Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

ESPN: Report: Diamondbacks trade Vazquez to White Sox

The Arizona Diamondbacks will send Javier Vazquez to the White Sox for Orlando “El Duque” Hernandez and outfield prospect Chris Young, the Arizona Republic and other newspapers reported Wednesday.

Thanks to Jimmy P.

Damon Rutherford Posted: December 14, 2005 at 01:57 PM | 131 comment(s) | Login to Bookmark
  Related News: ArizonaChi White Sox

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
   1. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:04 PM (#1776666)
Feels like too much to give up for Vazquez, and it leaves the Sox's rotation kind of crowded.
   2. Jimmy P Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:09 PM (#1776675)
I don't think it's too much, basically Chris Young for Vazquez. I'm just wondering what he's going to trade Contreras or Garland for.
   3. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:14 PM (#1776676)
Whew! At least it wasn't Garland.
   4. Mike Emeigh Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:14 PM (#1776677)
Garland could be moved in another deal, which would lessen the crowding. Since I think he overachieved in 2005, I think Kenny would be well advised to do just that.

I like this deal from both sides. Vazquez was clearly unhappy in Arizona, and he was probably the one pitcher hurt the most by the D'backs horrible D. Nonetheless, he ate innings and pitched acceptably anyway, and I think he'll be better-than-average for the Sox. Young gives the Snakes something that they didn't have - a real CF - and while I like him I think Anderson has more upside. Anything that the D'backs get from El Duque will be a bonus.

-- MWE
   5. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:15 PM (#1776678)
Vazquez would have been great in a pitchers park that is tough to hit homeruns in, such as Shea, or RFK.

In the AL, in the Cell? Not so much. But he will still strengthen that rotation even further.

It will be interesting to see if the D backs actually did cave and give up some money in the deal, despite insisting that they would not.

Hernandez? I personally think he is done. But if rest heals his shoulder some, with his delivery, he could be effective for half a season or so in the NL, where the hitters don't know him. He is getting 4.5 mil, but accordind to Cotts, he also has 2.5 mil in incentives. Does anyone know what they are? That is ALOT of incentive. 200 innings? All star selection? Cy Young? (Ha!)

Obviously Young is the prize. I have not followed him. I only know what I have read the last couple of days. I am sure others will fill in the blanks. It looks good though. I wonder if this impacts the Upton negotiations, or his eventual situation once he is signed.

Vizcaino is a nice "throw in". He made 1.3 million last year to avoid arbitration, and he had a decent season, so I think in todays market, it takes 2 million to avoid arbitration again. We'll see how they handle that.

Overall Grade for Byrnes: A, if the D Backs did not have to kick in any money. If they had to kick in money, it's still a high B.
   6. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:20 PM (#1776683)
From the White Sox perspective, I don't like the deal for two reasons.

The biggest is that it's unnecessary -- the White Sox don't need another starter when they've got five who are ready to go. Of course, this objection in part disappears if Garland or Contreras is moved in another deal, which certainly seems like a possibility. (But then we have the issue of why they need to be moved, since both are signed through '06. If they are, it better be for something good.)

The secondary problem is the loss of Young. I know the White Sox like Anderson and Owens, but I hope they have really done a qualitative assessment. Everything I read indicates that Young might be the best of the three.

The upside, of course, is a pretty sweet starting rotation: Buehrle-Garcia-Garland-Contreras-Vazquez. I assume that Cooper thinks he can fix Vazquez's homerific tendencies like he did with Contreras.

I'll be interested to see if money changes hands. El Duque + Vizcaino probably will make $6 million plus next year, so it's nice to get those liabilities off the books.
   7. Elton Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:23 PM (#1776686)
I'm an Indians fan, but even so I'm admiring KW's risk-taking this offseason. I'm not sure why the White Sox would want Vazquez at his current salary, given that their rotation was already the strength of the team, but it's fun to see Williams take risks with big upside. The bad thing for him is that if the White Sox win fewer games in '06 (very likely regardless of what he does), people will bash him for breaking up a championship team.
   8. PooNani Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:24 PM (#1776688)
What a heist
   9. Kyle S Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:25 PM (#1776689)
That seems like a great deal for the D-Backs. Congrats, levski, you didn't get taken to the cleaners! Although, I have it on good authority that the money saved by moving Javy is going to be used to give Tony Clark a 6 year contract extension...
   10. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:26 PM (#1776690)
levski? Whereaya?
   11. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:27 PM (#1776691)
BTW, it looks like flight time, with connections to San Juan is about 6-8 hours. From Phoenix it was 9-11 hours. So Mrs. Vazquez has shaved 3 hours off her trip. Thats important. :)
   12. DosRafaels Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:27 PM (#1776692)
Kenny is just killing my Indians' chances of winning the division right now. My pessimism level keeps getting raised with every Sox signing, and every realization that the B brothers (Broussard, Blake and Boone) will probably be starting at our three power positions. The commissioner's office should have forced them to take good old' Russ with this trade. That would only be fair.
   13. Crazy Old Man Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:31 PM (#1776695)
Reading in the Tribune:

Such a deal comes several hours after Sox general manager Ken Williams expressed his concern over the high prices paid for free-agent pitchers and his worries over whether Jose Contreras and Jon Garland would accept extensions that would preclude their free agency after the 2006 season.

"They'll know when it's time to get serious," Williams said of discussions on an extension past 2006.

Before a reporter could finish asking a question, Williams added: "And by the way, it's time for them to get serious."


Is this letting Garland know that they won't be held hostage for an extension? (apoligies to Mr. Ubina)
   14. Jimmy P Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:31 PM (#1776696)
I'm not sure why the White Sox would want Vazquez at his current salary,

Considering what Burnett, Loaiza, and Rogers signed for, Vazquez is a bargain.

The bad thing for him is that if the White Sox win fewer games in '06 (very likely regardless of what he does), people will bash him for breaking up a championship team.

If he would've stood pat, people would've said he was the Angels.

The secondary problem is the loss of Young. I know the White Sox like Anderson and Owens, but I hope they have really done a qualitative assessment. Everything I read indicates that Young might be the best of the three.

Young is the only loss in the trade. El Duque's done as a starter, Vizcaino stunk. Young could be very good, but he could also be Corey Patterson.

I want to see what Kenny does with Garland/Contreras before I fully evaluate this.
   15. Jimmy P Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:32 PM (#1776697)
Is this letting Garland know that they won't be held hostage for an extension?

Kenny doesn't like having to compete against the open market for his starters. Considering the prices pitchers are getting paid, I don't blame him.
   16. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:35 PM (#1776704)
Nov. 25, 2005 (Associated Press)
PONCE, Puerto Rico--Arizona Diamondbacks pitcher Javier Vazquez filed a trade demand to make it easier for his family to visit him during the baseball season.


Well, there are a lot of flights to O'Hare ...
   17. JC in DC Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:37 PM (#1776708)
I agree w/Emeigh and Elton. I really like this trade from a White Sox perspective. KW is showing real savvy and an unwillingness to assume things would fall into place again as they did last year.
   18. Crazy Old Man Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:40 PM (#1776711)
Kenny doesn't like having to compete against the open market for his starters. Considering the prices pitchers are getting paid, I don't blame him.

It can't just be this, though. I mean in real cost, he most likely gave up 6 years of an inexpensive, above average outfielder, plus will be paying b/w $8-12 million for Vazquez, which I'd call open market value for that term.
   19. Elton Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:40 PM (#1776712)
The bad thing for him is that if the White Sox win fewer games in '06 (very likely regardless of what he does), people will bash him for breaking up a championship team.

If he would've stood pat, people would've said he was the Angels.

I'm certainly not advocating that KW should have stood pat.
I meant that the MSM and fans will bash him for taking risks, when dealing from strength to improve a flawed championship winner is absolutely what he should be doing. It's very possible for Chicago to play better next year (at least in terms of run differential), win fewer games, and KW will catch hell from the dummies for too much tinkering. I think that's unfair to Williams; secondarily, as a fan of off-season transactions, I want him to tinker as much as possible.
   20. RP Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:46 PM (#1776716)
I don't know that much about Young, but this looks like a good deal for the White Sox. I give KW credit for being agressive. At worst Vazquez is probably an average to slightly below average starter, which is very useful. But there's also a decent chance that he could really turn things around and turn back into the pitcher he was a couple years ago (esp. with the White Sox defense).
   21. tribefan Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:46 PM (#1776717)
the B brothers (Broussard, Blake and Boone) will probably be starting at our three power positions

Good god, I never would have dreamed that Shapiro would allow that to happen in '06, hopefully it still won't, but it does look that way more and more each passing day.
   22. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:49 PM (#1776719)
How did the Cell play last year in terms of homers?
I remember people didn't like the Vizcaino deal, because of his tendency to give up the gopher ball, and him moving to the cell. Seems like a similar case here with Vazquez. I think the Dbacks should kick some money in here to make it even..
btw where does Young play in the crowded Dback future OF?
   23. Kyle S Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:51 PM (#1776722)
Also, this shows me Kenny is a pretty astute GM. Many people would have looked at that rotation and said, "Perfection! Why mess with a sure thing?" If you look at the moves he's made so far this offseason, they reveal I think three principles:

a) The rotation is a strength, and will be for several years
b) That said, the starters outperformed expectations last year
c) The Sox offense was below par

Trading pitching prospects for Thome shows a) and c); signing Konerko shows c) (who else would have played first?); trading for Javy shows b); and trading Garland and using McCarthy (if indeed Kenny does that) will demonstrate a) and b) again. It might not work out, but I like what kenny has done so far.
   24. KDub's CellPiece (BLtDH) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:51 PM (#1776723)
Williams continues to deal from a position of strength which I like....this would also make the seeminly logical next step to deal Garland/Contraras to make room for McCarthey in the rotation. It will be interesting to see what can be gotten in return.

BLtDH
   25. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:53 PM (#1776725)
Young should be in CF.

If Upton is the real deal at SS, Drew can move over to 2b. If Upton needs to play OF, whoever is the better fielder, Upton or Young, goes to CF, the other plays a corner.

They will work it out. Young is what, 1 year away? Two at the most. Upton is two years away, maybe 3.
   26. Kyle S Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:53 PM (#1776726)
I think the Dbacks should kick some money in here to make it even..
btw where does Young play in the crowded Dback future OF?


Center, maybe as soon as next summer. The real question is what happens to Stephen Drew and Justin Upton.
   27. Rob Base Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:56 PM (#1776728)
Young's good, but presumably this means that Omar didn't offer Milledge. Pwn3d.
   28. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:57 PM (#1776733)
I thought Upton* was a cinch to play CF
No hope for Zeringue?

* : provided he signs!
   29. RP Posted: December 14, 2005 at 02:57 PM (#1776735)
The DBacks don't have a top 3B prospect, do they? Can't one of them just move there once Glaus is traded?
   30. Josh Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:03 PM (#1776739)
Young hit 26 HRs while playing 1/2 his time in a park that is, according to Dan S's park factors, one of hardest in which to hit HRs. Is he only a considered a worse prospect than Anderson because he is at a less advanced level?

Also, can someone explain how Owens moved ahead of Young in the prospect talk? Young outperformed him in the same league while three years younger -- and, he even was better at the thing Owens is supposed to be good at (stealing bases). I realize Owens has a good atheletic background, but he has yet to hit for any power whatsoever. . .
   31. Shalimar Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:07 PM (#1776742)
I like this trade for both teams. Young, Vizcaino and Hernandez is a pretty good haul for someone the Diamondbacks were forced to trade. For the White Sox, Vazquez improves the team for next year (something they needed if they want to have a decent chance of repeating), and Garland should bring them more than they gave up for Vazquez if they choose to trade him.
   32. scotto Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:07 PM (#1776745)
On one list serve that I subscribe to a McCarthy, Uribe and a minor leaguer to the Orioles for Tejada rumor was floated by a Chicagoan. I have no idea if this is being reported elsewhere, but that's a wowser.
   33. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:08 PM (#1776747)
Young's good, but presumably this means that Omar didn't offer Milledge. Pwn3d.

Yo Da Man Rob.
   34. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:09 PM (#1776750)
You

Ugh!
   35. Jimmy P Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:09 PM (#1776751)
I mean in real cost, he most likely gave up 6 years of an inexpensive, above average outfielder, plus will be paying b/w $8-12 million for Vazquez,

1. I think Kenny's aiming to win now. So, giving up 6 years of a cheap OF 2 years from now doesn't bother him that much.
2. The Sox farm system is deep in OF prospects. Anderson, Owens, Sweeney, and I'm sure a few more will pop up.
3. The pitching market is really crazy right now. He's going for stability. Vazquez is locked in for a few more years.
   36. Jimmy P Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:11 PM (#1776753)
McCarthy, Uribe and a minor leaguer to the Orioles for Tejada rumor was floated by a Chicagoan.

When I saw the Vazquez trade, this was the first thing I thought of. Only I had Garland instead of McCarthy in my mind.
   37. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:11 PM (#1776754)
The DBacks don't have a top 3B prospect, do they? Can't one of them just move there once Glaus is traded?

If glaus is traded, Tracy goes back to 3b. If that does not work out, maybe someday Santos will learn how to hit, and he can be moved to 3b. Otherwise, then they will have to move either Upton or Drew to 3b. Upton was playing 3b towards the end of his High School season.

These are not problems. Give me 8 good shortstops who all can hit in high school and college, and somehow, I think I could find use for them in the minors and the majors if they actually make it there.
   38. JC in DC Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:13 PM (#1776762)
It's a wowser, for sure, but it also sounds very KW. The man's got stones.
   39. RP Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:18 PM (#1776767)
a top OF prospect better be included in that Tejada trade or it's pretty sucky for the Orioles.
   40. jolietconvict Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:18 PM (#1776768)
On one list serve that I subscribe to a McCarthy, Uribe and a minor leaguer to the Orioles for Tejada rumor was floated by a Chicagoan. I have no idea if this is being reported elsewhere, but that's a wowser.


Apparently Bruce Levine is reporting this on AM1000 in Chicago. If this happens, as a Cub fan I'm going to hang myself.
   41. I am Ted F'ing Williams Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:20 PM (#1776772)
On one list serve that I subscribe to a McCarthy, Uribe and a minor leaguer to the Orioles for Tejada rumor was floated by a Chicagoan. I have no idea if this is being reported elsewhere, but that's a wowser.

I love how people just make up stuff and then they call them rumors to make them sound like inside info.

So I'll just say Garland for Vernon Wells and leave it at that.
   42. JC in DC Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:20 PM (#1776773)
a top OF prospect better be included in that Tejada trade or it's pretty sucky for the Orioles.


Good for you for continuing to believe the Orioles can make decent trades!
   43. Danny Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:21 PM (#1776774)
Vazquez was clearly unhappy in Arizona, and he was probably the one pitcher hurt the most by the D'backs horrible D.


Why do you say that? Vazquez had the best K/9 in the D-Backs rotation by a health amount and seems to be pretty average in GB:FB.
   44. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:22 PM (#1776776)
I think Young is another Mike Cameron, and I think Vazquez is in the same general class as Loaiza. As such, I have to stick with my "thumbs down".
   45. Danny Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:24 PM (#1776782)
3. The pitching market is really crazy right now. He's going for stability. Vazquez is locked in for a few more years.


Isn't he locked in at 2 years and $24M?
   46. Kyle S Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:26 PM (#1776786)
18m - Yanks are eating 6m.
   47. RP Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:26 PM (#1776787)
I didn't say that the Orioles would get another prospect in that (hopefully theoretical) trade. I just meant that on paper, in a just world, the Orioles should get more for Tejada. But of course I know that the Orioles FO isn't smart enough to get a really good return.
   48. JC in DC Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:28 PM (#1776792)
But of course I know that the Orioles FO isn't smart enough to get a really good return.


C'mon! Don't give in. Hope springs eternal; even in Baltimore.
   49. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:28 PM (#1776793)
Huh.
   50. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:29 PM (#1776796)
KW continues to impress me.
   51. scotto Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:31 PM (#1776798)
I love how people just make up stuff and then they call them rumors to make them sound like inside info.

Yeah, that's my MO alright. I'm the Midwestern levski.
   52. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:33 PM (#1776801)
From the White Sox perspective, I don't like the deal...

At least he took a dump and then got off the #### toilet, Joel.

I think this deal is solid for both teams. AZ gets a true centerfielder in Young, a reliever to add some depth to the bullpen, and El Duque.

God knows what to expect from El Duque; at best, he'll give AZ 15 solid starts to begin the year, then he'll be pawned off to a contender.

The way I look at it, El Duque goes 9-2 in his first 15 starts, with 2.97 ERA, and Arizona trades him to the Mets for Lastings Milledge.

ESPN says the commish needs to approve the deal so CHA is getting more than $1m. Whatever it is, I doubt it's $6m, not with Vizcaino to AZ.

Solid trade for both teams. Now, if the Sox can use Garland to steal Tejada, they'd be really looking good next year. KW is really dealing
   53. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:35 PM (#1776803)
I think Young is another Mike Cameron, and I think Vazquez is in the same general class as Loaiza. As such, I have to stick with my "thumbs down".

Is he supposed to be THAT good with the glove? I can see the comparison from the offensive side. I had no idea his defense was rated THAT highly.

Can anyone else corraborate that?
   54. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:38 PM (#1776807)
The way I look at it, El Duque goes 9-2 in his first 15 starts, with 2.97 ERA, and Arizona trades him to the Mets for Lastings Milledge.


Rob sounds off in 3-2-1........

ESPN says the commish needs to approve the deal so CHA is getting more than $1m. Whatever it is, I doubt it's $6m, not with Vizcaino to AZ.


Well, D Backs won't save much at all in 2006, but by 2007, they have freed up ALOT of money to go chase some REAL pitching frree agents.

White Sox fans, whats the problem with Vizcaino? Does he just plain suck, or is there some problem that could be worked out with a different pitching coach and a change of scenery. (4.65 FIP last year)
   55. Nate Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:40 PM (#1776810)
I think Young is another Mike Cameron, and I think Vazquez is in the same general class as Loaiza. As such, I have to stick with my "thumbs down".

Is he supposed to be THAT good with the glove? I can see the comparison from the offensive side. I had no idea his defense was rated THAT highly.

Can anyone else corraborate that?


Every prospect report out there says Young has top-notch defensive skills in centerfield. I haven't seen any report that didn't mention him as a potential gold glover.
   56. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:41 PM (#1776811)
18m - Yanks are eating 6m.

Not really, the Yankees gave ALL 9 MILLION to the D Backs at the time of the trade. They have already spent that money. There is no 6 million that automatically moves along with the Vazquez contract. It's whatever Chicago was able to negotiate out of the D backs.
   57. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:41 PM (#1776813)
Gotta give Rosenthal props, by the way. He wrote yesterday that the Sox were talking of sending Garland or El Duque plus Young to AZ for Javy. He got two out of the three players sent to AZ correct.

I'm the Midwestern levski.

Yeah, but you aren't nearly as good looking.

Re: 3Bmen down the road. Drew will start at SS in AAA this year, so Santos will probably move to 3b. If Glaus is traded, Tracy will get another chance at 3b, and depending on how he does, and how Santos does in AAA, the two might end up splitting the 3b/lf positions down the road. Jon Zeringue should've been challenging for the LF job in 2007, but he really got spooked by AA pitching last year. AZ also has Jamie D'Antona as a 3bman, but he's starting to look like a bust...

And Mike Rizzo has said that AZ has every intention of playing Upton at SS. With Young now the CFer of the future, I expect AZ to indeed keep Upton at SS (probably starting him in the Midwest league when he signs), then eventually deciding whether to move him or Drew to 2B down the road.
   58. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:42 PM (#1776815)
Thanks Nate.

I am feeling better about this trade by the post.
   59. Elton Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:43 PM (#1776816)
On one list serve that I subscribe to a McCarthy, Uribe and a minor leaguer to the Orioles for Tejada rumor was floated by a Chicagoan. I have no idea if this is being reported elsewhere, but that's a wowser.

KW has stones indeed if he pulls this off. McCarthy looks like a good one but adding three or four extra wins at shortstop (estimating from the WARP numbers) in 2006 is a huge upgrade. Good God, I hope the Indians have an ace up their sleeve.
   60. Fred Garvin is a sick f**k, guilty as charged Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:46 PM (#1776819)
Seems to me that the D-Backs have a logjam in the OF. Young will help, but they still have Green and Gonzalez and Quentin, not to mention Chad Tracy as well.

Because of Green's no-trade, Tracy seems the obvious trade candidate, to move Green to 1B and allow Quentin to play RF, but you'd think something has to happen.
   61. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:51 PM (#1776825)
White Sox fans, whats the problem with Vizcaino? Does he just plain suck, or is there some problem that could be worked out with a different pitching coach and a change of scenery. (4.65 FIP last year)

Vizcaino's slider isn't as sharp as is sometimes made out, and so he nibbles with it a lot. His fastball tops out at about 94 mph on occasion, but usually more like 91-92 and not a lot of movement. He works so slowly that PH suggested that we name him after another slow-moving disaster: Hindenberg™.
   62. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:52 PM (#1776828)
dJf, moving Green to 1b does nothing, as he'd block Conor Jackson there. I think AZ will now focus on trading Glaus, and moving Tracy back to 3B, with Green staying in RF and Jackson playing 1b (with Clark his caddy).

Re: Quentin. Sucks to be him, but AZ doesn't really have to do anything. He isn't even on the 40 man roster, and doesn't have to be added until NEXT fall. So AZ could start him back in AAA for a few months in 2006.

That's not ideal, really, so you'd think AZ would want to move either Green or Gonzo, once Glaus has been traded. Green can be traded to ANA, SDP, and SFG. The moment Moises Alou craps out, Shawn is a Green Giant.

Anyhow, worst case scenario, Quentin beats up on AAA pitching until the August deadline, then either Green or Gonzo gets pawned off to a team looking to upgrade for the playoff push, and Quentin gets the call up.

Having too much talent isn't really a problem.
   63. Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:58 PM (#1776835)
How did the Cell play last year in terms of homers?

The Sox hit 85 HR's and gave up 69 on the road.
The Sox hit 115 HR's and gave up 98 at home.
   64. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:58 PM (#1776836)
The difference is in years past, we would sit around with dread, waiting for the day that Joe Jr. traded away our best prospects for a middle reliever or Elmer Dessens or something like that.

But clearly those days are over, so it is not difficult to be patient. This is not to say Byrnes will never trade a top prospect. At some point, he is likely to do that too. But I am confident that if he does, he will get proper value in return.
   65. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 03:59 PM (#1776838)
Gonzo is a 10-5 player, but he probably will waive his no trade clause if the team that wants him agrees to pick up his 2007 option ($12m or so). The Dbacks are probably not going to pick it up, even though he's been the best offensive player in AZ history, not with the sheer number of OF guys in the minors. So Gonzo might be convinced to waive his no trade for a chance to play in the postseason and get his option picked up.

Quentin is right now insurance should Green or Gonzo get hurt next year. And he'll be the first man up if either one of them gets traded. He can't be happy about it, but there's nothing he can do about it either. At least he knows the Dbacks will be trying to clear a spot for him next year...
   66. Elton Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:07 PM (#1776849)
If a team trading for Gonzo is expected to pick up his $12 million option, they better be RECEIVING prospects along with him. Gonzalez wasn't bad in '05, but his age-39 season isn't going to be worth anything close to 12 big ones.
   67. shoewizard Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:14 PM (#1776861)
Actually, shouldn't the D Backs be trading Terrero and using Quentin as the 4th outfielder?
   68. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:17 PM (#1776867)
Elton, I said Gonzo would probably waive his no trade if a team picked up his option. That's all.

AZ definitely isn't going to give up prospects to trade Gonzo; they could just decline his 07 option.
   69. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:22 PM (#1776869)
I must say, this is giving up a lot less than I thought the White Sox would. I said yesterday that El Duque and Young would make sense, but I didn't think that would happen.

Still, giving up Young to pick up a sixth starter seems odd. Presumably, there's something else in the works. It'll be interesting to see what that is.
   70. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:24 PM (#1776875)
shouldn't the D Backs be trading Terrero and using Quentin as the 4th outfielder?

Uh, no. Terrero is just fine as the 4th outfielder.

Incidentally, the Dbacks might decide to start Young in the minors (he was in AA last year) and bring up Quentin in CF next year. Quentin won't make anyone think he's the second coming of Carlos Beltran there, but he's got more speed than Shawn Green, has a strong arm and decent range. When Young has had enough beating up on AAA pitching, and Green or Gonzo are traded, Quentin can move to RF/LF to free up CF for Young.

That might be the best way to resolve the OF problem next year, assuming Glaus gets traded and Tracy gets moved to 3B, with Conor Jackson staying at 1b.
   71. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:26 PM (#1776876)
JRE, Garland's trade value has NEVER been higher. And he'll command a pretty penny in arbitration. The White Sox would be wise to move him, if they can significantly upgrade somewhere else.
   72. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:27 PM (#1776883)
Reports have it that the DBacks are sending $5 Million.

If that's true, The White Sox are close to breaking even money-wise here - El Duque is owed $4.5 Million and Vizcaino is arb-eligible and will probably get close to $2 Million. That's pretty impressive.
   73. plink Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:30 PM (#1776887)
BTW, Young and Cameron did put up near identical lines in Birmingham. But Cameron's was at age 23 in his second time thorugh the league, whereas Young was 21. Young could be really good if he can keep his average up.
   74. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:30 PM (#1776889)
The White Sox would be wise to move him, if they can significantly upgrade somewhere else.

The Tejada rumor seems intruiging, but I'm going to leave it as a rumor for now.

My biggest fear is that McCarthy will be dealt. McCarthy might have a bit more trade value, but I'm going to go out on a limb and he'll be significantly better than Garland in 2005 and be something special for his career.
   75. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:31 PM (#1776893)
Vizcaino for $2m isn't a bad deal, as relievers seem to be getting $3m/yr right now. And I strongly doubt El Duque is a Dback long enough to collect his entire paycheck from the Dbacks. Again, solid trade for both teams.
   76. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:33 PM (#1776896)
The White Sox are close to breaking even money-wise here

For 2006, anyway.
   77. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:37 PM (#1776908)
For 2006, anyway.

Right. Presumably, Vazquez' contract might be something of a burden come 2007, which is why Byrnes is happy walking away from this, but for this season, they gave up a prospect and two spare parts and got at least an average and potentially a very good starter without adding any payroll.

I like it from that perspective. The bullpen looks significantly weaker than it did a week ago, which I'm less excited about, and I'm nervous about where Kenny goes from here.
   78. Mike Emeigh Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:37 PM (#1776912)
Vazquez had the second-largest negative difference between his ERA and FIP among the D'backs starting pitchers, after Russ Ortiz. He allowed a lot of doubles and triples in addition to the 35 HRs - he had 54 EB on 188 non-HR extra-base hits, which is a *lot* (not as bad percentage-wise as Ortiz, who as a real flyballer should have allowed more anyway, but still pretty substantial).

That said, Estes was probably hurt worse by the defense than Vazquez. Vazquez just had many more opportunities to be hurt.

-- MWE
   79. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:38 PM (#1776914)
So, let's see...

Javy will get 24 m over the next two years.

Say that El Duque gets around $5m if he reaches some incentives, Vizcaino $2m in arb.

So, the Sox get to pay Javy $19m. AZ will pay around $12m for Duque, Viz, $5m cash.

So, for 06, AZ would pay exactly the same they would've paid Javy alone.

And the Sox get to pay Javy $9.5m/yr, but give up Young.

So, this trade is pretty much a push right now.

AZ COULD trade El Duque for more prospects AND come out ahead in this trade.

That's the wild card.
   80. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:41 PM (#1776921)
I'm with Emeigh here. People focus on Javy's 35 homers, and think that's why his ERA was over 4. In reality, the OF situtation was so horrendous that pretty much any hard hit ball that made it past the infield was an extra base hit. With ANY decent set of outfielders, Javy would've done a lot better.
   81. MM1f Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:43 PM (#1776929)
The Diamondbacks have a real interesting bunch of young bats all over the place. YOung, Quentin, Jackson, Montero, Drew, Tracy, Upton, and even the 2nd tier like Hairston, D'Antona, Zeringue, and Santos have all shown some skills before.
   82. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:45 PM (#1776936)
AZ COULD trade El Duque for more prospects AND come out ahead in this trade.

Who would give up prospects for El Duque? I love El Duque, for his perseverance in life as much as how fun it is to watch him pitch, but I can't see any team giving up much to get him. If AZ paid some salary, I could see the Marlins wanting El Duque as an attraction for the huge Cuban community there.
   83. Jimmy P Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:47 PM (#1776943)
Isn't he locked in at 2 years and $24M?

Reading Prospectus' guide (Premium, sorry) on trade demands from a few weeks ago, it says that any player that is traded under this rule (which Vazquez is) cannot become a free agent for three years - regardless of contract. So, Kenny guaranteed himself a starter for at least three years, which is the stability he craves.
   84. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:50 PM (#1776953)
I present to you, the 2008 Diamondbacks

C, Miguel Montero
1B, Conor Jackson
2B, Stephen Drew
SS, Justin Upton
3B, Sergio Santos
RF, Carlos Quentin
CF, Chris Young
LF, Carlos Gonzales


Vince, I didn't say AZ would get great prospects or even good ones for El Duque. I meant that, given El Duque's post-season record, his relief work against the BoSox, etc, etc, IF he looks decent or (hopefully) better than decent in August, some team will ask for him.
   85. Kyle S Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:51 PM (#1776958)
You know, if they did field that team it would probably suck. Still it's a nice group of prospects.
   86. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:51 PM (#1776960)
The bullpen looks significantly weaker than it did a week ago, which I'm less excited about

Marté is a loss of talent, even if his performance the last two years wasn't spectacular. Vizcaino isn't a loss to me at all. I think Bajenaru could accomplish much the same as the fifth or sixth man in the pen. I read that Arnie Muñoz is having another good season in the Dominican winter league, where he's used as a multiple-inning reliever. He, Paulino and maybe Corwin Malone (I think I read that he pitched well in the AFL) should get the first shots at replacing Marté.

I guess I agree that the bullpen has some question marks, but they're more of the variety of how close Jenks, Hermanson, Cotts and Politte can come to their 2005 performances. By age and stuff, Jenks and Cotts are the best bets. I hope Hermanson and Politte can at least be solid, with Politte having a better chance of that than Hermanson.
   87. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:52 PM (#1776961)
Anyone have a copy of the new THT handy? In the anaylsis section, don't they have an article on pitching, with a chart/list/whatever showing Vazquez as one of the most likely pitchers (the most likely?) to bounce back this year? I think it was based on the sorts of balled in plays he allowed - % line drives, % infield flies, etc - and how many hits came off of them vs. what one would expect.
   88. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:55 PM (#1776973)
[eric cartman]

Gawd Dammit, Kyle.

[/eric cartman]
   89. I am Ted F'ing Williams Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:57 PM (#1776982)
scotto,

I wasn't accusing you of doing it, but rather the list serve you subscribe to.
   90. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:58 PM (#1776987)
AZ COULD trade El Duque for more prospects AND come out ahead in this trade.

Vince, I didn't say AZ would get great prospects or even good ones for El Duque.

No, but you seemed to imply that what they could get for him would be enough to have a significant impact on the evaluation of this trade. I consider that unlikely, although you never know when some seeming C- prospect turns into a really good player.
   91. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 14, 2005 at 04:59 PM (#1776989)
but they're more of the variety of how close Jenks, Hermanson, Cotts and Politte can come to their 2005 performances. By age and stuff, Jenks and Cotts are the best bets. I hope Hermanson and Politte can at least be solid, with Politte having a better chance of that than Hermanson.

I'm sold on Cotts, but I really don't want them to ride Jenks like they did at the end of last season - he seemed to visibly wear down there at the end. I'd like some more stability there.

Politte surprised me last year, but a lot of his success came from a low BABIP, which makes me nervous.

I don't think the White Sox should take whatever Hermanson gives them in 2006 as a bonus - his back scares me.

I think Bajenaru would be a fine replacement for Vizcaino, but I'm not sold on Arnie Munoz yet.

All in all, I'd like the Sox to pick up one more bullpen arm this winter.
   92. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:00 PM (#1776992)
Vince, I meant it more in terms of NOT having to pay El Duque's salary by trading him, with the chance of actually getting someone decent back. I'm still holding out hope that Omar will offer Milledge for him in August tho.
   93. Nate Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:02 PM (#1776995)
it says that any player that is traded under this rule (which Vazquez is) cannot become a free agent for three years - regardless of contract.


Really? What is his salary in year 3? Avg annual? Arbitration? That seems very odd.
   94. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:02 PM (#1776999)
I meant it more in terms of NOT having to pay El Duque's salary by trading him

OK, I think we've gotten down to it now. Not to nitpick, but you mentioned prospects. Sending him off for nearly no talent in return for not having to pay him is different.

I'm still holding out hope that Omar will offer Milledge for him in August tho.

I think there's another Met farmhand you should be interested in. Fella named Pagan...
   95. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:05 PM (#1777006)
Vince, any prospects would be bonus. I can dream, right?

I heard Alex Pagan has leapfrogged Lastings on the totem pole. He's now Floyd's heir apparent in LF. Minaya might even move Beltran to give Alex the chance to show his stuff in centerfield. And to think that Omar has his brother Angel in the system too.
   96. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:06 PM (#1777008)
All in all, I'd like the Sox to pick up one more bullpen arm this winter.

I wonder if there are some NRI-type guys worth taking shots on. I don't know if there are any relievers left on the free-agent market. I doubt I'd like the price, given the signings this offseason.
   97. Jimmy P Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:07 PM (#1777013)
Really? What is his salary in year 3? Avg annual? Arbitration? That seems very odd.

Taken right from the article:

The club that takes on Vazquez's contract will have "Repeater Rights" to him for the 2008 season, so if they choose to they can take him to salary arbitration for that year.
   98. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:07 PM (#1777014)
Vince, you gotta figure the Angels will waive a few live arms. They always do.
   99. VG Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:07 PM (#1777015)
I can dream, right?

Sure. The events of October 2005 prove that.
   100. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 14, 2005 at 05:10 PM (#1777020)
I don't know if there are any relievers left on the free-agent market.

The biggest name left seems to be Julian Tavarez, but it looks like Minaya is going to give him an insane contract to ensure that he'll be a Met.

I wouldn't mind taking the approach they took a couple of off-seasons ago, which was to go rooting through the discard pile and look for the next Osuna or Gordon.
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Harry Balsagne's transparent jealousy
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012
(409 - 5:29pm, Feb 10)
Last: Athletic Supporter leads the nation in drifters

NewsblogSources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault
(6116 - 5:26pm, Feb 10)
Last: ?Donde esta Dagoberto Campaneris?

NewsblogCurt Schilling Says Manny 'Quit on the Field,' Teammates Stopped Him From Confronting Slugger
(11 - 5:25pm, Feb 10)
Last: tfbg9

Newsblog'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s
(292 - 5:23pm, Feb 10)
Last: Moe Greene

NewsblogMets owners knew about Maddoff
(21 - 5:22pm, Feb 10)
Last: Dan The Mediocre

Transaction Oracle2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's
(51 - 5:19pm, Feb 10)
Last: Davo the Magnificent

NewsblogFSKC announces on-air lineup for Royals - Rex Hudler and Steve Physioc to join
(8 - 5:08pm, Feb 10)
Last: Chris Needham

NewsblogMLB: Hall of Fame worthy? Furthest thing from Schilling's mind
(38 - 5:04pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Good Face

NewsblogBluetales blog: JetBlue’s 605 Wears Red Sox Colors!
(6 - 4:51pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogTom Brady getting new bro-in-law: Red Sox’ Kevin Youkilis!
(17 - 4:43pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

Sox TherapyOffseason Minor League Thread
(2 - 4:39pm, Feb 10)
Last: ellsbury my heart at wounded knee

NewsblogKnobler: Stay away from steroids -- but vote how you want
(23 - 4:36pm, Feb 10)
Last: Something Other

NewsblogESPN: Law: Top 100 Prospects (paywalled)
(8 - 4:27pm, Feb 10)
Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)

NewsblogWhatever Happened to the Spitball?
(25 - 4:21pm, Feb 10)
Last: Something Other

NewsblogGrantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans
(42 - 4:20pm, Feb 10)
Last: Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 1.8701 seconds
40 querie(s) executed