User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.6638 seconds
82 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Wednesday, March 05, 2008Galloway: Josh Hamilton might be Rangers’ best prospect everHow soon they drop Shelton McMath from the equation…
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: THT: Jaffe: Ranking MLB stadiums (that I’ve been to) (163 - 9:29am, Feb 09) Last: Teal & Black Newsblog: Kansas City Kansan: Sloan: It's time to trade Greinke, Soria (15 - 9:29am, Feb 09) Last: Dock Ellis on Acid Newsblog: Cashman: No new pacts for big three (7 - 9:27am, Feb 09) Last: JRVJ (formerly Delta Socrates) Newsblog: AP: Brewers erecting a statue of Selig outside Miller Park (75 - 9:26am, Feb 09) Last: J. Roberts Newsblog: FanGraphs: Carruth: Fastball Losses (2 - 9:19am, Feb 09) Last: RB in NYC (Now with Resolutions!) Transaction Oracle: 2010 ZiPS Projections - Toronto Blue Jays
(71 - 9:04am, Feb 09) Last: Rusty Priske |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.6638 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Exactly. The 27-year-old Josh Hamilton is much more fully formed than a 19-year-old Juan Gonzalez or Ivan Rodriguez or Sammy Sosa or somebody like that. Hamilton is making such an impressive first impression on the Rangers because he's never been a Ranger before.
Chronologically, yes. But in terms of his accomplishments careerwise, he's about where you might expect a spectacularly talented 21 year old prospect to be.
Right, and given his time spent being an addict/recovering addict, he's probably got about the same amount of actual development time as a 21 year old, but of course his chronological age is a big deal in terms of estimating his future value. It's not like a young pitcher, where you can argue that limited use in his early 20s saved his arm.
I dunno. The list of players who had 200+ PA as good as Hamilton's 2007 at age 20 in MLB is very short and almost universally HOFers.
That's what makes the Hamilton saga so sad. His brief MLB performance, combined with the way other players talk about his abilities really makes you wonder what might have been. An A-Rod/Griffey type career could have been possible. Now, who knows, but losing all those years plus the damage to his health from the years of drug abuse doesn't bode well. I'm guessing best case he's a fragile Jim Edmonds (St. Louis version) for a few years. That's damn valuable, but it's not a young Ken Griffey Jr.
You mean, Dusty Baker's in town?
The Rangers pitching lost one of its few hopes for non-horribleness with Volquez gone.
Like, 'he should play for the Rockies' fanatic or 'recruits women to be suicide bombers' fanatic? I can live with the first, but the second? One needs to draw the line somewhere.
of for goodness sakes half of ballplayes are religious fanatics. big deal.
but thing is that josh hamilton is not a prospect by ANY definition and he should not be talked about like he is.
too bad he took performance detracting drugs for so long. poor guy....
i wouldn't be real too surprised if there was a personal reason they traded hamilton. that happens with a LOT of trades - like with luke scott and houston. the management absolutely HATED the poor guy, not sure why, and spread all sorts of lies and crap about him
it could be something like him disapproving of porn/adultery and making, um, a fuss about it you know what i'm saying
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main