Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, November 23, 2006

BIEL & JETER UPSET SERIOUS ART FANS WITH MUSEUM LOVE SCENE

Happy Holidays, everybody!

New celebrity couple JESSICA BIEL and DEREK JETER sparked outrage when their public display of affection at a sombre exhibition left art fans upset. The actress and the New York Yankees baseball star were checking out the Holy Image, Hallowed Ground: Icons From Sinai exhibition at Los Angeles’ Getty Museum when things started getting hot and heavy. One eyewitness tells US tabloid the National Enquirer, “It was shocking. They were making out on a veranda in full view of everyone, including several Orthodox Jewish families who’d come to see the religious artifacts.” The upset witness even claims security staff had to interrupt the loved-up couple and ask them to cool it.

Repoz Posted: November 23, 2006 at 05:19 PM | 111 comment(s)
  Related News: GeneralNY Yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >
   1. Robert S. Posted: November 23, 2006 at 06:32 PM (#2244824)
If Jeter really wanted to win, he'd spend the offseason learning how to field.
   2. pv nasby Posted: November 23, 2006 at 06:36 PM (#2244825)
How could you? Making out during Schindler's List?
   3. AndrewJ Posted: November 23, 2006 at 06:39 PM (#2244826)
It must suck being Derek Jeter.
   4. kevin Posted: November 23, 2006 at 06:45 PM (#2244827)
They were making out on a veranda in full view of everyone, including several Orthodox Jewish families who’d come to see the religious artifacts.


If they stayed a little longer, they might have been treated to the viewing of a different kind of religious artifact.
   5. JRVJ (formerly Delta Socrates) Posted: November 23, 2006 at 06:47 PM (#2244828)
Primey for No. 4.
   6. Stan Papi Posted: November 23, 2006 at 06:54 PM (#2244829)
Certain things can't be quantified.
   7. The Bones McCoy of THT ... of DOOM! Posted: November 23, 2006 at 07:23 PM (#2244831)
It must suck being Derek Jeter.


Wasn't that what folks were complaining about?

Best Regards

John
   8. The elusive Robert Denby Posted: November 23, 2006 at 07:38 PM (#2244834)
Fist, pump!
   9. robinred Posted: November 23, 2006 at 07:38 PM (#2244835)
The upset witness even claims security staff had to interrupt the loved-up couple and ask them to cool it.

Another eyewitness, a baseball statistical analyst, added that Jeter dove at the security guard, but the guard got past him.
   10. Racer X Posted: November 23, 2006 at 07:47 PM (#2244836)
"Marrying a woman in a traditional ceremony continues to be my main focus," Jeter said in a statement. "There are no individual sexual favors that can compare with the sanctity of marriage, and I look forward to working towards that challenge again in 2007."
   11. The Bones McCoy of THT ... of DOOM! Posted: November 23, 2006 at 07:51 PM (#2244837)
Another eyewitness, a baseball statistical analyst, added that Jeter dove at the security guard, but the guard got past him.


I'm guessing what Anna Benson was doing to Michaelangelo's "David" went unnoticed. Someone was overheard saying that she sounded like she had marbles in her mouth...or something like that.

Best Regards

John
   12. Gold Star for Robothal Posted: November 23, 2006 at 07:58 PM (#2244838)
Marbles? How's that funny?
   13. The Bones McCoy of THT ... of DOOM! Posted: November 23, 2006 at 08:00 PM (#2244839)
Marbles? How's that funny?


The statue is made of marble.

Best Regards

John
   14. pkb33 Posted: November 23, 2006 at 08:33 PM (#2244844)
Justin Morneau would never have made this mistake.
   15. Bernal Diaz has an angel on his shoulder. Posted: November 23, 2006 at 08:51 PM (#2244848)
You are so busted.

/Arod
   16. jwb Posted: November 23, 2006 at 08:54 PM (#2244849)
Geez, kids, Get a room!
   17. Rich Posted: November 23, 2006 at 09:10 PM (#2244851)
Clutch...
   18. The_Ex Posted: November 23, 2006 at 09:40 PM (#2244854)
Jeter went into the hole to make a play on Biel.
   19. There's a chill wind blowing in Misirlou's soul Posted: November 23, 2006 at 09:46 PM (#2244855)
Justin Morneau would never have made this mistake.



Billy Bean should have never made out with Jennifer Beals.
   20. Repoz Posted: November 23, 2006 at 10:08 PM (#2244861)
Jeter gets kidnapped at the Getty Museum...kidnappers demand $17 million from Yankees...Yankees refuse to pay...kidnappers cut off Jeter's left hand and mail it to the Yankees...Yankees finally pay up...Jeter reports to spring training...Yankees report no noticable dropoff in his fielding.
   21. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: November 23, 2006 at 10:12 PM (#2244862)
Repoz only posted this article because he hates PDAs (or maybe it's art museums...one or the other).
   22. Rich Posted: November 23, 2006 at 11:53 PM (#2244880)
Jeter went into the hole to make a play on Biel.

She must have been sitting to right because he can't go left.
   23. Chip Posted: November 24, 2006 at 12:14 AM (#2244882)
Billy Bean should have never made out with Jennifer Beals.

I think we can be certain that Billy Bean has no interest in Jessica Biel.

Billy Beane, on the other hand ...
   24. Halofan Posted: November 24, 2006 at 12:56 AM (#2244889)
Steinbrenner buys the Getty to quiet the uproar...
   25. El Hombre 2 MVPs (Le Samourai) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 02:00 AM (#2244903)
She must have been sitting to right because he can't go left.


Jerry: "I'm the opposite. Lefty, can't go right."
   26. The Yankee Clapper Posted: November 24, 2006 at 02:45 AM (#2244909)
A 2nd hand reference to an unsourced National Enquirer story? Can't we at least get the New York Post version?
   27. Halofan Posted: November 24, 2006 at 04:31 AM (#2244919)
On second thought, this is just Jeterbashing - an art museum is NOT a church. It displays objects of aesthetic interest. The Getty is as popular for its architecture and scenery as it is for its exhibits.

The implication is that a date at the museum is akin to a date at a holy site. It isn't. It is far from that, in fact. This behavior would be more out of place at family-filled Disneyland than at the romance-inducing grounds of the Getty.
   28. Alex_Lewis Posted: November 24, 2006 at 04:56 AM (#2244920)
Having people get upset with you for making out with one of the most beautiful women alive = Building Your Legend

Having people get upset with you for having your lips turn blue during an October baseball game = Being a Gigantic Weeney No One Likes

Derek Jeter was given the best ticket possible in the genetic lottery. It's hard not to hate him, yet... Jesus, who wouldn't want to be him?
   29. Swedish Chef Posted: November 24, 2006 at 05:17 AM (#2244922)
I'd buy "Derek Jeter's big book of pick-up lines"!
   30. Inquisitor Posted: November 24, 2006 at 05:44 AM (#2244924)
"Having people get upset with you for making out with one of the most beautiful women alive = Building Your Legend"


I have taken the liberty of bolding the portion of your comment which is completely, absolutely, and unequivocally false.
   31. RB in NYC (Now with Christmas Spirit!) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 08:16 AM (#2244928)
I have taken the liberty of bolding the portion of your comment which is completely, absolutely, and unequivocally false.
I dunno, Biel was awarded almost exactly that title by Esquire magazine. I think the burden of proof is on you
   32. Howie Menckel Posted: November 24, 2006 at 08:32 AM (#2244930)
I blame A-Rod for not sticking up for his teammate during this difficult time. He should be speaking to Orthodox Jewish leaders, explaining why their fans should not be booing Jeter.
   33. Howie Menckel Posted: November 24, 2006 at 08:34 AM (#2244931)
Missed headline opportunity:

"Jews cry foul over Yankee's randy johnson"
   34. Inquisitor Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:25 AM (#2244940)
"I dunno, Biel was awarded almost exactly that title by Esquire magazine."

That speaks for itself.
   35. Billy Wagner's tears Posted: November 24, 2006 at 12:06 PM (#2244984)
Just when I think I can't find any more reasons to hate Jeter....he goes and does something to totally redeem himself.

one of the most beautiful women alive

Agreed
   36. winnipegwhip Posted: November 24, 2006 at 01:03 PM (#2245001)
NEWMAN!!!!!
   37. winnipegwhip Posted: November 24, 2006 at 01:06 PM (#2245002)
This should move Jeter up in Cowley's eyes as Most Valuable Playah! Jeter definately is a player.
   38. McCoy Posted: November 24, 2006 at 01:43 PM (#2245008)
It was shocking. They were making out on a veranda in full view of everyone

Chevy: Where did you kiss her Derek?
Derek: On the veranda.
Chevy: I would have kissed her on the lips.
   39. In what respect, Craig K? Posted: November 24, 2006 at 01:56 PM (#2245012)
I'd buy "Derek Jeter's big book of pick-up lines"!

Why? It's one page:

"Hi, I'm Derek Jeter. Suck it."
   40. Evil Twin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 02:25 PM (#2245022)
I'm reminded of Eric Idle on SNL in the 70s hawking a book of Prince Charles pick up lines.

"Hi, I'm the Prince of Wales."
   41. McCoy Posted: November 24, 2006 at 02:31 PM (#2245024)
I picture Joe Pesci in Casino giving the Sshowgirl the tour of his restaurant. Only Derek giving the girl a tour of Yankee Stadium.
   42. Softball-Playing Human Refuses to Be Walked Posted: November 24, 2006 at 02:41 PM (#2245028)
BIEL & JETER UPSET SERIOUS ART FANS WITH MUSEUM LOVE SCENE

I consider Jessica Biel a serious work of art.
   43. Шĥy Posted: November 24, 2006 at 04:18 PM (#2245092)
My friend claims to have seen Jeter in a club one time hit on some guy's wife. He then brought her back to his limo and let his bodyguards deal with the enraged husband.
   44. RB in NYC (Now with Christmas Spirit!) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 05:38 PM (#2245153)
My friend claims to have seen Jeter in a club one time hit on some guy's wife. He then brought her back to his limo and let his bodyguards deal with the enraged husband.
I've been saying for a while that on account of all the happiness Derek Jeter has given me over the years, if he wanted to sleep with me, I'd do it. Of course, now that I think this through, something like this makes a lot more sense. My girlfriend would make Derek happy? Well, it's only fair
   45. Cowboy Popup Posted: November 24, 2006 at 05:51 PM (#2245163)
"I've been saying for a while that on account of all the happiness Derek Jeter has given me over the years, if he wanted to sleep with me, I'd do it. Of course, now that I think this through, something like this makes a lot more sense. My girlfriend would make Derek happy? Well, it's only fair"

I have an agreement with my...whatever she may be that if either one of us sleeps with Derek Jeter, the other can't get mad, but I'm pretty sure if he did sleep with her, in front of me like that, I would stop liking him. I wouldn't try to kill him cuz of the what he's done, but I'd be bitter as hell.
   46. kevin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 07:21 PM (#2245216)
My friend claims to have seen Jeter in a club one time hit on some guy's wife. He then brought her back to his limo and let his bodyguards deal with the enraged husband.


If this is true, that's an incredibly immoral thing to do. That would justify the cuckold husband shooting him, IMO.
   47. Swedish Chef Posted: November 24, 2006 at 07:49 PM (#2245227)
If this is true, that's an incredibly immoral thing to do. That would justify the cuckold husband shooting him, IMO.

Are you OJ Simpson, by any chance?
   48. kevin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 08:21 PM (#2245234)
Are you OJ Simpson, by any chance?



The question is, what would you do?

It sounds like you would react like a craven jellyfish, just accepting another man kicking you to the curb while he ###### your wife.

The OJ analogy doesn't work for 3 rather obvious reasons:

1) Nicole wasn't married to OJ at the time.

2) Even if she were, Ron Goldman didn't hire thugs to physically intimidate OJ while he wisked Nicole away.

3) I'm not advocating killing the wife too.
   49. RB in NYC (Now with Christmas Spirit!) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 08:30 PM (#2245239)
If this is true, that's an incredibly immoral thing to do. That would justify the cuckold husband shooting him, IMO.
See, kevin? You could learn to adjust in life under Shir'ia law, you've already got some of the sprit down!
   50. kevin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 08:35 PM (#2245241)
See, kevin? You could learn to adjust in life under Shir'ia law, you've already got some of the sprit down!


There isn't a jury in the country that wouldn't see that as justifiable homicide.

I know it's difficult for you, RB, but could you at least make some passable effort as writing something marginally thoughtful sometime?
   51. Mayonnaise Savant (DTM) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:03 PM (#2245254)
If this is true, that's an incredibly immoral thing to do. That would justify the cuckold husband shooting him, IMO.


You have it backwards. Shoot the wife, she's the one that betrayed you. The guy was just trying to get laid.
   52. kevin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:09 PM (#2245256)
Yeah but Jeter is threatening you with thugs. To me, that crosses the line. I would put that on a par with breaking into your house to rob you.

If Jeter wants to get laid, there are plenty of single women about. Married women are off-limits and he should know that and respect the institution.
   53. Master of Karate and Friendship (Kyle C) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:09 PM (#2245257)
It sounds like you would react like a craven jellyfish, just accepting another man kicking you to the curb while he ###### your wife.


So the only solution is to kill him? Are you serious? I really wonder if you're legally insane.

If that happens and the wife agrees to this, it's quite simple. Dump the piece of #### ##### that happily ##### another man with you knowing.

And of course if Jeter did do this he is complete scum.
   54. There's a chill wind blowing in Misirlou's soul Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:10 PM (#2245258)
You have it backwards. Shoot the wife, she's the one that betrayed you. The guy was just trying to get laid.


Well, your first point is correct. "Jeter" could have anyone and he has to have your wife? And since he can have any woman, like a superhero, he has to use that power wisely. Like Superman winning bar bets arm wrestling. The wife is not blameless here, but that's a pretty shitty thing to do.
   55. Mayonnaise Savant (DTM) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:11 PM (#2245259)
Yeah but Jeter is threatening you with thugs. To me, that crosses the line. I would put that on a par with breaking into your house to rob you.


No, the thugs were there to keep the estranged husband away.

If Jeter wants to get laid, there are plenty of single women about. Married women are off-limits and he should know that and respect the institution.


The person respecting the institution of marriage should be the person that's part of it, not the other person. Why should Jeter respect it if the wife didn't?
   56. kevin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:15 PM (#2245260)
Kyle, why do you always respond to my posts as though you suffer from a combination of dyslexia and and complete lack of reading comprehension? Did I say it was the only answer?

Do you think it's not OK to shoot someone who is trying to steal your wife away from you by force with the aid of hired thugs?

If you do, you are the one that's insane. Or a coward, either one.
   57. Master of Karate and Friendship (Kyle C) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:18 PM (#2245261)
Do you think it's not OK to shoot someone who is trying to steal your wife away from you by force with the aid of hired thugs?

If you do, you are the one that's insane. Or a coward, either one.


Except if this is true, the wife willingly left with him. It would make Jeter a horrible person IMO, but no, it is not worth shooting him. Unless you're insane.
   58. Mayonnaise Savant (DTM) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:18 PM (#2245262)
Do you think it's not OK to shoot someone who is trying to steal your wife away from you by force with the aid of hired thugs?


If that were the case, it'd be perfectly justified.

The problem is that this isn't what Jeter did.
   59. There's a chill wind blowing in Misirlou's soul Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:19 PM (#2245263)
The person respecting the institution of marriage should be the person that's part of it, not the other person. Why should Jeter respect it if the wife didn't?


That has to be among the top 5 most absurd things I have ever read here, assuming you are serious. But that's why I love this site; everything's black and white. Everyone is either totally blameless or totally innocent.
   60. kevin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:19 PM (#2245264)
No, the thugs were there to keep the estranged husband away.


They weren't estranged. They were out together for a night on the town. This is a one-nighter for Jeter, a light frivility.

Why should Jeter respect it if the wife didn't?


Because grown men are expected to exhibit some basal level of integrity and ethics.
   61. JC in DC Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:20 PM (#2245265)
Kevin:

This "RB" isn't runningbyrd, I think, but maybe you knew that already. And while I don't condone shooting the guy, I take your point. You've got to go out fighting in that situation. OTOH, I don't believe the story at all. It's preposterous. Were it true, it would've been in the tabloids at minimum.
   62. Guapo Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:22 PM (#2245267)
Do you think it's not OK to shoot someone who is trying to steal your wife away from you by force with the aid of hired thugs?

Michael Dukakis says: It's a trap!
   63. There's a chill wind blowing in Misirlou's soul Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:23 PM (#2245269)
OTOH, I don't believe the story at all. It's preposterous. Were it true, it would've been in the tabloids at minimum.


Neither do I, which is why is used "Jeter" in my post.
   64. kevin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:23 PM (#2245270)
If that were the case, it'd be perfectly justified. The problem is that this isn't what Jeter did.


Let me quote the pertinet section of Why's post:

He then brought her back to his limo and let his bodyguards deal with the enraged husband.

I'm assuming that, since the husband was enraged, the bodyguards were there to physically restrain the husband while Jeter made a clean getaway. In this respect, the bodyguards were acting as mafia thugs.
   65. kevin Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:26 PM (#2245272)
This "RB" isn't runningbyrd, I think, but maybe you knew that already.


I do know that.

OTOH, I don't believe the story at all.


I really don't either. But you never know. A lot of stuff never gets in the papers.
   66. The Politics of Torre: How the HOF Really Works Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:32 PM (#2245275)
kev, didn't you used to admire jeter's #1 fan for sticking by Jeter while the other Yankee posters would denigrate him?
   67. RB in NYC (Now with Christmas Spirit!) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:34 PM (#2245276)
I'm slightly more meaningful content than runningbyrd, but only just, espcially in the off-season. Anyway, the point at issue seems to be the role of the bodyguards. But it seems pretty clear to me

Jeter and Wife: Leaving together, both pretty lousy
Husband: Wants to take a swing at Jeter, understandable
Bodyguards: Paid to keep people from--fairly or not--taking swings at Derek

Calling them "hired thugs" seems kind of low, and silly besides, bodyguards can't be moral relativists when it comes to these things
   68. RB in NYC (Now with Christmas Spirit!) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:37 PM (#2245278)
Oh, and I don't believe it either. If the husband is angry enough to try and take on bodyguards, he's angry enough to find a way to get this into Page Six
   69. The Politics of Torre: How the HOF Really Works Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:39 PM (#2245280)
I had a point with #66, but I forget exactly what it was. I think that I was trying to say that kevin seemed fonder of Jeter a couple of years ago.

Oh, and I don't believe it either. If the husband is angry enough to try and take on bodyguards, he's angry enough to find a way to get this into Page Six


Or Deadspin.
   70. Andere HUSSEIN Richtingen, Socialist Posted: November 24, 2006 at 09:54 PM (#2245286)
Come on. The Jeter/bodyguards story is completely implausible.
   71. Jeff K. Posted: November 24, 2006 at 10:20 PM (#2245301)
Of course it is. It's beyond the pale that it remotely happened and got kept quiet. But it's funny.
   72. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: November 24, 2006 at 10:59 PM (#2245320)
shooting a guy that's cuckolding you? that's crazy talk.
   73. There's a chill wind blowing in Misirlou's soul Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:12 PM (#2245324)
shooting a guy that's cuckolding you? that's crazy talk.


Perhaps.

Shooting a guy using bodyguards to aid and abet said cuckolding? Not as much.
   74. Srul Itza At Home Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:13 PM (#2245325)
A man comes home from work, and finds his wife in bed with another man. He pulls a gun from the night table, and shoots his wife.

The investigating detective asks him, why did you shoot her, and not the man?

He replied, "better to shoot one woman, than a different man every week."
   75. Jeff K. Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:14 PM (#2245326)
Oh, by the way:

See, kevin? You could learn to adjust in life under Shir'ia law, you've already got some of the sprit down!


There isn't a jury in the country that wouldn't see that as justifiable homicide.

Man, I'm from Texas. People are pretty trigger-happy and conservative around here. But I guarantee I can find 12 people who thinks that's completely deserving of being convicted of manslaughter. I'd be one of them.

Some guy ####### your wife deserves quite a few things. Getting killed isn't remotely one of them.
   76. Srul Itza At Home Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:19 PM (#2245330)
There isn't a jury in the country that wouldn't see that as justifiable homicide.

I would not want to be the one trying to convince a NY Jury that shooting Jeter was justified -- unless you pack the jury with all Mets fans.

Now if it was in Boston, I think the Grand Jury might refuse to even indict.
   77. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:21 PM (#2245334)
Shooting a guy using bodyguards to aid and abet said cuckolding? Not as much.

No, unless your wife is being forced to do something, that's still crazy.
   78. Monty Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:38 PM (#2245341)
How come nobody's in favor of shooting the bodyguards? They're the ones hypothetically roughing up the husband. "Just doing our jobs", my eye.
   79. I lost my thrill on Glenallen Hill Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:39 PM (#2245342)
shooting a guy that's cuckolding you? that's crazy talk.

Based on what I learned in the Claussen thread, I think the USA should invade the husband.
   80. There's a chill wind blowing in Misirlou's soul Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:41 PM (#2245343)
How come nobody's in favor of shooting the bodyguards?


'cause they'd shoot back?
   81. There's a chill wind blowing in Misirlou's soul Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:42 PM (#2245344)
Based on what I learned in the Claussen thread, I think the USA should invade the husband.


I never went there. Can you sum it up?
   82. Jeff K. Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:42 PM (#2245345)
Based on what I learned in the Claussen thread, I think the USA should invade the husband.

Or Jessica Linden's uterus.
   83. RB in NYC (Now with Christmas Spirit!) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:46 PM (#2245346)
How come nobody's in favor of shooting the bodyguards?
Well, how many bullets does this guy have? I mean, you figure it's going to take 3 or 4 to make you do the job on a demigod like Derek, a big, angry bodyguard is bad, a big, angry bodyguard with a minor bullet wound that is painful but incapcitating is much worse
   84. Monty Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:49 PM (#2245348)
'cause they'd shoot back?

Hey, no one said it would be easy. But it seems to me that even if you're dead-set on shooting Jeter (and, BTW, I'd like to say "Hello!" to the FBI agent who's now reading this thread), you'll have to get past the bodyguards somehow.
   85. JC in DC Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:51 PM (#2245349)
BTW: I'm sorry Kevin's not still here. I'd love to ask him how the Celtics looked tonight. David Lee, Kevin!!! Isiah > Ainge, on the court, and in the FO. (Ok, so maybe not)
   86. RB in NYC (Now with Christmas Spirit!) Posted: November 24, 2006 at 11:57 PM (#2245353)
Celtics! Knicks! Come watch a game that meant something once!
   87. JC in DC Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:02 AM (#2245354)
Celtics! Knicks! Come watch a game that meant something once!


No kidding.
   88. Backlasher Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:04 AM (#2245356)
David Lee, Kevin!!!

How did Lee end up with 8 Assists. When he was in college he couldn't pass gas.

Well, how many bullets does this guy have? I mean, you figure it's going to take 3 or 4 to make you do the job on a demigod like Derek, a big, angry bodyguard is bad, a big, angry bodyguard with a minor bullet wound that is painful but incapcitating is much worse


That is why the second amendment is so important. You can't use a rifle for that situation. Everyone needs a glock in case Derek Jeter tries to invade their wife. Our founding father's understood this type of stuff.
   89. The Yankee Clapper Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:05 AM (#2245358)
So now we know why some Red Sox fans are such Jeter-haters. They're afraid he'll steal their wives and girlfriends.
   90. JC in DC Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:06 AM (#2245359)
How did Lee end up with 8 Assists. When he was in college he couldn't pass gas.


Guys hit open shots. The Celtics must've defended very poorly. Lee's been great, however. He's a keeper. Isiah actually looks like a pretty good talent evaluator.
   91. I lost my thrill on Glenallen Hill Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:08 AM (#2245360)
I never went there. Can you sum it up?

Yes. The Americans are the elected people of the universe. Derek Jeter is, amongst Americans, the Chosen One. If a person messes with Jeter, this person obviously hates freedom. This person should be invaded, so democracy can be restored. It's all for this person's own good.
   92. Jeff K. Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:15 AM (#2245361)
So now we know why some Red Sox fans are such Jeter-haters. They're afraid he'll steal their wives and girlfriends.

I always thought of it like homophobes. They rabidly hate because secretly, it attracts them. And that scares them to the core.
   93. Jeff K. Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:17 AM (#2245363)
Hey, no one said it would be easy. But it seems to me that even if you're dead-set on shooting Jeter (and, BTW, I'd like to say "Hello!" to the FBI agent who's now reading this thread), you'll have to get past the bodyguards somehow.

I wonder if Jetes' bodyguards would take a bullet for him. I also wonder whether they carry guns, but I have to assume the answer to that is no.
   94. Moscow Hiding In The Shadows Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:31 AM (#2245371)
Some guy ####### your wife deserves quite a few things. Getting killed isn't remotely one of them.

I once had a girlfriend I was trying to get rid of for over a year, and when I found out that she was running around with my manager, I not only didn't kill him, I gave him a raise for the favor he'd done me. The poor guy didn't know what he'd stepped into. Listening to them come to me and complain about each other after they got married was my ongoing private soap opera, rife with constant amusement, until he slipped in a bathtub one morning, killed himself, and spoiled the show. Up to that point I felt like the burglar in The Ref, only without the cops after me.
   95. RB in NYC (Now with Christmas Spirit!) Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:36 AM (#2245375)
Up to that point I felt like the burglar in The Ref, only without the cops after me.
Oh, I love that movie. A Christmas tradition in my house
   96. Mayonnaise Savant (DTM) Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:41 AM (#2245377)
I once had a girlfriend I was trying to get rid of for over a year, and when I found out that she was running around with my manager, I not only didn't kill him, I gave him a raise for the favor he'd done me. The poor guy didn't know what he'd stepped into. Listening to them come to me and complain about each other after they got married was my ongoing private soap opera, rife with constant amusement, until he slipped in a bathtub one morning, killed himself, and spoiled the show.


I'm a horrible person who thinks this story is really funny.

Did he slip, or did he "slip"?
   97. kevin Posted: November 25, 2006 at 11:15 AM (#2245522)
I had a point with #66, but I forget exactly what it was. I think that I was trying to say that kevin seemed fonder of Jeter a couple of years ago.


I have a very negative attitude towards athletes that don't play defense. What makes it even worse is that he gets credit for being a great defensive player even though he isn't even average.

The reason I have this attitude is because, during my days playing hoops, a couple of very talented teams I was on had their chemistry destroyed by a teammate or two that were only interested in their points.

In this respect, I identify a lot with coaches like Parcells and Belichik and Larry and Hubie Brown, who will ride players who they think aren't focusing on the team concept enough. I'm amused by the comments that Parcells has been making about Romo. Romo has been lights out for him lately but to listen to Parcells, you would think he was throwing 5 interceptions a game. What Parcells is really doing is pre-emptively popping the ego balloon, of which Parcells is quite aware can ruin a team if it gets out of control.

I couldn't help notice the game the other night. Romo threw this laser touchdown pass to Terry Glenn. Glenn ran a beautiful pattern and Romo laid it right in there. So what happens? The camera pans to the bench after the play and there is Romo, smoothing the ruffled feathers on an obviously sullen Terrell Owens. If I were the quarterback and one of my receivers was complaining that I didn't throw to him on a touchdown play, I'd be tempted to kick him right in the nuts.
   98. JC in DC Posted: November 25, 2006 at 11:38 AM (#2245538)
Kevin: Stick to the topic - how about those Knicks?
   99. Chris Dial Posted: November 25, 2006 at 11:53 AM (#2245548)
I have a very negative attitude towards athletes that don't play defense.

Not an Ortiz fan?
   100. kevin Posted: November 25, 2006 at 12:01 PM (#2245556)
Not an Ortiz fan?


He is what he is. Jeter, on the other hand, could be a much better defensive player if he wasn't so stubborn about insisting on playing SS.
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 0.8306 seconds
81 querie(s) executed