|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Thursday, July 24, 2008
When the Baseball Hall of Fame holds its induction ceremony in Cooperstown, New York, July 27, three pillars of baseball’s corporate establishment will join the ranks. But the man who freed ballplayers from indentured servitude will not. This is not only a travesty, it’s the result of a coup engineered by the conservative cabal that controls the Hall of Fame.
[...]
What’s especially outrageous...is that Miller was blackballed by executives with whom he’d done battle--and defeated-- during baseball’s most intense labor wars. Each of them had a clear ideological and organizational conflict of interest in voting on Miller’s candidacy for the Hall.
[...]
DeWitt, MacPhail and Giles were each on baseball’s management side during the collusion scandal, and surely harbor a grudge against Miller. Moreover, all three are heirs of baseball dynasties. Their fathers (and, in McPhail’s case, father and grandfather) were part of baseball’s management during the pre-Miller era, before the players union weakened the owners’ power and profits. Another committee member, Kansas City Royals owner David Glass, is the former president and CEO of Wal-Mart, perhaps the country’s most anti-union corporation.
[...]
In a recent telephone interview, Miller said that the changes to the selection committee may have been made in order to pick fellow executives more than to exclude him from Hall membership. But Miller, who is hardly naive, is being too generous.
The baseball corporate establishment isn’t just anti-Miller. It is anti-union. And the MLBPA is the nation’s strongest union.
Casey Candaele‘s brother goes to bat for Marvin Miller.
|
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Didn't you read the article? This is baseball's biggest scandal! Then again, that's not a big accomplishment in a sport that's stayed so scandal-free over the past decade.
So did Abner Doubleday!
Or did he...?
I like how you lump Pavano in there with the other two.
I usually try to get along with everyone here, but I'm going to pull a Gaelan and say this is the stupidest thing I've ever seen posted here.
An article like it, maybe, I can't really speak for that. But this one wasn't posted until yesterday.
And the MLBPA is the nation’s strongest union.
I found this ridiculous, although you could say it's the most secure.
The hall of fame is quickly working itself towards irrelevance.
really bother me, because unless you are referring only to the plaque gallery itself and not the institution as a whole you are really missing out on the whole purpose of the Hall of Fame. The plaque gallery is the revenue-generating arm of the museum, whose value is in the representation and preservation of the whole history of the game. Dismissing the institution because Bill Mazeroski doesn't measure up to your Hall of Fame standards is really doing a grave injustice. Really, mostly, to yourself.
I think that the standard of "being a Hall-of-Famer" is becoming irrelevant, and I think that comments like the one above don't mean to imply anything more than that.
Morgan Bulkeley was in the second class. Any thoughts of a pristine standard pretty much went out the window right there.
That's a good point. I'm actually surprised I hadn't realized this before.
When you're young, you blindly accept the voters' decisions of who is and isn't a HOFer. After all, most of those players played a good deal before I was even born, not to mention before I could understand baseball.
As I've gotten older and understood the game more and more, I've come to question more and more HOF-related decisions. That'd be enough, I suppose, to leave me with a feeling that it's becoming irrelevant, instead of always having been irrelevant.
More people would agree with me if the Hall of Fame was just a nebulous concept (like the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame was for its first 15 years or so) instead of also being a building next to a much more interesting building with which it is often confused.
I keep hoping schuey will hang out with us on the next big political thread. My guess is he is one of those guys who would, but stays away now because he thinks the Liberals here are too mean and nasty.
A year or so ago I would have, too.
If the Yankees didn't want the risk of paying Pavano while injured, they should have offered him a non-guaranteed contract and let Pavano go to a team that would offer him a guaranteed one.
If the owners wanted cocaine out of baseball, they could have entered freely into a CBA that allowed drug testing. Instead, they struck a drug deal with the players that would have effectively short-circuited the drug problems of the last 25 years, but the representative of the owners, Bowie Kuhn, declared additional magical powers not in the contract and the union opted out at the first option.
Miller bears no responsibility for any of those things listed. Miller was simply the pivotal man at turning contracts in baseball from one-sided to two-sided.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main