User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.3121 seconds
40 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Ken Harrelson made reference to this the other day, too, and so I looked it up. Multi-year PF: 100. This year it's actually playing pitcherly.
The hitter friendly aspect is come and go. When the park was originally built, there were no enclosed luxury suites (pretty dumb hunh?). So, Hicks had them enclosed and air conditioned when he took over. As a result, the wind would hit the glass, bounce into the field of play, and help to carry balls a little further. They also have a HR porch. I guess there have not been too many windy games so far.
I agree that Hawk wouldn't shut up about it. I just think he was strainin' to do some explainin'.
Need to consider component park factors though. CBP for example has played pretty neutral overall, but it increases HR.
If, say, it increases HR, yet plays pitcherly anyway, then it's really depressing some other offensive stats.
And not to get all technical and precise, but the writer said "hitter friendly", not "homer friendly" or whatever. If the hitting components are worth breaking down, then so is the language.
I hope the infield is unusually fast. Maybe Michael Young has better range than it appears.
2008 117
2007 98
2006 108
2005 108
2004 122
Seems to me it's still a hitters' park. Am I missing something?
And not to get all technical and precise, but the writer said "hitter friendly", not "homer friendly" or whatever. If the hitting components are worth breaking down, then so is the language.
Yes, but the article was discussing it in terms of Kinsler hitting home runs, not hitting in general.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main