59 28 4 26 54 Hancock 3.79 9 5 27 25 145.0 133 61 13 46 118 Wedel 3.81 4 2 38 0 52.0 50 22 3 17 29 Wolf* 3.81 14 9 31 31 189.0 165 80 20 63 180 Telemaco 3.86 10 6 31 28 168.0 167 72 21 31 116 Smith* 4.04 8 6 25 24 136.0 128 61 12 48 98 Madson 4.05 11 6 27 26 160.0 145 72 14 52 111 Milton* 4.05 12 9 30 30 182.0 175 82 24 47 143 Myers 4.16 12 10 30 30 184.0 177 85 20 58 134 Coggin 4.16 8 7 33 23 147.0 141 68 10 62 93 Powell 4.37 8 8 28 23 142.0 144 69 16 45 79 Junge 4.74 8 8 28 25 152.0 151 80 18 64 102 Hernandez 4.95 4 5 62 0 60.0 56 33 7 33 50ZiPS Projections are not playing time predictors; they project a player's performance given playing time in the majors in their accustomed role. As with all projections, specific knowledge of non-statistical attributes of the player should temper what the computer says. | |||