User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.3905 seconds
40 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Doesn't the overall issue seem pretty clear? The Rockies lack respect because they haven't earned it. Their first playoff appearance in 12 years came as a result of a 13 of 14 end of season run. They've achieved 5 winning seasons in 16 years, and the team record for wins is 90 (and they had to play 163 and win the 13 of 14 to get there). Management has improved, but for fans in other cities, it takes a while to replace the old images--the ridiculousness of baseball played with 125 park factors, the constantly changing player acquisition plans, the Hampton and Denny Neagle failures, etc. That the last 18 games were great doesn't mean the first 52 no longer count.
Not that this excuses Kruk, or ESPN's biases.
The weird chip comes from the fact that Rockies fans for the most part know that this team is distinct from those previous teams, and much better, and that each of these last 18 games count just as much as each of the previous 52, as the last month of 2007 counted just as much as the five months before that, but fans in other places and the national media seem to toss them out altogether as odd anomalies. It's as though you were in a class and the professor decided to toss out your best work, while keeping all of your worst.
If the team does falter in 2009 and wind up out of the picture as Kruk says, than sure, it will be as you say that the Rockies won't have earned any sort of respect, but their current pace has them for 87 wins and perhaps the second best record in the NL. If that's true, that would mean two out of the last three seasons the Rockies would have been 87 wins or over and outpaced both the Mets and Phillies during the regular season. Hopefully then the respect might start coming.
I do not like Jim Tracy.
There were folks here who tossed them out the same way. The Rockies were the National League's best team when 2007 ended by any measure, but it sure seemed very few wanted to acknowledge it.
Do you realize that this year's team has only three regulars left from the 2007 NL Champs? Helton, Hawpe and Tulowitzki are all that remain; Atkins and Yorvit are still with the team, but have lost their starting jobs.
From what I've read on here, this does not seem to be the case. He seems to be a very divisive manager.
Just to clear up any confusion, AG1F, you're arguing with John Kruk.
I also liked Clint Hurdle's take on why the Rockies have turned things around: "It starts at the top with the manager."
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main