User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets. |
We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy Giants tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule |
Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers |
Page rendered in 0.4966 seconds
81 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Just had to post that...carry on...
not a hard hit- more of a location single-
pretty terrible at bat actually- except for the outcome (and he's hitting .257 so it's not like he's hacking his way to a .300 average)
hell even the swing that produced the hit was terrible- he was off balance- couldn't put any force into it- seeing eye hit.
the ANNOUNCERS went on and on for the rest of the inning about how it was a GREAT AT BAT.
All I could think was WTF?????
That's the hilarious thing about Frenchy. I mean the guy will take a pitch right down the middle and swing at something that looks like its about to hit B.Cox on the bench. He just has no mental conception of a strike zone. None. The word abnormal used earlier in the thread is the best thing to describe the guy. I mean as much as we've all been wowed by the ability of Vlad to hit something approaching his head, what Frenchy is doing is unprecedented in the 20 years I've been watching baseball.
Jeff Francoeur Swing Analysis Part 2
apparantly this is what Bobby Cox had to say about Francouer in the AJC:
In regard to what Cox said about his approach, it wouldn't bother me either if Francoeur didn't so clearly have an incredible amount of ability. Cox is right though, from the standpoint that Francoeur's swing will not really allow him to be more patient. Why it does bother me is because I don't seem him doing this same thing and really realizing his potential. We'll see though...I wish him the best (I live in a suburb right next to where McCann and Francoeur grew up and the hometown thing is pretty cool)
but Francouer DOESN'T hit pitches like that--his hits come on "regular" strikes; unlike Vlad & Yogi who could take a "bad ball" (meaning a waste pitch that should be unhittable) and drive it with power. Francouer can't do that.
I think opposing pitchers should be fined every time they throw Frenchy a strike
Absolutely. I think Francoeur's mind is already 95% of the way made up whether he's going to swing before the pitch is even thrown. Every scouting report on him should lead with "Never throw a strike" in bold.
For a good laugh, check out his stats on a 3-2 count this year. He will literly swing at anything offered on 3-2.
And of course the worst part is nobody in the Braves organization understands that there is a problem here.
I am not sure about that. Its possible that agree that there is a problem, but think that having him try to alter his approach will do more harm than good. If he doesn't improve one bit and simply continues to do what he's done for the last year and a half for the next 15 years, then he'll have had a solid career.
I'm not sure what this is based on, because he's a pretty terrible baseball player right now. He's a corner outfielder with a .281 on base percentage and a .445 slugging percentage. He has to improve just to get to mediocre. The only thing that makes him look respectable is the hot streak that started his career.
guys like Garvey, Buckner and Al Oliver had extremely low walk totals, not so much because they had no patience and couldn't recognize a ball/strike (they weren't good at it- but not abominable like Frenchy)- but they had such good contact skills that it was hard for them to go through several pitches without putting the ball in play.
with Frenchy it's random- when he doesn't swing it seems like whether the ball is hittable or not doesn't matter. I think he decides before the pitch is thrown whther or not to swing.
Is there any chance of an eye problem? That seems like the description you'd hear if the batter just couldn't see the ball.
Talking honestly to the media is not the key to winning baseball games. If you're right and no one is working with him on this issue, then sure that is bad. My guess is they are. Of course, I'm guessing coaches since he was 7 have been trying to work with him on this.
Jose Guillen, when he first came up with the Pirates, was about as bad. I see a lot of similarities.
-- MWE
I don't think so- he actually makes contact on some of this crap he swings at. I think he just never bothered to learn to swing only if the ball is "here" and to take if the ball is somewhere else-
I mean we (almost) all played little league, and most hitters know after the fact if the ball is a strike or not- but there's little or no connection between the part of their brain that says, "strike" or "ball" and the part that says "swing". Some hitters figure out that the only way they'll gwt to HIT is if they swing at everything- if you're a patient hitter you won't get to "HIT" because the pitchers at that level don't throw enough strikes.
The guys who never learn after the pitch is thrown selectivity (ie: decide to swing or not after the pitch is thrown) generally get weeded out as you move up from little league to JV to Varsity HS to the minors/college. For Frenchy to make it all the way to the MLB is extraordinary- but he probably never HAD to learn selectivity, because even without it, he could hit any pitching short of MLB caliber- and as godawful his OBP is- he's not the worst hitter in MLB either.
Personally, I don't think he's going to remotely approach what his potential could have been if at 17/18 his coach stuck him in a batting cage every effing day, and said he couldn't leave until for 20 straight pitches (random balls & strikes) he swung at every strike and took every ball.
I think Jose was seen as un-coachable from the get go- no one has said that about Frenchy- it's more like he's been mis-coached- but Atl is a good oprganization...
If Frenchy wanders in the wilderness awhile like Guillen before getting his act together (more or less), I think Atl fans will be greatly disappointed.
What's really amazing is that most ATL fans think Frenchy is a good/great hitter, NOW, in 2006.
No he won't. His career EQA is now 256, below league average, which is not "solid" for a corner OF. And of course this year it's even worse. That 256 is now the same as Ryan Langerhans's career EQA. His career ISO is now 208 which is nothing special for a corner OF (he doesn't hit a lot of doubles). 270/300/480 is basically Tony Batista (255/300/455, 249 EQA) at a corner OF spot. Nice 4th OF though.
Now, I have no problem with folks arguing that he'll develop, comparing him to Jose Guillen, etc. And if Bobby Cox isn't worried, who am I to question him. What I am saying is that he needs to improve to be an average, much less good, corner OF ... and great seems so far off as to be unattainable.
He's much younger, but he seems like Mark Quinn, who seemingly took pride in not walking (and who oddly walked decently at age 26 then turned into an insane hacker at 27).
Francoeur has a 7/1 K/BB ratio for his career and 9/1 this season. Even Jose Guillen was only 5/1 in his youth. Soriano had 1 year at 7/1 (2002) but is under 4/1 for his career. Ivan Rodriguez (from the article's list) was never worse than 3/1. Albert Belle was 4/1 in the beginning. Even Wily Mo Pena, about whom I've had similar doubts, has never been worse than 6/1 and is 5/1 for his career.
And now the coup de grace:
Francoeur: 33.8 AB per BB
OZZIE Guillen: 28 AB per BB
Francoeur has to improve.
Well, if he gets any worse, he'll lose his job.
The White Stockings played in a field, Lake Front Park, that had a ridiculously shallow left field fence. It was so extreme, that in most years, a ground rule specified that balls hit over it would be doubles. Playing with that ground rule in 1883, the entire team hit 13 home runs.
In 1884, for whatever reason, balls hit over the short fence were ruled home runs. Of the 322 home runs hit in the entire 8-team league, 142 of them were hit by White Stocking players, including 13 by King Kelly, 21 by Cap Anson, 22 by Dalrymple, 25 by Fred Pfeffer, and 27 by Ed Williamson. In 1885, the team moved to a different park, and the team HR total went down to 54, led by Dalrymple's 11. (Williamson hit 3 HR in 1885.) Williamson's 27 HR would stand as the (generally unknown) major league record until 1919 when a certain superstar Red Sox pitcher started playing more outfield.
Kelly and George Gore drew plenty of walks in 1884. The rest of the team? Here are some of the HR/BB totals:
Silver Flint (C) 9/7
Anson (1B) 21/29
Pfeffer (2B) 25/25
Williamson (3B) 27/42
Tom Burns (SS) 7/13
Dalrymple (LF) 22/14
Billy Sunday (4th OF) 4/4
John Clarkson (P) 3/2
Williamson attracted considerable support in the early years of Hall of Merit voting, but that support waned, and he is now a fringe candidate, hanging on deep in the backlog with a few loyal supporters. Exactly what to do with that 27-HR season of his has always been one of the issues surrounding his candidacy. But the team doesn't lack for elected Hall of Merit members: Anson, Gore, Kelly, and Clarkson.
Homer tonight. 21/10.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main