Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Looking Forward to ... > Discussion
Looking Forward to ...
— BTF's Preseason Previews

Sunday, March 21, 2004

St. Louis Cardinals

This 2004 Cardinals preview is essentially an exercise in looking at the two principles that have guided the current management team ever since they arrived in St. Louis, and, at least in Tony La Russa's case, ever since he started managing in the major leagues.

Principle #1: Walt Jocketty has the mind of a statistician and the soul of a gambler.

Here's what I mean: The Cards have open spots in left field, second base, and all over the pitching staff except for closer. Jocketty's approach to all of these openings has been to invite a bunch of cheap players to camp with provisional contracts, and see who has a good spring. His belief seems to be that if he invites enough marginal candidates to camp, at least one of them will have a good year and solve his problem for cheap money. That is, he's thinking like a statistical oddsmaker.

Now, this isn't a stupid strategy, although it does run the risks of all gambling. The assorted Dustin Hermansons and Garret Stephensons who have passed through the Cardinal rotation in recent years have been acquired through this plan and have helped the Cards win a couple of division titles. Last year, though, Jocketty shot craps. Closer Jason Isringhausen was injured to open the season, and the Cards must have tried a dozen candidates to just get through two lousy months until Izzy came back and nobody was able to step up. Kiko Calero had a couple of good weeks, but got hurt himself. Cal Eldred did have a decent half-year, but it was the second half, when the team didn't need him to close games any more. The lack of a closer caused La Russa to overwork his staff aces, Matt Morris and Woody Williams, which sent Morris to the DL for a month while Williams was ordinary at best in the second half. Overall, the lack of that one winning gamble to close games in April, May, and June was without doubt what cost the Cards the division title.

Principle #2: Tony La Russa wins when he has three solid veteran starters, two or more of whom are having good years, and does not win when he doesn't have them, almost no matter what his offense looks like.

This is one of the strangest observations I have ever made about a manager, but it's been true since Tony's days in Oakland, and even going back to the White Sox, although his pitching staffs there were much less stable than in Oakland. Look at those A's teams, and which years they won. Tony built his starting rotations around a top three of, to pick the archetype, Mike Moore, Bob Welch, and Dave Stewart. If all three had good years, Tony won, regardless of the offense surrounding them. If only one had a good year, he lost, again despite some good offenses there. If two of them had good years, he usually won, but that was the one situation in which the offense made a difference. And if you're wondering whether this is just some sort of coincidence and not the result of any La Russa pitching staff plan, here's a quote from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch "Cardinals Notebook" column by Joe Strauss, March 16, 2004: "La Russa described Chris Carpenter's performance to date as worthy of a 'top of the rotation starter.' BY LA RUSSA'S DEFINITION (emphasis mine), that means among his top three."

Last year, the plan was for Morris, Williams, and Brett Tomko to be those top three. Before overwork took its toll, Morris and Williams were having good years, and Tomko wasn't, and the Cardinals, with a very strong offense, looked like they would win. As soon as Morris hit the DL and Williams hit mediocrity, things went to hell. That's Tony. It's how he wins and it's how he loses.

This year, things could look better. The original plan was pretty obvious; Sports Weekly had it all written up just as soon as the postseason got going. The Cards were going to get Greg Maddux to add to Morris and Williams, and Tony was going to be on his way to victory. No more Brett Tomko for St. Louis. However, the money for Maddux was supposed to come from trading away Jim Edmonds, moving J. D. Drew to center field. Then Edmonds had surgery. Walt Jocketty, gambling again, traded Drew (and Eli Marrero) for three young pitchers, which saved some money, and let Fernando Vina and Tino Martinez go, which saved some more, and then hoped that the Cardinal ownership would pony up the rest of what it would take to sign Maddux. Unfortunately, the Cardinal ownership had a different plan, called "let's cut the roster budget the year that Albert Pujols comes up for arbitration." That meant no Greg Maddux. And, in turn, that means that the Cardinal starting rotation is dependent on a complete recovery by Chris Carpenter, or some just blind luck out of a kid. Not what Tony La Russa had in mind, but, judging by the Joe Strauss quote above, it's what he's resigned himself to.

You might think that all this implies that I don't think the Cards have much of a chance in their division, with its new versions of the Astros and Cubs. That would be wrong. I figure the teams as about even. For one thing, although it is certainly true that the other two teams have gained ground on the Cards, the Cards had more talent on hand last year; they just couldn't fix the closer problem in time. That means that the Cards have some room to give before they drop down below the Stros or Cubs.

For another, the Cubs are heavily dependent on a group of young arms that have already had some trouble. Kerry Wood has been seriously hurt, and Mark Prior went on the DL for a while last year. Sure, Prior recovered, but he also pitched a lot and he's already in trouble now in the preseason. Wood actually wasn't all that good, and he worked hard, too. The Cubs' staff is not deep; if a couple of the kids get hurt, the team could have real problems. Their offense won't save them; it's no better than last year's. It's added Derrek Lee, but subtracted Kenny Lofton. Frankly, they needed the leadoff man and center fielder more.

The Astros have the opposite problem. Their pitching staff looks fine, if they can find anything resembling a closer, which they should be able to do. However, the core of their offense - Bagwell and Biggio - is aging rapidly, and worse, the hitter-friendly ballpark has masked that, so that the Astros probably think they have much more offense than they really do. They could easily win with their pitching, but they could also end up losing a lot of low-scoring road games. All in all, the Cardinals have a decent chance of sneaking in there, especially if Tony finds that third "top starter."

Of course, Tony also needs to settle on a second baseman, a left fielder, a leadoff man, and a second batter. Reggie Sanders essentially replaces Drew in right field, so that's no issue, but moving Pujols to first base, where Tino Martinez was last year, leaves a hole in left, similar to the one that Vina's departure leaves at second and at leadoff. This sounds much worse than it is, because Tony's only trying to replace Vina's bat and Martinez', and they were the guys who had bad years in 2003. On the other hand, the situation is complicated by the number of candidates for the jobs.

I should also include something for you guys who are into fantasy leagues. I am not really into that hobby, but I do know that it's important to figure out who among a team's marginal candidates is actually going to get playing time. So here are my best guesses as to who will make the Cardinal club as left fielders and second basemen, and who will actually start. I will list them by my estimate of their chances; that is, the first guy listed, Bo Hart, is the guy I figure will see the most playing time.

Bo Hart

I call situations like this "cream skimming." Bo Hart is not good enough to have a real career as a real starting second baseman in the majors. He's a very good AAA player. However, a good AAA player will have a few peak years, between ages 26 and 29, where he really can start, if not star, in the major leagues. The Cardinals, short of options, are going to skim those few years of cream off the top of Hart's career, and then discard him into the Pool of Rotating Journeymen. There are always a lot of these guys out there: career AAA players who are at their peaks. Finding them to fill holes cheaply is a major survival skill unless your owner is George Steinbrenner. Oh, yeah. If Hart loses the second base job to Marlon Anderson, he may not make the roster as the backup shortstop, as originally planned. See Hector Luna below.

Ray Lankford

There's a principle here: If you have a bunch of candidates for a job, root for the guy who, if he has a good year, will have the best "good year" among the candidates. Lankford's main contenders for the Cardinal left field job are Kerry Robinson and So Taguchi. If either of those two succeeds, you get a decent average, mediocre walks, good defense, and base-stealing speed, but no power and not really enough on-base percentage for a leadoff man. If Ray succeeds, you get a slightly lesser average, good walks, decent defense, good speed, and decent power. Both Tony La Russa and I will take the walks and power over the speed and defense. Remember, this is left field, not shortstop. Sure, Ray is much older than the others, but his top end is still much higher. He will get the first shot at the job.

Marlon Anderson

He hits lefty (as does Lankford), which the Cardinals need, and he plays, oddly enough, both left field and second base. If he doesn't steal the second base job from Hart, he will make the club as a backup. If he's the starting left fielder, it means that everyone else has failed.

Kerry Robinson

Robinson is desperate for the left field/leadoff man job, because it would give him a real major league career. If he can't pull it off, he will still be the backup center fielder of choice, and might be Lankford's glove caddy in left. Unless he falls apart, he will be on the roster.

Greg Vaughn

Likely to make the team as a pinch-hitter. Too old for left field any more, except in the smallest of ballparks.

Hector Luna

Tony loves Luna's glove as a backup shortstop, much less third baseman or keystone man. If either Hart or Anderson fails, Luna will play a lot off the bench. BTW, for those of you who don't know, this job was supposed to go to the journeyman Brent Butler, but Butler showed up fat and immobile and was in no condition to play even backup shortstop. The Cards have released him.

So Taguchi

If Robinson fails, Taguchi has the job, whatever it is. Otherwise, it's AAA ball for "So far, so-so."

Mark Quinn

A long shot. Might make the team as a backup if Vaughn is completely finished. Might win the left field job; he's the last of the really viable candidates. More likely will start the year in AAA and await developments.

Wilson Delgado

A last-ditch desperation left fielder if no one else has anything going on.

John Mabry

What happens if even Delgado fails.

John Gall The Cards' best AAA hitter, but he only plays first base. Tony, who does not like to move people around during the season, is not going to move Albert Pujols off of first base; he's made that very clear to everyone in sight. That means that Gall will open the season as the AAA first baseman, with instructions to get in as much practice as possible in left field, just in case. Don't be fooled here. The Cards are letting Gall play some left in spring training, as a head start, but Tony has publicly stated that Gall is not even close to being able to play the position in the majors. He is NOT a left field candidate! He is also too young and too good to plunk down on the major league bench as a pinch hitter.

Just to make sure you get this and don't get fooled, the Cardinals just cut Steve Cox, who can hit some himself, because he can't play anywhere other than first base. Pujols is NOT moving!

After all that, my projection, made with no great certainty, is that Bo Hart will open the season at second base, but is very vulnerable to at least platooning with Marlon Anderson, and Ray Lankford will open in left, with a bit more job security than Hart. Right now, there are rumors that the Cardinals will make a trade with the Angels for a second baseman. I have no idea if that's true, but neither Hart nor Anderson is exactly claiming the keystone job by force. Neither one of them has either hit or fielded a lick.

As for the lineup, Tony has dropped some hints, and they make perfect sense. The hints are that Reggie Sanders, brought in to replace J. D. Drew in right field, might hit at the top of the order. The other hint is that Ray Lankford may well do the same. That makes sense. Neither Hart nor Anderson gets on base much for a leadoff man, although Anderson does steal bases when he gets there. Sanders and Lankford do take their walks and get themselves on base and they can both still run some. The Cards don't need Sanders' or Lankford's power in the middle of the order; they still have the best offense in the division. An added feature, from Tony's point of view, is that Reggie hits righty, while Ray hits lefty. Tony likes to alternate the sides, to avoid the relief guys who can only get lefties out.

Those of you who remember the Cardinal lineup from last year may wonder why Edgar Renteria isn't going to lead off; he'd be fine there. Well, the reason is that Edgar, fascinated with RBIs, publicly says that he does not want to hit up top; he wants a RBI spot. Tony doesn't want to force the man to hit where he's unhappy, any more than Whitey Herzog did when Willie McGee expressed the same desire. So, Edgar hits sixth, right behind the real power guys. It's a waste, but you have to live with your players' emotions, too. Anyway, here's my projected lineup, subject, no doubt, to many changes:

RF  Reggie Sanders
LF  Ray Lankford
1B  Albert Pujols
CF  Jim Edmonds
3B  Scott Rolen
SS  Edgar Renteria
C  Mike Matheny
2B Bo Hart
I guess I should mention that Tony likes to hit someone who can run a little right in front of the pitcher, which is why I'm guessing Matheny before Hart.

As for pitchers, Tony has already announced his plans there. The rotation will be Morris, Williams, Carpenter, Jeff Suppan, and Jason Marquis, unless something awful happens. Dan Haren, Jason Simontacchi, and Alan Benes are competing for the spot starter job. Everyone else except Isringhausen is a middle reliever; whoever is pitching well will be the setup man until he blows cold.

Tony is talking about taking 12 pitchers with him when he breaks camp, which would leave the following best guess as to the entire roster: SP Matt Morris SP Woody Williams SP Chris Carpenter SP Jeff Suppan SP Jason Marquis SP Jason Simontachi (spot starter) RP Julian Tavarez RP Kiko Calero RP Ray King RP Cal Eldred RP Steve Kline CL Jason Isringhausen C Mike Matheny C Chris Widger 1B Albert Pujols 1B Greg Vaughn (pinch hitter) 2B Bo Hart 2B/OF Marlon Anderson 3B Scott Rolen SS Edgar Renteria SS/3B Hector Luna LF Ray Lankford CF Jim Edmonds CF/LF/RF Kerry Robinson RF Reggie Sanders That's what Cardinal fans are looking at right now. Best bet to crack the roster as a position player: So Taguchi. Best pitcher chance: Dan Haren. It's no longer the dominant collection of talent in the division, but it's not really behind the Astros and Cubs. It lacks the pitching focus of those two rosters, but it's competitive because of the offense. The Cardinals should be in the mix.

2004 ZiPS Projections

Name               P    AVG   OBP   SPC    G   AB    R    H  2B  3B  HR  RBI   BB    K  SB  CS 
Pujols             lf  .359  .448  .667  162  619  137  222  43   2  48  151   90   69   3   3 
Edmonds*           cf  .281  .394  .580  141  459   84  129  40   2  31   97   81  129   2   4 
Rolen              3b  .284  .384  .512  155  574   95  163  41   3  28  100   82  107  11   4 
Renteria           ss  .316  .382  .457  156  576   84  182  41   2  12   78   60   59  26   7 
Gall               1b  .299  .353  .463  136  521   70  156  29   1  18   79   38   70   3   2 
Sanders            rf  .252  .324  .515  131  460   68  116  32   4  27   83   42  113  13   8 
Brown              cf  .275  .330  .436  100  367   51  101  22   2  11   50   27   79   9   3 
Porter*            rf  .276  .334  .422  120  410   57  113  25   4   9   49   33  113  15   7 
Witt*              1b  .267  .319  .440  135  464   58  124  24   1  18   69   30  128   1   1 
Seabol             3b  .269  .323  .435  110  402   45  108  24   2  13   56   28   88   2   2 
Anderson*          2b  .271  .333  .383  147  517   61  140  28   3   8   56   43   66  11   3 
Mabry*             1b  .233  .309  .423   89  163   18   38  10   0   7   24   15   35   1   1 
Hart               2b  .272  .323  .383  133  519   69  141  24   5   8   54   31  108   7   4 
Luna               ss  .267  .337  .331  130  453   76  121  13   2   4   40   44   59  18   6 
Quinn              rf  .235  .283  .396   89  328   34   77  21   1  10   42   19   60   3   3 
Robinson*          lf  .267  .305  .339  128  236   30   63   8   3   1   18   11   30   7   2 
Widger             c   .229  .286  .377   71  223   21   51  18   0   5   27   15   37   0   1 
McKay*             c   .240  .291  .355  103  366   37   88  16   1   8   41   23   58   1   1 
Matheny            c   .238  .309  .328  130  399   37   95  16   1   6   39   39   71   1   2 
Mahoney            c   .235  .282  .330   61  200   22   47  11   1   2   18   12   38   0   1 
Taguchi            cf  .235  .284  .330  125  349   38   82  19   1   4   33   21   54   7   5 
Delgado#           2b  .234  .282  .331  102  290   25   68  13   0   5   30   19   48   1   3 
Vaughn             lf  .175  .267  .322   96  332   36   58  17   1  10   37   39  101   5   4 

Name                  ERA   W   L   G  GS     INN    H   ER  HR   BB    K 
Isringhausen         2.90   3   1  55   0    59.0   46   19   2   20   63 
Morris               3.51  17   8  31  31   200.0  185   78  16   51  159 
Haren                3.77  14   7  30  30   172.0  171   72  17   33  115 
Rust                 3.88   5   3  50   0    58.0   53   25   2   26   43 
King*                3.97   4   2  79   0    59.0   54   26   4   23   45 
Journell             3.97   6   4  33  12    93.0   84   41   5   41   74 
Duff                 4.11   6   4  48   0    57.0   47   26   4   29   60 
Kline*               4.14   4   3  78   0    63.0   60   29   3   27   41 
Williams             4.21  14   9  31  31   199.0  201   93  23   50  135 
Marquis              4.28   8   5  32  19   124.0  118   59  12   47   97 
Lincoln              4.31   5   5  53   6    94.0   94   45  10   30   65 
Parrott              4.31  10   7  28  28   165.0  164   79  15   58  109 
Pearson*             4.31   4   3  56   2    71.0   71   34   7   23   44 
Wainwright           4.31   8   5  27  27   144.0  140   69  16   51  106 
Carpenter            4.34   9   7  27  27   166.0  163   80  18   56  121 
Tavarez              4.37   9   6  40  20   140.0  146   68   8   55   70 
Calero               4.42   7   6  26  16   112.0  104   55  12   47   95 
Eldred               4.50   6   4  59   0    64.0   57   32   8   29   63 
Suppan               4.50  13  11  32  32   206.0  214  103  23   64  121 
Martinez*            4.66   7  10  30  26   145.0  130   75  10   87  129 
Layfield             4.68   4   4  45   0    50.0   48   26   5   23   38 
Simontacchi          4.92   9   9  36  22   150.0  164   82  21   45   81 
Pearce               5.01   7   8  23  20   124.0  136   69  22   31   74 
Levrault             5.07   6   8  33  20   119.0  123   67  16   51   85 
Benes                5.11   6  11  29  22   141.0  145   80  19   63   94 
Creek*               5.71   2   3  53   0    52.0   49   33   8   36   53 
Ankiel*              7.00   2   3  17  10    45.0   40   35   7   47   46 
ZiPS Projections are not playing time predictors; they project a player's performance given playing time in the majors in their accustomed role. As with all projections, specific knowledge of non-statistical attributes of the player should temper what the computer says.
Brock Hanke Posted: March 21, 2004 at 12:00 AM | 11 comment(s)
  Related News: General

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Transmission Posted: March 20, 2004 at 11:17 PM (#615193)
Things I would have appreciated seeing:

1. Some sort of segregation between the second base and the left field candidates. Currently, it looks like Ray Lankford is the second most likely candidate to play second base, behind Bo Hard

2. Some sort of comparative study when discussing LaRussa's need for three good pitchers in order to win - isn't that sort of universally true of all managers? I don't see that as being anything unique or peculiar to the man.

3. Some sort of explanation and analysis to lines like "Wood actually wasn't all that good", "The Cubs' staff is not deep" and "Their offense won't save them; it's no better than last year's". One is just wrong, the second is true only if one assumes that three injuries are likely, in which case it is true of every other team in baseball, and three is, at the least, very debatable.

4. Some analysis of the Cardinal team beyond the left field and second base contests. Not a word about Pujols or Edmonds or Morris or the effects of replacing Drew with Sanders? Any one of these deserves more than a gloss.

5. Ok, so you decide to focus on the two positional challenges. Given that, I'd like more depth on these characters. Half of them are given superficial, one-line throw-away answers.
   2. Robert S. Posted: March 20, 2004 at 11:17 PM (#615195)
The Cardinals just added Tony Womack.

That isn't good.
   3. cardsfanboy Posted: March 21, 2004 at 11:17 PM (#615197)
   4. cardsfanboy Posted: March 21, 2004 at 11:17 PM (#615198)
Have to agree, the throwaway comments about the Cubs were pretty inaccurate, saying Wood wasn't really that good is just inaccurate. 3.20 era last season, and unlike Prior and Zambrano he didn't have half a dozen unearned runs. and to say that the Cubs offense is no better is just a debate waiting to explode, even with assuming more than likely declines from alou, patterson/cf, and second base, a full season out of aramis, and derrek lee should more than compensate.

Still some good analysis, (don't think Greg Vaughn has any chance of making the team though) Pitching comments and Walts strategy seem to be dead on.
   5. Robert S. Posted: March 21, 2004 at 11:17 PM (#615200)
That Pujols projection is INCREDIBLE.

Seriously.

PECOTA's unadjusted = .324/.413/.591 with 36 HRs.

   6. John Posted: March 21, 2004 at 11:18 PM (#615205)
What's Crankford's ZIPS projection?
   7. Andere Richtingen Posted: March 21, 2004 at 11:18 PM (#615206)
Nice analysis, Brock. Very insightful description of how the Cardinals organization works.

I completely agree that it would be foolish to discount the Cardinals in the division race, and think they are fairly close to the Astros and Cubs. But I disagree with some of your statements about the Cubs:

Kerry Wood has been seriously hurt,

Kerry Wood had Tommy John surgery five years ago. He has had a few issues here and there since, but he's thrown over 200 IP the last couple of years. Pitchers are generally a fragile commodity, but there is little beyond that truism on which to discount Wood.

and Mark Prior went on the DL for a while last year. Sure,

Prior was hurt in a collision on the basepaths. It was not the sort of injury that should affect this year's projections.

Prior recovered, but he also pitched a lot and he's already in trouble now in the preseason. Wood actually wasn't all that good, and he worked hard, too.

If ~16th best starter in the majors doesn't qualify as "not all that good", I agree.

Overwork is indeed an issue.

The Cubs' staff is not deep;

How can you possibly say that? If the Cubs aren't deep, then who is? The Cubs have five starters, all of who put up at least a 100 OPS+ and threw 200 IP last season.

if a couple of the kids get hurt, the team could have real problems. Their offense won't save them;

Here I completely agree.

it's no better than last year's. It's added Derrek Lee, but subtracted Kenny Lofton. Frankly, they needed the leadoff man and center fielder more.

Most projections of the Cubs offense show improvement. Not enough to make it a really good offense, but improvement. Lofton is gone and he was useful, but his .295 with the Cubs last year compares well with Patterson's .285. I find Patterson difficult to project, but I don't see CF as a particular problem.
   8. Hendry's Wad of Cash (UCCF) Posted: March 21, 2004 at 11:18 PM (#615209)
Not to pile on, but the Cubs comments were pretty ill-informed. Yes Prior was hurt last year, but the implication in the article was that the injury was arm-related and that Prior could blow at any moment. He has had an Achilles injury this spring, but no one seems to think it's all that serious.

The statements about Wood have been refuted enought that I'll pass. Suffice it to say that Wood was not very good last year only in comparison to Prior. Almost any other staff, he would have been the number one starter.

As for pitching depth, given that the Cubs go 5 deep with the best rotation in the majors, Cruz backing that up (not that Dusty will ever give him the chance), and about a dozen stud pitchers coming up through the system, I'd say that Cubs have more pitching depth than just about anyone. TINSTAAPP, of course.

The offense is spotty, but I don't think you realize how truly awful it was for parts of last year. After Dusty lost faith in Bellhorn at third, the Cubs ended up giving the bulk of the playing time to Lenny Harris, who hit about .150/.180/.220 (I'm exaggerating, but not by much) during the couple of months where he got the lion's share of 3B ABs. Ramirez will make a huge difference over that. And I agree that, if Patterson plays anywhere near what he was able to show last year, then the Lofton loss will be at worst a wash. Sosa should hit better or at least not miss so much time with the injury/suspension. Alou and Gruz will regress, Barrett won't do much (but then Miller didn't do much). All in all, the Cubs should have a better offense than last year -- not a great offense (or likely even a good one), but given the pitching it should be more than enough to keep them in contention.

Sorry -- I piled on. It's the lawyer in me.
   9. philistine Posted: March 21, 2004 at 11:18 PM (#615210)
Enjoyed the insights into the Cards decision-making and thought processes of La Russa, and I appreciate all the hard work that’s gone into it, but I feel there are things that have been overlooked here. The first lot of reviews all followed the same structure more or less while the last couple haven’t made things any easier for themselves by abandoning the established format. Maybe I’m just old-fashioned...

A lot of focus on 2b and LF — as well as those Cubbies — while the 4th and 5th starters get no more than a name check, despite Brock’s claim that La Russa needs three good starters for him to have a successful year. How good/bad are they? Does either have a chance of becoming one of the three “top” starters if one of them breaks down? Will those top three be good enough if they play as expected?

There’s no mention either of the batting of Rolen, Matheny, Edmonds, Pujols or Rentería, only Albert’s fielding position and Edgar’s place in the batting order. I’m don’t mean to be critical, but I feel it’s a problem caused by not following the usual format, as I’m sure Brock has the answers to all my questions.
   10. Scott Posted: March 22, 2004 at 11:18 PM (#615226)
Thanks for the read. Pretty insightful read for a fan of another nl central team (astros). I find it amusing that so many people (probably cubs fans) object to the cubs being glossed over, while I have only seen one comment about the astros rebuttal.

I too think the division should be close. The cards are definitely a factor. But the cubs offense is improved, and their pen is much stronger. Lee upgrades 1b (though Karros had a good year), and a healthy Patterson will make people forget that Lofton played that half season in chicago. Lofton's obp was .350 last season, borderline for a lead-off hitter. He isn't the player this author made him out to be.

Similarly with the astros. The astros replaced ~60 starts from Jeriome Robertson and Kirk Saarloos/Ron Villone with Pettitte and Clemens. Biggio has been on the decline for a few years now; that fact hasn't escaped the astros. And MMP doesn't really "hide" decline as much as the author states, over the last three years, the astros' park has been about only 6% in favor of hitters. Chicago, for reference, has favored pitchers by about 12%. Which of those parks skews the numbers the most? The problem is that there isn't a better lead-off option available. Biggio last season also produced a .350 obp. If he slips, Lane will at least equal Biggio's production, if not surpass it. As a previous poster noted, based on runs scored and runs allowed (not actual record) the astros were clearly the best team in the nl central last year by about 5 games. That might not mean a whole lot for 2003, but it does set a parameter for 2004. The 'stros and cubs have also added the most impact talent, and depth, this off-season. The cards have added a ton of questionable players, but none that truly answer a need definitively, or at least at this point in time.

I think dismissing any of the three teams at this point in time is silly, but ON PAPER at least, the nl central is pretty easy to predict:

Astros
Cubs close 2nd
Cards close 3rd
then the others.
   11. Andere Richtingen Posted: March 22, 2004 at 11:18 PM (#615249)
I find it amusing that so many people (probably cubs fans) object to the cubs being glossed over, while I have only seen one comment about the astros rebuttal.

Well, that's easy to explain. Cubs fans probably outnumber Astros fans around 10:1 around here.

Patterson will make people forget that Lofton played that half season in chicago. Lofton's obp was .350 last season, borderline for a lead-off hitter.

The Cubs lineup is hardly stable, but right now Patterson is not slated to leadoff. He will likely hit somewhere in the middle of the order, anywhere between 3rd and 7th. He's important because he's the only lefty-hitting starter. That said, I would not be surprised to see him end up in the leadoff spot for a significant amount of time at some point.

Astros Cubs close 2nd Cards close 3rd then the others.

That's my impression as well, although I think the Astros and Cubs are closer than the Cardinals. Good arguments have been put forward to call it Cubs/Astros/Cardinals. Still, I think this division is too close to call, and all three teams have a significant chance of winning the division. I also think the improvements among the top teams in the Central along with the bad teams in the division means that there is a good chance that the WC will come from the Central.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

Ticket Nest sells Braves, Cubs, Padres, Indians, Marlins, Nuts, Pirates, Rangers, Patriots, Royals, Stars, Tides, Tigers, Twins, Phillies, Wings, Mets, Yankees, Angels, Dodgers tickets, and Dragons tickets.

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.4474 seconds
61 querie(s) executed