Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, July 03, 2008

Baltimore Sun: O’s interested in Toronto’s Eckstein

Seeking to fill what has become the team’s most glaring deficiency, the Orioles have engaged in talks with the Toronto Blue Jays regarding shortstop David Eckstein, according to industry sources.

Eckstein, 33, is hitting .273 with one home run and 18 RBIs in 198 at-bats. However, he has become expendable on a roster that includes infielders Marco Scutaro, John McDonald and Joe Inglett, who has seen his role increase with regular second baseman Aaron Hill injured.

Because of the glut of middle infielders, the Blue Jays’ asking price for Eckstein isn’t expected to be too high. The two-time All-Star and former World Series Most Valuable Player signed a one-year, $4.5 million deal with the Blue Jays and will be a free agent at the end of the season.

NTNgod Posted: July 03, 2008 at 10:05 PM | 17 comment(s)
  Related News: GeneralBaltimoreTorontoRumors

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Tim Lincecum-stain (SuperBaes) Posted: July 03, 2008 at 10:45 PM (#2842974)
Why?
   2. Ryan Jones Posted: July 03, 2008 at 10:49 PM (#2842975)
Because they're the Orioles.
   3. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: July 03, 2008 at 11:18 PM (#2842985)
This is just...so Orioles. I think third in the AL East is an overly optimistic goal at this point. I don't see how they finish with a better record than the Red Sox, Rays, White Sox, Tigers, Twins, Angels, A's, and perhaps Yankees and Rangers. It's like when the Mets thought they were buyers in 2004. Though I'm not sure if anyone could replicate the type of moves they made.
   4. Aspiring One-Armed Economist (6 - 4 - 3) Posted: July 03, 2008 at 11:35 PM (#2842992)
There might be some teams for whom Eckstein could be an asset. Not convinced that the Orioles are one of them.

Actually, Eckstein's defense has taken a dive in the past few years. Whereas he used to be an average shortstop, the last two seasons he's been among the worst by RZR (~.830 is typical of league average):

2004: .816
2005: .844
2006: .841
2007: .783
2008: .771
   5. AROM Posted: July 03, 2008 at 11:36 PM (#2842993)
Why?


Because their shortstops have combined to hit 228/264/287. Getting a league average SS looks pretty good, so long as they get him cheap.
   6. Jose Can Jussi Jokinen (Justin T) Posted: July 03, 2008 at 11:54 PM (#2842994)
Yeah, I wouldn't say we're looking down the barrel of Eckstein for Liz or anything. Not a meaningful pickup for the O's, but they aren't going to give up anything.
   7. Baseballing powerhouse Crispix Attacks Posted: July 04, 2008 at 12:24 AM (#2843007)
t's like when the Mets thought they were buyers in 2004. Though I'm not sure if anyone could replicate the type of moves they made.

Replicating "Ty Wigginton for Kris Benson and Roberto Hernandez" shouldn't be that hard. But as for that other trade...maybe Nick Markakis for Khalil Greene?
   8. Shock Posted: July 04, 2008 at 01:02 AM (#2843027)
Oh God yes, please take him. I can't take any more of the media fawning over him while he grounds out to second and botches critical defensive plays.
   9. fear and loathing in birdlives Posted: July 04, 2008 at 02:01 AM (#2843045)
Not a meaningful pickup for the O's, but they aren't going to give up anything.


Yup, my sentiment as well. They're not going to give up anything of value and Eckstein will be gone in a few months if acquired.
   10. bonifacio's got the good face! Posted: July 04, 2008 at 04:03 AM (#2843073)
couldn't the Dodgers use him?
   11. snowles Posted: July 04, 2008 at 09:52 AM (#2843119)
The Jays might as well take the pick for Eckstein, assuming he remains a type B.
   12. GotowarMissAgnes Posted: July 04, 2008 at 10:18 AM (#2843136)
We'll know the O's aren't back to their same old stupidity if they only take Eckstein on the condition that Toronto pick up his full salary above the minimum and they get a prospect in return to compensate for the lost pick.
   13. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: July 04, 2008 at 10:52 AM (#2843160)
The Jays might as well take the pick for Eckstein, assuming he remains a type B.

There is a very real chance they get stuck with him in arbitration, a situation they don't seem to want to be in.
   14. snowles Posted: July 04, 2008 at 06:05 PM (#2843533)
I don't know, the FA shortstop class looks awfully weak next year, and after Furcal and Cabrera, Eckstein might well be looked at by a desperate team.

And honestly, would taking the chance really be that bad? I mean, it's not like Eckstein is blocking the next Babe Ruth. Are the Jays prepared to go with Scutaro/McDonald/Inglett/mystery bag, especially with Hill's status as unknown.
   15. Ryan Jones Posted: July 04, 2008 at 06:11 PM (#2843536)
Are the Jays prepared to go with Scutaro/McDonald/Inglett/mystery bag, especially with Hill's status as unknown.


Well, Inglett has his well so far, and Scutaro has been capable (at least at getting on-base). Assuming that McDonald's defense doesn't collapse, I don't think the Jays would have any problem at all with trading Eckstein - even with Hill's unknown status.
   16. snowles Posted: July 04, 2008 at 06:36 PM (#2843587)
I don't think it's an issue this year with the season all but lost, but the optics of playing 3 bench players in 2 regular spots next year doesn't exactly raise a lot of confidence in most people, and I love all 3 of them. Relying on a 30 year old career backup/minor leaguer, and 2 bench players forced into doing more isn't exactly my idea of a championship-caliber team, which the Jays are looking less and less like each year. Especially with the absolute mess the position is in the minors (Justin Jackson notwithstanding).

The only way I can see it working is if Hill would shift to short and Inglett can take over at 2B. Someone like Scott Campbell might be a good player for the Jays, but again he plays 2B. All reliant of course, who knows how (or if) Hill will recover.
   17. Ryan Jones Posted: July 04, 2008 at 10:22 PM (#2843996)
The only way I can see it working is if Hill would shift to short and Inglett can take over at 2B. Someone like Scott Campbell might be a good player for the Jays, but again he plays 2B. All reliant of course, who knows how (or if) Hill will recover.


Hill's not moving over to SS. He's a gold glove quality defender at 2B, and moving him would have the effect of creating two holes. Really, their best hope it to play McDonald at SS - as has been noted, he is one of the very few guys whose glove makes up for his bat. Besides, with the nature of the Jays "pound the strike zone" pitching staff, they get a bigger advantage out of their defence than most teams.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.4968 seconds
81 querie(s) executed