User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 1.0338 seconds
82 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Monday, June 29, 2009Calcaterra—Yankees and Mets fans are unimaginative
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: MLB, Granderson join anti-obesity effort (55 - 5:37pm, Feb 09) Last: ellsbury my heart at wounded knee Newsblog: Hardball Talk: Gleeman: Lenny Dykstra is back with some more can't miss investment advice (90 - 5:34pm, Feb 09) Last: DL from MN Newsblog: Kansas City Kansan: Sloan: It's time to trade Greinke, Soria (48 - 5:33pm, Feb 09) Last: ghost of perros Newsblog: Sam Hutcheson's Top 11 Sabrenerd Baseball Dork's* Basements (15 - 5:32pm, Feb 09) Last: Alex_Lewis Newsblog: MLB: Mays' life and legend transcend statistics (70 - 5:27pm, Feb 09) Last: what the hell, just use your initials or something Newsblog: Orioles sign P Will Ohman to minor league deal
(2 - 5:25pm, Feb 09) Last: Esmailyn Gonzalez Sr. |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 1.0338 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I do object to chanting "Yankees suck." That just adds to the little brother syndrome. "Let's go Mets", that's what's important.
Actually, the rarity of Marlins fans only helps my cause. Further fans would dilute my cleverness contribution. So, yes, the Marlins have the cleverest fans because they have the Barry Bonds of clever fans: Me.
Finally, the only way a team could have a higher cleverness factor is if I invented a team and cheered for it as its only fan. That would be the platonic ideal of a clever fan base.
How about we run both sets of fans through the Prisoner's Dilemma?
Also, one of the things to keep in mind is that silence can be more effective than noise. A full-throated cheer followed by dead silence would be really cool.
Nats fans. They're smart enough to realise that their ownership is a joke, the team stinks, and there's no point in paying to watch the team play.
Nats fans. They're smart enough to realise that their ownership is a joke, the team stinks, and there's no point in paying to watch the team play.
You've got a point there, but it's also possible that the Nats fan base exists only in Thomas Boswell's imagination or in a Douglas Wallop novel. And it's entirely possible that the 876 known MASN viewers for Nats games are nothing but channel surfers who happened to be passing through when the Nielson meter kicked in.
I rarely text, so I don't know the answer to this. Can you text a broad range of people? Or do you actually have to have all of them in your phone's address book? This seems like an ideal situation for Twitter. But I don't know if there's a delay in Twitter. This only works if everyone gets the message at the same time.
Wouldn't it be easier and more efficient to just get with the team and put something on the scoreboard? (Granted this would nix anything that wasn't fairly vanilla and inoffensive, but still...)
Those guys know how to organize a fan base for chants, songs, flares, chair throwing, beatdowns and general rioting.
I kid, but they do really have good chanting/singing in the stands. I went to catch a B-level game (Charlton Athletic, before they got demoted another level) and they were quite good.
Oakland A's fans have got us outwitted to the tune of around 5,000 fans per game on the same list of criteria!
This had been going on for years at Shea; the new ballpark has nothing to do with it.
One thing footie has going for it in this regard is that the supporters know they've only got 90 minutes of cheering, chanting, and singing to do, come hell or high water. Maintaining that level of enthusiasm (and volume) for a ballgame that will usually clock in at 150-200% of the duration of an EPL match would be a tall order indeed.
That said, we Americans could certainly learn a thing or two about fandom from our colonial oppressors. I am as proud of the Fenway atmosphere as anyone, but it doesn't hold a candle to a good footie ground of comparable capacity. It's not even close. The singing and chanting that goes on over here is a bit like the "Sweet Caroline" experience at Fenway...for 45 minutes at a time.
Some of the more common chants would be easily adaptable to baseball games as well. "Can we play you every week?" would be perfect for Sox fans to break out during Yankee games this year. There's also "Are you [insert name of rubbish team or player here] in disguise?" when the opposing team or star player is having a bad game. For NL fans, "Are you the Nationals in disguise?" would be a beauty.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main