|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, September 03, 2010
Mr. Madden, your BrainSeepuStar multi-media virtual video glasses should arrive in time for the Moneyball opening.
When you read stuff like this from the Daily News’ Bill Madden, you have to ask yourself two questions: (1) At what point will columnists stop using a now seven year-old book as a hook to write about the A’s? and (2) would Billy Beane have been better off if he had never provided Michael Lewis the access to write “Moneyball” in the first place?
Bud Selig and the major league poobahs ought to be ashamed to be charging major league prices of $100 and stiffly upward for what amounted to be the $200 million world champions vs. Sacramento. What’s especially wrong with this picture, however, is that these are the same Oakland A’s that, in Michael Lewis’ 2003 best-selling book “Moneyball” - now being made into a major motion picture starring Brad Pitt as A’s GM Billy Beane - were depicted as the model franchise for all of baseball because of their ability to make the most out of spending the least.
Given the time that has passed—one of the main subjects of the book has retired already for cryin’ out loud—I can’t help but wonder if it’s really all that enlightening to critique the 2010 Oakland Athletics by referencing the book. And really, given that teams like the Yankees owe a lot of their recent success to co-opting and improving upon many of Beane’s ideas, it’s rather amusing to see “Moneyball” slammed over and over again like it is.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: NYT: Alderson Remakes Needy Mets From Bottom Line Up (41 - 1:37am, Feb 10)Last: PreservedFishNewsblog: Sources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault (5843 - 1:12am, Feb 10)Last:  He's Bought a Bat Like Prince FielderNewsblog: Orioles Scouts Banned from Korea (3 - 1:11am, Feb 10)Last: TriponNewsblog: NY Daily News: Brian Cashman's accused stalker says Yankees GM misled feds on steroid probe (48 - 1:05am, Feb 10)Last: The Yankee ClapperNewsblog: Jeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected? (46 - 12:58am, Feb 10)Last: outl13rNewsblog: 'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s (282 - 12:44am, Feb 10)Last:  MM1fNewsblog: Whatever Happened to the Spitball? (18 - 12:15am, Feb 10)Last: Sleepy supports unauthorized ramblingJim's Lab Notes: Please Excuse the Mess (174 - 12:06am, Feb 10)Last:  SoSHially UnacceptableNewsblog: The Book Blog: MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential (78 - 11:50pm, Feb 09)Last: RayDiPernaNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012 (379 - 11:31pm, Feb 09)Last:  robinredNewsblog: Grantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans (25 - 11:28pm, Feb 09)Last: Dan SzymborskiNewsblog: Yankees TV host Bob Lorenz charged with drunken driving; cops found YES anchor passed out in car (15 - 10:56pm, Feb 09)Last: botemanNewsblog: Strange Times in Baseball: 1891-1895 (13 - 10:48pm, Feb 09)Last: botemanNewsblog: Justice: 5 things that could make the 2012 season a successful one for the Astros (28 - 10:17pm, Feb 09)Last: bbc is prejudice bout menNewsblog: Fangraphs: Cameron: The 10 Worst Transactions Of The Winter (82 - 10:10pm, Feb 09)Last: Cooper Nielson
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
(I forget what the actual fangraph ranking was, Sorry!)
And Ben Sheets.
Of course they resent him! I would, too, in their shoes. So, probably, would you. And of course they take joy in seeing the hypothesis seem to (though not really) collapse.
This is my take too. Looking at them from afar I see a team that has the foundation of a successful group. Even accounting for a favorable ballpark they have one of the best pitching staffs in the league. If Beane can find a way to elevate that offense to "competent" there is no reason they can't be a divisional contender in 2011 and for the next couple of years beyond that (at which point they would probably have to move guys like Anderson, Braden, etc...like they did with Hudson and Mulder).
"'Baseball can save the world'? 'The chicks are great'? I sound like a ****!"
Other than increased name recognition (the value of which is certainly debatable from a GM's perspective), what did Billy Beane ever get out of allowing Michael Lewis to write Moneyball?
It's been a while since I read the book, but I don't remember Lewis making fun of sportswriters. He definitely made fun of scouts, with their old-fashioned ways, but I don't remember him talking about sportswriters at all.
Thank you Billy Beane, for showing the Yankees how to win.
His public image might be better in the MSM, but I don't think it has affected him much otherwise...UNLESS, of course, it has affected his ability to do business with other GMs (Kenny Williams comes to mind). Has it?
That noted, I don't think letting Lewis write the book was a very good idea from Beane's POV, but I also don't think it has really hurt him. And, hell, it would be kind of cool to have Brad Pitt play you in a movie--even if the movie turns out to suck, as everyone seems to think it will.
He did work the Swisher trade with him. I can't think of any other dealings with the Sox off the top of my head
I'd want Adrien Brody, but probably get stuck with David Arquette.
Kenny Williams was more than happy to hand over Gio Gonzalez and Ryan Sweeney to Beane just a couple of years ago.
This could be a fun hijack: If someone made a movie about your work and/or life, who would you want to play you, assuming a somewhat realistic match in terms of physical appearance?
Well, if Beane can deal with other GMs as he did before, then I don't see any reason to say that the book has "hurt" Beane in any substantive way. He still has his job, etc.
I'd want Daniel Day Lewis, but would probably end up with Paulie Shore.
he was absolutely vicious towards sportswriters AFTER the book came out when reacting to their hatred of Moneyball--he called them the Ladies Auxiliary of baseball
I'm a tubby guy with a baby face considering my age. I feel like Andy Richter would probably be a good fit.
Of course, OTOH, this is a Calcaterra piece. Aren't we supposed to hijack it to talk about WW2 military history and strategy?
Dermot Mulroney, who does bear a bit of a physical resemblance, though I never had the whole got to sleep with Catherine Keener thing he had going for him.
I'd want Chris Evans (with glasses), but probably get Anthony Michael Hall (with less hair).
In the epilogue in paper back edition he ripped them pretty good. It was a fun read.
Jon Lovitz. Be very afraid.
People said exactly the same thing to me. He's not a handsome guy, but it was fine with me, since I had a thing for Susan Sarandon.
In my younger days, people used to tell me that I looked a lot like Bruce Springsteen. Of course, we both look much different than we did 30 years ago.
I'd Want Mark Ruffalo, but have to settle for the dude who plays Harry Crane on Mad Men
Winston Churchill?
Ew.
No, it isn't. It is low pay, but it isn't hard. Sure, making deadlines are no fun, but we aren't talking about vast and documented research here.
Seven years is nothing. Shakespeare should have never written that play about Hamlet.
It's a lot of hours, particularly for a baseball beat writer. I got out of sportswriting because the hours really weren't conducive to having a semi-normal family life.
Edit: Coke to Voxter.
At least we'll always have Dallas Braden telling A-Rod to get the f**k off his mound. They can never take that away from us.
Yes. I became fed up with working with and for dipshits and left the trenches a long time ago to lock myself in an ivory tower.
And management is even more work -- if, again, you're doing it right (again, read: wrong).
And all that was as of going on 8 years ago. Things have since gotten much, much worse industry-wide with respect to fewer & fewer reporters & editors being employed to perform not only their own work but also the work formerly done by people in positions that no longer exist.
And yeah, I'd probably still be doing it (assuming I hadn't keeled over dead from mental & physical exhaustion, of course) if my bridge to the Montgomery daily (i.e. the only game in town, & I'm in no position to move) hadn't been burned for me back in 11/02 by an executive editor who's now presumably (if the Christians are right, & in this one special instance I hope to god -- no pun intended -- they are) helping Satan put out the Hell Gazette between turns on a spit.
A lot of hours doesn't equate to "hard" -- menial perhaps, but not hard.
As I indicated (not that you were responding to me), "hard" if you're doing it right. Lots of people don't, of course. From what I observed at the two dailies of any size where I worked as a news reporter & editor, quite a few of them (but by no means all) work in sports.
Whoa, we aren't talking All The President's Men here -- we are talking about sports reporters. There is a Grand Canyon type chasm of difference. Look, there is a reason the sportswriter is the low man on the totem pole in the industry (the only lower is the now pretty much defunt rock 'n roll dude). It doesn't require a great deal of writing talent to be a beat writer (in fact, a beat writer trying to sneak in talent to his article is usually frowned upon; editors want it cut and dried). It doesn't take a great deal of documented research. Any beat writer with talent will quickly move unless he is a A)screwup, or B) is biding his time working for a notable paper, C) stuck in bumfuck. Most talented writers in sports don't stay in sports.
80 percent? Wow. You must've been working at the Workers' Paradise Daily.
Depends on where you are & what you're covering, I'd say. In, for instance, SEC territory (which is where I am now, albeit as alluded to above no longer at a newspaper), the sports guys pretty much have their pick of who wants to pay how much for the privilege of sucking their pica poles. The fact that one of 'em is basically a teenage girl (with a voice to match) trapped in a man's body, as far as his real interests (reality TV, idiotfuck movies & such garbage) are concerned, hasn't kept him from a cush local radio gig, for instance.
This. This is exactly why I left. I quickly grew tired of pissing matches with assclowns. I guess if we are throwing that in the mix, then the business might be the hardest in the world.
I'd want Drew Carey. I'd get...
Corey Haim after putting on 75 pounds and fake glasses?me working for a percentage of the non-existent profits. Those are the only two actors I've EVER been compared to...and the second didn't happen until last week.Pre-edited when I remembered that one of the Coreys was dead and Wikied to find out which it was...
Some muppet, I guess.
How long was it before Jim Bouton stopped being a pariah?
Me. Edward Norton.
If that is the bar, then the rock dudes are king. Hands down. Ignoring the soft curve you threw me about SEC country, that type of "royalty" is the exception, not the norm.
Could be. Wasn't a whole lot of call for that in Little Rock & Montgomery, though. (Though we did at least get the Stones in LR back in 11/94. Here in this pathetic excuse for a city, if, say, the reconstituted version of the Fixx plays, there are ####### riots in the streets.)
Why wouldn't it be included? Interaction is kind of a big thing.
Not to hijack the hijack, but the Yankees do the opposite of Moneyball.
I assume a team doing the opposite wouldn't win so much, the Royals or the Cubs might be doing the opposite.
I get a lot of comparisons to Steve Zahn. I don't get it, but more than once I've had people I don't know stop me to mention it.
Right -- the interaction part is one of the perks. The downside is the assclowns (in my case, I was talking about the assclowns within the profession). There are assclowns in every profession, so I didn't count that as part of the job criteria.
My original point which I guess I didn't phrase well enough is that, in general, sports reporting (not to be confused with other types of reporting) isn't hard -- menial and time consuming perhaps, but not hard. I don't equate long hours to hard work if you aren't completing a hard task. In general, writing a book (what Lewis did) is hard; writing sports articles is not. Given the chance, any first year journalism student can write a beat article. Writing an article to stand up to peer review is hard; writing a grant proposal, which is one of the most time consuming, menial writing chores that exists, is not.
Really? (I didn't RTFA) For me the main tenet of Moneyball was finding hidden value and exploiting a market inefficiency. The Yankees don't do either of those things.
Also, I look nothing like him from the front. Also, he's 17 years older than I.
But if they were to do my life story, I'd want Bill Paxton to play me. My life story would be so boring that it would inspire those who watch it to take vengeance on the cast and crew for wasting their time. As part of that, someone would almost certainly torture Bill Paxton. And I really don't like Bill Paxton.
But for all those who bash it without having read it, the main tenets of Moneyball are a) OBP rules, and b) fat catchers who walk and hit homers are da bomb.
Being that you look much more like Melvin?
In 7th grade a friend compared me to John Denver, but I cling to the belief that that was because I probably had shaggy blond hair, may've been somewhat round-faced at the time & wore glasses. (Better John Denver than Robbie Ritter, I suppose.)
Except, come to think of it, I didn't start wearing glasses till 10th grade.
Hmmmm. Well, my friend was black (& almost certainly still is, though I haven't seen him in 33-odd years; I'm assuming he hasn't lost his mind a la Sammy Sosa), so maybe we all looked alike to him.
I didn't realize Moneyball was about Jorge Posada. That must be the hidden connection.
From the excerpt above:
"Given the time that has passed—one of the main subjects of the book has retired already for cryin’ out loud—I can’t help but wonder if it’s really all that enlightening to critique the 2010 Oakland Athletics by referencing the book. And really, given that teams like the Yankees owe a lot of their recent success to co-opting and improving upon many of Beane’s ideas, it’s rather amusing to see “Moneyball” slammed over and over again like it is."
1) That's not evidence; that's merely a statement without facts.
2) Even if it's true that the Yankees have co-opted Beane's ideas, how many of those ideas were actually Moneyball?
Also, someone once told me I looked like their lesbian cousin.
Welcome to the world of journamalism!
I suspect it will also be my last novel.
I didn't know Bernal Diaz was on a major league team.
Sure, he's not the most discriminating actor when it comes to choosing roles, but Fraser has a reputation of being one of the nicest guys in Hollywood. So you've got that going for you.
One of the other tenets is the Billy Beane is the coolest, slickest bond trader in a world of chumps. Lewis was completely bedazzled by Beane, and it sickenly comes forth in every chapter. This tenet has certainly caused the most backlash from both who have and have not read the book.
In retrospect, the draft chapter is absolutely hilarious.
It takes a while for Joe to get around to Fraser, but then he makes an interesting case for why Fraser is his favorite actor.
In retrospect, the draft chapter is absolutely hilarious.
I'm glad you said it and not me!
I'm still rather amazed that a Hollywood studio was willing to pony up the money to bankroll a movie on this. I could have understood doing it way back in the day when the guy was still getting results worthy of a Rocky-like plucky underdog, but the book has been rendered so obsolete by events in recent years, it's almost ludicrous.
I think that was the overall theme, as opposed to being a mere tenet
Someone in my office, just last week, actually asked me how "that fat catcher Beane drafted" was doing...
Anyway, one bit I love was how Grady Fuson told another scout how Depo "forced" him to sign this double jointed soft tosser... and Lewis brings that up to Depo, "I did not tell him to sign him, I told him to take a look at him"
The book portrays Fuson and Depo as enemies and Fuson as not fitting in with Beane's regime- and yet since then Depo and Fuson worked together in SD with no reported conflicts and Beane rehired Fuson earlier this year.
Lewis also makes comments that are difficult to see the source of, a team drafts Kazmir and he goes off on how on earth can team waste a 1st round pick on a HS pitcher... is that Beane's view? Bill James' view? Or Lewis view? I suspect that it was Lewis' view after having been exposed to Bill James- of course in hindsight it doesn't hep that the 3 HS pitcher draftees he fells fit to deride the most- 2 of the 3 went on to become reasonable effective MLBers...
From 2000-2010 the Mets have had 14 1st round picks
Mets 1st round picks with more than a cup of coffee;
Traber 215 ip, got hurt lost mph
Keppel 92 ip, ditto
Heilman
Wright
Kazmir
Milledge
Humber 42 ip, got hurt lost mph
Pelfrey
Ike Davis
A's:
Crosby, was good, got hurt really can't play anymore (and yet he tries)
Bonderman
Blanton
Swisher
Teahen
Street
Pennington
Buck
I'm probably missing 1-2 guys, but no one really significant, if the A's are drafting better than the Mutts (a wholly direction-less and dysfunctional team insofar as scouting and drafting is concerned)I don't see it- ok Ethier and Cahill are second rounders, Niese was a 7th, Joe Smith a 3rd, there is also a very good chance one or more of the Mutts later round 2008 picks is going to be a decent MLBer
In fairness to the writers, a "big" Hollywood movie is being made about this SEVEN-YEAR-OLD book ... which was mostly about a season, what, 10 years ago? If it's "fresh" enough for Hollywood, it's surely "fresh" enough for sportswriters to get a column out of.
Also it's probably evidence that "Moneyball" was a sufficiently terse, catchy title.
As to actors, I once proposed Ice Cube (no reason a black man can't play this role) but got John Candy in return. Once was compared to William Hurt which I still desperately cling to even if he is a has-been now.
So I guess I'll say I'd like Vince Vaughn to play me but I'd probably end up with Jon Favreau.
About 10 years ago Brendan Fraser and I were at the same wedding and got chatting at one point. He was just about the nicest person you could meet- sweet and humble. I knew the bride from childhood and knew few people at the wedding and he and his wife also hardly knew anyone there. After our chat, every time I passed his table, he'd wave to me. I felt pretty cool about it. I guess that makes me kind of lame.
Oh, in terms of actors to portray me, I would want Alfred Molina from 20 years ago, but I would probably be played by Judah Friedlander.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main