|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
It’s easy to second-guess him because Brian Bruney came in and blew the lead—and got the win; nice scoring rules, MLB!—but Bruney’s been pretty brilliant lately. My problem with taking out Hughes is that every time you use him for just one easy inning, you make it that much harder to get him back into the rotation if the need arises. Why not use Hughes for two or three innings at a time? And if the “problem” is not enough work for the other relievers, here’s a radical idea: don’t carry so many relievers.
happysky
Posted: July 01, 2009 at 01:18 PM | 10 comment(s)
Related News: NY Yankees
|
My Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Do the Yanks really need Tomko?
Hughes, OTOH, has just been Philthy, and would probably be a better starter than Joba *right now*. Of course he's probably a better reliever than Joba would be too...
Absolutely, Aceves and Hughes can both pitch the 7th and 8th innings. It used to be, prime setup relievers would go two and three inninigs at a time. That time wasn't that long ago like, 3,4 years ago.
How many prospects have more potential as a hitter?
I do wonder though, if he was really so bad at C. why aren't the other teams just stealing 6+ times against him EVERY game?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main