|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, November 07, 2008
I’ll show you the Bonilla right here, Klap!
There were a lot of reasons for the failures of those early nineties Mets teams, but Bobby Bonilla wasn’t one of them. He wasn’t the perennial MVP candidate the Mets hoped they were getting when they opened the vault to bring him to Shea, but they really should have known that all along. His numbers weren’t those of a terrific hitter. A very good hitter, sure, but his production at the plate paled in comparison to those of his former Pittsburgh teammate Barry Bonds. The Mets thought they were getting more than just a ballplayer in Bonilla, and perhaps that’s where the biggest evaluative failure lies. Bonilla was being paid like an outstanding hitter even though everyone knew—even at the time—that he was merely a very good hitter whose personality was supposed to bridge the gap between goodness and greatness. When it didn’t, the backlash was aimed at Bonilla instead of the more appropriate target, Al Harazin.
Bonilla is best remembered for his massive contract (that the Mets continue to bear the financial burden of), and is most often thought of unfavorably as a result. The reality is that the Mets shoved that money in front of Bonilla and he took it, and all he could manage in return was to be the best hitter the Mets had in each of the four years he served with them from 1992 through his deadline trade to the Orioles midway through the 1995 season. Bobby Bonilla wasn’t a great player, but he was a very good player, even if he couldn’t quite live up to the lofty expectations placed on him.
Repoz
Posted: November 07, 2008 at 02:17 PM | 11 comment(s)
| Login to Bookmark
Related News: General, History, NY Mets
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Don Malcolm for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: NYT: Alderson Remakes Needy Mets From Bottom Line Up (29 - 10:24pm, Feb 09)Last: PreservedFishNewsblog: Jeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected? (34 - 10:23pm, Feb 09)Last: Vaux, A.B.D.Newsblog: NY Daily News: Brian Cashman's accused stalker says Yankees GM misled feds on steroid probe (45 - 10:22pm, Feb 09)Last: villageidiomNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012 (377 - 10:20pm, Feb 09)Last:  Famous Original Joe CNewsblog: 'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s (280 - 10:20pm, Feb 09)Last:  Der_K is getting more dogmatic.Newsblog: Whatever Happened to the Spitball? (12 - 10:17pm, Feb 09)Last: SquashNewsblog: Justice: 5 things that could make the 2012 season a successful one for the Astros (28 - 10:17pm, Feb 09)Last: bbc is prejudice bout menNewsblog: Grantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans (19 - 10:15pm, Feb 09)Last: villageidiomNewsblog: Fangraphs: Cameron: The 10 Worst Transactions Of The Winter (82 - 10:10pm, Feb 09)Last: Cooper NielsonNewsblog: Sources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault (5812 - 10:02pm, Feb 09)Last:  Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral IdiotNewsblog: MLB: Hall of Fame worthy? Furthest thing from Schilling's mind (11 - 10:00pm, Feb 09)Last: SquashNewsblog: The Book Blog: MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential (76 - 9:50pm, Feb 09)Last: PreservedFishNewsblog: Orioles Scouts Banned from Korea (2 - 9:31pm, Feb 09)Last: Voros McCracken, Human ShieldNewsblog: Strange Times in Baseball: 1891-1895 (12 - 9:15pm, Feb 09)Last: AndrewJHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player : 1969 Discussion (75 - 9:02pm, Feb 09)Last: fra paolo
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I'm doing a similar list for the Royals though, and its been pretty embarrassing who makes their top 50. Brent Mayne. That's right. Brent Mayne.
This always reminds me of Bill James talking about how he got the idea for the abstract while arguing that Mike MacFarlane was one of the top 100 catchers of all time. It's amazing how guys you thought were meh were actually pretty damn good historically. Of course, if I did a top 50 Oakland A's I might be horrified by who made the list. Bill Caudill? Mike Gallego? Jeff Newman? Wayne Gross?
He probably wouldn't make my revised list, though I still don't totally regret having him on there because he was a lot of fun to research (as most of these guys are, legends or otherwise).
Among Mets with 2000+ PAs, he's 2nd in Avg, 3rd in OBP, 2nd in SLG, 2nd in OPS, 10th in runs, 8th in total bases, 6th in doubles, 5th in HR, 7th in RBI, 3rd in OPS+
you get the idea
* How long is it taking them to work on this list? - apparently the Wright write up was done 2/07???? Sheesh, they should take Wright down, and adjust everyone 1 slot- at this rate by the time they reach Wright again it'll be in 3-4 years and he'll be #2 behind Seaver.
That thread was .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
I didn't think then and I certainly don't think now that Rey Rey was in the top 50- or all that close to it- one of my all time most hated players...
Yea, that's on me. I didn't realize how time-consuming these would be when I started them a couple of years ago. Suffice it to say that Wright would already be higher than he was at the time, and could very well be top-20 at this point.
Plus I've been almost solely relying on Win Shares, so guys that just kinda hung around for years and played crappy - Michael Tucker, Brent Mayne, David Howard, are high on the list, while guys that were great for one year and gone - Jay Bell, Chili Davis, Paul Byrd - are pretty low.
I relied heavily on WARP3 for my list, which has its drawbacks, too. It does account for defense (and its offensive component is adjusted positionally), but FRAR is kinda suspect. Also, relying mostly on raw counts of anything undercut players who had a significant impact for a shorter period of time (e.g. simply aggregating WARP3 over his Met career doesn't give Mike Piazza nearly the credit he deserves; he's something like 12th overall). At the same time, on a team-specific list like this, longevity with the team definitely counts for something, even if it was a long period of mostly mediocrity (see: Ed Kranepool).
They're still paying that contract?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main