|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Sunday, March 16, 2008
With...Ian Casselberry - Bless You Boys, Bill Ferris - Detroit Tigers Weblog and Peter Robins-Brown - Bugs & Cranks.
Question 4: Who is the best Detroit Tigers player of all time? Why?
Ian: Ty Cobb should probably be the pick when you consider what a phenomenal hitter he was (.366/.433/.512 for his career). When you look at his career numbers, it’s like he had a bad season If he hit below .350. But I guess I like a guy who can also hit the long ball (399 career home runs, for example), as well as provide outstanding defense, which gives the nod to Al Kaline for me. I’ll admit, however, that I’m influenced by having talked to people who actually saw Kaline play. If I ever mentioned a nice play that a Tiger made in the outfield - especially right field - my dad would say that I should’ve seen Al Kaline, and that’s stayed with me as long as I’ve watched the Detroit Tigers.
Peter: As always, coming up with a best of all-time list, or pick, of any sort is difficult. In this case I discount Ty Cobb and Hank Greenberg, despite their greatness, because I tend to favor players who played after the color barrier was broken. With that said, I’m going to go ahead and pick, Al Kaline. I’m too young to have seen him play, but when you look at his numbers (399 home runs in a time when home runs were especially difficult to come by), combined with his reputation as maybe the best defensive right fielder of all-time, and the way the players of his time reverentially spoke of his talents, I think it’s hard to go with anybody else.
Kaline over Cobb?...Yea, and Rare Earth Records was better than Fortune Records.
Repoz
Posted: March 16, 2008 at 11:19 AM | 28 comment(s)
Related News: General, History, Detroit
|
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Dear Peter,
You're an idiot.
Sincerely,
RMc
Is it a no-brainer that it's Kaline and not Trammel or someone?
Actually Kaline came up in 1953, I believe the first Tiger "Negro" player was Ossie Virgil in 1958 so I think Al should also be excluded.
I favor players who played in the dead ball era.
What's that have to do with anything? Kaline did compete against black players.
In this case I discount Ty Cobb and Hank Greenberg, despite their greatness, because I tend to favor players who played after the color barrier was broken.
Depending on the discount, this is a reasonable statement.
Two Hall of Famers, but both were VC picks - and one played half his career elsewhere. I think Newhouser qualifies as a great pitcher, but he's got the WW2 stigma. It's a really impressive list of really good pitchers without anyone clearly and uncontestedly breaking from the pack.
# of seasons Cobb finished in top ten HRs in league = 11
# of seasons Kaline finished in top ten HRs in league = 8
I found that statement strange for a discussion of Tiger fans. Cobb hit home runs.
Rob Deer, because he remains the only player to hit more than 25 homeruns and bat under the Mendoza line.
This is silly. Of the 'original 16' I think the Tigers probably have the biggest gap, or one of the biggest gaps, between best player in franchise history compared to #2.
I've never heard it put exactly this way, but it sounds reasonable to me.
If someone batted exclusively against righthanded pitchers, wouldn't we have to take that into account?
As for pitchers, my dad says Newhouser was as dominant as anybody there for a few years. I'd probably take Lolich over Morris. Justin Verlander has an outstanding chance to be the best Tigers' pitcher ever. And Miguel Cabrera is going to put up some good numbers in Detroit too.
(Keep in mind I've given this like 20 seconds of Michelob-induced "thought"...)
1. White Sox (Frank Thomas vs.... Bill Melton!)
2. Pirates (Honus Wagner vs.... Paul Waner?)
I'm sorry, the answer we were looking for was "Arky Vaughan."
I realize we're not here to talk about the past, but Mark McGwire pulled off the trick in his last season. Sure, his batting average was eight points higher, but he did it in 299 at-bats. 23 singles, 4 doubles, 29 home runs.
In 1940 at age 29, Hank Greenburg hit 41 HR, a line of .340/.433/.670 (170 OPS+) and won his second league MVP, the first to win at two different positions.
In 1946 at age 35, he hit 44 HR, a line of .277/.373/.604 (163 OPS+).
In between those seasons, he served his country honorably during WWII, missing five and half years during his peak. From ages 24-36 he never had an OPS+ lower than 156. I wonder if giving up five and a half of his peak years compensates for not playing against blacks?
Obv. Vaughn and Kaline had more defensive value (even though Greenburg seemed a nifty 1B), but neither was near Greenburg's class as a hitter. Of course, Cobb was, and given his defensive value, he wins.
Ed Walsh was apparently not in any of your Strat sets, eh?
Ed Walsh was apparently not in any of your Strat sets, eh?
Eddie Collins' very best seasons were at Philly, but 12 yr of OPS+ about 133 isn't to shabby at 2B.
At the other Philly, who's next after Mike Schmidt? Chuck Klein? Somebody I've missed? Do we include pitchers and say Carlton? (Though if pitchers are included, Walter J vs any other Senator ends the "biggest gap" discussion, IMO anyway, even if we include the Twins and Killebrew or Carew.)
Aaron and Matthews are pretty far apart, too.
Barry Bonds' three earned MVP awards that resulted in two that were not completely robbed might take offense to that. Granted, he left Pittsburgh before he turned 30, but that doesn't mean that during that 7 season stretch he wasn't one of the best Pirates of all time.
Aaron and Matthews are pretty far apart, too.
I think you are underrating Matthews. And Killebrew. Agree that Collins is in the WS discussion. Also Appling.
For the Phils, maybe Sam Thompson. If your timeline adjustment gags on that, I guess I'd have to take Lefty or Richie Ashburn. That's a pretty large gap in any case.
I wonder how big the gap is from Ruth down to...Gehrig, I guess.
I don't think the gap from Ruth to Mantle is much to speak of.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main