User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 3.3319 seconds
82 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Monday, September 22, 2008Cybermetrics: Morong: Was Devon White A Good Leadoff Man As A Blue Jay?Doody Now for the Past?
Repoz
Posted: September 22, 2008 at 08:19 AM | 10 comment(s)
Related News: General, Sabermetrics, Toronto |
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Hardball Talk: Gleeman: Lenny Dykstra is back with some more can't miss investment advice (42 - 3:30pm, Feb 09) Last: Craig in MN Newsblog: Baseball Prospectus: Introducing SIERA (6 - 3:28pm, Feb 09) Last: Dayton Moore is a Big Fat Idiot (AG#1F) Newsblog: Rosenthal: Looking back on race, Red Sox
(25 - 3:27pm, Feb 09) Last: baseball chick (now, with NEW blog) |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 3.3319 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Not so good, Morong.
Morong continues to be unable to see the forest for the trees.
Anyway, White's marginal run value as a leadoff man was 1.290 while for the average leadoff man it was 1.292. So he was below average. Not by alot, but that is not good.
I don't trust the validity or accuracy of your made up stat to assume that being .002 "below average" is of significance.
But the conclusion isn't really proper without identifying who the 10 players ahead of White are. In fact, in the article that Morong links to, the top 11 players from 2007 contain several players who were not leadoff men
I don't trust the validity or accuracy of your made up stat to assume that being .002 "below average" is of significance.
So are you both saying this article is Morong than right?
Morongoloid, he was Morongoloid
And it determined what he could see
Is this a stat that he uses often or has in the past? Or is it something he put together to "prove" his premise that White was not a good leadoff hitter. Looks like the latter to me.
I think Frank Howard should be in the Hall of Fame. Give me a day or two and I'll cobble together some stats to prove that.
In one of his books, probably the NBJHBA, he put together a stat to look for the greatest leadoff hitters. It turned out that the qualities he was looking for were more prevelant in sluggers like Ruth and Williams and Bonds and Cobb, so he mentioned them then threw them out of the mix and looked at only leadoff hitters. One would hope Morong did that here, but it doesn't look like it.
Now, whether his level of performance was "not excellent", "not good", "bad", or what is a totally semantic question, so, have fun with that.
doubles +1.25 triples + sb / outs
White ranked 8th, and since he's not looking at homers, we don't have to worry about Frank Thomas or Jose Canseco sneaking in:
1. Lofton
2. Rickey
3. Alomar
4. Brady A
5. Knoblauch
6. Polonia
7. Lance Johnson
8. White
9. Chad Curtis
10. Molitor
11. Raines
12. Shane Mack
13. D Hamilton
All leadoff or top of the order hitters (including 2 of White's teammates). No wonder Joe Carter got so many RBI. White looks average to me as a leadoff hitter.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main