User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 1.1275 seconds
65 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Thursday, March 19, 2009Hulkower: What the Dodgers batting order SHOULD look like
And Joe Torre can move around the dunny as he does a doubleshit take. Repoz
Posted: March 19, 2009 at 07:43 AM | 18 comment(s)
Related News: General, Sabermetrics, Projections, LA Dodgers |
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Yahoo: Passan - As La Russa goes, so might Pujols (8 - 3:12am, Sep 09) Last: Omar'sBlackCloud Newsblog: MSR: Twins’ ‘commitment to diversity’ not reflected in all-White stadium concessions (43 - 3:06am, Sep 09) Last: Jason Kendall's #6,530,420,771 fan (AS) Newsblog: FanGraphs: Cameron: Carlos Gonzalez And The Value Of Runs (11 - 2:53am, Sep 09) Last: Don Malcolm Newsblog: Billy Crystal to Headline 2010 HOF Baseball Film Festival (16 - 2:43am, Sep 09) Last: Rich Rifkin Newsblog: ajc: Hot-hitting Gonzalez moved past Infante in NL batting race (57 - 2:33am, Sep 09) Last: Harold Newsblog: MLB.com: Halos need extras, but snap home skid (1 - 2:25am, Sep 09) Last: Los Angeles PTBNL of Anaheim Newsblog: Walkoff Walk: Michael Kay Eats Like An Insolent Five-Year-Old
(130 - 2:21am, Sep 09) Last: villainx |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2010 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 1.1275 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Wait, so batting Ramirez leadoff would result in 1.5 wins, but the writer things it shouldn't be done because Ramirez will knock in more runs batting second? Isn't that similar to people intentionally reducing their income to fall into a lower tax bracket?
Yeah, only a moron wouldn't bat the pitcher eighth. I mean, everyone knows that.
Yeah, only a moron wouldn't bat the pitcher eighth. I mean, everyone knows that.
And if he thinks it makes some sense for Manny Ramirez to bat leadoff, then maybe the pitcher should bat seventh so there are as many men on base as possible for Manny. Or sixth!
An interesting investigation into statistics, though.
It's probably true, but the fun of fretting over batting orders will always trump the statistical truism of it.
So batting order is not truly irrelevant, just not worth losing sleep over. And there's something to be said for having a relatively stable order over the course of the season.
They are not obvious to me.
It does matter, but only in the margins.
Didn't RTFA, but Hulkower seems to have read "The Book" - they say bat your best guy 2nd, and Manny is certainly the Dodgers best hitter.
The quantitative description is that an optimal batting order can get you 5-15 more runs in a season. (This has been the case since I started looking at this several years ago, and has not changed since.) How you want to qualitatively say that "a little" or "a lot" is up to you. The numeric description is more accurate in any case, and will not change. That's the only thing you have to keep up with.
Also: remember that moving pitchers from the 8th slot (best) to 4th slot (worst) will cost your team 0.1 runs per game. That's the breadth of impact in making the single worst decision that no one would ever make.
***
Your best hitter should *generally* bat 2nd or 4th. It could happen that he will bat 1st (Rickey, Raines), it could happen that he will bat 3rd. You'd have to look at your entire set of players.
However, it will be very very difficult to find a situation where your five best hitters will not bat somewhere in the top 5. This may seem obvious to everyone here, but I think it's easy to find teams that put one of their 2 or 3 worst hitters in the 2-hole.
***
Also, since star hitters have huge egos, you have to defer to their inner child, as their petulance will easily evaporate the carefully crafted 5-15 run gain you can otherwise hope to get.
It's a fun toy, but the results truly are meaningless. For most lineups, you'd be better off just summing the players' stats and ingoring lineup entirely.
I wouldn't've thought petulance was so well-measured.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main