User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.3571 seconds
40 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Is that so absurd?
Kind of, yeah. I see Larkin and Trammell as fairly similar players. I'd put Larkin ahead, but the difference between the two is not so great that one should be ignored while the other sails easily through.
I was going to say, there's plenty of room between Larkin and Trammell to draw your in/out line (which I'd draw well below both of them). But I checked AROM's WAR just to put a number to it, and, while AROM confirms my view that Larkin was better, his WAR also LOVES Alan Trammell - 67th-best position player in MLB history at 66.8 WAR (0.1 ahead of Eddie Murray, for example). Larkin's #58 @ 68.8, Tim Raines is #79 @ 64.9, and, going back to Trammell, AROM has HOF shortstops Ozzie Smith and Ernie Banks at #80 (64.7) and #81 (64.3), respectively.
Again, by AROM's WAR, he has Raines worse than Larkin (see above) and better than Alomar (63.6, #84 among position players). He also has both of them better than McGwire (Arvia doesn't vote for him; I'm just mentioning this since he's also on the ballot) - #87, 63.2 WAR. Blyleven's far and away the best player on this year's HOF ballot by WAR - 90.1 (13th-best pitcher in MLB history).
Not that I think raw career WAR should be the end-all/be-all way of ranking these guys. I just think it's an interesting starting point (and, coupled with Eugene's and Ray's comments here, suggests that I've probably been under-rating Alan Trammell).
Well, they were both 3B and they both have "Robin" in their names, but Brooks has an extra 800 games and presumably better defense while their peaks are similar. I'm not sure it's all that close.
He feared the Wrath of Anno!!
I'd take Larkin fairly easily over Trammell (and I think Trammy should have been a 1st-ballot HOF selection).
Only because it isn't, Ray. :-)
Banks' case is all peak of course ... well, plus hanging around for 500 HR.
True, Walt. Those years at first base do not add much to his HOF resume at all, excepting for his counting stats. After 1961, Banks just wasn't close to being a great player anymore.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main