Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, August 04, 2008

Dodgers outfielder Pierre: I’m in `difficult position’

Oh, Lordosis! With no cure in sight for permanent buntcrouchitis ethier!

All the changes have led to frustration for Pierre.

“I wouldn’t say I’m disappointed, but they put me in a difficult position,” Pierre said.

“I wouldn’t say it’s bad, but it’s been difficult. You go on the bench, and then you work your way back in the lineup and possibly going back to the bench. All I’ve ever done is be Juan Pierre when I wear this jersey. They’re sticking it to me this year for whatever reason.

“When you have a chance to get Manny Ramirez, you have to get him. But from a personal standpoint, it’s a touchy position for me.”

..."You have to believe when Andruw (Jones) starts hitting, I’ll probably be back on the bench if he strings together two to three good games. Everyone knows I’m not selfish, but it’s a difficult spot they continue to put me in throughout the whole year.”

Repoz Posted: August 04, 2008 at 07:53 AM | 74 comment(s)
  Related News: GeneralLA Dodgers

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. TomH Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:16 AM (#2889235)
Life is hard when you're not that good.

I'm in a "difficult" spot too; my boss says it's not worth paying me a million a year, even though I put my office uniform on every day, and I'm still the same engineer I've always been. Boo hoo.
   2. Prostetnic Vogon Steve Jeltz (Dan Lee) Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:18 AM (#2889238)
they put me in a difficult position
What, like in the back of a Volkswagen?
   3. Tuque Snider Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:19 AM (#2889239)
The fact that Andre Ethier is "the odd man out" in this situation, as the article says, is utterly infuriating. Juan Pierre is sluggin .318. I have several appendages that could all slug .318 even in isolation.
   4. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:21 AM (#2889243)
Life is hard when you're not that good.

Four 200-hit seasons, lifetime .300 hitter, 426 SBs and hardly ever gets caught, has been a top-ten MVP. I'm not saying this means he's good, but you'll have to forgive him if these things (and his gigantic salary) make him think so.
   5. tjm1 Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:22 AM (#2889245)
1) Pierre should be a defensive replacement/pinch runner on this team, maybe also pinch-hitting in some cases. 2) Just because he wants to play everyday doesn't make him a bad guy. It doesn't look to me like he went out of his way to make this statement, but rather that he just gave honest answers to questions the Dodgers' brass probably would have preferred he had not been asked.
   6. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:22 AM (#2889246)
Not one 'in the back of a Volkswagon beetle" refernece from any of you?
   7. Gromit Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:23 AM (#2889249)
when Andruw (Jones) starts hitting, I’ll probably be back on the bench if he strings together two to three good games

Don't worry, Juan. Ain't gonna happen.
   8. Prostetnic Vogon Steve Jeltz (Dan Lee) Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:42 AM (#2889266)
Not one 'in the back of a Volkswagon beetle" refernece from any of you?

Man, I wish I'd have thought of that.
   9. ColonelTom Posted: August 04, 2008 at 09:02 AM (#2889278)
All I’ve ever done is be Juan Pierre when I wear this jersey.

Therein lies the problem.
   10. Dr Love Posted: August 04, 2008 at 09:04 AM (#2889280)
Not one 'in the back of a Volkswagon beetle" refernece from any of you?


Post #2.
   11. Tropical Storm Davis aka Quilvio "Ebola" Veras Posted: August 04, 2008 at 10:14 AM (#2889314)

GEORGE: You see what just happened here?
JERRY: What?
GEORGE: She treated me to the Arabian mocha java.
JERRY: And you misinterpret this how?
GEORGE: She's stickin' it to me that she makes more money than me.
JERRY: I'm sure she was just being nice, buying you the coffee.
GEORGE: No, not nice. She's stickin' it to me.
JERRY: You're crazy.
GEORGE: Stickin' it to me, Jerry.
JERRY: George.
GEORGE: (angry) Stickin' it!


Pierre: $11 million
Andruw: $18 million
Manny: $20 million
   12. Ray DiPerna Posted: August 04, 2008 at 10:14 AM (#2889315)
“When you have a chance to get Manny Ramirez, you have to get him. But from a personal standpoint, it’s a touchy position for me.”


Just another chemistry problem that Ramirez has caused.
   13. CW treats quantity like a vampire treats blood Posted: August 04, 2008 at 10:42 AM (#2889335)
I'm not a big fan of Juan Pierre as a ballplayer - watching him lead off for the Cubs was one of the roughly 832 things that made the 2006 season like getting your head pounded in with a ball peen hammer. But I really don't see that he's wrong about any of what he says.

Sure, it's easy to mock the "All I’ve ever done is be Juan Pierre when I wear this jersey" line, but it's 100% true, and up until now people - including the Dodgers - have been telling him that it's good to be Juan Pierre in baseball. I can understand being frustrated now that nobody's telling you that, especially when you really haven't changed any.
   14. retro-shiite Posted: August 04, 2008 at 10:52 AM (#2889340)
Owed 30MM+ over the next 3+ years to suck at his job. We should all be in such difficult positions.
   15. SoSH U at work Posted: August 04, 2008 at 10:54 AM (#2889341)
Juan Pierre is one of my favorite players. I wish he didn't suck.
   16. Mike in MI Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:01 AM (#2889346)
Hey Juan,

Let's worry about Andruw playing more once his batting average gets within 50 point of his weight.
   17. Cooperstown Schtick Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:11 AM (#2889356)
Owed 30MM+ over the next 3+ years to suck at his job. We should all be in such difficult positions.

I will cut in line to be the first to jump on a player who is making a MLB salary and doesn't care about his job, but I don't see the point in telling a guy to shut up when his complaint is that he isn't getting a chance to work more for the money.

Pierre seems to be a standup guy. Even in his lament he manages to subtly plug a teammate, suggesting that the time for Andruw Jones to start hitting is imminent. He also seems to be a really good guy who gets an awful lot out of his actual abilities. If he played in the Dead Ball Era, he's probably be a Hall of Famer. Cut the guy some slack.
   18. Justin Zeth Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:20 AM (#2889362)
I will cut in line to be the first to jump on a player who is making a MLB salary and doesn't care about his job, but I don't see the point in telling a guy to shut up when his complaint is that he isn't getting a chance to work more for the money.
'

Point taken, but then, they don't say 'work ball'. Most of the work of being a major league athlete comes away from the games themselves. Having to put in that work and then not actually getting to play is endlessly frustrating, as any little league bench warmer will tell you.
   19. Cooperstown Schtick Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:24 AM (#2889367)
Point taken, but then, they don't say 'work ball'.

Adam Dunn does.
   20. Chip Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:24 AM (#2889368)
But he's the only True Leadoff Hitter™ - he has to keep playing!
   21. The District Attorney Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:28 AM (#2889370)
This is like the third "Pierre complains about playing time" article, and also the third time that everyone has, surprisingly to me, responded with "can't blame a guy for wanting to play." I, too, understand why he would feel this way. But here's the thing. How about he not tell reporters about it? Wouldn't that be better for the team?
   22. phredbird Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:28 AM (#2889372)
i don't like slappy but if the dumb### dodgers are going to make it between him and andruw then i feel for the guy. andruw jones is done. done. they've got to get him out of the lineup. and the criminal part of this is that ethier is losing playing time.
   23. Ryan Jones Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:52 AM (#2889385)
Adam Dunn does.


Jeff Kent does too.
   24. Roy Hobbs of WIFFLE Ball Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:56 AM (#2889388)
$11 million per year to be shitty at your job = "difficult."

Brain cancer is difficult. Stop ########, Juan.
   25. Russ Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:00 PM (#2889391)
How about he not tell reporters about it? Wouldn't that be better for the team?


It's a catch-22. He can either

(a) Refuse to speak to reporters and then get cast as a pariah.

(b) Talk to reporters and tell them the truth about how he feels.

(c) Talk to reporters and lie and say it doesn't bother him.


I think in general, (b) [telling the truth] is the best way to go. Especially if you're able to do it in a respectful way, as Pierre did.
   26. snapper Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:07 PM (#2889396)
I think in general, (b) [telling the truth] is the best way to go. Especially if you're able to do it in a respectful way, as Pierre did.

I can see almost buy this argument, but it would be nice if Pierre would throw in a little recognition that he is NOT playing well. He must (or should) be aware of the straight line decline in his OPS+ since 2004. His BA, OBP, and SLG are all way down from his FLA peak.

He should at least throw in a line about needing to get his BA above .300. Show some awareness that his play is part of the problem.
   27. andrewberg of udub law Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:10 PM (#2889399)
It's annoying but understandable when a team plays an inferior player because he's making a ton of money; they have to protect their reputations and make it look like they made a good investment. When a player is arguing that he should be playing more because he has a huge salary, it seems ludicrous. The Dodgers should offer to restructure his deal to reflect his role as a 4th or 5th outfielder. Would that make him happier?
   28. aleskel Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:12 PM (#2889401)
so much for Torre having the magic touch for keeping all of his players comfortable and accepting of their roles.
   29. JPWF13 Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:17 PM (#2889403)
1) Pierre should be a defensive replacement/pinch runner on this team, maybe also pinch-hitting in some cases.


I was about to say that, hey, despite his speed, Pierre isn't any better defensively than the others... then I remembered, Manny is there now...
   30. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:18 PM (#2889405)
Brain cancer is difficult.

Not everything has to be mortal to be difficult.
   31. Dr Love Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:26 PM (#2889418)
He must (or should) be aware of the straight line decline in his OPS+ since 2004.


I doubt Juan Pierre knows what his OPS+ is, was or gives a #### about it. Even if he was fully aware of it, he would, and I say this because he has made such comments in the past, justify things by pointing out (correctly or uncorrectly) his stolen bases, defense, bunting ability, etc... the little things that don't show up in the box score that the Juan Pierres of the world need to do to stay employed in Major League Baseball. I'm not trying to defend Juan Pierre, but athletes, even the most modest of ones until it's clear they've got nothing left, have egos that prevent them from accepting that they're not good enough. Always have, always will. Juan Pierre was brought in to hit 300, bat leadoff, and steal bases. Last year he hit 293, this year it's 280 and he's stolen 101 bases in 123 attempts as a Dodger. In his mind he's doing what he was paid to do (and he pretty much is, he wasn't brought in to hit for power or be a high OBP guy), and not surprisingly he is upset that people think he's not playing well.
   32. Vida Blew Over the Legal Limit Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:28 PM (#2889420)
It's tough to adjust when you are used to leading the league in outs and now, well, those outs are more evenly distributed. That's tough for the ego to swallow.
   33. snapper Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:33 PM (#2889423)
Always have, always will. Juan Pierre was brought in to hit 300, bat leadoff, and steal bases.

But he hasn't hit .300 since 2004. His defense is, by all accounts, poor, and his arm laughable. He has to be aware he isn't as good as he used to be.
   34. CW treats quantity like a vampire treats blood Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:43 PM (#2889436)
But he hasn't hit .300 since 2004. His defense is, by all accounts, poor, and his arm laughable. He has to be aware he isn't as good as he used to be.


Juan Pierre is a very good defensive outfielder - I have him at +5 in center, +11 in left. Okay, so he has a bad arm. He still has good range and speed. Does that make up for the fact that he's a bad hitter? Probably not. But that's all the more reason to not make up things about how bad he is.
   35. Dr Love Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:45 PM (#2889440)
But he hasn't hit .300 since 2004.


He hit 292 in 2006, 293 in 07. Close enough.

His defense is, by all accounts, poor, and his arm laughable. He has to be aware he isn't as good as he used to be.


His arm has always been weak. And I'm sure he feels that his defense is just as good as it's ever been, irregardless of how good it actually is. We can sit here and point out all the stats that show he's not as good as he once was, and even then he wasn't that good to begin with. It doesn't matter. Athletes' egos won't let them acknowledge that. You think he's going to walk into the clubhouse and go over to reporters and say "you know what, you're right, I stink." He's not going to do that, he's going to try to "prove them wrong." Just as we have every reason to think he stinks, he has every reason to believe he's a starting CF.
   36. Brandon in MO (Fire Trey Hillman) Posted: August 04, 2008 at 12:51 PM (#2889448)
Would the Dodgers get better or worse if they replaced Berroa at shortstop with Pierre?
   37. AJMacaroni Posted: August 04, 2008 at 01:21 PM (#2889474)
Let's worry about Andruw playing more once his batting average gets within 50 point of his weight.

That's a high standard. No one has hit .400 since Ted Williams.
   38. OCF Posted: August 04, 2008 at 01:21 PM (#2889475)
Would the Dodgers get better or worse if they replaced Berroa at shortstop with Pierre?

Not only does Pierre throw laughably, he throws laughably with his left arm.
   39. The Joe Mauer Power Hour (kj) Posted: August 04, 2008 at 01:24 PM (#2889476)
Well, how much worse could his right be?
   40. JPWF13 Posted: August 04, 2008 at 01:31 PM (#2889483)
Would the Dodgers get better or worse if they replaced Berroa at shortstop with Pierre?


My mind boggles...

Actually if Pierre could field short no worse than Tony Womack circa 2000-02, yes he would be a clear improvement over Berroa.
   41. Chase Utley, America's Favorite Robot (Joey Belle) Posted: August 04, 2008 at 01:31 PM (#2889484)
Well, how much worse could his right be?


It's certainly well rested.
   42. Ray DiPerna Posted: August 04, 2008 at 01:41 PM (#2889491)
$11 million per year to be shitty at your job = "difficult."

Brain cancer is difficult. Stop ########, Juan.


Sorry, but it's you who's lost perspective, not Pierre. He's talking about something being "difficult" within a certain context. You're the one who's ripping his statements out of one context and ludicrously putting them in another. When someone says to you, "Gee, it sucks that I lost my cell phone" do you reply "Do you know what sucks? Brain cancer."
   43. Kiko Sakata Posted: August 04, 2008 at 02:09 PM (#2889506)
I kind of like Juan Pierre (I like him more now that he's no longer a Cub) and I do kind of feel bad for him. His 2007 was a near replica of his 2006 season (BA and OBP up .001 each, a few more steals - 64-58 - fewer CS - 15-20 - more runs scored - 96-87). It wasn't a GOOD season, but it was exactly what anybody should have expected out of Juan Pierre. If that was worth $9 million per season and a spot as the starting CF to Ned Colletti before the 2007 season, why wasn't it before the 2008 season (from Pierre's perspective)? I can understand his frustration, especially when the guy they paid twice as much money to replace him is batting .161.
   44. LSR Posted: August 04, 2008 at 02:33 PM (#2889534)
I'm not a big fan of Juan Pierre as a ballplayer - watching him lead off for the Cubs was one of the roughly 832 things that made the 2006 season like getting your head pounded in with a ball peen hammer.

The worst part of it was the way that they kept playing him in September and wouldn't call up Pie to give him some PT.

BUT ... I'm willing to believe that Hendry outfoxed us all. By keeping Pierre as the primary CF through September 2006 he enabled JP to pile up enough stats to be designated a Type B free agent when he left the Cubs. IIRC the supplementary pick that they got for Pierre turned into Josh Donaldson - who was one of the pieces that they just sent to Oakland for Rich Harden.

So ... in return for suffering through watching Pierre audition for the Dodgers when Pie should have been honing his skills in front of the Ivy, we got Rich Harden. I don't really believe that Hendry did it on purpose ... but it still makes me feel much better.
   45. retro-shiite Posted: August 04, 2008 at 02:40 PM (#2889543)
Cut the guy some slack.

He was a member of both the 2003 Marlins and the 2006 Cubs. He can get his slack from somebody else.
   46. alex perros gives up the ghost Posted: August 04, 2008 at 04:24 PM (#2889666)
Juan Pierre is a guy who's always done his best and busts his butt day in and day out, and until his latest injury -- which he returned from more quickly than most -- he was in the lineup every day.

I know that on a statistical level that is a negative for most of us, and I will agree that I'd rather be playing Ethier against righties and drop Pierre to batting eighth/pinch running/hitting duties, but there is something unseemly about trashing a guy with that attitude.

Juan Pierre would be Ty Cobb's kinda player.
   47. Jimmy P Posted: August 04, 2008 at 04:26 PM (#2889669)
Juan Pierre would be Ty Cobb's kinda player.

Have you seen the color of his skin?
   48. Dizzypaco Posted: August 04, 2008 at 04:27 PM (#2889670)
Juan Pierre is a guy who's always done his best and busts his butt day in and day out, and until his latest injury -- which he returned from more quickly than most -- he was in the lineup every day.

Juan Pierre is a guy who busts his butt when he's in the lineup, and complains when he's not. There are worse personalities to have on a ballclub, but there are also better, particularly among players with questionable talent. The ideal is a player who plays hard when he's in the lineup, and doesn't complain when someone better is brought into play. They exist.
   49. Cooperstown Schtick Posted: August 04, 2008 at 05:42 PM (#2889763)
When a player is arguing that he should be playing more because he has a huge salary, it seems ludicrous.

I missed the part where somebody did this. At least in this article, he never mentioned his salary at all nor did he argue that he should be playing more. He said that he wants to play every day, and acknowledged that the situation prevents everyone from playing as much as they want. The guy had a consecutive games streak going into this season that was ended by just not playing him.* Missing the playing time does not equate to ludicrous. Some people may be reading more into Pierre's "complaint" than there really is.

*Torre learned to overlook consecutive games streaks a little late. If he had similarly disregarded Matsui's earlier on and rested that guy more frequently, maybe his knees would be in better shape these days.


On edit: Pierre's sponsorship on baseball-reference.com is utterly classless. Even leaving aside the awkward racial reference, paying for the opportunity to trash a player like Pierre in that way is really weak. I can't believe the sponsor was actually willing to link that trash to an actual company website.
   50. Shock Posted: August 04, 2008 at 08:42 PM (#2890011)
"Gee, it sucks that I lost my cell phone" do you reply "Do you know what sucks? Brain cancer."

Hence why he lost his cell phone.
   51. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: August 04, 2008 at 09:08 PM (#2890058)
Especially since the comparison to Eckstein isn't even accurate.
   52. alex perros gives up the ghost Posted: August 04, 2008 at 09:54 PM (#2890166)
#49 -- Ironic the sponsor is selling the cloak of anonymity.

But it reinforces my point that there's something mean-spirited about the attacks upon Pierre that go beyond criticizing his OPS+.
   53. Srul Itza Posted: August 04, 2008 at 11:50 PM (#2890414)
"Gee, it sucks that I lost my cell phone" do you reply "Do you know what sucks? Brain cancer."

This is a perfectly reasonable response, since by losing his cell phone, he has reduced his chances of cell phone-radiation induced brain cancer. So you are actually pointing out how much better off he is for having lost his cell phone.
   54. SoSHially Unacceptable Posted: August 05, 2008 at 12:06 AM (#2890435)
But it reinforces my point that there's something mean-spirited about the attacks upon Pierre that go beyond criticizing his OPS+.


I agree. As I said above, he's always been one of my favorite players, in part because I'm partial to speedy, center fielders with little power, but mostly because when he was with the Marlins, in particular, he seemed to be having so much fun playing baseball. I wish he was a better player or that his skills had more value in today's game, but even while recognizing he isn't and they don't, I don't get the attacks on him.
   55. MM1f Posted: August 05, 2008 at 12:23 AM (#2890455)
Jesus.
Worst. Thread. Ever.

There is some serious horsecrap being spewed around here.

I don't know why people need to get so vitriolic about a guy who does his best.
Yes, he shouldn't be a starting LFer but I don't know why people feel to take that fact and hold it against Pierre personally... especially when it is taken to these extremes. Get a grip folks.
   56. Roy Hobbs of WIFFLE Ball Posted: August 05, 2008 at 05:20 AM (#2890537)
#42-

Juan Pierre makes eight figures to be terrible at his job. I don't want to hear him complain about that job in any context. Excuse me for not wanting to hear the "poor me" routine. I exaggerated to make a point. Here's some perspective: if you make $11M a year and play like Betty White don't go on the record that your employer is "sticking it to you."
   57. alex perros gives up the ghost Posted: August 05, 2008 at 10:06 AM (#2890654)
Nobody should ever complain about your job -- you signed up to be paid market value to work at their discretion.

Apples and oranges, but every pro athlete knows he's got a limited number of years in him to play, and the competitive ones don't want to spend it as a backup -- a role Pierre has never found himself in.

Take your paycheck and shut up is a truly insulting rejoinder. If you'd take that, no matter how much they're paying you, you are less of a man than Juan Pierre.
   58. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: August 05, 2008 at 10:10 AM (#2890658)
I tend to agree with that sentiment, although Pierre's job is really "major league baseball player", and that's what he's being deployed as. He's not being abused in any way that I can tell, unless it says in his contract that he'll start a certain percentage of his team's games.

If he was a young player, and being held on the bench, then that would inhibit his future earning potential and reputation, and would definitely have a point that the situation was unfair.
   59. Roy Hobbs of WIFFLE Ball Posted: August 05, 2008 at 01:04 PM (#2890908)
Take your paycheck and shut up is a truly insulting rejoinder. If you'd take that, no matter how much they're paying you, you are less of a man than Juan Pierre.


Look, most of us make less than 1% of Juan Pierre's yearly salary. Most of us HAVE to take our paycheck and shut up because we want to keep our jobs. My problem with Pierre isn't that he has issues at work and wants to address them. My problem is that he's doing so in the media.

He's making several times this year what most of us will earn by our retirements. And he rather clearly isn't very good. I can't see where the Dodgers have jerked him around at all. Sure, he's entitled to his gripes and grievances. But do it behind closed doors like a professional. Do you think it's classy or productive to grouse about your employer in the newspaper?
   60. JPWF13 Posted: August 05, 2008 at 01:13 PM (#2890921)
He's not being abused in any way that I can tell, unless it says in his contract that he'll start a certain percentage of his team's games.


I remember way back in 1980 that this guy re-signed with et Yankees only on condition that he be the starting 1B, or at least start X number of games...

He of course started the year in a terrible slump and the team wasted no time in PUBLICLY requesting that he waive that contract provision (which he did...)
   61. The Joe Mauer Power Hour (kj) Posted: August 05, 2008 at 01:16 PM (#2890928)
Do you think it's classy or productive to grouse about your employer in the newspaper?

No one cares what you think about your employer. Juan Pierre is a ballplayer, so the media asks him what he thinks of his. Constantly. And, you know what, for the situation Juan Pierre is in, I think he came off pretty well in his comments.

If you were in a comparable situation at your job, and you had a dozen reporters asking you about it, I imagine you'd say something. You could only hope that you'd say something as respectful and honest as what Juan Pierre said.
   62. Ray DiPerna Posted: August 05, 2008 at 01:24 PM (#2890941)
Look, most of us make less than 1% of Juan Pierre's yearly salary.


Is that why you're upset with him? Because he makes more money than you?
   63. As foretold by the prophesy (JFSE) Posted: August 05, 2008 at 01:57 PM (#2890988)
This is the story of a man, wanting to be a ballplayer. As a kid, and through the minors, he saw baseball players hit .300 and steal 50 bases... and knew if he worked hard, he could do it.

And so he did. He slapped and swiped his way to a World Series, and got a huge contract. Then, the unthinkable happened. Suddenly, steals imply you not get caught, and batting average without walks or power isn't very useful. Poor Juan's dreams have been shattered as he learns his entire career was a lie. A 75 OPS+ lie.
   64. phredbird Posted: August 05, 2008 at 02:31 PM (#2891049)
i don't dislike juan pierre as a person, but i really can't stand him as a player. every time he comes to bat he gets cheered. then he hits a weak grounder somewhere and gets thrown out by half a step. almost every game i've been to, he gets on base with a swinging bunt ... then gets thrown out stealing. or he reaches on an error ... and gets thrown out stealing. if there is a runner on base, he might, just might, advance the runner with a ground out ... i exaggerate, i'm sure i've seen him get a hit and score and all that. but it drives me nuts to watch him hustle the dodgers out of games while a player with pop in his bat sits on the bench.
   65. JPWF13 Posted: August 05, 2008 at 02:32 PM (#2891052)
Poor Juan's dreams have been shattered as he learns his entire career was a lie. A 75 OPS+ lie.


It's 83 for his career not 75.

Back in 2003-04 when his OBP was .361 and .374, AND he played much better in the field than he does today- he WAS a good ballplayer.

His current salary, if paid to that 2003/04 player, would not be such a horrible contract.

What we have now is a player, whose OPS+ trend is this:
107, 84, 82, 75, 68
OBP trend:
.374, .326, .330, 331, .324
Slugging:
.407, .354, .388, .353, .316
and his dee seems to slip year by year

he IS worse than he was 3 years ago and 5 years ago
In 2004 Pierre was a poor man's Ichiro
In 2008 Pierre is pretty much this guy.

IMHO what should Pierre do? I think the big problem is his complete inability to hit the ball with any authority. His K/bb is quite good actually- he can stand to either

A: Hit the ball harder early in the count- swing harder or simply try to adopt a guess approach early in the count- sure he'll pick up a few Ks- but he might elevate his BABIP and get some XBHs back.

B: Use a heavier bat. I'm serious, he's basically a deadball era hitter anyway, let him go up there with a 40 ounce bat rather than 30 (or whatever he uses)- it's what deadball era slap hitter did, his infield grounders could be hit some 10-15% harder- and IFs either won't be able to cheat in as much on him- and he'll pick up some IF hits h's been losing, or if they still cheat in, extra balls will escape the IF.

Players change, they change athletically, or the competition changes the way they play you- you have to make adjustments. Pierre looks to me like he's lost a little athletically, and he has to make adjustments, but he hasn't yet (or can't)
   66. OCF Posted: August 05, 2008 at 02:39 PM (#2891069)
Use a heavier bat.

For what it's worth, I remember Ozzie Smith using what looked like a pretty big bat. Worked for him.
   67. Roy Hobbs of WIFFLE Ball Posted: August 05, 2008 at 06:11 PM (#2891688)
Is that why you're upset with him? Because he makes more money than you?


I'm not upset with him. I really don't care about him one way or the other.

On the other hand, you probably don't make more money than me and I think you're an obnoxious ass.
   68. Roy Hobbs of WIFFLE Ball Posted: August 05, 2008 at 06:15 PM (#2891690)
If you were in a comparable situation at your job, and you had a dozen reporters asking you about it, I imagine you'd say something. You could only hope that you'd say something as respectful and honest as what Juan Pierre said.


I understand what the man said is relatively mild. But what's the point in complaining about it publicly? It doesn't change anything and helps nothing.
   69. Shock Posted: August 05, 2008 at 06:20 PM (#2891691)


Is that why you're upset with him? Because he makes more money than you?


I do not want to speak for anyone, but I think what some people are trying to say is simply that it's difficult to listen to a man talking about his "difficult position," when in reality he is so well-off.

I'm sorry that you're not having much fun Mr. Pierre, but as long as you're making $10,000,000 a year to play baseball, it's going to be tough for you to get a piece of my sympathy cake.
   70. Shock Posted: August 05, 2008 at 06:29 PM (#2891697)

If you were in a comparable situation at your job


A comparable situation?

Okay:

So I was the highest-paid worker in my company, but I am doing a terrible job and the company just brought in someone who makes more than me but who is much better. The company would probably like to fire me but they can not because we are unionized and my contract is guaranteed, so instead my workload is simply reduced so that I get to still be one of the highest paid workers in the company but I only have to work 24 hrs/week.

Sounds good to me. ;)
   71. CFiJ Posted: August 05, 2008 at 06:34 PM (#2891703)
Yes, but unlike Pierre it seems you enjoy working at your job less.
   72. Cooperstown Schtick Posted: August 05, 2008 at 06:38 PM (#2891708)
So I was the highest-paid worker in my company, but I am doing a terrible job and the company just brought in someone who makes more than me but who is much better. The company would probably like to fire me but they can not because we are unionized and my contract is guaranteed, so instead my workload is simply reduced so that I get to still be one of the highest paid workers in the company but I only have to work 24 hrs/week.

Don't forget that it's being nationally revealed how much your employer thinks you suck at your job. Also, a huge number of people who live around you feel like they pay a part of your excessively high salary and hate you for sucking. Also, the thing you only get to do 24 hrs/week is one of the most fun things you've ever done and you love doing it. Also, you're not a natural slacker.
   73. Shock Posted: August 05, 2008 at 06:43 PM (#2891710)
My post 70 wasn't intended to be serious: note the wink at the end. I was just trying to show how impossible it is to draw parallel's between Pierre's job and Average Joe's job.
   74. Cooperstown Schtick Posted: August 05, 2008 at 09:24 PM (#2892027)
My post 70 wasn't intended to be serious: note the wink at the end.

Oops. Sorry. My browser has an emoticon-blocker.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy concert tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Baseball Bats

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Major League Baseball: All Star Game, New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, LA Angels, Washington Nationals, Chicago White Sox, and the Chicago Cubs.

Find terrific deals on Yankees tickets for the new home, Cubs tickets for classic Wrigley, or Red Sox tickets for Fenway with OnlineSeats. We have seats for every baseball game, including Dodgers tickets.

Page rendered in 0.8752 seconds
81 querie(s) executed