User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.6752 seconds
82 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Monday, August 10, 2009Authors and Publisher of Baseball Steroids Book Sued for DefamationAnd hopefully Judge Friedrich von Spee is presiding…
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Dodger Thoughts: In search of truth about Frank McCourt and the Dodgers (6 - 11:25pm, Feb 09) Last: Johnny Clash Newsblog: MLB: Mays' life and legend transcend statistics (82 - 11:18pm, Feb 09) Last: Joshua Gibsons Ruth (Voxter) Newsblog: Hardball Talk: Gleeman: Lenny Dykstra is back with some more can't miss investment advice (131 - 10:51pm, Feb 09) Last: Zuvella! Newsblog: Sam Hutcheson's Top 11 Sabrenerd Baseball Dork's* Basements
(20 - 10:43pm, Feb 09) Last: baseball chick (now, with NEW blog) |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.6752 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Wait, his name is "Christian Red?"
Sources: Kelly Blair made boasts about juicing Clemens, Pettitte & Bagwell from the Daily News
Texas trainer with link to Pettitte may be key to Roger Clemens’ perjury probe also from the Daily News.
Or an high-end brand that Eric would drink at Fangtasia
/closet fan of "True Blood"
I used to believe in The Rocket, wholly and with all the tenderness in my heart. Later, I switched my allegiance to the crusading goodness of the Daily News Steroid I-Team™. If my faith is befouled twice, I don't know what will become of me.
Rusty Hardin's comment to the media in response was priceless. Something along the lines of "Now step back and understand what's happening here. Roger Clemens says, 'You. You did not provide me with illegal steroids' -- and he's being sued for defamation."
Rollicking good times.
I also love McNamee's position here: "I'm a drug dealer, not a liar!"
Of course, the other problem is that McNamee is a liar. A self-confessed one.
McNamee's suit is insane; he had won (on a technicality) most of Clemens' suit against him, and yet now he's inviting Clemens to dig into his personal life.
Even though I don't particularly believe Clemens' side of things, I'll agree that McNamee is just asking for trouble by suing Clemens. After all, while almost everything that Clemens is accused of is sleazy, I don't remember there being anything that he's been accused of that was notable illegal.
McNamee is an admitted dealer, and a possible rapist, and that's just information that's already out there. And Clemens definitely has the money to hire a whole ton of private investigators and lawyers to dig through every single corner of McNamee's past.
McNamee also sues for malicious prosecution; I'm not intimately familiar with that cause of action, but it's not clear to me that a dismissal based on immunity/lack of personal jurisdiction constitutes a favorable termination for malicious prosecution purposes.
Finally, McNamee claims IIED because in the telephone conversation that Clemens taped and released at that press conference, McNamee discussed his son's "private medical information." That's not IIED.
I repeat my earlier prediction: Clemens will not be indicted on the evidence that is public right now. They'll need something more. And it's obvious they're trying to fish for evidence from Blair. But it would be silly for Blair to state publicly that he didn't supply Clemens, yet tell a different story in front of the grand jury.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/2009/08/11/2009-08-11_former_mlb_pitcher_jason_grimsley.html#ixzz0NuDTTAQQ
And it should be so easy to prove this "obvious" truth that Clemens perjured himself. But apparently, Mike Lupica's rantings don't count as evidence.
(If they can't convict, it's not a sign of lack of evidence; it just means Greg Anderson is covering for him.)
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main