|
| |||
|
You are here > Home > Looking Forward to ... > Discussion
| |||
Looking Forward to ... — BTF's Preseason Previews Monday, April 04, 2005St. Louis Cardinals PreviewIn order to make hash out of the Cardinals 2005 prospects, or their 2004 season, or their offseason moves, or pretty much anything about the Cards during the Tony La Russa era, you need to know two things. First, you need to know how manager La Russa organizes a baseball team, and what the characteristics are of the teams he wins with. Then you need to know how GM Walt Jocketty goes about adapting to Tony's needs and the team's budget constraints. Only then can you figure out how well the 2005 edition conforms to Tony's personal model and how likely it is that Jocketty will be able to provide help if needed. Tony La Russa, like most good veteran managers, has a team profile that he prefers. If his team fits the profile - and has enough talent to contend - Tony will likely win his division. If not, then usually not. Tony's favored profile, to the surprise of many who have seen his offenses, is almost entirely pitcher-driven. When Tony has three good veteran starters who give him good years, he wins, without exception in his history. When two veteran pitchers turn in good years, he's on the bubble. When only one is hot, he doesn't win. Offense is all but irrelevant, which is very odd, but also very true. The last two years could not be a better pair of examples of this. In 2003, Tony's closer, Jason Isringhausen, had arm problems early. This forced Tony to badly overwork his two functioning ace pitchers - Matt Morris and Woody Williams - just to stay in the pennant race early in the year. Eventually, Izzy came back, but by then, Matt Morris was headed for the Disabled List and Woody Williams was getting hammered. The end result was that Tony got approximately one good season between the two pitchers, and didn't win a thing, in spite of all the offense that team possessed. They collapsed late, just when the starting pitching failed. In 2004, everything went right. Tony opened with four functioning veteran pitchers, plus Jason Marquis, who isn't exactly a veteran. Izringhausen was healthy, so Tony didn't have to overwork any of those starters. All five starters came through except for minor injury problems. Tony got approximately four good whole seasons out of them, and won 105 games. The offense was certainly all there, and Tony would not have won THAT many games without it, but he would have won. The arms for Tony's staffs, not to mention the bats for his lineups, come from GM Walt Jocketty's idiosyncratic approach to acquiring playing talent. Basically, Walt looks over his team in the offseason and identifies his solid starters and his question marks. Then he floods spring training with low-cost gambles at the questionable spots, waiting to see who has one last good season left in them. For example, in 2004, Walt/Tony had a solid starter at every position except second base and left field. Many teams would have looked at all the other starting talent and just accepted that two lineup spots were going to be undermanned. Walt, however, took a different course. He invited every free second baseman and left fielder he could find to spring training. He'd gotten a respectable half season out of Bo Hart at second in 2003, but Hart isn't a serious talent, so in came Tony Womack and Marlon Anderson, who had the extra feature of being able to play left. Walt also brought in every available left fielder, from Ray Lankford to Brian Hunter. As luck would have it, Womack and Lankford had something left, so they got the starting jobs, with Anderson kept around as an overall backup. If you think about it, this is a good plan. Walt isn't looking for people who are going to be solid starters for a decade - he's already got all of those his budget can afford. He's just looking for a player who can put up one last decent season at an open spot. He takes enough such gambles that, although the odds of any one of them working out might be small, the odds of just getting one winner out of the pack are good. Walt is also willing to be patient, a quality that also played into the success of 2004. In 2003, one of the pitchers he brought in to compete for rotation spots was a very injured Chris Carpenter. Carpenter produced nothing in 2003, but he was arguably the Cardinals' best starter in 2004, and Walt waited for that. Tony Womack is a similar case, taken one year later, except that he recovered from his injury much faster than Carpenter and was ready to help by opening day. And you know, when the Yankees decided to gamble that Tony Womack had found some miracle formula and completely revitalized his career, Walt was willing to let him go and bring in a new crew of second basemen. The last piece of Walt's plan involves trade-deadline moves. As most fans know, Walt is notorious for bringing in people like Will Clark, Chuck Finley, and, of course, Larry Walker late in the season to fill holes. This plan has two facets. First, you can often get good players cheap if you wait until the deadline, especially if you're willing to gamble on injuries and age. You can gamble on injuries and age if all you're really looking for is a couple of months' help in a pennant race. And second, you often have a much better idea of what your needs are by then. Again, in 2004, Ray Lankford, although a huge help in the first half, got hurt late, leaving left field in bad shape. Larry Walker was the solution to that. Had Lankford stayed healthy and, say, Womack been hurt, Walt would have known to go looking for a second baseman, not an outfielder. The effect of all this is to maximize payroll dollars. By holding out a couple of million payroll dollars until the trade deadline (no one in St. Louis believes Walt's spring claims as to how much money he has available any more), Walt is able to put the money where the team's needs are, rather than wasting it on expensive redundant players. This is important to the Cardinals because their payroll makes them what basketball calls a "bubble" team - their payroll is usually about 8th in baseball, and there are 8 spots in the playoffs. Walt's approach has gotten the Cards into the playoffs far more often than that would predict - more often than 50 percent. The entire plan appears in the current 2005 Cardinals. They traded, in effect, starting shortstop Edgar Renteria for Mark Mulder, David Eckstein, and Mark Grudzielanek. That is, the money they would have had to pay to keep Edgar is what paid for the other three. Mulder is yet another veteran starter who might give Tony a good year (replacing the used-up Woody Williams). Tony needs that more than his monster lineup needs Renteria. Eckstein and Grudzielanek are currently the starters, but both are vulnerable, and if either disappoint, Walt still has money available for the trade deadline, just in case. So, are the 2005 Cardinals guaranteed to win? Well, I wouldn't bet against them. There is a lot of talent on the roster, hardly a surprise coming off 105 wins. In particular, the starting rotation is loaded with five good arms, and Tony only needs three. However, the Cardinals do have the most injury-prone roster among the competition. Virtually all the starters, both in the lineup and the pitching staff, have injury histories. They could get unlucky and have half the team on the DL by July. But that's not likely. And even if they do have injuries, and even if their stars don't all duplicate their 2004 seasons, and even if David Eckstein proves beyond all doubt that he absolutely, positively cannot play shortstop on defense, they should have enough depth to slide on by the Astros and Cubs and maybe the Reds. Besides, Walt still has those $2 million or so in his back pocket, waiting for the trading deadline. Two final notes. First, the injury cases, at least in the lineup, are a deliberate part of Walt's plan. Walt is always on the lookout for players like Jim Edmonds and Scott Rolen, who have been hurt and who are in trouble in their current clubhouses. He trades for them relatively cheap, and relies on Tony to handle their personalities, and on the sheer number of them to overcome the injury risk. That is, the Cardinals can afford to lose, say, Jim Edmonds for a couple of months as long as Rolen and Larry Walker stay healthy, and vice versa. And last, if Mark Grudzielanek falters at second base, starting looking for mentions of the retired Roberto Alomar in the papers. Tony La Russa spent most of February chasing Alomar around, trying to sign him to compete for the second base job. Robbie went instead to Tampa Bay, where he thought he would get a sure starting spot. Well, Alomar ended up retiring a few weeks ago, but who's to say that will stick if a contending team comes calling rather than the Devil Rays? 2005 ZiPS Projections Name ERA W L G GS INN H ER BB K HR Isringhaus 3.00 4 1 63 0 63.0 52 21 21 62 3 Tavarez 3.25 6 3 71 0 72.0 67 26 24 43 1 Mulder* 3.63 16 9 30 30 206.0 195 83 63 149 15 King* 3.66 4 3 81 0 59.0 54 24 25 42 2 Carpenter 3.81 11 7 25 25 156.0 152 66 36 128 20 File 3.95 2 2 43 0 66.0 72 29 17 23 4 Borland 4.00 4 4 56 0 63.0 56 28 29 62 6 Lincoln 4.08 5 3 50 0 64.0 62 29 24 48 6 Reyes 4.09 4 3 59 1 66.0 58 30 27 73 9 Reyes 4.11 6 5 19 19 105.0 98 48 31 104 16 Morris 4.13 13 11 31 31 192.0 192 88 54 138 24 Journell 4.20 5 5 32 12 90.0 83 42 43 77 8 Marquis 4.28 9 9 31 26 166.0 163 79 62 118 18 Thompson 4.44 6 5 22 11 77.0 79 38 25 49 10 Suppan 4.52 13 12 32 32 195.0 206 98 62 111 24 Eldred 4.57 4 4 56 0 67.0 66 34 25 55 10 Rust 4.64 4 4 53 2 66.0 63 34 37 52 6 Wainwright 4.70 5 6 22 22 113.0 111 59 47 93 16 Pearce 4.72 4 4 21 9 61.0 65 32 19 42 10 Flores* 4.75 6 6 40 18 127.0 127 67 59 91 15 Cali* 4.89 2 3 61 0 70.0 66 38 41 56 7 Parrott 5.03 7 8 25 25 145.0 150 81 69 95 19 Gissell 5.24 7 9 31 16 122.0 135 71 44 92 21 Pulsipher* 5.36 2 4 39 0 42.0 42 25 29 28 4 Bauer 5.54 3 5 43 3 78.0 80 48 56 44 6 Ankiel* 6.59 1 3 15 7 41.0 36 30 43 41 5 Name P AVG OBP SLG G AB H 2B 3B HR R RBI BB K SB CS Pujols lf .347 .435 .659 160 622 216 46 2 48 141 144 91 63 4 4 Rolen 3b .295 .393 .538 150 546 161 37 3 30 98 107 80 94 7 4 Edmonds* cf .287 .402 .588 145 471 135 33 2 35 88 100 89 134 4 4 Gall 1b .280 .337 .444 136 511 143 31 1 17 68 73 41 66 2 2 Gonzalez lf .275 .325 .407 147 528 145 29 1 13 70 66 37 57 11 8 Seabol 3b .271 .321 .445 126 458 124 24 1 18 64 66 31 90 4 3 Eckstein ss .265 .333 .328 139 551 146 22 2 3 76 47 43 45 15 7 Sanders rf .245 .310 .447 132 445 109 24 3 20 60 70 38 105 15 6 Walker* rf .254 .361 .432 116 366 93 21 4 12 52 52 55 74 5 3 Hart 2b .271 .315 .382 131 490 133 23 5 7 69 47 27 90 9 5 Berger rf .243 .315 .435 111 395 96 23 1 17 58 62 39 71 5 3 Schumaker* cf .267 .330 .333 131 483 129 20 3 2 61 36 42 66 16 13 Grudzielanek 2b .284 .326 .391 114 412 117 24 1 6 52 48 22 57 3 2 Cedeno# rf .265 .322 .363 134 419 111 19 2 6 52 39 36 72 13 6 Harris# 2b .266 .341 .350 110 383 102 17 3 3 55 34 41 65 3 4 Luna ss .281 .342 .357 118 370 104 12 2 4 60 33 32 61 11 7 Bell 3b .221 .267 .398 115 412 91 20 1 17 49 57 23 93 7 6 Guerrero# 2b .281 .314 .343 111 367 103 16 2 1 46 30 15 48 15 8 Nelson ss .225 .289 .318 117 418 94 19 1 6 52 36 35 105 7 4 Gorecki cf .219 .271 .302 130 453 99 16 2 6 60 36 30 69 14 10 Molina c .273 .332 .341 97 311 85 10 1 3 32 33 27 37 0 1 Mabry* 1b .278 .343 .469 87 209 58 10 0 10 26 35 21 49 0 1 Cresse c .231 .280 .361 75 299 69 18 0 7 35 33 18 88 0 0 McKay* c .239 .285 .332 91 310 74 12 1 5 29 33 18 47 1 2 Taguchi cf .248 .289 .346 125 298 74 15 1 4 36 32 15 47 6 6 Nunez# 2b .245 .311 .344 116 253 62 10 3 3 30 25 22 43 4 4 Mahoney c .255 .305 .356 74 239 61 13 1 3 24 23 15 40 2 1 Diaz c .224 .273 .298 88 272 61 12 1 2 22 21 12 24 2 1 Lemanczyk cf .203 .249 .232 109 375 76 6 1 1 66 20 20 70 27 13ZiPS Projections are not playing time predictors; they project a player's performance given playing time in the majors in their accustomed role. As with all projections, specific knowledge of non-statistical attributes of the player and role should temper what the computer says. | |||