User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets. |
We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule |
Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers |
Page rendered in 0.4631 seconds
81 querie(s) executed


Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Ken Harrelson made reference to this the other day, too, and so I looked it up. Multi-year PF: 100. This year it's actually playing pitcherly.
The hitter friendly aspect is come and go. When the park was originally built, there were no enclosed luxury suites (pretty dumb hunh?). So, Hicks had them enclosed and air conditioned when he took over. As a result, the wind would hit the glass, bounce into the field of play, and help to carry balls a little further. They also have a HR porch. I guess there have not been too many windy games so far.
I agree that Hawk wouldn't shut up about it. I just think he was strainin' to do some explainin'.
Need to consider component park factors though. CBP for example has played pretty neutral overall, but it increases HR.
If, say, it increases HR, yet plays pitcherly anyway, then it's really depressing some other offensive stats.
And not to get all technical and precise, but the writer said "hitter friendly", not "homer friendly" or whatever. If the hitting components are worth breaking down, then so is the language.
I hope the infield is unusually fast. Maybe Michael Young has better range than it appears.
2008 117
2007 98
2006 108
2005 108
2004 122
Seems to me it's still a hitters' park. Am I missing something?
And not to get all technical and precise, but the writer said "hitter friendly", not "homer friendly" or whatever. If the hitting components are worth breaking down, then so is the language.
Yes, but the article was discussing it in terms of Kinsler hitting home runs, not hitting in general.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main