Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, August 30, 2010

ESPN: Szymborski: Manny Ramirez will help the White Sox (INSIDER)

For the Chicago White Sox, picking up Manny Ramirez for essentially nothing—they’re going to pay $4.3 million of his salary the rest of the way—was a good move, especially for a second-place team that appears to be treading water.

Fuentes and Hawpe are over on TO.

Dan Szymborski Posted: August 30, 2010 at 03:04 PM | 119 comment(s) | Login to Bookmark
  Related News: Chi White SoxLA Dodgers

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
   1. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: August 30, 2010 at 03:40 PM (#3629893)
I think this is a fun move, even if it doesn't result in an increased chance at postseason baseball. Manny Ramirez is a fun player to watch, no matter what the results.
   2. Arthur Pewty Posted: August 30, 2010 at 03:47 PM (#3629906)
Manny in Fenway:
2010: .417/.462/.667 (13 PA)
2009: ---
2008: .303/.408/.503 (206 PA)
2007: .303/.403/.488 (290 PA)
2006: .355/.469/.659 (277 PA)
Career: .316/.423/.583

Just for laffs, Manny's career numbers in Comiskey Park, where he did not bat against the Yankees while the Dodgers slowly deliberated over what they wanted to do:
.338/.448/.601 (261 PA)


If he's potentially worth that much to the CHW, it's a travesty that the Dodgers got nothing for him. What's predictably ending badly is the McCourts' ownership of the Dodgers.
   3. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: August 30, 2010 at 03:55 PM (#3629919)
it's a travesty that the Dodgers got nothing for him

1) Is this known for sure? I've still seen nothing official on any of this.

2) Even if they do get no players in return, $4.3 million in salary relief at this late date is nothing to sneeze at.
   4. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: August 30, 2010 at 03:57 PM (#3629922)
Oh, and I'm a little bit annoyed that Ramirez sat on the Dodger bench all weekend rather than play against the Yankees, while the Dodgers dithered.
   5. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: August 30, 2010 at 04:01 PM (#3629930)
I'm a little bit annoyed that Ramirez sat on the Dodger bench all weekend rather than play against the Yankees, while the Dodgers dithered.

That was delightful.
   6. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: August 30, 2010 at 04:15 PM (#3629942)
$4.3 million in this economy is "essentially nothing"?
   7. Hack Wilson Posted: August 30, 2010 at 04:19 PM (#3629947)
Well with the $4.3 million Jamie McCourt can finally get a new wardrobe. Poor girl is now wearing clothes from last year.
   8. Nasty Nate Posted: August 30, 2010 at 04:22 PM (#3629950)
Couldn't they have gotten a decent DH for the entire season for $4.3 million?
   9. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: August 30, 2010 at 04:28 PM (#3629957)
Couldn't they have gotten a decent DH for the entire season for $4.3 million?

They could have gotten an entire season of Jim Thome for < $1.5 million.
   10. Never Give an Inge (Dave) Posted: August 30, 2010 at 04:32 PM (#3629962)
Right, the Dodgers get out of the remainder of Manny's contract, which is likely a net benefit to them the rest of the way from a financial standpoint (even though having Manny on the field does bring some incremental revenue). I mean, it's not like Manny was underpaid.
   11. RayDiPerna Posted: August 30, 2010 at 04:34 PM (#3629965)
$4.3 million in this economy is "essentially nothing"?


Yes, given the operating expenses of a team. And if they make the playoffs he pays for himself.
   12. Arthur Pewty Posted: August 30, 2010 at 05:27 PM (#3630002)
Um, the Dodgers don't "get" $4.3 mil, except to the extent that they get to pay nothing to not have Manny in their lineup the rest of the year. For $4.3 mil, the White Sox get to put him in their lineup like they do any other player under contract. From a baseball standpoint, for a team ostensibly fighting for a playoff spot, under normal circumstances that would be worth some kind of a prospect in return. If the CHW felt the Dodgers were "dithering" while it was costing them runs, maybe they should have offered something of value for him.
   13. phredbird Posted: August 30, 2010 at 05:50 PM (#3630023)
if he ends up with the white sox i hope they win the WS. anything to shut the pieholes of the idiots at the LA times. on second thought nevermind they would probably give juan pierre the credit.
   14. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: August 30, 2010 at 05:51 PM (#3630026)
Um, the Dodgers don't "get" $4.3 mil, except to the extent that they get to pay nothing to not have Manny in their lineup the rest of the year.

This is the whole point, isn't it? If I saved $4.3 million in upkeep on an asset that my employer couldn't use by giving it to another company that can use it, that would generally be considered a "win-win" scenario.

From a baseball standpoint, for a team ostensibly fighting for a playoff spot, under normal circumstances that would be worth some kind of a prospect in return. If the CHW felt the Dodgers were "dithering" while it was costing them runs, maybe they should have offered something of value for him.

From what I understand, the White Sox did offer something of value - 3B prospect Jon Gilmore. Bear in mind that the White Sox were not able to offer any of their best prospects for Ramirez - those guys would have to clear waivers in order to be traded, which would not be possible. (And that's setting aside the question of whether five weeks of Manny Ramirez is worth a top prospect, which is dubious at best).

Nobody gets value-for-value on a waiver-wire trade. The mechanics of a waiver-wire trade don't allow it. Coletti couldn't reasonably expect more than what was offered. If the Dodgers weren't going to play Ramirez over the weekend, the question is, what were they waiting for?
   15. Dan Szymborski Posted: August 30, 2010 at 05:54 PM (#3630029)
Um, the Dodgers don't "get" $4.3 mil, except to the extent that they get to pay nothing to not have Manny in their lineup the rest of the year.

Sure they do. The $4.3 million was guaranteed to be paid - it was a sunk cost. Now they are relieved of the cost. Just like if your credit card company forgives a portion of your debt, that is considered income.

Given the way the team has been run, I don't really expect the $4.3 million to benefit the team - it'll probably just be a bigger number of funds available for one of the McCourts to either loot or receive in a settlement.
   16. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:01 PM (#3630037)

Couldn't they have gotten a decent DH for the entire season for $4.3 million?


I was wondering what Jermaine Dye is doing right now.
   17. Fly, the most judgment-free human being on Earth Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:02 PM (#3630039)
Sure they do. The $4.3 million was guaranteed to be paid - it was a sunk cost. Now they are relieved of the cost. Just like if your credit card company forgives a portion of your debt, that is considered income.


No, this isn't accurate at all. Not at all.

This is equivalent to me returning a flat panel tv to the store, and having $1000 taken off of my credit card bill. This is not debt forgiveness at all.
   18. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:03 PM (#3630040)
I was wondering what Jermaine Dye is doing right now.

After watching Jermaine Dye attempt to play baseball at the end of last year, I'd hesitate to throw him into a lineup at this point. He looked completely finished, and judging by the amount of interest he's gotten, I'd say I'm not the only one with that perception.
   19. Tom Nawrocki Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:08 PM (#3630046)
And if they make the playoffs he pays for himself.


That's a mighty big If. The Dodgers are six and a half games back in the Wild Card race, which is a lot but not insurmountable. But they're in fifth place in that race, which is an awful lot of teams to climb over. They're even deader in the NL West, where they're ten games back and in fourth place.

Baseball Prospectus gives them a 2 percent chance of making the playoffs. That seems about right to me.
   20. Dan Szymborski Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:18 PM (#3630057)

No, this isn't accurate at all. Not at all.

This is equivalent to me returning a flat panel tv to the store, and having $1000 taken off of my credit card bill.


The Dodgers didn't have the option of returning Manny Ramirez to the store. The White Sox, however, executed a separate transaction in which they assumed the Dodgers debt.
   21. Eddo Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:18 PM (#3630059)
And if they make the playoffs he pays for himself.

That's a mighty big If. The Dodgers are six and a half games back in the Wild Card race, which is a lot but not insurmountable. But they're in fifth place in that race, which is an awful lot of teams to climb over. They're even deader in the NL West, where they're ten games back and in fourth place.

Baseball Prospectus gives them a 2 percent chance of making the playoffs. That seems about right to me.

I believe Ray was talking about the White Sox making the playoffs.
   22. SoSH U at work Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:19 PM (#3630060)
That's a mighty big If. The Dodgers are six and a half games back in the Wild Card race, which is a lot but not insurmountable. But they're in fifth place in that race, which is an awful lot of teams to climb over. They're even deader in the NL West, where they're ten games back and in fourth place.

Baseball Prospectus gives them a 2 percent chance of making the playoffs. That seems about right to me.


Tom, I think Ray was speaking of the playoff chances from the White Sox perspective. Now they're not exactly in great position, but they are quite a bit more likely participants than LA.
   23. Foghorn Leghorn Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:20 PM (#3630062)
I was wondering what Jermaine Dye is doing right now.
Bonds would likely be better.
   24. SuperGrover Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:27 PM (#3630069)
I was wondering what Jermaine Dye is doing right now.

After watching Jermaine Dye attempt to play baseball at the end of last year, I'd hesitate to throw him into a lineup at this point. He looked completely finished, and judging by the amount of interest he's gotten, I'd say I'm not the only one with that perception.


Yeah Dye was/is done. He was probably the worst regular in all of MLB the second half of last season. I am glad KW didn't bring him back.

The Thome thing was just flippin' ridiculous. But, I think all Sox fans knew that was coming.
   25. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:36 PM (#3630084)
The Dodgers didn't have the option of returning Manny Ramirez to the store

I see a great five-second film in that concept.
   26. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:38 PM (#3630089)
The MLB.com story is throwing some interesting light on this situation -

Ramirez was initially reported to be seeking a contract extension in return for waiving a no-trade clause, which includes waiver claims, with the White Sox balking at that request. Apparently the extension was dropped when Ramirez saw that he had become a bench player with the Dodgers. Eligible for free agency after the season, he has a better chance to audition for a job for next year as a designated hitter for the White Sox, who will be responsible for the remaining $3.8 million on his contract.


So the holdup wasn't the Dodgers after all, but Ramirez, and the Dodgers benched him so that he'd agree to leave.
   27. Crispix Attacks Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:39 PM (#3630092)
"The jerk store called. They've got a Manny Ramirez display model on clearance."
   28. GEB4000 Posted: August 30, 2010 at 06:42 PM (#3630096)
To paraphrase a founding father: $4.3 million saved is $4.3 million earned.
   29. jingoist Posted: August 30, 2010 at 08:44 PM (#3630229)
Jayson Stark has an apt article on Manny's leaving of LA over at ESPN.
I personally find Manny to be a jerk of the first order of magnitude and a team cancer.
Oh sure, he "might" get motivated and be the fabulos player he is capable of being but, inevitably, something will piss Manny off, it always does.

He will pout and underachieve, as he always does.

Manny being Manny; about as enjoyable as a prostate exam.
   30. Nasty Nate Posted: August 30, 2010 at 09:02 PM (#3630235)
Jayson Stark has an apt article on Manny's leaving of LA over at ESPN.
I personally find Manny to be a jerk of the first order of magnitude and a team cancer.
Oh sure, he "might" get motivated and be the fabulos player he is capable of being but, inevitably, something will piss Manny off, it always does.


I just read that article, and I don't really get it. In what way did Manny show that he's pissed off? His team traded him to save some money, how did he run himself out of town? I haven't read any indication that he refused to play this week (maybe I missed it), it just seems like Torre didn't put him in the lineup. He didn't force a trade or anything, I don't get how this exit from a team is similar at all to the one he had w/ Boston.
   31. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: August 30, 2010 at 09:17 PM (#3630244)
Manny has pouted and underachieved his way to almost 10,000 PA of 1.000 OPS. Just imagine if he'd ever gotten motivated and been the fabulous player he is capable of being.
   32. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: August 30, 2010 at 09:23 PM (#3630251)
Manny being Manny; about as enjoyable as a prostate exam.

Not a Digital Underground fan?
   33. phredbird Posted: August 30, 2010 at 09:29 PM (#3630254)
Manny has pouted and underachieved his way to almost 10,000 PA of 1.000 OPS. Just imagine if he'd ever gotten motivated and been the fabulous player he is capable of being.


doesn't conform to the narrative, so it is ignored. props to gonfalon, he's said it before.
   34. RayDiPerna Posted: August 30, 2010 at 09:51 PM (#3630269)
And if they make the playoffs he pays for himself.

That's a mighty big If. The Dodgers are six and a half games back in the Wild Card race, which is a lot but not insurmountable. But they're in fifth place in that race, which is an awful lot of teams to climb over. They're even deader in the NL West, where they're ten games back and in fourth place.

Baseball Prospectus gives them a 2 percent chance of making the playoffs. That seems about right to me.


I was referring to his new team, the White Sox.

EDIT: Cokes all around.
   35. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: August 30, 2010 at 09:58 PM (#3630273)
National League, adjusted OPS+ leaders to date, 2010:

171-- Albert Pujols
170-- Joey Votto
156-- Adrian Gonzalez
150-- Pouting, Cancerous Underachiever
142-- Cecil Fielder; Carlos Gonzalez; Ryan Zimmerman
139-- Adam Dunn; Matt Holliday; Jayson Werth; Aubrey Huff
   36. Francoeur Sans Gages (AlouGoodbye) Posted: August 30, 2010 at 10:05 PM (#3630278)
Manny's probably one of the top 5 RH batters of all time, and he's won 2 WS. The idea that he's a cancer or an underachiever is laughable.
   37. RayDiPerna Posted: August 30, 2010 at 10:05 PM (#3630279)
Jayson Stark has an apt article on Manny's leaving of LA over at ESPN.
I personally find Manny to be a jerk of the first order of magnitude and a team cancer.
Oh sure, he "might" get motivated and be the fabulos player he is capable of being but, inevitably, something will piss Manny off, it always does.


He was a fabulous hitter for the Dodgers. That you can't understand it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

And if the steroids suspension shows anything, it shows he was TOO "motivated" to play well.

He will pout and underachieve, as he always does.


But he didn't underachieve. He had a 171 OPS+ for the Dodgers. Do you not understand how good that is?

Manny being Manny; about as enjoyable as a prostate exam.


So was your commentary.
   38. RayDiPerna Posted: August 30, 2010 at 10:08 PM (#3630281)
I just read that article, and I don't really get it. In what way did Manny show that he's pissed off? His team traded him to save some money, how did he run himself out of town? I haven't read any indication that he refused to play this week (maybe I missed it), it just seems like Torre didn't put him in the lineup. He didn't force a trade or anything, I don't get how this exit from a team is similar at all to the one he had w/ Boston.


Because he "got himself ejected on purpose." Duh.

Sounds a bit like the completely unremarkable three-pitch strikeout he had against The Greatest Closer Of All Time during his last few games with the Red Sox.

The people asserting this stuff are delusional.

But, yeah, I also noticed the media's cute "he has sat out for the Nth straight game" this week, implying that he was refusing to play. It was a management decision, because they didn't want him to get hurt before they traded him.
   39. Hang down your head, Tom Foley Posted: August 30, 2010 at 10:10 PM (#3630283)
Oh sure, he "might" get motivated and be the fabulos player he is capable of being but, inevitably, something will piss Manny off, it always does.

He will pout and underachieve, as he always does.


There's only a month left in the season, so I like the odds of him remaining un-pissed off. Actually, I'd prefer if the Sox got really hot and gave him a few more weeks with the team in October to find something he can pout about.
   40. vigaro Posted: August 30, 2010 at 10:10 PM (#3630285)
Where'd this Tuesday come from?

Manny's primed to kick some ass and help the Sox to the playoffs.

ONCE he's back for his 3-4 week vacation to refocus.

Shewt if the Sox's facilities are up to snuff, wouldn't even mind spending it on their dl.
   41. Moneyball can't buy you love (Joey B.) Posted: August 30, 2010 at 11:39 PM (#3630356)
He will pout and underachieve, as he always does.

Manny being Manny; about as enjoyable as a prostate exam.


Nobody can deny that he was spectacular for them in '08 after the trade, and I think he's going to have to hit almost that well for the White Sox for them to catch the superior Twins, who have an easier schedule the rest of the way. It's only since his pregnancy suspension that he's been underachieving, and you don't need to be a genius to figure out why that is.

But I fully second the second part. His antics ceased being amusing to me a while ago.
   42. akrasian Posted: August 31, 2010 at 12:12 AM (#3630393)
It's only since his pregnancy suspension that he's been underachieving, and you don't need to be a genius to figure out why that is.


Well, let me see - he got off to a hot start after coming back from his suspension, then got hit on the hand by a pitch and hit poorly for a while, and then gradually started hitting better.

This year he's hit well, especially for an old player, with the problem that his legs are going. Basically, his underachieving - to the extent that you can say a still feared hitter at his age is underachieving - is tied into injuries. The hand injury obviously had nothing to do with chemicals. I suppose steroids might have helped him heal faster from the leg injuries, and helped prevent recurrences - I don't know. I don't think it's any great surprise that a 38 year old, reasonably heavy guy who has to sprint at times and often change directions while sprinting would suffer various pulls.
   43. McCoy Posted: August 31, 2010 at 12:27 AM (#3630410)
The $4.3 million was guaranteed to be paid - it was a sunk cost.

Future costs are not sunk costs and quite obviously if you don't have to pay it then it isn't a sunk cost. Since the Dodgers don't have to pay 4.3 million then that 4.3 million is not and was not a sunk cost.
   44. Biff isn't really an apt handle anymore Posted: August 31, 2010 at 12:32 AM (#3630415)
Cecil Fielder

Whoa.
   45. Designated Sitter (GGC) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 01:10 AM (#3630445)
National League, adjusted OPS+ leaders to date, 2010:

171-- Albert Pujols
170-- Joey Votto
156-- Adrian Gonzalez
150-- Pouting, Cancerous Underachiever
142-- Cecil Fielder; Carlos Gonzalez; Ryan Zimmerman
139-- Adam Dunn; Matt Holliday; Jayson Werth; Aubrey Huff



That's disingenuous, though. Ramirez has only been in 66 games.

Wasn't Kotsay a centerfielder three years ago? How'd he wind up a DH?
   46. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: August 31, 2010 at 01:28 AM (#3630457)
It's only since his pregnancy suspension that he's been underachieving, and you don't need to be a genius to figure out why that is.

Post-partum depression?
   47. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: August 31, 2010 at 01:38 AM (#3630463)
That's disingenuous, though. Ramirez has only been in 66 games.

Not at all. Anyone who's on this board knows he's only played half a season. If it's about the season-long grind slowing one's bat, Ramirez's career OPS+ has been higher in the second half.

I don't know the answer to this question: is it uncommon for a top hitter to put up something like a 150 OPS+ in a year that they repeatedly go on the DL (three separate times in Manny's case)?

Cecil Fielder

D'oh! That was a big, round screwup. Or should I say "D'oughy!"
   48. Designated Sitter (GGC) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 02:23 AM (#3630482)
I'm glad someone still reads my posts. It's tough to get a conversation going here unless you mention Pavement, greenies or other PEDs, or Neshoba County.
   49. SoSHially Unacceptable Posted: August 31, 2010 at 02:24 AM (#3630483)
Not at all. Anyone who's on this board knows he's only played half a season. If it's about the season-long grind slowing one's bat, Ramirez's career OPS+ has been higher in the second half.


Yes, it is Gonfalon. The numbers show that Manny's been good when healthy, which is a perfectly legitimate point and one you could have made without inserting his name onto the actual NL Adjusted OPS+ leaderboard, where Manny's name won't be found. That's pretty much as disingenuous as it gets.
   50. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: August 31, 2010 at 07:55 AM (#3630538)
Of course it is. And that last sentence is the most hyperbolic claim of the last five centuries.

The numbers also show that Manny's been good when NOT healthy. Specifically, the 2010 numbers.

OPS+ is a rate stat, Ramirez's abridged 2010 OPS+ is all but identical to his 1993-2009 rate, and there's no real argument that his 2010 rate's been padded or distorted because of the limited time. He's hit better than almost every player in the National League + Cecil Fielder, but while losing half his year to three separate DL stints. Four NL players have a 150 OPS+ or better this season, but in too few plate appearances to qualify for the leader boards: Ramirez (232 PA), Donnie Murphy (42 PA), Jay Gibbons (27) and Raul Valdes (11). What's the ingenuous way to go-- lumping the four of them together as statistical also-rans?

Despite my underhanded cunning, you've figured out that Ryan Zimmerman's 142 was worth more this year than Manny Ramirez's 150. I think others might pull it off, too.
   51. jyjjy Posted: August 31, 2010 at 08:12 AM (#3630539)
Wasn't Kotsay a centerfielder three years ago? How'd he wind up a DH?

Inexplicable idiocy.
   52. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 11:31 AM (#3630570)
Basically, his underachieving - to the extent that you can say a still feared hitter at his age is underachieving - is tied into injuries.


What injury was it that prevented him from taking extra outfield work and becoming a competent defender years ago?

Manny is a great hitter. But he never put in the work to try and make himself a complete player, and that's a shame, given the talent he had.
   53. Fly, the most judgment-free human being on Earth Posted: August 31, 2010 at 11:41 AM (#3630576)
What injury was it that prevented him from taking extra outfield work and becoming a competent defender years ago?

What? Really? REALLY?

Look, Manny is not a great fielder. But he is also not a total embarrassment, and more to the point, even if he was, what makes you think he could get better?
   54. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 01:39 PM (#3630691)
But he is also not a total embarrassment, and more to the point, even if he was, what makes you think he could get better?


The fact that my grandmother would be embarrassed to field that badly?

I do buy the idea that he's not a "total embarrassment", though, insofar as I've never seen any evidence that Manny has the ability to be ashamed, despite the many shameful things he's done.
   55. Fly, the most judgment-free human being on Earth Posted: August 31, 2010 at 01:56 PM (#3630721)
Your grandmother would be embarrassed to field that badly? Really?

Look, even if we accept (which I don't), that he is the worst defensive outfielder in the sport, SOMEONE has to be worst, even if everyone is working to improve their defense 24 hours a day.

Add to that the fact that he's visibly superior to the "average guy" who plays in pickup softball leagues, the fact that major league teams have found him acceptable as an outfielder for the past ~15 years, and the fact that he's one of the greatest hitters of all time, and it's ridiculous to claim that he either a) doesn't put any effort into his fielding or b) is worse than your grandmother.

You're arguing irrationally.
   56. SoSH U at work Posted: August 31, 2010 at 02:03 PM (#3630730)
Of course it is. And that last sentence is the most hyperbolic claim of the last five centuries.

The numbers also show that Manny's been good when NOT healthy. Specifically, the 2010 numbers.

OPS+ is a rate stat, Ramirez's abridged 2010 OPS+ is all but identical to his 1993-2009 rate, and there's no real argument that his 2010 rate's been padded or distorted because of the limited time. He's hit better than almost every player in the National League + Cecil Fielder, but while losing half his year to three separate DL stints. Four NL players have a 150 OPS+ or better this season, but in too few plate appearances to qualify for the leader boards: Ramirez (232 PA), Donnie Murphy (42 PA), Jay Gibbons (27) and Raul Valdes (11). What's the ingenuous way to go-- lumping the four of them together as statistical also-rans?

Despite my underhanded cunning, you've figured out that Ryan Zimmerman's 142 was worth more this year than Manny Ramirez's 150. I think others might pull it off, too.


Wow, you've really showed me and all the other folks arguing that Manny's not a great hitter the error of our ways.

You changed the actual Adjusted OPS+ leaderboard to make a point no one was disputing. But please, perhaps you can go into 6,000 additional words of snark to defend it.
   57. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 02:21 PM (#3630751)
Your grandmother would be embarrassed to field that badly? Really?


Yeah. And she at least has an excuse, in that she can't lift her glove arm above shoulder height anymore.

Manny has had a long career as an outfielder because he's a good enough fielder to bring a lot of value at that position in spite of his terrible glove. That doesn't excuse him for his lack of effort in improving his defense.

Somebody had to be the worst - but it didn't have to be him. He let himself remain a terrible fielder because he didn't care enough to want to be any better. He'd rather spend extra hours looking cool hitting line drives in the batting cage than putting in the hard work needed to fix one of the actual weaknesses in his game. That's his choice, but it's not a choice I have to support or admire.
   58. Fly, the most judgment-free human being on Earth Posted: August 31, 2010 at 02:37 PM (#3630774)
What about David Ortiz? Same thing? Derek Jeter? Edgar Martinez? All lazy? Or maybe just not that great at defense, which doesn't make them evil lazy people?
   59. if nature called, ladodger34 would listen Posted: August 31, 2010 at 02:41 PM (#3630780)
I wonder if people would have had these kinds of conversations about Ted Williams if he played in the internet/free agency era.
   60. SoSH U at work Posted: August 31, 2010 at 02:45 PM (#3630787)
I wonder if people would have had these kinds of conversations about Ted Williams if he played in the internet/free agency era.


I imagine they did.
   61. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:03 PM (#3630807)
What about David Ortiz? Same thing? Derek Jeter? Edgar Martinez?


Ortiz is, as you note, a fat, lazy pile. Given that he didn't spend enough time on basic physical conditioning to keep himself from getting a ginormous beer gut, it's tough to argue that he maxed out his natural defensive abilities any more than Manny did.

Jeter was mainly a crappy defender over his career, but he put in work and improved himself in '08 and '09 once he started getting called out with advanced metrics, as has been discussed on the site at length. He pretty significantly undercuts your point, in that he did what Manny couldn't be bothered to do, and benefitted from it.

Edgar was a decent defender, but too physically brittle to take the wear-and-tear of playing baseball, so he ended up as a DH. I'm not sure what you think he proves.
   62. Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:07 PM (#3630815)
Oh, and I'm a little bit annoyed that Ramirez sat on the Dodger bench all weekend rather than play against the Yankees, while the Dodgers dithered.

And the Red Sox still have seven games to play against Manny's new team---Wonder what sort of reception he'll get in Fenway this weekend?
   63. RayDiPerna Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:10 PM (#3630820)
SoSH, I think you're overreacting. He posted the OPS+ leaders (*) to show how good a hitter Ramirez has been this year. Pretty much everyone knows Ramirez has missed a lot of time this year, and if they don't, it doesn't change the point: he's been a hell of a hitter when he's played.

(*) What's the PA cutoff for showing the leaders? According to who? Regardless, Gonfalon wasn't arguing that Ramirez was one of the most valuable players in the league this year (quality + quantity); he was showing rate. Do you think Ramirez's OPS+ this year has been a fluke? I really can't understand why you're barking up this tree.
   64. Smiling Joe Hesketh Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:11 PM (#3630821)
Maybe Manny just sucks at defense. No one has any idea if it's effort that keeps his defense down. I mean, Jeremy Hermida sucks at defense too; no one ever suggested he didn't put in the effort to improve. He just is awful at it.

Manny was actually deceptively decent for a couple of years on Boston in the small LF; had 17 assists one year because guys kept running on him and he had a sneaky quick release and was surprisingly accurate with his throws.
   65. jingoist Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:13 PM (#3630829)
No denying Manny has been a tremendous hitter; as others have said, one of the top 5 all-time RH hitters.
Nobody here is denying that, nor did I mean to discredit that enormous acheivement in my previous post.

Here's my issue with Manny.
It's the price the team pays, both monetarily and psychologically, to have Manny act as he has these past 3 or 4 years. Manny being Manny was never an acceptable standard of behavior.
Once management allowed that behavior to occur it was all down hill.

Manny refusing to even attempt to improve his fielding ability shows his team mates that he has one foot on the dock and one foot on the boat.
Manny not hustling shows that he is handled like a star with a different set of rules.
Not helpful in building team chemistry

Am I old school about what being a good team mate is all about.
Yes.

Do I willingly accept the new self-indulgent approach that many ball players currently employ?
Not readily.

For $45M over two years I expect a better approach to self discipline and a level of caring about winning ballgames.
Getting yourself thrown out after one pitch isn't helping the Dodgers get into the playoffs.

Getting rid of this bad actor may just motivate the remaining Dodgers a bit more.
Enough to overcome 9 or so games they are behind; that's doubtful.

Maybe Ozzie can get Manny to really care again.
Lets hope so, for everyone concerned.
   66. Dan Szymborski Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:16 PM (#3630834)
I've seen lots of old-time articles of writers who clearly didn't like Ted Williams. But has anyone ever come across one that claimed Ted was less valuable to the Red Sox than say, Billy Goodman? Plaschke would, I bet.
   67. RayDiPerna Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:16 PM (#3630835)
What injury was it that prevented him from taking extra outfield work and becoming a competent defender years ago?

Manny is a great hitter. But he never put in the work to try and make himself a complete player, and that's a shame, given the talent he had.


Something tells me you have no clue how much work he did.
   68. Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:18 PM (#3630837)
Maybe Ozzie can get Manny to really care again.
Lets hope so, for everyone concerned.


And quickly. Like by 7:10 PM this Friday.
   69. SoSH U at work Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:21 PM (#3630843)

(*) What's the PA cutoff for showing the leaders? According to who? Regardless, Gonfalon wasn't arguing that Ramirez was one of the most valuable players in the league this year (quality + quantity); he was showing rate. Do you think Ramirez's OPS+ this year has been a fluke? I really can't understand why you're barking up this tree.


GGC simply pointed out that GB's list was disingenuous, which it was. That was the entirety of his remark. For some reason, instead of just saying "yeah, I shouldn't have listed him there," Gonfalon is going to great (and snarky) lengths to justify his incorrect OPS+ leadeboard.

We all post dumb things from time to time. Gonfalon did here. Why he can't either a) admit it was, or B) simply say nothing, is perplexing.

As for my barking, I'm done now.
   70. Fly, the most judgment-free human being on Earth Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:21 PM (#3630844)
Manny refusing to even attempt to improve his fielding ability shows his team mates that he has one foot on the dock and one foot on the boat.
Manny not hustling shows that he is handled like a star with a different set of rules.
Not helpful in building team chemistry


Where has there ever been a report that Manny has refused to attempt to become a better defender?
   71. Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:23 PM (#3630847)
I've seen lots of old-time articles of writers who clearly didn't like Ted Williams. But has anyone ever come across one that claimed Ted was less valuable to the Red Sox than say, Billy Goodman?

That actually did happen once, in 1950, when the Red Sox went on a 16-1 tear when Goodman replaced Williams in LF after Williams fractured his elbow in the All-Star game. The mindset of a certain type of writer is always there, and all it needs for perpetual replenishment is fresh fodder.
   72. Fly, the most judgment-free human being on Earth Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:25 PM (#3630849)
GB's list was completely appropriate. Suggesting that it was not is just strange.
   73. Nasty Nate Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:27 PM (#3630853)
And quickly. Like by 7:10 PM this Friday.


I'm a Red Sox fan, but I agree. It will be fun if Manny is launching some bombs this weekend. But besides naturally wanting the Red Sox to lose, wouldn't you (from a Yankees perspective) rather Minnesota be in the playoffs than a Manny-infused White Sox team?
   74. Fly, the most judgment-free human being on Earth Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:35 PM (#3630869)
I really hope Manny has a great weekend.
   75. RayDiPerna Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:35 PM (#3630871)
GGC simply pointed out that GB's list was disingenuous, which it was.


No, it wasn't.

That was the entirety of his remark. For some reason, instead of just saying "yeah, I shouldn't have listed him there," Gonfalon is going to great (and snarky) lengths to justify his incorrect OPS+ leadeboard.


But he should have listed him there. That was his entire point: to show how good a hitter Ramirez has been this year relative to the other top hitters in the league.

Ramirez has missed a lot of games, but that doesn't change how well he's hit when he's played. Gonfalon wasn't arguing that he's the MVP - only that he's hit well.

And what the hell is an "incorrect OPS+ leaderboard"?

We all post dumb things from time to time.


I fully agree, but perhaps not in the way you think.
   76. Moneyball can't buy you love (Joey B.) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 03:47 PM (#3630879)
Oh yeah, I totally forgot that Reinsdorf has a pretty strict grooming policy for his players, including no long hair.

I can't wait to see if he's going to try and enforce that on Mr. Sunshine.
   77. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: August 31, 2010 at 04:01 PM (#3630894)
Mr. Sunshine.

!
   78. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 04:32 PM (#3630921)
Something tells me you have no clue how much work he did.


I've seen lots and lots of articles about Manny's batting practice regimen. For example:

Jim Rice used to say that Ramirez used to practice hitting just breaking balls. And then he’d practice fastballs and sliders and changeups. It’s no secret why Ramirez was a great hitter — he truly worked at it. He’s a guy who will always be able to hit, maybe not for power, but we’ll likely not see the likes of this talent again. -Nick Cafardo, Boston Globe


Bits like that are fairly common. (Here's another. And another. And another. Etc.) Manny has a custom-tailored routine and spends hours a day in the cage, and that dedication and focus has obviously paid off for him on the offensive end of things. Good for him.

I have never, however, seen any discussion of Manny doing extra fielding drills or reporting early for extra outfield practice or anything like that. You would think that if he were putting in even close to the same amount of work that he was on his hitting, someone would have noticed by now. Particularly given the built-in narrative hook - the piece practically writes itself!
   79. Srul Itza Posted: August 31, 2010 at 04:33 PM (#3630924)
76. Strasburg is here (Joey B.)


No, he's not.
   80. RJ in TO Posted: August 31, 2010 at 04:46 PM (#3630930)
76. Strasburg is here (Joey B.)

No, he's not.


Yes, he is. Joey works at Dr. James Andrews' offices.
   81. robinred Posted: August 31, 2010 at 04:48 PM (#3630933)
@ 78: Ramirez supposedly does many unusual hand-eye coordination drills. One involves a mini-hula hoop (about 18-24" in diameter) with four wiffle balls attached. Supposedly the trainer tosses it to Ramirez, spinning it like a frisbee, at a slow speed. The wiffle balls are red, yellow, green and blue, and as the hoop spins towards Ramirez, the trainer calls out a color, and Ramirez then attempts to catch the hoop by grabbing said color.

I have always enjoyed watching Ramirez hit. To me the interesting question is who signs him for 2011. I think on a one-year deal to DH with a lot of incentives he would be a great buy for contender, a la Vlad Guerrero in Texas. I could see Ramirez DHing in the 4-hole for the Angels in 2011.
   82. Ron Johnson Posted: August 31, 2010 at 04:50 PM (#3630936)
I wonder if people would have had these kinds of conversations about Ted Williams if he played in the internet/free agency era.


Williams had all sorts of issues relating to lack of effort. Including being beat up by a teammate in the minors for not hustling.
   83. Ron Johnson Posted: August 31, 2010 at 04:55 PM (#3630940)
Dan, Jim Murray wrote a column about phony Hall of Famers. Included Williams. The telling point for Murray is that Williams didn't play well in either the playoff in 1948 or in his one shot at the World Series. Something like, "In the 10 most important games of his career Williams just didn't hit."
   84. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: August 31, 2010 at 04:58 PM (#3630942)
Yes, he is. Joey works at Dr. James Andrews' offices.

Works as what?
   85. RJ in TO Posted: August 31, 2010 at 05:00 PM (#3630943)
From My Turn at Bat, Egan is the one who wrote in the "10 most important games of his life, Williams his 0.232."
   86. Eddo Posted: August 31, 2010 at 05:08 PM (#3630955)
I have never, however, seen any discussion of Manny doing extra fielding drills or reporting early for extra outfield practice or anything like that. You would think that if he were putting in even close to the same amount of work that he was on his hitting, someone would have noticed by now. Particularly given the built-in narrative hook - the piece practically writes itself!

That's a fair enough point, but there's also the possibility Manny realized years ago that the work he was putting into his fielding wasn't getting nearly the same magnitude of results that his work at the plate was. It could be that his lack of fielding effort is a calculated move.
   87. RayDiPerna Posted: August 31, 2010 at 05:20 PM (#3630969)
That's a fair enough point, but there's also the possibility Manny realized years ago that the work he was putting into his fielding wasn't getting nearly the same magnitude of results that his work at the plate was. It could be that his lack of fielding effort is a calculated move.


Right. Even assuming arguendo that Vlad's screed is correct, presumably the extra hitting work improved Ramirez's hitting. It's plausible the ultimate effect was to increase Ramirez's overall value by increasing his value on offense more than he could have increased his value on defense.
   88. bads85 Posted: August 31, 2010 at 05:24 PM (#3630974)
I have never, however, seen any discussion of Manny doing extra fielding drills or reporting early for extra outfield practice or anything like that.


When Ramirez was an Indains, there was much written over his years there about his trying very hard to improve his defense. As a minor leaguer, he was an atricious outfielder, but spent a great deal of time working to improve his defense. He continued in the majors to work hard to improve his defense. The 1999 STATS Inc. Scouting Notebook credits Manny for working diligently to improve his defense, even going as far to see a shrink to get over his fear of the walls. When Ramirez arrived in Boston, there were articles about him working on defense to learn to play the Green Monster.

I don't know for certain if Ramirez quit working on his defense --- as his leg problems began, he migght have just said screw it. However, when he was young, he certainly worked his ass to improve his defense.
   89. if nature called, ladodger34 would listen Posted: August 31, 2010 at 05:31 PM (#3630982)
Williams had all sorts of issues relating to lack of effort. Including being beat up by a teammate in the minors for not hustling.

Which is kind of what I was getting at. By all accounts, Teddy didn't really give a damn about defense.
   90. robinred Posted: August 31, 2010 at 05:36 PM (#3630989)
By all accounts, Teddy didn't really give a damn about defense


Hmmm. In Epic Season, David Kaiser's detailed account of the 1948 AL pennant race, he claims that Williams was actually a good LF in the 40s and cared about it.
   91. if nature called, ladodger34 would listen Posted: August 31, 2010 at 05:42 PM (#3630994)

Hmmm. In Epic Season, David Kaiser's detailed account of the 1948 AL pennant race, he claims that Williams was actually a good LF in the 40s and cared about it.


I didn't get that sense when I read "The Teammates", but of course it was way after their playing careers.
   92. John DiFool2 Posted: August 31, 2010 at 05:56 PM (#3631009)
The data backs up Teddy being average from 1939 to 1957, but dropping off the cliff for his last 3 seasons.

[Edit note: trying to type one handed with a hamburger in the other doesn't make for coherent OPs]
   93. phredbird Posted: August 31, 2010 at 06:04 PM (#3631014)
Here's my issue with Manny.
It's the price the team pays, both monetarily and psychologically, to have Manny act as he has these past 3 or 4 years. Manny being Manny was never an acceptable standard of behavior.
Once management allowed that behavior to occur it was all down hill.


yeah, i hated it when the dodgers won 2 straight division titles and pounded the cubs and the cards both years and put up a pretty good fight in the NLCS. without manny who knows what that team could have accomplished. he was a distraction. no, he was a cancer!

Manny refusing to even attempt to improve his fielding ability shows his team mates that he has one foot on the dock and one foot on the boat.


let's see some actual instances of that. you know, other players actually saying that, not the blowhards and idiots in the LA times.

Manny not hustling shows that he is handled like a star with a different set of rules.
Not helpful in building team chemistry


if you don't think the mashers and other stars on a team get some slack, you don't know anything about 'team chemistry'.


Am I old school about what being a good team mate is all about.
Yes.


now i'm beginning to understand.

For $45M over two years I expect a better approach to self discipline and a level of caring about winning ballgames.


again, i'd like to know how you know this is true? dodger record with manny is something like 121-84, without him it is .500.

Getting yourself thrown out after one pitch isn't helping the Dodgers get into the playoffs


this happened how many times exactly? this is going to sink the dodgers chances? how about casey blake turning into a pumpkin? rafael furcal breaking down? matt kemp regressing to ordinariness?

Getting rid of this bad actor may just motivate the remaining Dodgers a bit more.


oh brother.
   94. McCoy Posted: August 31, 2010 at 06:05 PM (#3631015)
I'm not sure where in Teammates would be passages that said that Ted didn't care about defense. It has been awhile since I read it but the passages on his defenses mostly had to do with his buddies defending his defensive abilities. There were articles an incidents during his short minor league career about how wasn't being your standard ballplayer out there in the field. He'd do jumping jacks and work on his swing out there which riled up a lot of the old farts. But in the majors he was for the most part throwing himself around out there to the point where supposedly ownership had to tell him to pull a Bobby Abreu and shy away from the walls. Of course all of that could be bull that ownership shat out to protect Ted but that is what the history books claim. Ted made his mistakes out there and even threw some tantrums that created fielding miscues but there really is no evidence that points toward Williams not caring about defense. He is widely credited with being the first player to figure out the the Green Monster. I've also never come across anything about some player in the minors beating him up.
   95. if nature called, ladodger34 would listen Posted: August 31, 2010 at 06:17 PM (#3631021)
Ted made his mistakes out there and even threw some tantrums that created fielding miscues but there really is no evidence that points toward Williams not caring about defense. He is widely credited with being the first player to figure out the the Green Monster. I've also never come across anything about some player in the minors beating him up.

Can I pull a Roger and say that I misremembered?
   96. RayDiPerna Posted: August 31, 2010 at 06:24 PM (#3631024)
When Ramirez was an Indains, there was much written over his years there about his trying very hard to improve his defense.


How dare you suggest Ramirez is not evil?
   97. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: August 31, 2010 at 06:54 PM (#3631046)
Am I old school about what being a good team mate is all about.
Yes.


Who gives a crap what you think makes a good teammate? Unless you actually have some first hand knowledge of what kind of teammate Manny is. Which you don't. So either stop talking out of your ass, or admit that you're talking out of your ass.
   98. Ron Johnson Posted: August 31, 2010 at 07:08 PM (#3631056)
#94 See the Jim Tabor comment in the New Historical Abstract. Source is Lefty LeFebvre.
   99. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: August 31, 2010 at 07:13 PM (#3631061)
How dare you suggest Ramirez is not evil?


I know you're a Republican, Ray, but lazy and evil aren't the same thing.

Though listening to W. bluster about the Axis of Lazy would've been amusing...
   100. McCoy Posted: August 31, 2010 at 07:29 PM (#3631082)
tabor did not beat up ted. He threatened to do it.
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Sheer Tim Foli
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012
(417 - 8:20pm, Feb 10)
Last: ray james

NewsblogSources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault
(6129 - 8:19pm, Feb 10)
Last: Ron J

NewsblogMets owners knew about Maddoff
(32 - 8:16pm, Feb 10)
Last: SouthSideRyan

NewsblogSullivan: 2011 in Extreme Home Runs
(1 - 8:15pm, Feb 10)
Last: Good cripple hitter

NewsblogKnobler: Stay away from steroids -- but vote how you want
(26 - 8:14pm, Feb 10)
Last: Booey

Transaction Oracle2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's
(56 - 8:12pm, Feb 10)
Last: Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas)

NewsblogCurt Schilling Says Manny 'Quit on the Field,' Teammates Stopped Him From Confronting Slugger
(26 - 8:07pm, Feb 10)
Last: Tripon

NewsblogMLB: Hall of Fame worthy? Furthest thing from Schilling's mind
(41 - 7:55pm, Feb 10)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogGrantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans
(45 - 6:59pm, Feb 10)
Last: Ron J

NewsblogESPN: Law: Top 100 Prospects (paywalled)
(11 - 6:54pm, Feb 10)
Last: Crispix Attacks

Newsblog'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s
(298 - 6:51pm, Feb 10)
Last: rfloh

NewsblogFSKC announces on-air lineup for Royals - Rex Hudler and Steve Physioc to join
(12 - 6:32pm, Feb 10)
Last: Robert in Manhattan Beach

Sox TherapyOffseason Minor League Thread
(3 - 6:11pm, Feb 10)
Last: Dan

NewsblogJeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected?
(67 - 6:00pm, Feb 10)
Last: Eric J is Financed by a Rich Grandpa

NewsblogBluetales blog: JetBlue’s 605 Wears Red Sox Colors!
(8 - 5:56pm, Feb 10)
Last: JE (Jason Epstein)

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 2.0896 seconds
40 querie(s) executed