First of all, being 28th all-time at something does not constitute “amazing” in my book. A-Rod is right on his heels, and will pass him before the end of May next year. Jim Thome and Carlos Delgado are about 140 RBIs back, and could both pass him in the next two years, without necessarily even being much good. Chipper Jones is about 250 back, and could pass him inside of three years easily. Any two of those four will push Baines out of the top 30, and thus his best case for Cooperstown will weaken quite a bit.
Also, it’s hard for me to agree with “consistent excellence” as an appropriate term to describe someone who hit, on average, .289 with 22 homers per 162 games. (His actual average per season was about 17.5 homers, because he rarely played more than around 145 games.) More like “typical goodness” which sounds a lot less compelling.
Sure, I’ll give him three snaps in Z formation for not using steroids, but then do we even know that for sure? He played almost half his career in the so-called steroids era, and suffered little apparent drop off in skills as he went into his late 30’s, when most players slow down.
Baines hit the second most homers of his career at age 40, in 1999, the height of the PED era, and also had the third highest slugging percentage and RBI totals of his career that year, then fell off the table, hitting just .254 with 11 homers in Y2K. If players as mundane as Jason Grimsley and Ricky Bones and Hal Morris and David Justice and dozens of others were all using, is it so hard to believe that Baines could have, too?
Hotel Coral Esix Snead (tmutchell)
Posted: December 03, 2008 at 09:20 PM |
8 comment(s)
|
Login to Bookmark
Related News:
General,
History,
Hall of Fame,
Sabermetrics,
Teams,
Baltimore,
Chi White Sox,
Oakland,
Texas,
Awards
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I think its great having everyone put forward their case for and against for every player, it allows me to pretty much comment about what I think is important....VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES, VOTE TIM RAINES....well you get the point.
There's not even that much support there travis. MLB.com puts out stories on all eligible candidates that appear, as far as I can tell, on the team page of the club he's most associated with and is written with a friendly spin for his fans. It's really not something any of us need to get worked up about.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main