Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Notes in a Minor Key > Discussion
Notes in a Minor Key
— 

Friday, June 02, 2006

NCAA Div I Baseball Tournament

The NCAA Division I baseball tournament has started. The NCAA’s Web site has details.

College WS Pairings:

Bracket 1, Friday, June 16:
Clemson 8, Georgia Tech 4
North Carolina 7, Cal State Fullerton 5 (13)

Sunday, June 18:
Cal State Fullerton 7, Georgia Tech 5 - Georgia Tech eliminated
North Carolina 2, Clemson 0

Tuesday, June 20:
Cal State Fullerton 7, Clemson 6 - Clemson eliminated

Wednesday, June 21:
North Carolina 6, Cal State Fullerton 5 - Cal State Fullerton eliminated, North Carolina advances

Bracket 2, Saturday, June 17:
Rice 6, Georgia 4
Miami 11, Oregon State 1

Monday, June 19:
Oregon State 5, Georgia 3 - Georgia eliminated
Rice 3, Miami 2

Tuesday, June 20:
Oregon State 8, Miami 1 - Miami eliminated

Wednesday, June 21:
Oregon State 5, Rice 0

Thursday, June 22:
Oregon State 2, Rice 0 - Oregon State advances, Rice eliminated

June 24-26: North Carolina vs Oregon State, best-of-three final series, 7 PM EDT each day.

Super Regional Results:

Oral Roberts at Clemson
Clemson 11, Oral Roberts 8
Clemson 6, Oral Roberts 5 - Clemson advances

Coll of Charleston at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech 5, College of Charleston 0
Georgia Tech 12, College of Charleston 3 - Georgia Tech advances

Missouri at Cal State Fullerton
Cal State Fullerton 7, Missouri 1
Cal State Fullerton 9, Missouri 1 - Cal State Fullerton advances

North Carolina at Alabama
North Carolina 11, Alabama 5
North Carolina 8, Alabama 7 - North Carolina advances

Oklahoma at Rice
Rice 10, Oklahoma 4
Oklahoma 11, Rice 5
Rice 9, Oklahoma 5 - Rice advances

South Carolina at Georgia
South Carolina 15, Georgia 6
Georgia 11, South Carolina 5
Georgia 11, South Carolina 6 - Georgia advances

Miami at Mississippi
Mississippi 11, Miami 9
Miami 7, Mississippi 0
Miami 14, Mississippi 9 - Miami advances

Stanford at Oregon State
Oregon State 4, Stanford 3
Oregon State 15, Stanford 0 - Oregon State advances

Regional Results:

Clemson Regional: Clemson (#1) advances.
Fayetteville Regional: Oral Roberts (#3) advances.
Lexington Regional: College of Charleston (#2) advances.
Atlanta Regional: Georgia Tech (#1) advances.
Fullerton Regional: Cal State Fullerton (#1) advances.
Malibu Regional: Missouri (#4) advances.
Chapel Hill Regional: North Carolina (#1) advances.
Tuscaloosa Regional: Alabama (#1) advances.
Houston Regional: Rice (#1) advances
Norman Regional: Oklahoma (#1) advances.
Charlottesville Regional: South Carolina (#2) advances.
Athens Regional: Georgia (#1) advances.
Lincoln Regional: Miami (#2) advances.
Oxford Regional: Mississippi (#1) advances.
Corvallis Regional: Oregon State (#1) advances.
Austin Regional: Stanford (#3) advances.

Mike Emeigh Posted: June 02, 2006 at 04:28 PM | 192 comment(s)
  Related News: College

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 2 of 2 pages  1 2
   101. MM1f Posted: June 11, 2006 at 09:39 PM (#2060595)
How often do you see a 155 pounder get intentionally walked like Jemile Weeks did?

Kids a stud
   102. Sam M. Posted: June 11, 2006 at 10:05 PM (#2060626)
Kids a stud

Miami should be loaded next year, if they can keep their signees, including Kyle Snyder (taken by the Red Sox in the 10th round). The pitching's kept them in the ACC's second tier this year, but with all their freshman hitters back, and a strong group of pitchers recruited, they should be strong . . . if they don't go pro.
   103. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 12, 2006 at 02:45 PM (#2061260)
Mid5: Okla 4, Rice 3; neither starter made it out of the first inning.
   104. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 12, 2006 at 03:37 PM (#2061313)
Rice just put up 5 on the Sooners. Three-run shot by Joe Savery. Oklahoma's head coach and assistant were both just ejected.

-- MWE
   105. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 12, 2006 at 04:47 PM (#2061383)
That 5-spot stood; Rice advances.
   106. Sam M. Posted: June 12, 2006 at 11:01 PM (#2061775)
So Miami did it, coming back from the debacle Saturday night to win the next two and make the ACC four-for-four in Super Regionals. Lucky for them, they are on the other side of the bracket from the other ACC squads, because they were clearly not as good as any of the other three in the regular season:

Clemson 24-6 (52-14 overall)
UNC 22-8 (50-13 overall)
Ga. Tech 19-11 (50-16 overall)
Miami 17-13 (40-22 overall)

Besides those three, Miami also finished behind Virginia in the regular season standings, earning the # 5 seed in the conference tournament (in which they were eliminated by losing twice in three games).

In other words, no one really saw a trip to the CWS coming for this particular Miami team. That they made it -- in combination with the impressive performances of the other three ACC teams -- is a huge indication of the strength of the conference this year.
   107. MM1f Posted: June 12, 2006 at 11:03 PM (#2061776)
I still cant belive how the only ACC team to ever win it all was Wake in the 50s.
Thats a lot of collective, conference wide choking
   108. Sam M. Posted: June 12, 2006 at 11:17 PM (#2061785)
I still cant belive how the only ACC team to ever win it all was Wake in the 50s.

You mean the ACC doesn't get to retroactively claim Miami's four titles?

Guess not.

I suspect either Georgia Tech or Clemson is going to end the ACC's frustration this year.
   109. MM1f Posted: June 12, 2006 at 11:20 PM (#2061787)
Tech doesn't have nearly the pitching needed.

Carolina is who I'm afraid of, their combination of dominance and depth on the mound is frighening and their offense is underrated.
Josh Horton has been Derek Jeter since high school.
   110. Sam M. Posted: June 12, 2006 at 11:29 PM (#2061794)
Tech doesn't have nearly the pitching needed.

Tech's been awfully dominant in the regional and super regionals. But yes, their pitching may doom them in Omaha. OTOH, I could see them bludgeoning the whole field into submission and never looking back.

And if UNC does do it, then it'll still make it an ACC year. Either way, that side of the bracket sure looks like it's on fire:

UNC, Clemson, Ga. Tech, Cal. St-Fullerton

Whereas Rice sure looks like the class of this side:

Rice, Oregon St., Georgia, Miami
   111. CFBF Has Neither Diabetes nor Cryabetes Posted: June 12, 2006 at 11:40 PM (#2061801)
I'll admit to being rather stunned to see Miami at this point. When UF came down to Coral Gables in the second weekend of the season, the Hurricanes looked awful, just friggin awful. They got some solid starting pitching, but couldn't field for squat or drive in a single run in a clutch situation.

And months later, UF finishes .500 and misses their CONFERENCE tournament, while Miami ends up in the CWS.
   112. Sam M. Posted: June 12, 2006 at 11:59 PM (#2061816)
They got some solid starting pitching, but couldn't field for squat or drive in a single run in a clutch situation.

Most amazing of all, late in the year, Miami lost to an arm injury one of its best starters, Carlos Gutierrez. Gutierrez had gotten off to a great start, then fell off as his arm starting bothering him. He recently had surgery. How the heck Miami is still alive is just a mystery. Their bats just got hot at the right time, and they got a little lucky to have Nebraska fall apart in Lincoln in the regional.
   113. CFBF Has Neither Diabetes nor Cryabetes Posted: June 13, 2006 at 12:08 AM (#2061822)
Well, however Miami got where they are now, it's impressive. I never could have imagined it.

And however UF got where they are now, it's also...impressive, in it's own way.
   114. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 13, 2006 at 08:41 PM (#2062628)
CWS schedule is up.

I think Clemson (in particular) and Rice got screwed because the NCAA didn't reseed. Neither should be playing another top-8 seed in the first round when three seeds from below #8 made it.

-- MWE
   115. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 09:30 AM (#2063447)
Neither should be playing another top-8 seed in the first round when three seeds from below #8 made it.
Maybe, but it's consistent with lots of other tournaments (including many run by the NCAA) - I don't have a problem with that.
   116. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 14, 2006 at 10:45 AM (#2063499)
Maybe, but it's consistent with lots of other tournaments (including many run by the NCAA)


Just because it's consistent doesn't make it right. They should reseed after every round; I can't think of a good reason not to.

Bracket 1 is much tougher than Bracket 2, IMO. You have the #1, #5, and #8 overall seeds (and CSU-Fullerton had a good argument for a higher seed, IMO), plus a team that could easily have been a top-8 seed. On the other side, you have #2, #7 who might have been overseeded, perhaps the weakest top-16 seed, and a #2 seed who didn't have a good argument to be seeded any higher.

-- MWE
   117. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 12:04 PM (#2063548)
I agree that bracket 1 is tougher than bracket 2, but I suspect we differ as to the degree - the biggest difference between the two is that the second bracket has a "subpar" Miami team (though the other three are still a little weaker than the top three from the other bracket, which are probably Clemson, Fullerton, and UNC).

I like Oregon State more than you do (though not as much as Boyd Nation's ISRs, which has them up to 4th nationally) - they've a very good rotation and Gunderson in the pen, along with an underrated, if far from stellar offense (having Graham back helps). They really lack power, but they'll largely be facing teams that don't give up a lot of extra base hits. [I guess they're a lesser version of Fullerton.] To tell you the truth, I like them more than Georgia...
   118. Sam M. Posted: June 14, 2006 at 12:24 PM (#2063573)
the biggest difference between the two is that the second bracket has a "subpar" Miami team

This Miami Herald article does a pretty good job explaining why this Hurricane team is "subpar," and why it's so surprising it has made it this far. NCAA sanctions and scholarship limits will do that to a team.

And I'm with Mike: they should reseed. But I can think of a counter-argument, which is that if a team knocks off, say, the # 1 national seed (which this year would be Clemson) in the Super Regional, it should be rewarded for that by inheriting the favorable bracket position of facing the # 8 seed (if everything else stays true to form), instead of penalized by being re-bracketed and drawing the # 2 seed in the first round of the CWS.
   119. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:00 PM (#2063615)
"To tell you the truth, I like them more than Georgia..."

hater. :)

I'll respond to this in full after Tech has gone 2 and out.

"This Miami Herald article does a pretty good job explaining why this Hurricane team is "subpar," and why it's so surprising it has made it this far. NCAA sanctions and scholarship limits will do that to a team."

Nice to see Miami operates the same way in all their sports.\
What were these violations from? I seem to remember some story about an exU pithcing coach who ran one of the big HS teams down there (Gulliver or Pace) getting in trouble for his "recruiting connections"

was this it?

I do find it interesting that Miamis recruiting has seemingly branched out the last few years, when they did fine in the past just recruiting Latin kids from Miami schools and the occasional Cali guy.
Theyve gone into suburban Atlanta (Dexter Fowler), semi rural NC (Chris Archer), St Louis (Jason Hagerty and Tekotte), Chicago (Carillo).
   120. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:02 PM (#2063622)
Question..
"...recruiting contest. The last two schools standing were Miami and Cal State Fullerton, both of which boasted proud baseball traditions. The Boston Red Sox also entered the fray, taking Pat with the 43rd pick of the draft. But when the Bosox refused to include a signing bonus in their contract offer, he settled on the Hurricanes."

Was it really common then for a top 50 pick to NOT BE OFFERED a signing bonus?
   121. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:15 PM (#2063641)
My problem with Georgia is like the one I've with Tech - weak rotation. Brooks Brown is the best of the bunch and he ain't that great. (Truth be told, I might take Hyde, on recent performance).

"Was it really common then for a top 50 pick to NOT BE OFFERED a signing bonus?"
No. I don't believe that allegation (which I haven't read - was that in Sam's link?).

One issue Miami had was the behavior of pitching coach Lazer Collazo (now at Louisville, interestingly enough). (link)
   122. Sam M. Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:41 PM (#2063661)
And, also interestingly, the Louisville AD mentioned in that article, who OK'd the hiring of Collazo? His son is Mark Jurich, a Braves' farmhard for the Myrtle Beach Pelicans of the Carolina League.
   123. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:43 PM (#2063665)
oo, Emiegh takes some nice, subtle potshots at D-town...i love it.
Or maybe he didn't mean it that way but i want to read it that way.

"One issue Miami had was the behavior of pitching coach Lazer Collazo (now at Louisville, interestingly enough). (link)"

And somehow got top 50 HSer Chris Dominguez to come from Miami, to bypass pro ball, and play a Louisville of all places. I remember I was shocked when i saw that, then i saw the connection and i was only surprised.

Of course that article alleges that his 3 Gulliver players signed w UL before he was named coach, which i dont fully believe. I assume he knew he would get that job and steered them there then signed.

"But controversy engulfed him again last spring. According to a police report, Collazo dropped his pants in front of his players after a tough loss."

This is actually awesome
   124. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:46 PM (#2063668)
"(which I haven't read - was that in Sam's link?)."

No, I googled Pat Burrel (http://www.jockbio.com/Bios/Burrell/Burrell_bio.html) cos i was pretty sure he was from Cali but he birthplace was listed as Ark. so i was looking for where he went to HS cos it would have surprised me if the U recruited him out of Arkansas.

"His son is Mark Jurich, a Braves' farmhard for the Myrtle Beach Pelicans of the Carolina League."

Jurich Jr., holds some offensive records at Louisville, im pretty sure.
   125. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:48 PM (#2063670)
Wow my typing sucks more than normal today.

"holds some offensive records at UL" wasn't supposed to be preposition-ized obviously
   126. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:51 PM (#2063673)
"oo, Emiegh takes some nice, subtle potshots at D-town...i love it.
Or maybe he didn't mean it that way but i want to read it that way."

Wrong thread. Nice
   127. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 01:59 PM (#2063677)
And less interestingly, Willie Collazo used to play for Myrtle Beach in the Braves org after his college career at (a) Miami (school, called Florida International). Though I don't think he's related to Lazer; that's all I got.

"Or maybe he didn't mean it that way but i want to read it that way."
I read it that way and was amused. I greatly prefer Bulls games myself - Five County is in the middle of nowhere, the seat angles are a little steep, and I've sat by a lot of idiots in the few games I've seen there (small sample size, though).

Jurich was good, but no Dan Kopriva, one of the first college players I ever really started to follow (scroll to his mini bio if you like).
   128. Sam M. Posted: June 14, 2006 at 02:01 PM (#2063680)
"But controversy engulfed him again last spring. According to a police report, Collazo dropped his pants in front of his players after a tough loss."

This is actually awesome


I'm actually kind of curious to know what he said to the players to accompany the floor show. But definitely NOT curious enough to call over to the athletic department and ask. Some questions are better left unanswered.
   129. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 02:07 PM (#2063685)
"I'm actually kind of curious to know what he said to the players to accompany the floor show."

I don't think any coach I've ever had would drop trow but I know exactly the kind of talk Callazo gave to accompany it.
Something along the lines of "Look what I've got. Do you have these? cos youre playing like a bunch of [freaking] [females]. Be men and play like men. Grow some balls, ect ect." Sort of a generic coach speech in substance, though obviously not style in this case, but it can be effective at the HS level.
   130. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 14, 2006 at 02:23 PM (#2063701)
I greatly prefer Bulls games myself - Five County is in the middle of nowhere, the seat angles are a little steep, and I've sat by a lot of idiots in the few games I've seen there (small sample size, though).


What - did Dial show up in Zebulon or something?

My experience has always been that the staff workers at Five County are more approachable and that they take care of the fans a lot better. The folks at the DBAP (with occasional exceptions) tend to be less friendly.

-- MWE
   131. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 02:41 PM (#2063713)
What - did Dial show up in Zebulon or something?
Zing!

Staff: I'll defer to you on this - I all-but-never deal with them. Regardless, I'm glad I've got both clubs (and more!) as options...

By the way, congrats on the interview.
   132. rb's team is inventing new ways to lose! Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:01 PM (#2063729)
Some UGA hate going on here. We'll see.
   133. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:10 PM (#2063738)
I'm glad I've got both clubs (and more!) as options...


Me too. I'm going to try to get to Greensboro before the summer is out, and should neither Durham nor Carolina make the postseason (which appears likely at this point, but yanevahknow) I'll probably go to Kinston for their games.

-- MWE
   134. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:15 PM (#2063743)
No hate, rb - just noting UGa lacks a starter with an ERA below 4 and the team ERA is 4.76. You're better than Miami, at least.
   135. rb's team is inventing new ways to lose! Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:32 PM (#2063761)
But GA has a killer bullpen and an awesome, awesome lineup, and has been ranked in the nation's top ten for months. Now suddenly, after winning their super-regional, they're a team that doesn't deserve to be in the WS. Good stuff.
   136. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:41 PM (#2063773)
I don;t think any one said they weren't deserving of Omaha...


and hes a tech fan, its not like they know what it takes to get to Omaha anyways, much less win much there... : )
   137. CFBF Has Neither Diabetes nor Cryabetes Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:42 PM (#2063776)
I knew Miami had some scholarship limitations, but they're down to SEVEN at this point? Wow. Coaches complain all the time about only having 11.7 'ships to work with.

Seven? That has to put some serious limitations on what you can do.
   138. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:45 PM (#2063788)
What are you smokin', rb? They're a damn good team and it's no surprise that they've made it this far. They are not, however, better than most of the remaining teams. How are those points inconsistent?

By RPI (thought to be biased in favor of the southeast and SEC in particular), they're the fifth best team left (Clem 1, Rice 2, GT 3, Fullerton 4, Georgia 6, UNC 7, Miami 9, OSU 22).
By ISR (thought to favor the west), they are the sixth (Fullerton 1, Rice 2, Clem 3, OSU 4, GT 5, Georgia 8, UNC 10, Miami 23).
I think UNC is better "built" for tournament play than the Bulldogs so I'd rate them ahead of you (Miller is tremendous, and Woodard/Putkonen is a decent fill-in for Bard, should he be erratic - they also have a good offense) and I think the RPI vastly underrates OSU.

I'd rate the schools: Rice/Clemson/Fullerton (order depends on my mood), UNC, Oregon State/GT, Georgia, Miami
   139. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:47 PM (#2063791)
Now suddenly, after winning their super-regional, they're a team that doesn't deserve to be in the WS.


I don't think anyone said that they don't deserve to be there - they did get a #7 seed, after all. My opinion is that they aren't as good as Georgia Tech or North Carolina, both of whom were seeded behind them. But you do have to give them props for shutting down Florida State twice when they needed to do so in order to get out of the regionals.

-- MWE
   140. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:48 PM (#2063795)
and hes a tech fan, its not like they know what it takes to get to Omaha anyways, much less win much there... : )
It's somewhere in the Midwest, right?
   141. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 14, 2006 at 03:57 PM (#2063810)
I think the RPI vastly underrates OSU.


I had them pegged at somewhere between #15 and #20 going into the tournament, based on what I'd read and heard, so I don't think it underrates them all that much. I wasn't impressed with the Pac-10 this year, at all.

-- MWE
   142. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 04:00 PM (#2063817)
For your perusal (were it followed by analysis - it would be quick and dirty. yes, these aren't the metrics to trot out for a variety of reasons, it's what I had handy.):

Team ERA / opponents ERA / ISR strength of schedule ranking
Georgia 4.76 / 6.44 / 26
UNC 3.30 / 6.92 / 75
GT 4.33 / 8.17 / 47
Miami 4.38 / 6.05 / 38
Fullerton 2.57 / 5.85 / 5
Rice 3.16 / 7.40 / 43
Clemson 3.21 / 6.70 / 27
Oregon St 3.43 / 6.08 / 28
   143. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 14, 2006 at 04:05 PM (#2063824)
OSU's middle relief is weak, so they can be beat if you get their starter out early but, Buck-Nickerson-Stutes is an above average rotation, even at the CWS level, and Kunz-Gunderson is a solid end game tandem. I believe in Gillespie's bat, think Canham is underrated, and like the ability of the rest of the club to get on base and cause trouble.

The Pac-10 didn't knock my socks off either, though.
   144. MM1f Posted: June 14, 2006 at 04:43 PM (#2063846)
"I knew Miami had some scholarship limitations, but they're down to SEVEN at this point? Wow. Coaches complain all the time about only having 11.7 'ships to work with."

Well, seven scholarships that the NCAA knows about....
   145. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 02:18 PM (#2066081)
And games are back on.

This is the seventh matchup between Tech and Clemson this year - as GT is familiar with most of the Clemson arms (and maybe because of injuries Berken suffered last week), Clemson is starting Sean Clark on the mound for only the second time all season.
   146. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 16, 2006 at 02:27 PM (#2066094)
Clemson is starting Sean Clark on the mound for only the second time all season.


Clark wasn't even on the original travel roster for the ACC tournament, only being added when Travis Storrer was hurt, but came back to pick up wins in the ACC championship game and the CWS regional opener.

Story.

-- MWE
   147. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 03:13 PM (#2066169)
Bot4, 2 out, man on 1st: GT 3 Clem 0.
Clark had a rough start to the contest (with GT managing four hits (and 3 runs) in the first, including a 2-run homer by Jeff Kindel), but set the Jackets down in order this inning. Meanwhile, the Tigers have been patient versus a wild Lee Hyde (walked a man each inning), but haven't knocked one in.
   148. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 03:45 PM (#2066199)
Top7: 0 out, runners on the corners: GT 3, Clem 0
Clark has been great the last few innings, but has given up a walk and single to open the seventh. Ryan Hinson is entering in relief and will face Matt Wieters, who is, like, totally awesome.
Hyde, for GT, has allowed only one hit in six innings thus far.
   149. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 03:48 PM (#2066201)
Wieters hits into a double play, but the runner on third (Blackwood) scores ... 4-0 as we enter the bottom of the 7th.
   150. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 04:10 PM (#2066215)
Bot 8: 0 out, runners on 1st and 2nd: GT 4, Clem 0
Walk and a single for Clemson knock Hyde out of the game - Rulon coming in for Tech as the heart of the order comes up for the Tigers.
   151. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 04:15 PM (#2066222)
Marquez Smith doubles, scoring two ... 4-2 GT as Rulon is replaced with likely third starter Ryan Turner. Tyler Colvin at bat.
   152. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 04:22 PM (#2066230)
... an infield single, errant pickoff throw, and walk later and the score is 4-3 with no one out and runners on the corners with dangerous Andy D'Alessio at the plate.
   153. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 04:26 PM (#2066232)
Homerun: 6-4 Clemson. Hyatt in to pitch.
   154. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 04:42 PM (#2066248)
In the ACC tournament, Clemson had a ten-run ninth inning to beat Georgia Tech. It's happening again as nine of the first ten Tigers reach, the Jackets have gone through five pitchers, and Clemson has scored 8 times to take a commanding lead, with only one out.
   155. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 04:55 PM (#2066259)
Game over - Clemson 8, Georgia Tech 4, as Clemson's closer retires the Jackets 1-2-3.
   156. MM1f Posted: June 16, 2006 at 04:59 PM (#2066263)
Choking 101 baby. Gotta love that Gtech education.

Oh, in case you want to see what a real bullpen looks like, Georgia plays at 2 tmrw : )
   157. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 05:07 PM (#2066272)
Choking 101 baby. Gotta love that Gtech education.
Hey - we found a schtick and we do it well... this one is getting deleted from my Tivo before I ever watch it. Painful.
   158. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 16, 2006 at 10:11 PM (#2066644)
UNC and Fullerton are tied at five in the bottom of the ninth - there are all kinds of swirly/whirly winds in the stadium.
Random assertion: UNC's Johnathan Hovis is this year's Lee Gronkiewicz.
   159. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 17, 2006 at 12:07 AM (#2066734)
UNC wins in 13 innings, 7-5. Great f'n game.
   160. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 17, 2006 at 10:44 PM (#2067396)
Eddie Degerman took a no-hitter into the seventh today (albeit with a ton of walks), then saw the no-hitter and a 2-0 lead disappear in the top of the seventh as Georgia jumped out to a 4-2 advantage. The Owls then came storming back with a four-spot of their own in the bottom half to defeat the Bulldogs 6-4.

Miami is pounding Oregon State 7-0 in the second game. Scott Maine has checked the Beavers on four hits through seven. The game is in a weather delay.

-- MWE
   161. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 18, 2006 at 06:26 PM (#2067981)
Georgia Tech jumped out to a 4-0 lead, but Cal State Fullerton came back to take a 7-5 win and eliminate the Yellow jackets.

-- MWE
   162. Baseballing powerhouse Crispix Attacks Posted: June 18, 2006 at 06:49 PM (#2067986)
I just want to say that this thread is very cool...I've never met anyone in my life who cared even the tiniest amount about NCAA baseball, so it's nice to know that there's communities of people who do.
   163. Sam M. Posted: June 18, 2006 at 08:09 PM (#2068002)
Well, Ga. Tech's pitching proved its undoing, as some of you forecast. I was beginning to think the only team that could beat the ACC this year was another ACC team. OTOH, I strongly suspect Rice is going to follow up Fullerton's triumph by sending Miami into the loser's bracket tomorrow.
   164. MM1f Posted: June 18, 2006 at 08:43 PM (#2068039)
Crispix,
I don't know where you live but you should go to an SEC baseball game sometime. Some places sell out and its got the crowd feel of a mini-football game with the tailgating and such and the fans are generally knowledgable and passionate.
   165. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 18, 2006 at 09:30 PM (#2068071)
So, I last heard the score of GT/CSF in the top of the 9th before I did Father's Day stuff ... I'm glad to know the Jackets didn't let me down by coming through in the clutch.

OTOH, I strongly suspect Rice is going to follow up Fullerton's triumph by sending Miami into the loser's bracket tomorrow.
I bet that's a common sentiment.
   166. Sam M. Posted: June 18, 2006 at 09:38 PM (#2068073)
I bet that's a common sentiment.

Yeah, but not everyone expresses it with the fervent hope it might have some reverse jinx effect!
   167. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 19, 2006 at 04:32 PM (#2068690)
Georgia appears to be about to join Georgia Tech in a two-and-out effort. OSU's Jonah Nickerson pitched seven solid innings, allowing 4 hits and two runs. 5-2 Beavers, 1 on 1 out bottom 8.

-- MWE
   168. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 19, 2006 at 04:45 PM (#2068711)
5-3 entering the bottom of the 9th, with the Dawgs 5 thru 7 spots due up.
   169. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 19, 2006 at 04:55 PM (#2068730)
Georgia threatened (gametracker shows runners on 1st and 2nd with 1 out), but didn't score. Oregon State plays the loser of Rice/Miami in an elimination game - Georgia ties its in-state rival with a 7th place finish.
   170. MM1f Posted: June 19, 2006 at 05:03 PM (#2068744)
Georgia had 2 on and 1 out in a 5-3 game and GIDPs in the bottom of the ninth. ####### hell this CWS sucked
   171. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 19, 2006 at 05:08 PM (#2068752)
Sorry, MM1f and rb... I'm rooting for UNC now (since I work there), my wife is pulling for Rice (since she eats it).
   172. Sam M. Posted: June 19, 2006 at 09:53 PM (#2069211)
Heck of a dramatic bottom of the 9th here between Rice and Miami . . . .
   173. Sam M. Posted: June 19, 2006 at 09:55 PM (#2069221)
Terrible call on the swing on Jay. I don't care what the announcers say. No way that was a swing. Critical second out.
   174. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 19, 2006 at 10:15 PM (#2069277)
Bryce Cox is a monster. An absolute beast. What a steal.
   175. MM1f Posted: June 20, 2006 at 06:14 PM (#2069957)
They just said Herman Demmink did a statistical research paper for an Econ 405 class his study of 15 years of major league stats led him to the conclusion that stolen bases could add 3 wins per season. I don't know his methodology or the specifics of the paper at all to look at the accuracy of his conclusions but its interesting that hes a kid with a SABR friendly bent.

Can also do 4,700 crunches per day
   176. MM1f Posted: June 21, 2006 at 07:35 PM (#2071229)
I love how this Cowherd idiot is blathering on about Fullertons greatness bc they can small ball and know how to play like it was back when you only had 1 HR hitter in the lineup, ect. when the scoreboard over there says Carolina-6 Fullerton-3.

Carolinas got 3 jacks, FUllerton non.

Hmm...well, Colin. You know whats an even better strategy. Getting yourself some Jay Cox in your lineup.

Don't get me wrong, i like smallball more than 95% here and i agree that Fullertons a great team to watch and they usually get the most out of their talent offensively but Jesus sometime in your blabbering would it kill you too acknowledge that theres this other team that somehow inexplicably appears to be winning despite the fact that they can go yard.

And they are winning despite Mike Fox's scrubby, short 2b fetish (Steed starting over Shelton all year and now benching Fronk for Gore) and his insistance on making his team's top HR hitter bunt when he doesn't know how and messes the bunt up
   177. Mike Emeigh Posted: June 21, 2006 at 07:50 PM (#2071257)
I love how this Cowherd idiot is blathering on about Fullertons greatness


Is that Colin Cowherd? He does a mid-morning radio show on ESPN which is gack-awful.

-- MWE
   178. MM1f Posted: June 21, 2006 at 07:59 PM (#2071278)
"Is that Colin Cowherd? He does a mid-morning radio show on ESPN which is gack-awful."

Yep its him. He "graced" the TV booth with his presence for an inning
   179. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 21, 2006 at 08:49 PM (#2071486)
UNC def. Fullerton 6-5, Andrew Miller got the save, Wes Roemer got hit hard (again), Jay Cox hit 2 HR for the 2nd time in the tourney.
The Tar Heels will face either Rice or Oregon State in the best-of-three final.
   180. MM1f Posted: June 21, 2006 at 08:57 PM (#2071523)
Roemer's an ####### BTW. He struck out some Mizzou guy (i think it was Priday, the catcher) in supers and walked off the mound toward Priday as he was walking to the dugout to yell "[Fock] you! Fock you!"

Assuming there was no history between the two thats just ridiculous. Its one thing to be pumped at your K and even show him up a little but to be that directly insulting for no reason is desipicable.

As a side note, Roemer has 6 walks but 23 HBPs....i wonder if he gets to 3-0 and says, #### it, im hitting this dude.
I actually kind of like that in a weird way.

Miller was tossing it up to 97 in his one batter save.
   181. MM1f Posted: June 21, 2006 at 08:59 PM (#2071532)
"...but to be that directly insulting for no reason is desipicable."

Or despicable if you prefer
   182. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 21, 2006 at 10:28 PM (#2071856)
I love Wes Roemer.
   183. Templeusox has reached his genetic threshold Posted: June 23, 2006 at 12:33 AM (#2073018)
Bryce Cox is about as dominant as you can get.
   184. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 26, 2006 at 09:01 PM (#2077097)
This is a heck of a final game: 2-2, mid 6th.
   185. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 26, 2006 at 10:12 PM (#2077240)
UNC batting with a man on first and 1 out in the top of the 9th - down 3-2. OSU just scored on a simply awful error by the second baseman.
   186. Sam M. Posted: June 26, 2006 at 10:14 PM (#2077246)
I don't care who wins this, but I hope UNC scores to tie the game and let that second baseman off the hook. Then let either side win in extra innings.
   187. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 26, 2006 at 10:14 PM (#2077247)
Questionable walk drawn by UNC, runners on 1st and 2nd. Gunderson (leads nation in saves) replacing Buck. If you're reading this, you ought to instead be tuned into the game.
   188. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 26, 2006 at 10:21 PM (#2077257)
A fielders choice and flyout to center later, and Oregon State is the national champ.
   189. Sam M. Posted: June 26, 2006 at 10:25 PM (#2077264)
If you're reading this, you ought to instead be tuned into the game.

You can be doing both! It's sort of a glorified game chatter . . . . Such a shame, not who won, but how UNC lost. Ouch.
   190. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 26, 2006 at 11:08 PM (#2077295)
Though I rooted for UNC in the game, it's great to see a school from the north take the title. Apart from that ... poor Bryan Steed, man.
   191. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: June 26, 2006 at 11:09 PM (#2077296)
You can be doing both!
And where was I? :)
   192. CFBF Has Neither Diabetes nor Cryabetes Posted: June 26, 2006 at 11:50 PM (#2077321)
I don't remember the thread being this big last year, when UF was making its run. :(

No, seriously, congrats to the Beavers. College baseball is a lot of fun.
Page 2 of 2 pages  1 2

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Rule 5 Draft
(116 - 4:48pm, Dec 11)

It's never too early
(3 - 10:11pm, Sep 23)

Price's AAA Debut
(11 - 4:18pm, Aug 21)

2008 draft signings
(245 - 9:04pm, Aug 16)

Minor Moves
(16 - 5:02pm, Aug 11)

The Week Ahead
(11 - 10:42am, Aug 04)

Recent Minor Moves: NL East
(38 - 10:39pm, Jul 17)

Recent Minor Moves: NL Central
(10 - 7:38pm, Jun 15)

Draft thread
(75 - 11:28am, Jun 09)

BTF Mock Draft
(59 - 3:32pm, May 30)

Recent Minor Moves: AL Central
(4 - 12:54pm, May 30)

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 1.8790 seconds
62 querie(s) executed