User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.8980 seconds
83 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Thursday, May 17, 2007Fanhouse: Julian Tavarez: ‘Who’s Ernie Banks?’A real head-rubber here…
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Plain Dealer/Pluto: Matt LaPorta is still in the minors because of Grady Sizemore's cranky elbow (9 - 4:03pm, Jul 05) Last: Sidd [bleeping] Finch (SuperBaes) Newsblog: Steve Kettman: A review of the unmaking of 'Moneyball: The Movie' (13 - 4:01pm, Jul 05) Last: Justin Zeth Newsblog: tampabay.com: Tampa Bay Rays minor-league affiliate's Ladies Night promotion causing a stir (21 - 3:59pm, Jul 05) Last: PreservedFish Newsblog: Madden: Omar Minaya's Mets have issues with injuries and inside the clubhouse (4 - 3:58pm, Jul 05) Last: Swedish Chef Newsblog: NYT: Kilgannon: Why Short Al From Brooklyn, Talkative Fan, Calls No More
(22 - 3:55pm, Jul 05) Last: Robert Machemer |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.8980 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Julian Tavarez's career isn't included in a rudimentary understanding of baseball history, but a little research would have been real nice here.
Julian Tavarez's career isn't included in a rudimentary understanding of baseball history, but a little research would have been real nice here.
1993, 2001. Same difference. Still, I kind of suspect that Tavarez actually MET Ernie Banks at some point in 2001.
at least he was respectful about it.
Julian, I'm not sure you are like Ernie, but you sure are entertaining.
If there's a school that taught Ernie Banks, I'd have loved to attend it.
God, that'd be even scarier than Ron Jeremy.
You probably can't appreciate this until Tavarez has pitched for your team, but his head is absolutely terrifying when seen from up close.
have to agreee with that, he's one of those space cases that you only appreciate when they are on your side, but those space cases sometimes make the game fun to watch.
I'll call crazy. I was born in 1970, and got into baseball around '78 or '79. I don't give a #### what anybody did in baseball prior to that. It's fine that some people do care -- it's cute, like how some people are really interested in the lindy hop or the charleston -- but it's ridiculous to expect players to know or care about baseball history.
Hilarious.
Now, I'm an historically-minded person, so if I was an accountant or an airline pilot or anything else, I'd also have an interest in my profession's history. Obviously, however, people in those professions aren't necessarily going to be historically-minded; musicologists are self-selected for that trait. Baseball players aren't self-selected that way, so I wouldn't expect them to be historically aware.
Does a rudimentary knowledge of the game really cover Ernie Banks? Maybe if you're a Cubs fan. But I think if that is the standard, then I might not qualify for a "rudimentary" understanding of my own profession's history (cooking). And there are certainly websites full of amateurs that know much more than I do - even if they couldn't do my job.
You can count me as one of those who has at least a rudimentary understanding of the history of my profession. But when I played ball I could not care less about the history of the game or even the game at the major league level. I probably knew the name Babe Ruth because of the candy bar and that was about it in terms of history of baseball. It wasn't until Ken Burns came along that I discovered a lot of the old timers of baseball. Plus Earl Weaver Baseball came out at or around that time and for my B-Day I got a baseball card kit that came with 100 reproductions of old time cards. It wasn't until I was an adult and no longer playing baseball that I became interested in the history of baseball. If somehow I had managed to have any kind of talent for the sport and made it professional I seriously doubt I would know much about baseball's past.
This is a profession that usually gets people interested in it when they are very young, involves a lot of current names and is steeped in tradition.(who growing up in the 70's didn't hear garveys name mentioned with gehrig for consecutive games- pete rose with ty cobb, reggie jackson with babe ruth) I would imagine that anyone who grew up in the united states and played competitive baseball of any sort, should be able to name about 50 past major league ball players. If you were born and raised in another country? I think it would be a little much to expect you to know more than Babe Ruth, Jackie Robinson, Hank Aaron and Roberto Clemente.
And Banks was retired before Tavarez was born (god I'm old!). And Tavarez of course didn't grow up in this country and probably didn't get to watch too many WGN rain delay highlight reels.
Now, if he doesn't know who Roberto Clemente or Cesar Cedeno or Julio Franco or Juan Marichal are, then you can call him ignorant of baseball history that he probably "should" know.
Not knowing a guy that played years before he was born that is not one of the top 1 or 2 all time names in the sport isn't that huge. I bet you could find a large number of players that don't know Mel Ott, Ducky Medwick, etc. A player, even a HOFer, that was iconic to a single team isn't huge. I doubt that forty years from now, many baseball players will know Wade Boggs or Tony Gwynn. They probably will know Barry Bonds.
Mostly from his latest book, "If I had taken Steroids, Here's how I would have done It."
Not knowing a guy that played years before he was born that is not one of the top 1 or 2 all time names in the sport isn't that huge. I bet you could find a large number of players that don't know Mel Ott, Ducky Medwick, etc. A player, even a HOFer, that was iconic to a single team isn't huge. I doubt that forty years from now, many baseball players will know Wade Boggs or Tony Gwynn. They probably will know Barry Bonds.
He doesn't need to know who those people are, because he's JULIAN TAVAREZ, BIOTCH!!!
Still, you'd think he'd know how to google/wiki/B-ref
I bet you know the greats though, like Julia Childs and Bernal Diaz.
LOL, I choked on an orange... you should give a warning
Okajima and Matsui are viewing "scouting videos" one day:
Matsui: Why does that dude look familiar?
Okajiam: Dude, that guy's the real deal, I can tell you that.
You're not.
You're crazy.
Baseball players are baseball players because they're good at baseball, not because they have vast knowledge or even any particular knowledge of the history of baseball.
This doesn't strike me as all that unusual - with the exception of people with a passion for the history of their profession, a knowledge of the history of one's occupation isn't exactly high priority. Artists, musicians, and (duh) historians know a lot about the history of their occupations because at least some portion of that knowledge is frequently required for their jobs.
But take lawyers. While lawyers who take cases in a particular field should know the case history and the historical application of a law, they won't necessarily know which congressman wrote the law or the role of lawyers in Roman and Byzantine society. I doubt many mayors of cities or congressmen could name who was in charge of their city or their district in 1850. And I'm virtually certain that most people working at banks don't have a lot of knowledge about the Panic of 1819, the Second National Bank or how much a talent of gold weighed.
Obviously, in any profession, there will be some people with a particular passion for the history associated with the profession. As it is in baseball - some players will be familiar with the players while a helluva lot will not. Knowing who Ernie Banks is has zero impact on Tavarez's - or any other player's - job. Now, if they go into broadcasting after careers, then some level of historical knowledge becomes a prerequisite, though from hearing some of them, not an absolute necessity.
But so do non-cooks. I'm sure a lot of sauciers can make fantastic mother sauces without knowing much about the life of Auguste Escoffier.
However, Tavarez played for the Cubs for a season and has visited Wrigley Field as a visitor many times. How oblivious do you have to be to look up at the left field foul pole and never once think to yourself or ask anyone "Hey, who's 'Banks - 14'"? I am sure Ernie made an appearance or two at Wrigley during the 2001, as well. Probably sang the Seventh Inning Stretch and visited the clubhouse once or twice, too.
Not knowing any 2 time MVP for a team you once represented is just willful ignorance.
Last nite, while clicking thru the horrific "Hendrix" movie...my 53-year old brother-in-law (who happens to be a HS teacher) sez..."I didn't know Jimi Hendrix was black"
After that...I was so confuded...I set my lighter fluid on fire with a guitar!
And, yes,...then I bashed his nimerrodian skull in.
Your brother-in-law is Stephen Colbert?
Well that is because Escoffier didn't come up with mother sauces. That and a two year old could make a good mother sauce. Roux and milk isn't exactly rocket science. Nor is butter and egg yolk, which okay I'll give you was Escoffier's addition to the classification. Though today some people have removed from the classification. So nowadays the only contribution to the mother sauces for Augie might very well just be Tomato sauce.
DON'T YOU KNOW WHO I AM??????
But so do non-cooks. I'm sure a lot of sauciers can make fantastic mother sauces without knowing much about the life of Auguste Escoffier.
That's my point, when you reach the truly great, like Julia Childs and Bernal Diaz, you transend the history of your profession.
Priceless. He doesn't know who Ernie Banks is but he's presumptious enough that we wouldn't know who Charles Nagy was.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main