Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Friday, November 06, 2009

Boston Globe/Massarotti: Sox were in on Hardy

Stoking some fires in the ol’ hot stove:

Milwaukee wanted either starter Clay Buchholz or reliever Daniel Bard for Hardy. The Sox were not willing to offer either pitcher. Milwaukee was not interested in righthander Michael Bowden, whom the Sox would have been willing to part with, and the Sox did not have a center field prospect who could match Gomez’s skill set.

I’d have done Bard for Hardy myself - of course I don’t think that would have been enough to get it done, and one wonders what else Doug Melvin might have wanted.

Mike Emeigh Posted: November 06, 2009 at 09:26 PM | 42 comment(s)
  Related News: GeneralBostonMilwaukee

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. Dale Sams  Posted: November 06, 2009 at 09:56 PM (#3381654)
Despite my decrying of many of my fellow RSN member assertions that Bard is the second coming of Christ...Im certainly not ready to part with him to take a chance on a guy who had a 74 OPS+ last year.

As for Mazz. He's Fredo. He's dead to me.
   2. Rough Carrigan  Posted: November 06, 2009 at 10:08 PM (#3381659)
He does bear some resemblance to John Cazale.
   3. Miss Remember  Posted: November 06, 2009 at 10:30 PM (#3381661)
Am I wrong for thinking Bowden > Gomez?
   4. OCD SS  Posted: November 06, 2009 at 10:57 PM (#3381674)
Am I wrong for thinking Bowden > Gomez?


I think that's defensible. Gomez probably has higher upside if he were going to put everything together, but I think Bowden is more likely to actually produce. It's kind of surprising that Melvin wouldn't be interested at least, given what Melvin has said about looking for pitching. Of course if he thinks Hardy was worth either Buchholz or Bard, I think he's going to have a hard time finding someone to trade with.
   5. JB H  Posted: November 06, 2009 at 11:21 PM (#3381681)
Bowden was pretty bad in 2009, I'm sure there's a lot of teams that think he has pretty negligible value
   6. The Artist  Posted: November 06, 2009 at 11:22 PM (#3381683)
3. Miss Remember Posted: November 06, 2009 at 11:30 PM (#3381661)
Am I wrong for thinking Bowden > Gomez?


Nah, I'm not even a Red Sox fan and that was my assumption - Bowden seems as if he could be a decent back-end starter in the NL right now, with the upside of a #3. Gomez definitely has a higher ceiling, but he doesn't seem like he ever learnt to hit.
   7. SteveF  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:06 AM (#3381701)
Bowden is still pretty young so there's time for him to develop, but his stuff isn't that great.

Gomez can't hit and will probably never hit, but he can play above average defense and run fast around the bases (were he to get on). So there's actually a spot for him on a ML roster, whereas with Bowden we don't quite know yet.

But Bard and Buchholz are obviously both far more valuable than Gomez (and Hardy). So not surprised to see Melvin ask for these (and be turned down).
   8. dirk  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:31 AM (#3381717)
i'm thinking mike cameron will be hermidia's platoon partner if bay or holiday don't get signed. not really a hardy comment, but i couldn't find a posting of the hermidia trade.
   9. Crispix Attacks is in the best shape of his life.  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:39 AM (#3381720)
Despite my decrying of many of my fellow RSN member assertions that Bard is the second coming of Christ...Im certainly not ready to part with him to take a chance on a guy who had a 74 OPS+ last year.

And had a 113 OPS+ the year before that? And plays shortstop? And is 27 and arbitration-eligible?
   10. Dale Sams  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:56 AM (#3381723)
And had a 113 OPS+ the year before that? And plays shortstop? And is 27 and arbitration-eligible?


Money Schmoney. And as I said elsewhere...Im not taking a chance on that with the stuff Bard has, especially since Hardy would be moving to the AL Beast. If Bard goes, it's going to be to some putz (heh heh) like Omar Minaya for something very shiny.
   11. battlekow  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 01:05 AM (#3381727)
I don't really think it's "obvious" that Bard is more valuable than Hardy. I'd definitely rather have Bowden than Gomez.
   12. Biff uses the power of mental thinking  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 01:34 AM (#3381743)
Well, all I wanted to hear was that the Red Sox made an attempt for Hardy. Good enough for me.
   13. Joshua Gibsons Ruth (Voxter)  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 01:37 AM (#3381746)
I guess, with incomplete information on Hardy's health and so on, I can't determine what I would think of a Bard-for-Hardy trade, but I wouldn't take it as a given that Bard's more valuable. And if I were the Brewers, I'd definitely take Bowden over Gomez, who is a bucket of suck if ever there was one.
   14. Darren  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 06:27 AM (#3381790)
The Red Sox have continued their tinker-the-hell out of any young pitcher coming up through their system. With Lester, it was having him pitch without his cutter (IIRC), for Buchholz it was to rework his delivery, and for Bowden they decided that he needed to add a slider. No level of success (even throwing ML no hitters) is great enough that the Sox aren't sure they can "fix" you. I hope that this year Bowden, like Buchholz, will abandon the new plan and revert to what made him excellent throughout his minor league tenure.


I have to say, I can't fathom a world in which Carlos Gomez has more value than Dan Bard (or Bowden for that matter).
   15. Zuvella!  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 06:44 AM (#3381792)
Just as well for the Sox and Hardy. If the Sox had gotten him, obviously given the Sox's recent SS curse, Hardy's career would be over by the end of 2010 and the Sox would be searching for a new SS. It's now possible for Hardy to bounce back. With the Sox, his one year decline would have become a career collapse.
   16. sunnyday2  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 07:01 AM (#3381798)
Jeez. Two teams make a trade, and the longer-lived thread here is about the Red Sox' non-involvement therein. You guys really need to get a life.
   17. Fumbduck Joe Bivens  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 07:07 AM (#3381800)
I’d have done Bard for Hardy myself

Please keep your fingers out of the pudding. You'll ruin it.
   18. Biff uses the power of mental thinking  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 07:37 AM (#3381802)
Jeez. Two teams make a trade, and the longer-lived thread here is about the Red Sox' non-involvement therein. You guys really need to get a life.

?

Other thread: 100 posts. This thread: 18 posts.
   19. Campeones de la Serie Mundial('zop)  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 08:02 AM (#3381804)
I'm not sure Bard is that valuable..

Y'all are suffering from a disease that, as a Yankee fan, I call Chamberlainitis. I had it too. It's really easily to get suckered in by a rookie who has mega-velocity. But if that mega-velocity is that rookie's primary skill, because of the basically inexorable downward trend of velocity after Year X, at some point, be it Year X+2 or Year X+3, the velocity will dip from otherworldy to merely excellent. And then, if that pitcher doesn't have at least one good pitch to complement that fastball, he'll get hit pretty good.

Billy Wagner lasted forever b/c once he dropped down to 97ish, he had a killer slider to mix in. But a lot of the ultra-hard throwers have very short periods of success.

EDIT: I should add, I think Bard's very good, but not great statistics for a short reliever who throws a legit 101 are prima facie evidence that he doesn't yet have a good complementary pitch.
   20. pkb33  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 08:52 AM (#3381821)
I hope that this year Bowden, like Buchholz, will abandon the new plan and revert to what made him excellent throughout his minor league tenure.


Have you considered the end results with the other pitchers you mentioned, by chance? Just a thought.
   21. AROM  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 09:25 AM (#3381832)
i'm thinking mike cameron will be hermidia's platoon partner if bay or holiday don't get signed.


Why would you think Mike Cameron would accept the 250 or so atbats that come with the short end of a platoon? He's going to be somebody's everyday center fielder. He might get only a 1-2 year because of his age, but I don't think there's any way he takes a pay cut. There isn't much competition on the free agent market for center fielders.
   22. Ball Point Pen Guy (Will Young)  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 09:49 AM (#3381841)

Why would you think Mike Cameron would accept the 250 or so atbats that come with the short end of a platoon?


Because he's the same sort of person who think that Joe Mauer will be available for Jonathan Van Every, Jed Lowrie, and a bloody sock.
   23. Dale Sams  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 10:11 AM (#3381850)
Because he's the same sort of person who think that Joe Mauer will be available for Jonathan Van Every, Jed Lowrie, and a bloody sock.


Take out the sock.
   24. Crispix Attacks is in the best shape of his life.  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 10:40 AM (#3381859)
Because he's the same sort of person who think that Joe Mauer will be available for Jonathan Van Every, Jed Lowrie, and a bloody sock.


Hey, nobody ever claimed that trade would be possible. At least not until Van Every proves that he's an upgrade over Jason Bay, which he inevitably will given playing time.
   25. sunnyday2  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 10:47 AM (#3381860)
Other thread: 100 posts. This thread: 18 posts.


Well, this a.m. when I got outta bed, this thread was on Hot Topix and the other wasn't. I said "longer lived." Still you're right, that was misleading.
   26. dangnewt  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 11:28 AM (#3381873)
But Bard and Buchholz are obviously both far more valuable than Gomez (and Hardy). So not surprised to see Melvin ask for these (and be turned down).


My thoughts exactly.

Y'all are suffering from a disease that, as a Yankee fan, I call Chamberlainitis. I had it too. It's really easily to get suckered in by a rookie who has mega-velocity. But if that mega-velocity is that rookie's primary skill, because of the basically inexorable downward trend of velocity after Year X, at some point, be it Year X+2 or Year X+3, the velocity will dip from otherworldy to merely excellent. And then, if that pitcher doesn't have at least one good pitch to complement that fastball, he'll get hit pretty good.


Chamberlainitis - great term. It is a fair warning. I don't recall Joba's secondary pitch when he was blowing away batters as a set-up guy; but Bard has a pretty good slider which for him works as a change-up. The stats are partly due to some rough outings earlier in the year - he made great progress as the year went on.

I'm glad the Sox are shopping but not overpaying. I am willing to live with a stopgaps until we know whether Lowrie can be healthy and productive over an entire season and/or Inglesias is ready. Given the great reports on Inglesias' fielding, if he can hit .240 in the majors, I'd hand him the job should Lowrie prove unable.
   27. Tripon  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 11:32 AM (#3381875)
Dodgers will trade Furcal for Bard, and Lowrie. Well, I would.
   28. Kyle C welcomes back our OBP Savior  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 11:44 AM (#3381883)
I don't recall Joba's secondary pitch when he was blowing away batters as a set-up guy


Slider, and IMO it was better than his fastball.
   29. snapper  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 11:49 AM (#3381889)
Slider, and IMO it was better than his fastball.

He also has a very good curve. That's why he's in the rotation. Even if his velocity sits in the 92-95 range as a SP (it was back up at 96 in post-season RP appearances) Joba has the pitches to be a very, very good SP. He just needs to learn to pitch.
   30. Kyle C welcomes back our OBP Savior  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:01 PM (#3381896)
He also has a very good curve. That's why he's in the rotation. Even if his velocity sits in the 92-95 range as a SP (it was back up at 96 in post-season RP appearances) Joba has the pitches to be a very, very good SP. He just needs to learn to pitch.


I liked his changeup this year as well, and IIRC, it was considered his best offspeed pitch when he was drafted. His command obviously needs to improve a ton, and I thought his fastball at lower velocities looked too... straight as well.
   31. robinred  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:08 PM (#3381898)
Why would you think Mike Cameron would accept the 250 or so atbats that come with the short end of a platoon? He's going to be somebody's everyday center fielder.


I agree with this. Cameron is a personal favorite (has been both a Red and a Padre). I think he is 1-2 years away from a bench role.
   32. BarrettsHiddenBall  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:25 PM (#3381903)
TFA is pretty vague; seems like the Bard/Buchholz details could reflect discussions two months ago rather than anything recent.

Cameron in CF, Ellsbury in LF, Hermida in AAA (apparently he has options) could work.
   33. Petunia: Pursuing a Prurient Pastime, All the Time  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:46 PM (#3381907)
I agree with #12. Glad to hear the Sox were in the discussion, disappointing to hear that the tenor of said discussion was bat-#### craziness from Melvin. I wouldn't do Bard for Hardy, and certainly not Buchholz. Bowden maybe, grudgingly. But they're all three sure as hell better than Carlos Gomez.
   34. Dock Ellis on Acid  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 12:54 PM (#3381913)
He's going to be somebody's everyday center fielder. He might get only a 1-2 year because of his age, but I don't think there's any way he takes a pay cut

Cameron made $10MM last year! I think he'll be someone's starting CF and I think he'll take a pay cut.

EDIT: He was better than I thought last year. Fangraphs says he was worth $19.4, 4.3 WAR.
   35. Big Red Basketball (NJ)  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 01:06 PM (#3381917)
Re: 33

I thought 12 was being sarcastic, referring to the "Sox were involved, but couldn't make a deal" stuff that comes out after every non-Red Sox trade the last year and a half. Jack O made a humorous reference to it on Simmons' latest podcast.
   36. Petunia: Pursuing a Prurient Pastime, All the Time  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 04:00 PM (#3382032)
Oh, funny. I took it at face value because it happens to, in this case, exactly describe how I felt about it.
   37. snapper  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 04:24 PM (#3382043)
Cameron in CF, Ellsbury in LF, Hermida in AAA (apparently he has options) could work.

That's a serious offensive downgrade in an already weakened lineup, and I doubt they want to pay Hermida $3M to sit in AAA.
   38. Joshua Gibsons Ruth (Voxter)  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 04:32 PM (#3382046)
I know a lot of people who seem to be getting excited about the idea of Ellsbury in LF with Cameron in CF. It makes no sense to me. Jacoby Ellsbury has very little value in LF.
   39. Petunia: Pursuing a Prurient Pastime, All the Time  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 05:57 PM (#3382075)
I know a lot of people who seem to be getting excited about the idea of Ellsbury in LF with Cameron in CF. It makes no sense to me. Jacoby Ellsbury has very little value in LF.

Take Ellsbury as a given and it makes a little more sense, I think. Barring Bay/Holliday, what's available at LF on the whole ranges from unexciting to downright unpalatable.

That's a serious offensive downgrade in an already weakened lineup, and I doubt they want to pay Hermida $3M to sit in AAA.

Especially if you factor in the possibility of the Sox giving up offense for defense at SS - unless Lowrie makes a serious comeback I think there's a definite chance that SS will be a zero in the lineup for the most part of 2010.
   40. HOPE: Madison Obamagarner (Flynn)  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 06:45 PM (#3382089)
And then, if that pitcher doesn't have at least one good pitch to complement that fastball, he'll get hit pretty good.

I assume you have not seen Daniel Bard's curveball?

Ellsbury in LF would be only mildly palatable. Ellsbury/Cameron/Drew would be an all-world defensive outfield, but the offense would be averageish at best. I'd have to assume if that's on the table the Sox try and swing a trade for an infield bat.
   41. BarrettsHiddenBall  Posted: November 07, 2009 at 06:53 PM (#3382093)
That's a serious offensive downgrade in an already weakened lineup, and I doubt they want to pay Hermida $3M to sit in AAA.

I think you've got that sideways--he'd be going to AAA to play, not sit. Besides, it's the Red Sox; $3m to see if a former all-world prospect can develop is a pretty good investment for a rich team, especially with a weak FA market and an organizational weakness at corner OF. Better than paying a 25-year-old with potential $3m to play twice a week as 4th OF on the big club, anyway. Or $10m on John Smoltz and Brad Penny.

Cameron definitely means a big drop-off in OF offense, but to echo [39] there's not much out there. Combine it with a move for AGonz or Fielder (so AGonz/Cameron for Bay/Lowell), and the lineup wouldn't really suffer.
   42. mopar  Posted: November 09, 2009 at 08:32 PM (#3383631)
For a few years now Sox fans have assumed that KY could shift over to 3B and play every day if necessary to boost the offense, but I don't think it's same to assume that anymore. He didn't always look comfortable there this year in limited innings and it might be too late for a reverse spectrum shift

I'd like to see them just leave KY alone at 1B and go out and find a 3B who can throw some leather around to caddy for Lowell or replace him if he falls apart. In that scenario the offense would have to be upgraded with incremental gains at SS and the bench, a reasonable LF plan, and a full season of Martinez
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Mike Emeigh
for his generous support.

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy concert tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Baseball Bats

JustGreatTickets.com provides the best value for Chicago Cubs Tickets, MLB tickets including Red Sox Tickets, Yankees Tickets, SF Giants Tickets, LA Dodgers Tickets, Cleveland Indians Tickets. Get the best concert tickets like Jonas Brothers tickets and more Chicago Tickets.

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Major League Baseball: All Star Game, New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, LA Angels, Washington Nationals, Chicago White Sox, and the Chicago Cubs.

Find terrific deals on Yankees tickets for the new home, Cubs tickets for classic Wrigley, or Red Sox tickets for Fenway with OnlineSeats. We have seats for every baseball game, including Dodgers tickets.

Page rendered in 1.5683 seconds
82 querie(s) executed