Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Notes in a Minor Key > Discussion
Notes in a Minor Key
— 

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Draft News and Notes

Baseball America reports that Luke Hochevar, Pedro Beato, and Bryan Morris will be re-entering the draft. Hochevar is not a surprise, but Beato was expected to sign with the Mets and Morris with the Devil Rays.

Hochevar has made three starts for Fort Worth (Amer Assoc, Ind) with generally solid results. He went five innings in his first start against Shreveport, fanning nine and walking three while allowing four hits. In his second effort, against Lincoln, he fanned 10 and walked 4 in six innings, allowing four hits and two runs. In his most recent outing, he lasted 5 2/3 innings, giving up seven hits, fanning 9 and walking three in a 8-3 win over St. Joseph’s. (Oddly enough, Matt Harrington is playing on the same team.) His next start, I believe, is tomorrow against Pensacola in an afternoon affair. Hochevar has been consistently in the low 90s, and has hit as high as 97, according to reports.

BA also notes that Scott Boras is “advising” eight players in this year’s draft, in addition to Hochevar:

In order of how they ranked on our initial College Top 100 Prospects list, they are: Missouri righthander Max Scherzer (No. 3), Southern California righty Ian Kennedy (No. 5), Florida first baseman Matt LaPorta (No. 7), Arizona shortstop Jason Donald (No. 17), Arizona State outfielder Colin Curtis (No. 19), Cal Poly righty Gary Daley (No. 24), Tulane first baseman Mark Hamilton (No. 33) and Mississippi third baseman Chris Coghlan (No. 38).

Right now, I don’t see any of these guys as top-10 material. Scherzer’s been hurt and his secondary pitches have been questionable. LaPorta’s regressed this year, still hitting home runs but flashing very little pop otherwise. Kennedy’s also regressed, with his K rate declining and his ERA and his allowed jumping up. Scherzer will probably still go in the first round (the Orioles were reportedly interested at #9, but my guess is somewhere in the second half of the round), but the others are question marks.

MLB.com’s Jonathan Mayo has a full cut at the top 30 on-line.

Probably the biggest question is where Washington’s Tim Lincecum will wind up. He’s been under consideration for #1 overall, and I’ve seen at one projection that has him sliding out of the top 10. There isn’t much question that he’s got quality stuff; the questions about him revolve around his small stature, his unusual delivery, and lack of a third pitch. Some think he’ll end up as a closer.

Mike Emeigh Posted: May 30, 2006 at 01:44 PM | 106 comment(s)
  Related News: Minor Leagues

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >
   1. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: May 30, 2006 at 03:03 PM (#2044062)
Any update on which DFEs signed? O'Sullivan did, Beato and Morris didn't...
   2. Harold Reynolds: An Erotic Life (AG#1F) Posted: May 30, 2006 at 03:28 PM (#2044087)
An article in the KC Star says the Royals are considering taking Hochevar, but only in a pre-draft deal.
   3. Mike Emeigh Posted: May 30, 2006 at 03:34 PM (#2044094)
Any update on which DFEs signed?


Haven't heard.

This article lists some of the more prominent DFEs.

-- MWE
   4. Mike Emeigh Posted: May 30, 2006 at 03:48 PM (#2044111)
Pittsburgh signed Justin Byler, a 36th round DFE from a year ago. Byler was drafted as a C but has played OF and 3B as a juco.

-- MWE
   5. Sam M. Posted: May 30, 2006 at 03:54 PM (#2044120)
It's kind of shocking, in a way, that the Mets didn't get Beato signed. A New York kid. They had no # 1 pick, so the budget would seem to have been there to allocate to him. The only thing that makes sense is that they disagreed on where he should be slotted; either that, or his agent just didn't think the Mets should be talking slot money at all. Pity. I assume now the Mets will take that cash and spend it in the international market, or on a # 1 quality player who slips to the second round for signability reasons.
   6. battlekow Posted: May 30, 2006 at 04:04 PM (#2044131)
13. Pedro Beato, rhp, St. Petersburg (Fla.) JC
The Mets don't have a first-round pick, but they have a first-round talent under their control. Everyone expects them to sign the 17th-round 2005 draft-and-follow.


"Who is Pedro Beato and why are the Mets guaranteed to sign him?"

RHP, A Dominican kid who went to HS in NYC. The Mets spent a late pick on him last year and he went off to a Florida JuCo. He took off there and is now considered a first round talent. The Mets are "guaranteed" to sign him since they have money and no 1st round pick to spend it on...the way DFEing works they have till a week before the draft to sign him.
Theres really no point in NOT signing him, unless they feel totally differnt about him than everyone else. ANd even then they might as well sign him since hes a nice commodity and would presumably still be a good trade chip 12 months after they sign him


Wow.
   7. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: May 30, 2006 at 04:09 PM (#2044139)
I assume now the Mets will take that cash and spend it in the international market, or on a # 1 quality player who slips to the second round for signability reasons.

That'll be hard considering that in this year's draft there aren't any 1st round quality players available in the 1st round. /sarcasm...kinda
   8. Doc Scott Posted: May 30, 2006 at 04:15 PM (#2044144)
Cincinnati signed 2005 37th-rounder Jacob Long, a catcher. SS/3B Milton Loo, who is a DFE mentioned in that linked BA article above, was the real prize. He rejected two offers from the Reds, and it seems as though the deadline might have run out. He'll end up at LSU if he doesn't sign.
   9. Kyle S Posted: May 30, 2006 at 04:16 PM (#2044146)
I was just about to say what TempleU said. Bad year for the strategy that Sam mentions, but a good year to have lower first round and second round picks IMHO. Hopefully the Braves can take advantage - they have 6 selections between 24th overall and 72nd overall.
   10. Sam M. Posted: May 30, 2006 at 04:19 PM (#2044150)
That'll be hard considering that in this year's draft there aren't any 1st round quality players available in the 1st round. /sarcasm...kinda

Bad year for the strategy that Sam mentions, but a good year to have lower first round and second round picks IMHO.


Well, then, hell. Just send a check to me. I'll put it to good use.
   11. Kyle S Posted: May 30, 2006 at 04:28 PM (#2044159)
I agree also that it's a good year to go prospect-hunting in the DR and VZ, especially if the Mets have money in the budget this year that is looking for a place to get spent.
   12. Mike Emeigh Posted: May 30, 2006 at 04:53 PM (#2044187)
MLB.com's Around the Minors show is doing a mock draft (today's broadcast is archived and has picks 1-15, tomorrow they'll do the rest of the first round).

-- MWE
   13. Mike Emeigh Posted: May 30, 2006 at 05:20 PM (#2044227)
Some notes from the Around the Minors show:

Dick Kaegel (KC beat reporter) suggests that the Royals haven't yet made a decision on their #1 - they want to see both Miller and Brad Lincoln pitch this weekend in the regionals. Lincecum is no longer in their mix (workload concerns, apparently).

Although the Pirates have been rumored to be looking at Kyle Drabek, Jonathan Mayo suggests that the only HS arm they are actually looking at is Clayton Kershaw (also a Texas kid). He still expects that the Bucs will take Morrow (with Lincoln gone to Tampa at #3).

Mayo expects the Mariners to take Hochevar at #5, the Tigers to take Kershaw at #6, and LA to take Greg Reynolds (Stanford) instead of Lincecum at #7.

-- MWE
   14. Doc Scott Posted: May 30, 2006 at 05:24 PM (#2044234)
Correction and addition on my post #9:

-The deadline has not run out on Milton Loo. The Reds have until 48 hours after Loo's team finishes playing in the JC World Series.

-Cincinnati has also signed 25th-round pick Robbie Nickols, a 6'5" lefthander with low-to-mid 90s velocity.
   15. J. Cross Posted: May 30, 2006 at 05:33 PM (#2044245)
From baseball's labor agreement:

Teams not signing draft picks in the first two rounds will receive compensation picks. For a first-round pick, the compensation pick will be in the same spot as the unsigned pick;

If there is no good #2 pick for the Rockies aren't they best off just picking someone who they won't sign and then getting the #2 pick next year when a better player will be available? Sure, they have to wait a year so the value is discounted somewhat but if they can get a significant better player don't teams have some motivation NOT to sign the players they draft? Will any team employ this strategy? I wouldn't be surprised if one or two teams lowball their picks this year.
   16. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: May 30, 2006 at 05:36 PM (#2044250)
Post #13 is great news for Pirate fans. I like Kershaw a LOT, and Drabek has red flags out the wazoo.

Surprised to hear about the LA-Reynolds link, since they've got a good record under White and he looks an awful lot like a bum steer.
   17. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: May 30, 2006 at 05:38 PM (#2044251)
   18. J. Cross Posted: May 30, 2006 at 05:55 PM (#2044266)
They drafted him in the 17th round out of Brooklyn's Xavieran High in 2005, a year after he had Tommy John surgery.

Beato has made a full recovery and showed three plus pitches at times this spring at St. Petersburg (Fla.) Junior College: a low-90s sinker that touches 96 mph, a sharp mid-80s slider and a changeup. He has a classic pitcher's build at 6-foot-5 and 210 pounds and just needs to smooth out his mechanics and command.


Xaverian is in the same league a my high school and I honestly can't even imagine facing a guy with this kind of stuff. He must have seriously outclassed every pitcher who's ever pitched in this league. By contrast, here's the scouting report on someone who pitched against Xaverian High back in 1996 (I think we even won).

Less than classic pitcher's build at 5-foot-10 and 140 pounds. Wild mechanics and sporadic control on a fastball sits in the high 70's and has been clocked as high as 82 (I'm guessing -- no when even bothered to clock it). No breaking pitches to speak of.

On the other hand, I have no injury history to speak of and have logged very few innings over the last decade.
   19. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: May 30, 2006 at 06:04 PM (#2044276)
Xaverian has also produced current big leaguers Rich Aurillia and Ruddy Lugo as well as former Padre Frank Seminara.
   20. Harold Reynolds: An Erotic Life (AG#1F) Posted: May 30, 2006 at 06:06 PM (#2044279)
Teams not signing draft picks in the first two rounds will receive compensation picks. For a first-round pick, the compensation pick will be in the same spot as the unsigned pick;

If there is no good #2 pick for the Rockies aren't they best off just picking someone who they won't sign and then getting the #2 pick next year when a better player will be available?


Is that new? Because I think the O's only got a sandwich pick for not signing Wade Townsend.

If that is true, then yea, that kind of makes sense.
   21. J. Cross Posted: May 30, 2006 at 06:08 PM (#2044283)
Xaverian has also produced current big leaguers Rich Aurillia and Ruddy Lugo as well as former Padre Frank Seminara.

Wow. I don't remember them being all that good.
   22. J. Cross Posted: May 30, 2006 at 06:18 PM (#2044298)
... although it's possible that I'm confusing Xaverian with Nazareth. Both schools are in the CHSAA and my memory is a little foggy here.
   23. Mike Emeigh Posted: May 30, 2006 at 10:55 PM (#2045082)
In addition to the fifth-year seniors listed in the BA link (#17), fifth-year Florida senior P Darren O'Day signed with the Angels.

-- MWE
   24. Mike Emeigh Posted: May 31, 2006 at 09:58 AM (#2045352)
Rangers sign DFE OF Tim Rodriguez (2005 #37). They also signed P Luke Massetti out of U of Pacific, who was a fifth-year senior.

-- MWE
   25. MM1f Posted: May 31, 2006 at 12:41 PM (#2045504)
Battlekow....what did you mean by "Wow." in post 6?
   26. MM1f Posted: May 31, 2006 at 01:08 PM (#2045526)
"LaPorta’s regressed this year, still hitting home runs but flashing very little pop otherwise. "

In other words...exactly ONE double against his 14 or so HRs...which just scares the crap out of me prospect wise.

"Kennedy’s also regressed, with his K rate declining and his ERA and his [hits] allowed jumping up."

And his velo has declined, reportedly.
   27. Sam M. Posted: May 31, 2006 at 01:19 PM (#2045536)
Re. Beato (from the NY Post):

Minaya said he was never close to signing last year's 17th-round pick, Pedro Beato, who will re-enter the draft and now is a projected first-rounder. Apparently, the two sides were hundreds of thousands of dollars apart and stopped negotiating hours before their midnight deadline Monday.

"We just couldn't agree on the finances," Minaya said. "Around 6 o'clock at night, we knew we weren't going to be in the same ballpark."


It'll be very interesting to see if Beato's agent played this right. The right slot could make his choice a very good one; Beato slips a few places, and he could have one unhappy young client on his hands.
   28. Mike Emeigh Posted: May 31, 2006 at 01:22 PM (#2045539)
Beato was reportedly asking for "first-round" money, which is logical under the circumstances. My guess is that he was asking for top-10 money and the Mets were looking more at 21-30 money - which is normally a fairly substantial difference.

Everything I've seen suggests that Beato could go anywhere from 13-20.

-- MWE
   29. Randy Jones Posted: May 31, 2006 at 01:24 PM (#2045544)
If Beato is really 1st round talent and the difference was only hundreds of thousands of dollars, shouldn't the Mets have sucked it up and signed him? It's not like $500k is gonna prevent them from doing anything.
   30. Sam M. Posted: May 31, 2006 at 01:36 PM (#2045555)
If Beato is really 1st round talent and the difference was only hundreds of thousands of dollars, shouldn't the Mets have sucked it up and signed him?

Speculation: Perhaps the Mets have their eyes on someone from the D.R. or Venezuela, whom they now like better than Beato. This hypothetical someone might have created a very real ceiling in Omar's mind in how high he'd go for Beato -- in effect, giving him another option to spend that first-round money and less reason to reach higher for Beato.
   31. Mike Emeigh Posted: May 31, 2006 at 03:00 PM (#2045670)
Interesting factoid about Beato: He was born on October 27, 1986, which is a fairly significant date in Mets' history.

-- MWE
   32. You can't lose with Randy Winn, says Flynn Posted: May 31, 2006 at 06:39 PM (#2045946)
From what I've been reading, the Mets were looking for 750 K while Beato wanted 1.4 mil.
   33. CFBF Has Neither Diabetes nor Cryabetes Posted: May 31, 2006 at 06:43 PM (#2045949)
"Speculation: Perhaps the Mets have their eyes on someone from the D.R. or Venezuela, whom they now like better than Beato."

Sorry for the OT, but I just had to point out that this construction reminds me so much of the HK-47 droid in KOTOR.

OK, I'm done.
   34. ess eff Posted: May 31, 2006 at 10:48 PM (#2046796)
Cardinals signed two of their draft picks from last year, junior college RHPs Armando Carrasco and Blake King. King is Mickey Mantle's great-nephew btw, and put up some good numbers this spring at Eastern Oklahoma State College.
   35. PhillyBooster Posted: June 01, 2006 at 09:43 AM (#2047007)
For the 178th time in the last week, I've read or heard someone refer to Kyle Drabek's "character issues" or "make up problems" without specifying in any detail what those issues or problems are. This means either: (a) "I'm just repeating what I heard someone else say in this article, and I don't know what his character issues are," or (b) It is something so unspeakable that I fear a lawsuit if I mention it publicly.

So, did he kill a man in Laredo with his bare hands, just to watch him die? Coke lines off of naked hookers? Was he the real-life basis for the main character in "Fight Club"?

The repeated unspoken is just fueling my out of control speculations. Anyone know?
   36. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 01, 2006 at 11:17 AM (#2047095)
No one (and I do mean NO ONE) will confirm anything about Kyle Drabek. You're free to speculate all you want.

-- MWE
   37. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 01, 2006 at 11:19 AM (#2047097)
Marlins sign three DFE's: 1B Logan Morrison (#22), C Adam Howard (#33), and OF Josh Short (#37).

-- MWE
   38. MM1f Posted: June 01, 2006 at 12:28 PM (#2047159)
35,
The "s(teroids) word" has come up alot in conjunction with Drabek. In addition hes supposed to be an arrogant, assholish SOB..of course that can be said about alot of 18-22 year old guys, especially guys who know their whole senior year of HS is directed towards making themselves some millions.

I'd guess that those 2 things are a factor in the Drabek rumors but theres got to be more than that, im sure theres also some specific incident that was real damning.

BTW, wasn't Drabeks dad supposed to be a reall good guy?

Mike is right though, no one will say anything on or off record bout Drabek.

Kasey Kiker also has some whispers about that sort of thing but less severe.

As far as how comperale situations go, suburban Atlanta lefty Miers Quigley drunkenly kicked out the window of a cop car his senior year (pretty routine behavior for Cobb county actually) and saw his stock fall some although its hard to say how much that incident made it fall bc he also struggled w a sore arm at the end of the spring.
Quigley was once a top 10 HSer but didnt go til the 19th round bc of all that plus signablity.
Lastings Milledge we all know about.


Thats all that comes up off the top of my head and even those 2 situations aren't very comparable to Drabeks
   39. Kyle S Posted: June 01, 2006 at 12:50 PM (#2047178)
How does Drabek compare with the last few highly touted Texas HS pitching prospects (Homer Bailey, Colt Griffin, Josh Beckett, Kerry Wood, Scott Kazmir, Clint Everts, John Patterson)?
   40. Max Parkinson Posted: June 01, 2006 at 01:09 PM (#2047190)
From what I know, he would compare most to Everts. Similar build, although Everts is a little taller. Both athletic (there were considerations for Everts as a top few round SS). Best pitch for both is an excellent curveball...

He played for a while on the same travel team with Bailey (and Kenn Kasparek, who is a starter for UT), but Bailey was 2 years older. Bailey is a lot bigger, and has better pure stuff. He's significantly more polished than Griffin (but noone has ever accused , and has been a big player on big stages for years. Beckett had better stuff as well in HS, bigger frame too. Wood is no contest - he's got what, six inches on Drabek? Kazmir was similarly impressive in the PG circuit when he was a senior, but threw harder then Drabek. Both of them have (had) the best breaking ball in the draft - I remember Kazmir's slider from the Wood Bat in the fall of his senior year as completely unfair for amateur hitters.

I don't remember seeing Patterson as an amateur, but again, he's a lot bigger than Drabek.

For Mordechai:
Without going into much detail, when you say that the whispers about Kiker are less severe than Drabek - are you sure? I can't imagine what it could be that would be more severe than the rumours about Kiker.
   41. Max Parkinson Posted: June 01, 2006 at 01:09 PM (#2047191)
Sorry.

No one has ever accused Drabek of triple digits.
   42. MM1f Posted: June 01, 2006 at 01:17 PM (#2047196)
Im pretty certain he's sub-Bailey/Beckett. And wood and kazmir. Not that kind of dominant.

Colt Griffin is sort of apples n oranges with Drabek to me.

Now that you mention it he sounds pretty comparable to Everts to me. Both were 1st round SS prospects if they weren't pitchers. Neither real tall, though Evert has a couple inches on Drabek. Both had solid fastballs, good command and really good breaking balls.
   43. Max Parkinson Posted: June 01, 2006 at 01:19 PM (#2047198)
I believe that I'm owed a Coke.
   44. MM1f Posted: June 01, 2006 at 01:30 PM (#2047207)
I believe that I'm owed a Coke.

ha, yeah, sorry. i didnt see yours when i posted. i started writing something then did 5 other things then finished.

"Without going into much detail, when you say that the whispers about Kiker are less severe than Drabek - are you sure? I can't imagine what it could be that would be more severe than the rumours about Kiker."

I actaully have no damn clue what Kikers rumors are other than "off field issues and makeup issues". I just hear it about Drabek more so i assume Drabeks problems are worse. I guess that could be bc Drabeks higher profile anyway

What do you hear about Kiker?
   45. Max Parkinson Posted: June 01, 2006 at 01:45 PM (#2047217)
Kinda sensitive, but enough that more than one agent said no to representing a no-brainer first round talent. If you care to follow, check out a catcher from Grand Junction (particularly the Okie State).
   46. NJ in DC loathes his classmates and the law Posted: June 01, 2006 at 02:27 PM (#2047247)
MP, could you provide a better hint? My friends in the scouting community have repeatedly told me that Kiker's issues are enormous, worse than Drabek's, and that were he to fall to the Yankees, he should not be picked.

As far as controversy going into the draft, Tyler Clippard wasn't a big time prospect, but he got kicked off his HS team his senior year for DWI. There's also Gio Gonzalez who got kicked off his HS team because his coach wouldn't play his little brother and his mom wasn't pleased with that, IIRC.
   47. PhillyBooster Posted: June 01, 2006 at 02:38 PM (#2047254)
No one (and I do mean NO ONE) will confirm anything about Kyle Drabek. You're free to speculate all you want.


Thanks, I will.

My newest speculation involves taunting Kiker endlessly about his name, followed by pistols at dawn at 20 paces.

Always good to know that I'm not missing what "everyone knows" but no one is saying. Like when everyone started calling Francisco Cordero "Co-co", as if that's what they had been calling him for years.
   48. MM1f Posted: June 01, 2006 at 02:51 PM (#2047266)
If its criminal (like Clippard, Quigley or David Duncan) im sure word would have gotten out by now.

Now i mean it could be criminal activities but i mean if the cops have gotten invovled no charges or arrests have been made involving him cos that word would have spread.

I know most at his HS are rooting to see their kid make it big but HS being HS youd figure someone would havea grudge and would spread the HS rumors (that im sure exist) to the media with more specific detail and accusations

I do feel a little dirty vicariously wondering about the private life of a HS senior but its how it goes.
Plus im not that far removed from HS so its not like a long lost experience here.

Im actually really surprised that NO ONE knew about Jeff Allisons drug problems either cos you KNOW that a good portion of his HS did
   49. PhillyBooster Posted: June 01, 2006 at 03:01 PM (#2047277)
I do feel a little dirty vicariously wondering about the private life of a HS senior but its how it goes.<strike></strike>


See, I wouldn't care either if it didn't affect his draft position, but I keep hearing that Drabek is the most talented pitcher, but that he won't be picked first due to "character issues."

If he's still available when my team is picking, and they don't pick him and defend it because of "character issues", I think we fans have a right to know what those issues are. Character issues are just as likely to mean "lazy" as "the girl elected not to press charges." If it's leading to possible on-field changes, I think there's more of a right to inquire beyond morbid curiousity.
   50. MM1f Posted: June 01, 2006 at 03:03 PM (#2047281)
We certainly dont have a "right" to know at all. It does justify our interest somewhat though
   51. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 01, 2006 at 03:32 PM (#2047305)
We certainly dont have a "right" to know at all.


I agree with this. If Drabek is not having the sort of trouble that is likely to become a matter of public record, it would be unfair to him to make it public.

The only thing that I know for sure is that Drabek comes with a "potentially explosive, handle with care" label. Kiker, too.

-- MWE
   52. PhillyBooster Posted: June 01, 2006 at 03:51 PM (#2047328)
Okay. Maybe not a "right to know", but certainly a "right to ask."
   53. Kyle S Posted: June 01, 2006 at 04:05 PM (#2047347)
The most I could dig up on Kiker was a rumored fight with a teammate. That seems a little tame from what has been insinuated here. Anyone make any headway with the Okie State catcher?
   54. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 01, 2006 at 04:14 PM (#2047360)
Hochevar started Tuesday's game against Pensacola for Fort Worth, and had his best outing to date, pitching six shutout innings of five-hit ball, fanning six and walking one. He left leading 1-0, but received a no-decision as the Cats lost 2-1.

Hochevar's next start - his last one before the draft - will be on Saturday against Shreveport. It will be the second time that he's faced the Sports, so we'll see how well they handle him.

-- MWE
   55. Brandon in MO (for America!) Posted: June 01, 2006 at 04:23 PM (#2047377)
I don't get why the Royals are looking at Hochevar. He already has a history of holding out and his agent is Satan Boras.

It doesn't seem like Hochevar is that close to the majors, at least compared to maybe Lincecum.
   56. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 01, 2006 at 04:27 PM (#2047384)
I don't get why the Royals are looking at Hochevar.


I don't think they are, to be honest - I think that's a Boras-started rumor designed to drum up the market for/interest in Hochevar (and it wouldn't be the first time Boras had done something like that). Dick Kaegel, the Royals' beat writer for MLB.com, had heard nothing of the sort when Jonathan Mayo asked him about it.

-- MWE
   57. Harold Reynolds: An Erotic Life (AG#1F) Posted: June 01, 2006 at 04:30 PM (#2047390)
I don't get why the Royals are looking at Hochevar. He already has a history of holding out and his agent is Satan Boras.

The rumor is that they will only draft him if they have a pre-draft deal with him. So holding out won't be an issue.
   58. WTM Posted: June 01, 2006 at 05:00 PM (#2047416)
No one (and I do mean NO ONE) will confirm anything about Kyle Drabek. You're free to speculate all you want.

Jim Callis said in a chat yesterday that "we should have a story up at baseballamerica.com in the next couple of days that will shed light on" the Drabek issues.

Seems to me that it's better not to bring it up until you can print real information. That sort of thing often causes issues to seem much more serious than they really are.
   59. Bicycle RepairMan Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:01 PM (#2047490)
Braves invited Kiker for a workout.

Is he going to be available at #24 realistically?
   60. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:04 PM (#2047492)
Is he going to be available at #24 realistically?


There's a good chance.

-- MWE
   61. Kyle S Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:15 PM (#2047516)
On the one hand, he's a high school pitcher from Alabama with the kind of raw talent that isn't usually available that low in the draft, so you can see why the Braves would drool over him. On the other hand, given their stated (and demonstrated - see their treatment of Chuck James and Matt Esquivel after the Sally league ASG) proclivity of highly valuing makeup, I don't see them picking a kid they thought was a crummy human being.

Then again, Chuck James is on the 40 man roster now. So what do i know.
   62. Max Parkinson Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:16 PM (#2047517)
Kyle,

Even better, he's from Georgia! Just moved across the river to Phenix City to join the best HS team around.
   63. Kyle S Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:28 PM (#2047528)
Ahh, I didn't know that. Cool.
   64. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:46 PM (#2047542)
I wish amateur football and basketball players were afforded this type of respect to their private lives. What a coincedence they aren't. #### Drabek, he gets no sympathy from me. The writing is all over the wall. The people at BA are practically jumping over one another to imply it in every chat and writeup. I don't know if he did or didn't do steroids. But I do know that that the concerns about his makeup are directly related to whether he did or didn't do steroids.

Kikier wears eyeblack when he pitches. I don't need to know much more than that.

Always good to know that I'm not missing what "everyone knows" but no one is saying. Like when everyone started calling Francisco Cordero "Co-co", as if that's what they had been calling him for years.

I'm glad this is out in the open, because it has been bothering me for several months.
   65. Kyle S Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:55 PM (#2047551)
I just read in a newspaper article that Kiker is 5'9". Is this true? I'm not trying to sell jeans here, but the list of good pitchers that short is prety slim. He is listed at 5'11" by AFLAC's website, so is he really "5'11" like Kazmir is really "6 feet"?
   66. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:56 PM (#2047552)
Yea, 5'9" seems to be his "true" height. At least from what I've heard.
   67. Kyle S Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:56 PM (#2047553)
btw does the cordero thing mean he's a cokehead? i certainly never heard that before.
   68. Max Parkinson Posted: June 01, 2006 at 06:57 PM (#2047554)
You have to be pretty short as a pitcher not to be listed at 6 feet (like Kazmir). Anyone who you can say is 6' and not bust out laughing is normally bumped up.
   69. Bicycle RepairMan Posted: June 01, 2006 at 07:02 PM (#2047562)
But he is a high school kid. He can still grow some.
Maybe the AFLAC is the projected height :-)
   70. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: June 01, 2006 at 07:21 PM (#2047584)
35 height, projected to a 50?
   71. Kyle S Posted: June 01, 2006 at 07:27 PM (#2047591)
for fun, here is a table of pitchers listed at under 6 feet in the lahman database who have been born since 1950 and have at least 100 career decisions.

if someone knows how to format this properly (since the pre tag no longer works) let me know.
<font face="courier">Last First Birth ht Th Dec Wins WPct ERA
Martinez Pedr 1971 71 R 281 197 0.701 2.72
Valenzue Fern 1960 71 L 326 173 0.531 3.54
Guidry Ron 1950 71 L 261 170 0.651 3.29
Colon Bart 1973 71 R 221 139 0.629 3.94
Hampton Mike 1972 70 L 239 138 0.577 3.97
Boddicke Mike 1957 71 R 250 134 0.536 3.80
Gordon Tom 1967 69 R 242 127 0.525 3.93
Honeycut Rick 1954 71 L 252 109 0.433 3.72
Higuera Tedd 1958 70 L 158 94 0.595 3.61
Guzman Juan 1966 71 R 170 91 0.535 4.08
Franco John 1960 70 L 177 90 0.508 2.89
Underwoo Tom 1953 71 L 173 86 0.497 3.89
Lidle Cory 1972 71 R 132 70 0.530 4.52
Cormier Rhea 1967 70 L 130 69 0.531 4.08
McClure Bob 1952 71 L 125 68 0.544 3.81
Shirley Bob 1954 71 L 161 67 0.416 3.82
Berengue Juan 1954 71 R 129 67 0.519 3.90
Bankhead Scot 1963 70 R 105 57 0.543 4.18</pre></font>
   72. Kyle S Posted: June 01, 2006 at 07:29 PM (#2047593)
oh wow, looks like pre is working again. very nice!

yeah, the only 5'9" guy on that list is tom gordon. not too many lefties either.
   73. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 01, 2006 at 08:52 PM (#2047694)
When you mix in Kiker's stature with the fact that he is already pitching at max effort, I am lead to think that if he makes the show, it will be as a reliever.
   74. NJ in DC loathes his classmates and the law Posted: June 01, 2006 at 10:57 PM (#2047908)
Always good to know that I'm not missing what "everyone knows" but no one is saying. Like when everyone started calling Francisco Cordero "Co-co", as if that's what they had been calling him for years.

Can someone please explain this?
   75. NJ in DC loathes his classmates and the law Posted: June 01, 2006 at 10:59 PM (#2047913)

Kikier wears eyeblack


Hmmm...this plus use of the term "catcher" is making me think something about his sexuality is the problem for baseball teams.
   76. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 01, 2006 at 11:02 PM (#2047918)
Dick Kaegel, the Royals' beat writer for MLB.com, had heard nothing of the sort when Jonathan Mayo asked him about it.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but it didn't sound as if Kaegel had ever even heard of Hochevar. If true (and presumably it's not), that's slightly amazing.
   77. MM1f Posted: June 01, 2006 at 11:06 PM (#2047925)
"If true (and presumably it's not), that's slightly amazing."

Not when you consider it was an mlb.com "writer"

and im only somewhat kidding
   78. Bicycle RepairMan Posted: June 01, 2006 at 11:13 PM (#2047937)
When you mix in Kiker's stature with the fact that he is already pitching at max effort, I am lead to think that if he makes the show, it will be as a reliever.

this makes no sense to me actually. And the Coco thing was kinda new to me too. Think it is from FrancisCO COrdero
   79. The Artist Posted: June 02, 2006 at 01:01 AM (#2048080)


"Speculation: Perhaps the Mets have their eyes on someone from the D.R. or Venezuela, whom they now like better than Beato."

Sorry for the OT, but I just had to point out that this construction reminds me so much of the HK-47 droid in KOTOR.



Psst - I thought the same thing. ;)
   80. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 02, 2006 at 12:01 PM (#2048309)
"If true (and presumably it's not), that's slightly amazing."

Not when you consider it was an mlb.com "writer"


Well, the MLB.com writers are tuned in to their team's thinking. If the Royals were seriously considering Hochevar as an option, I'm sure that Kaegel would have heard something to that effect, and said so; he didn't know Lincecum's name, but he did know that Lincecum was no longer on the radar.

-- MWE
   81. Tony H. Posted: June 02, 2006 at 12:59 PM (#2048360)
I'm getting ready to head over and watch Brad Lincoln pitch against Wichita State. Is there anyone else in that regional (Houston, Wich. St., TCU) worth watching? I'm familiar with the Oklahoma players.
   82. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 02, 2006 at 01:04 PM (#2048365)
Two LHP's.

Kris Johnson from WSU and Brad Furnish from TCU.

I don't know if they're pitching, but if they are check them out.

They could be nice mid-round picks.
   83. MM1f Posted: June 02, 2006 at 01:06 PM (#2048367)
Brad Furnish at TCU is a power lefty who transferred from Nebraska. In the top 10 or 20 nationally in k/9
Chad Huffman is a good hitter for TCU.

At WSU Damon Sublett is a power hitting 2b (.394, .500, .642) and dominant closer (no ERs, 4 hits, 23 Ks in 12+ innings) but hes hurt somehow and i dont know what he'll be doing
   84. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 02, 2006 at 01:10 PM (#2048372)
Also Chad Huffman for TCU. This man has less red flags than a Canadian embassy.
   85. Tony H. Posted: June 02, 2006 at 01:24 PM (#2048387)
All right, thanks guys.
   86. PhillyBooster Posted: June 02, 2006 at 04:29 PM (#2048548)
Jim Callis said in a chat yesterday that "we should have a story up at baseballamerica.com in the next couple of days that will shed light on" the Drabek issues.


Baseball America article on Drabek is at ESPN now.

Yet some teams are backing away from Drabek. He's high-strung on the field, and there are off-field issues as well.


Well, that cleared it all up! Let's hope this wasn't the Drabek article Callis was talking about.
   87. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 02, 2006 at 04:44 PM (#2048557)
Let's hope this wasn't the Drabek article Callis was talking about.


I'm sure it was not.

-- MWE
   88. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 02, 2006 at 04:45 PM (#2048558)
I don't think it was. The article coming later today is written by someone else, though I now forget his name.
   89. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 02, 2006 at 05:03 PM (#2048577)
Out of curiosity, why has BA's company line been over the last few months that releasing information on Drabek's issues would not be fair to him or his family, yada, yada, yada, but then they go out and do a feature story on it?
   90. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 02, 2006 at 05:37 PM (#2048598)
DFE Steve Marquardt signed with Texas (per USA Today).
   91. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 02, 2006 at 05:43 PM (#2048600)
The Sox have signed DFE's Luis Exposito, Levi Tapia (supposedly), and Ryan Colvin (supposedly).
   92. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 02, 2006 at 06:05 PM (#2048612)
The article is up at BA if you're interested. It mostly dives into his history of partying and drinking, though it talks about his mysterious car crash last year. He shoots down the allegations about steroids which the author claims "derived from internet message boards." Nothing too shocking or surprising. His description sounds like the typical jock-type ####### we all are familiar with. But maybe he has a good soul or something.
   93. Bicycle RepairMan Posted: June 02, 2006 at 06:58 PM (#2048653)
They couldn't find a single underage girl who gave him a blowjob?
disappointing
   94. CFBF Has Neither Diabetes nor Cryabetes Posted: June 02, 2006 at 07:50 PM (#2048680)
Maybe they did, but the women simply didn't want to talk with their mouths full.
   95. NJ in DC loathes his classmates and the law Posted: June 02, 2006 at 08:15 PM (#2048704)
So yeah, that Kyle Drabek article was the biggest letdown ever. If my team has a pick in the first half of the draft, I want him picked.
   96. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 02, 2006 at 08:45 PM (#2048744)
   97. PhillyBooster Posted: June 02, 2006 at 09:18 PM (#2048817)
Jeez. If it was just a'drinkin' and a'partyin', why was everyone so tight-lipped?
   98. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 02, 2006 at 09:28 PM (#2048827)
That's a very good questions. I guess some of the other problems diminished once BA got access to the Drabek family.
   99. Brandon in MO (for America!) Posted: June 02, 2006 at 09:39 PM (#2048847)
FIFTH-YEAR SENIOR SIGNINGS

KANSAS CITY
Rowdy Hardy, lhp, Austin Peay State


ROWDY HARDY WAYNE!

ROWDY HARDY GARTH!
   100. Brandon in MO (for America!) Posted: June 02, 2006 at 09:49 PM (#2048864)
Rowdy Hardy signs with Royals, APSU pitcher glad to get good news after being declared ineligible last week

Wait.. a pitcher named Rowdy Hardy was declared academically ineligible? Stunning!

Hardy said several teams were interested in him, and some of those wanted him to enter Major League Baseball's June draft. But Hardy said the Royals' offer was the first solid offer he received, so he took it.


Heck.. he sounds smart enough!
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Rule 5 Draft
(12 - 10:05pm, Dec 01)

It's never too early
(3 - 10:11pm, Sep 23)

Price's AAA Debut
(11 - 4:18pm, Aug 21)

2008 draft signings
(245 - 9:04pm, Aug 16)

Minor Moves
(16 - 5:02pm, Aug 11)

The Week Ahead
(11 - 10:42am, Aug 04)

Recent Minor Moves: NL East
(38 - 10:39pm, Jul 17)

Recent Minor Moves: NL Central
(10 - 7:38pm, Jun 15)

Draft thread
(75 - 11:28am, Jun 09)

BTF Mock Draft
(59 - 3:32pm, May 30)

Recent Minor Moves: AL Central
(4 - 12:54pm, May 30)

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.8806 seconds
61 querie(s) executed