|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Why wasn’t Freel’s catch of Humberto Cota’s long drive one of ESPN’s Web gems? Because Freel didn’t catch it. With evidence mounting, Norris Hopper confessed that he put the baseball in Freel’s glove after they collided and Freel was knocked out and taken to a hospital.
...
OK, how about Hopper shoving the baseball into Freel’s glove while Freel lay still on the grass?
“I didn’t have to touch Freel,” said Hopper. “The ball was right there, inches from his open glove, and I just had to roll it in quickly.”
Said Griffey, “That was smart. Saved Kyle Lohse an earnie (earned run).”
Dayton Daily News: Hatteberg’s homer lifts Reds past struggling Astros (RR)
NTNgod
Posted: May 30, 2007 at 02:13 AM | 21 comment(s)
Related News: General, Cincinnati
|
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
LOL ... ouch!
BTW, does Griffey come off like a jerk in this article, or is it just me.
Did he really say "earnie"?
Really?
Just like every player of the 1960s, 1970s, or 1980s who has ever admitted to amphetamine use, Hopper only tried putting the ball into Freel's glove once. He immediately didn't like the way it felt, and he never tried putting the ball into Freel's glove again.
No, he's just being his usual sarcastic self. Put a smiley next to the quotes...
Funny thing: Hopper's quick thinking was ten times scapprier than anything Freel has ever done.
Is there an official rule against pretending you (or your teammate) caught the ball? Or lying to the ump? What is the penalty?
If you watched the replay video that was on ESPN.com (which is no longer there, and the one on MLB.com doesn't show it), it was pretty obvious he put the ball back in Freel's glove. If Hopper continued to deny it, he would have looked pretty stupid for arguing against something everyone could see on video.
And players try to deceive umpires all the time; its pretty much a part of the game. I don't see anything particularly wrong or unusual with what Hopper did.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main