Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Jacksonville Suns Employee Caught Smoking Marijuana on the Job

Zerba the Geeked.

Police say a juvenile told an off duty officer he saw a man smoking marijuana in the stadium during Saturday’s game. It turnded out to be Ray Zerba, Assistant General Manager of Personnel for the team.

...For nearly a year, Ray had the job of his dreams, and in a moment, it was taken away. “One of the best jobs I could ever imagine having and I’ve just kind of thrown it all away, and now I have to pick up the pieces,” said Zerba.

His life fell to pieces while working that dream job, when he was caught doing something he says he’d normally leave at home.

“I’ve been addicted to marijuana my whole life pretty much,” said Zerba.

Repoz Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:03 AM | 872 comment(s)
  Related News: GeneralMinor LeaguesLA Dodgers

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 9 pages  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >
   1. DFA SILVA-clap-clap-clapclapclap, DFA SILVA-clap-c  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:18 AM (#2484078)
pot really isnt that bad and should be legalized.....go!
   2. jamcadbury  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:20 AM (#2484079)
Police say a juvenile told an off duty officer he saw a man smoking marijuana in the stadium during Saturday's game.

What kind of kid in today's society does this?
   3. Justin T  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:23 AM (#2484081)
I think the first wave of posts here will be strongly in favor of the pot smoking employee. Once all the people with jobs start coming on tomorrow morning, the conversation will take a new turn.
   4. Guts  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:24 AM (#2484083)
pot really isnt that bad and should be legalized
   5. David Nieporent (now, with child)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:25 AM (#2484084)
What kind of kid in today's society does this?
That was my thought about this whole thing. We used to think it was creepy when totalitarian regimes trained kids to inform on adults. It's not like he spotted him chopping up a body and dismembering it. Why the hell would someone report this?
   6. David Nieporent (now, with child)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:26 AM (#2484087)
Oh, and "pot really isnt that bad and should be legalized" But of course it should be legalized not because it "isn't that bad" but because it's a matter of personal liberty. (Whether he should be fired should be, of course, solely up to his employer.)
   7. Bhaakon  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:28 AM (#2484088)
Why the hell would someone report this?


Zerba decided not to give in to blackmail, and paid the price. Should have just given that kid the remainder of the stash.
   8. Rich  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:29 AM (#2484089)
When it comes to marijuana, the mass culture has turned kids into little McCarthyites.

Kids, if the issue is ratting someone out for smoking pot, just say no.

btw, You can be psychologically dependent on pot, but you can't really be addicted because there are no physical symptoms of withdrawal when you quit.
   9. Dag Nabbit: formerly tolerant of lactose  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:32 AM (#2484091)
It's not like he spotted him chopping up a body and dismembering it.

Well actually he did but didn't bother mentioning it. Not that big a deal and you gotta focus on the big things. If you want to consume drugs at a ballpark, you're supposed to make it booze like everyone else.

On a more serious note, I have no real problems with a person recreationally using pot, but I have very limited sympathy for someone who got fired because he did it on the job.
   10. baudib  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:35 AM (#2484093)
I have a job, but I work odd hours, so I don't count.

I'm pretty much pro-legalization of marijuana and pro-firing people for being dumba$$es.
   11. David Nieporent (now, with child)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:37 AM (#2484095)
On a more serious note, I have no real problems with a person recreationally using pot, but I have very limited sympathy for someone who got fired because he did it on the job.
Well, on the one hand it falls under "Lack of anything resembling common sense," so in that sense my sympathy is limited as well. But according to the article, he wasn't fired for smoking pot; he was fired for getting arrested. So my sympathy meter stays pretty high.
   12. Srul Itza At Home  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:04 AM (#2484105)
Why the hell would someone report this?

D.A.R.E.
   13. DFA SILVA-clap-clap-clapclapclap, DFA SILVA-clap-c  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:12 AM (#2484107)
well if the game was between innings does it really count as on the job. ok that was a joke, getting caught at work is dumb. none the less on his own time he should have been able to do it if he wanted
   14. yb125  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 03:22 AM (#2484118)
I don't remember D.A.R.E ever telling us to report pot useto police. Nor do most youths I know think it's worth reporting. (sure most of the kids I know in the 10-13 range thinks it's a sign of a bad babysitter but wouldn't turn anyone into the police over it) The last time I remember a kid turning in anyone over turn potwas a ex/never was girlfriend turning the guy into a teacher on a camping trip. Point being despite spending most of my time around kids and teenagers I've never seen this McCarthyites syndrome Rich speaks of. Then again I live in San Diego where you can find medical marijuana shops every other block in many places.
   15. BFFB  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 04:26 AM (#2484121)
Should be legalized because what people choose to inhale, inject or swallow is their own business. Whether restrictions on the use of certain substances are a fireable offense is entirely down to the contract negotiated between the employee and employer.
   16. Hello Rusty Kuntz, Goodbye Rusty Cars  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 06:46 AM (#2484133)
Pot really isn't that bad and should be mandatory.

It says he was smoking pot in the bleachers. Isn't it illegal to smoke cigarettes in the bleachers most places now?
   17. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 07:07 AM (#2484140)
This is what comes from voting for Republicans.
   18. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 07:11 AM (#2484142)
Ahh memories. I used to work the graveyard shift at a hotel when I was in grad school in Mississippi. I was almost always stoned or drunk for the first half of those shifts. I'd sober up by the morning when I actually had to deal with people, though. One time, while under the influence, I watched while a squirrel that was trapped inside the wall slowly chewed its way through the drywall and into my office where it then proceeded to run around, um, like a squirrel trapped in a hotel office. Good times. Good times.

Kids, don't do drugs. They will #### you up!
   19. FelizForPresident  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 07:57 AM (#2484152)
There is a time and place for smoking marijuana...my belief is that that time and place must be on the boring job...Zerba should be honored for his bold statement
   20. Superunknown Gary Geiger Counter  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 08:20 AM (#2484167)
It says he was smoking pot in the bleachers. Isn't it illegal to smoke cigarettes in the bleachers most places now?


Yeah. I believe it's verboten in Florida. So, not only was this guy doing this on the job, he was probably violating some other rule, too.
   21. Dayton Moore is a Big Fat Idiot (AG#1F)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 08:31 AM (#2484175)
This kid gets fired, and yet David Littlefield is obviously high every day on the job and gets to keep his job. Where's the outrage?
   22. zonk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 08:36 AM (#2484178)
Pretty stupid to do it "at work"...

I mean, I only do so when I'm telecommuting ;-)
   23. Cowboy Popup  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:20 AM (#2484211)
“I’ve been addicted to marijuana my whole life pretty much,” said Zerba.

STFU. No one is addicted to pot, you're just too damn weak and irresponsible to control yourself.

And doing it at work is just stupid. God, what a disgrace.
   24. CrosbyBird  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:23 AM (#2484214)
First of all to understand what happened to killer, you gotta understand who killer the dog was. Now killer was born to a three-legged ##### of a mother. He was always ashamed of this, man. And then right after that he's adopted by this man, Tito Liebowitz he's a small time gun runner and a rotweiler fight promoter. So he puts killer into training. They see killer's good. He is damn good. But then he had the fight of his life. They pit him against his brother nibbles. And killer said "no man that's my brother, I can't fight nibbles" but they made him fight anyway, and killer, he killed nibbles. Killer said "that's it!" he called off all his fights, and he started doing crack, and he freaked out. Then in a rage, he collapsed, and his heart no longer beat.
   25. JLAC has a future time orientation  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:28 AM (#2484219)
I'm sick and tired of people like Ray Zerba and Chris Truby with their Jacksonville values.
   26. CrosbyBird  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:29 AM (#2484220)
By the way, for something other than an obscure-ish movie quote:

1) Marijuana should be legal, for, at the very least, competent adults to use.
2) It's not addictive, regardless of what this idiot says.
3) He should fired just as a guy who gets drunk on the job would be.
4) That narc kid makes me sick.
   27. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:32 AM (#2484225)
Ditto what crosbybird says for me. Except housepainters should still be allowed to smoke pot while on the job. That's one job where pot smoking is a must, especially in Florida.
   28. andrewberg  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:33 AM (#2484229)
Have you ever been to a Jacksonville Suns game?

Have you ever been to a Jacksonville Suns game... on weed??


Seriously though, if this guy is claiming to be addicted to pot and that being the assistant personnel director for a minor league baseball team is his dream job, then he probably isn't so much of a visionary/hero in the first place.
   29. andrewberg  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:35 AM (#2484234)
There are many jobs that should encourage pot smoking. For instance, Shooty, if any member of the production crew of flight of the conchords was not stoned, you would end up with an episode where they just sit around talking in funny accents. Wait, that might be pretty funny.
   30. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:38 AM (#2484237)
For instance, Shooty, if any member of the production crew of flight of the conchords was not stoned, you would end up with an episode where they just sit around talking in funny accents. Wait, that might be pretty funny.

Isn't that what the show pretty much is? Not that I don't still get a chuckle from it.
   31. North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:39 AM (#2484238)
Marijuana being illegal: stupid

Smoking weed in the stands while at work: also stupid
   32. andrewberg  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:40 AM (#2484239)
Except for the randomly interjected and ill-fitting songs, which have made less and less sense as the season as gone on, then yes.
   33. aleskel  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:41 AM (#2484241)
Have you ever been to a Jacksonville Suns game?

Have you ever been to a Jacksonville Suns game... on weed??


And to think that the guy who introduced that comedy motif is now one of the most respected men on television. If that isn't a sign of progress in our society, I don't know what is.
   34. CrosbyBird  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:43 AM (#2484242)
Except for the randomly interjected and ill-fitting songs, which have made less and less sense as the season as gone on, then yes.

I can't disagree. The first four episodes were better than what's come since. I doubt this show has serious staying power. (Although the video sequence for "It's Business Time" was pretty damn funny.)
   35. Cowboy Popup  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:47 AM (#2484246)
The first four episodes were better than what's come since. I doubt this show has serious staying power.

Watched it for the first time the other day (sober, which was probably a mistake) and I thought it would fit much better in the adult swim schedule, as a fifteen minute show. I don't think they've got enough to fill 22 minutes, but they could make a strong 10-12 minute show.
   36. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:53 AM (#2484248)
I can't disagree. The first four episodes were better than what's come since. I doubt this show has serious staying power. (Although the video sequence for "It's Business Time" was pretty damn funny.)

I think there's a solid foundation. Season 2 will be interesting. From what I've read, they wrote plots around the songs they already had written which is why they seem forced sometimes. It'll be interesting when they start writing songs and plotlines more organically.
   37. Joey B.  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 09:58 AM (#2484252)
It's not addictive, regardless of what this idiot says.

Really. Is that why more than a quarter of a million people a year in America check into drug rehab for marijuana addiction?

Granted, pot is substantially less addictive than many other more powerful drugs, but this idea that it isn't at all addictive for anyone is nothing but B.S. put out by the pro-legalization lobby.

As someone with a family member who's gone through this, I can tell you that there's nothing funny about it.
   38. CrosbyBird  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:01 AM (#2484256)
I would go a step further than #35. HBO used to occasionally have these 5-10 minute shorts that fit between movies, so they could start a 1:45 movie at 8pm and then the next movie at 10pm instead of 9:45.

Flight of the Conchords would be perfect as a series of those little shorts.

It would also be an incentive for leaving HBO on at the end of a movie and watching a few commercials for their original stuff. Perhaps after a few shorts they would have a special that showed a few of them (or offer them On Demand to encourage people to purchase that package).
   39. aleskel  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:16 AM (#2484261)
Granted, pot is substantially less addictive than many other more powerful drugs, but this idea that it isn't at all addictive for anyone is nothing but B.S. put out by the pro-legalization lobby

if by "pro-legalization lobby" you mean "doctors" and "scientists" and "people who make a profession out of understanding how the human body operates", than you're dead on.
   40. Fly is Part of the Landed Gentry  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:23 AM (#2484266)
Really. Is that why more than a quarter of a million people a year in America check into drug rehab for marijuana addiction?

No, that's probably largely employer and/or parental requirements that lead to that. I could check into rehab for heroin addiction, but it doesn't mean I'm addicted to heroin.
   41. North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:27 AM (#2484271)
Granted, pot is substantially less addictive than many other more powerful drugs, but this idea that it isn't at all addictive for anyone is nothing but B.S. put out by the pro-legalization lobby.

What people are saying is that it isn't physically addictive, like heroin or cigarettes or alcohol or coffee (to varying degrees).

Psychologically addictive, like gambling? Sure.
   42. Joey B.  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:35 AM (#2484280)
if by "pro-legalization lobby" you mean "doctors" and "scientists" and "people who make a profession out of understanding how the human body operates", than you're dead on.

Bull. The official position of the American Medical Association and the Institute of Medicine is that marijuana should remain a controlled substance, they are opposed a blanket ban of prescriptions for medical purposes.

And the beneficial compounds of cannabis such as THC can be obtained in legal FDA approved prescription drugs such as Marinol, without any of the negative effects of doing something as stupid as inhaling smoke and other toxins from a plant.
   43. a bebop a rebop  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:38 AM (#2484281)
I think there's a solid foundation. Season 2 will be interesting. From what I've read, they wrote plots around the songs they already had written which is why they seem forced sometimes. It'll be interesting when they start writing songs and plotlines more organically.


My understanding was that they were only doing a 12 episode series.
   44. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:43 AM (#2484285)
My understanding was that they were only doing a 12 episode series.

That would be ok, too. It would be like the Louis CK show then. Man, was that Louis CK show filthy. What a great show!
   45. aleskel  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:45 AM (#2484289)
now now now, hold on, Joey B., don't go changing the subject. We were talking about pot's ADDICTIVE qualities, not its overall medical qualities. Its been scientifically and medically demonstrated that THC does not have physical addictive qualities but does have psychological addictive qualities, as was noted in #41. And of course no doctor is going to endorse smoking pot, just as they wouldn't endorse smoking tobacco.

Just curious, but you noted that 250,000 people check into rehab for pot. What are the numbers for heroin? Cocaine? Um ... ALCOHOL??
   46. North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:46 AM (#2484291)
Bull. The official position of the American Medical Association and the Institute of Medicine is that marijuana should remain a controlled substance, they are opposed a blanket ban of prescriptions for medical purposes.

Aleskel's statement didn't go to those points. It went to whether marijuana was physically addictive.
   47. Shibal  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:50 AM (#2484296)
If I'm at a ballgame with my kids and see a guy smoking a joint in the stands, I'm damn sure going to 'snitch' on him. If he's in the office, or making an attempt to be discreet, I won't care. Either way, this guy would probably be a Darwin award candidate if he wasn't stoned all the time.
   48. Dewey, Local Boy and Soupuss  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:50 AM (#2484298)
And the beneficial compounds of cannabis such as THC can be obtained in legal FDA approved prescription drugs such as Marinol, without any of the negative effects of doing something as stupid as inhaling smoke and other toxins from a plant.

That's sort of my thinking - I'm all for research into the palliative properties of THC, but the pro-medicinal marijuana's insistence on allowing smokable marijuana is a bit puzzling. It's a bit like saying that morphine has medicinal purposes, so we should allow people with pain problems to smoke opium.
   49. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:51 AM (#2484299)
That would be ok, too. It would be like the Louis CK show then. Man, was that Louis CK show filthy. What a great show!

Does this mean his show is done? That stinks.
   50. Confined to the Halls of Congers (formerly Y...)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:52 AM (#2484300)
Bull. The official position of the American Medical Association and the Institute of Medicine is that marijuana should remain a controlled substance, they are opposed a blanket ban of prescriptions for medical purposes.

Non-sequitur.

edit: 45 & 46 beat me to the punch.
   51. Shredder  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:53 AM (#2484306)
I can't disagree. The first four episodes were better than what's come since. I doubt this show has serious staying power. (Although the video sequence for "It's Business Time" was pretty damn funny.)
It's become what the Simpsons was like for me about 8-10 years ago. I chuckle the first time through, but it's hilarious the second time through. The first time I watch it just to take it all in. The funny hits me in the second, third, and fourth viewings.

Plus, by limiting it to the first four episodes, you've apparently forgotten arguably two of the funniest exchanges in the show so far:
From Episode 5:
Murray: Planet Jemaine has supernovaed. There's apparently nothing left but a gaseous cloud and the beginnings of a black hole.
Jemaine: When did this happen?
Murray: About 4 million years ago.

From Episode 7:
Dave: You know, the English, the oppressors. You guys are pretty much the most hated race in the whole country.
Jemaine: What about black people?
Dave: They don't like you either.
   52. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 10:57 AM (#2484312)
Does this mean his show is done? That stinks.

Yep. It's toast.

The Conchords mini-tour was funny in the last episode. Murray is a comic goldmine.
   53. andrewberg  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:01 AM (#2484320)
I agree that it's funnier the second time around. I don't mind sitting down for an hour to watch entourage and fotc on sunday nights, so the fact that they stretch the episodes 3 or 4 minutes too long is acceptable. Adult swim is dead to me. Since sealab went in the tank, it has become a contest to see who can be the most random without having any coherence whatsoever. I know the vast majority would not see any coherence in sealab, but i think it's there. FotC has already entered my pantheon of most clever shows, with sealab, strangers with candy, and south park after the first 4-5 seasons.
   54. Dewey, Local Boy and Soupuss  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:02 AM (#2484321)
Plus, by limiting it to the first four episodes, you've apparently forgotten arguably two of the funniest exchanges in the show so far:

The bit in the most recent episodes about the $8 can of mixed nuts from the mini-bar and how it led to the television getting thrown out the window was pretty funny.
   55. Dewey, Local Boy and Soupuss  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:04 AM (#2484325)
Since sealab went in the tank, it has become a contest to see who can be the most random without having any coherence whatsoever.

If you're talking about shows like "12 Oz. Mouse", I agree. There are still a couple of pretty funny shows on there ("The Venture Brothers" and "Frisky Dingo" are pretty good). It seems like they've focused a lot of attention on bringing in new anime lately, which I guess is nice if you like anime.
   56. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:06 AM (#2484328)
I like that this thread is a war between irreverence and deadly seriousness, kind of like smoking a joint while watching C-SPAN.

Stay away from the drugs kids. They will #### you up!
   57. Shredder  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:07 AM (#2484330)
The bit in the most recent episodes about the $8 can of mixed nuts from the mini-bar and how it led to the television getting thrown out the window was pretty funny.


"It's a classic rock and roll move".

"I was happier with the mixed nuts caper".

I also liked "Per diem means for the day. You should have called it per weekum".
   58. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:14 AM (#2484342)
I also liked "Per diem means for the day. You should have called it per weekum".

I like how the few times you see them perform, it's always Jemaine singing that awful "Rock the Party Song". Also, the conversation about penguins a couple of episodes ago made me laugh. Peen-guins. It's stupid, but it's funny how they say that to me. (No, I don't smoke pot while I watch it. In fact, I rarely smoke anymore. Maybe once a year at a party. I feel kind of sorry for my friends pushing 40 who still need to toke up everyday. Why can't they just get their high posting on internet message boards like civilized people?)
   59. aleskel  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:25 AM (#2484357)
"Britt?"
"Brett"
"Britt?"
"Brett"
"Britt?"
"... Britt"
"ooooh, Britt!"

I thought that was hilarious. Sort of an Inspector Clouseau accent joke.

Oh, and I absolutely loved Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law. Now that its done, I won't have any reason to watch Adult Swim, except for the odd Futurama and Family Guy rerun.
   60. Dewey, Local Boy and Soupuss  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:39 AM (#2484380)
"It's a classic rock and roll move".

By the way, was that Kate Pierson in the cameo as the club operator who slammed the door in their face?
   61. Shredder  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:43 AM (#2484385)
"Britt?"
"Brett"
"Britt?"
"Brett"
"Britt?"
"... Britt"
"ooooh, Britt!"
What was funny was that it was the second time they've made that joke.

There was a similar one in the third episode when Jemaine got mugged, and no one knew where he was:
Murray: He may be dead.
Dave: He maybe did what?
Murray: No, he may be dead.
Dave: Yeah, I know, he maybe did what?
Murray: No, he may be dead.
Dave: Yeah, maybe he did, maybe he didn't. What did he maybe do?
Bret: No, he may be dead.
Dave: Are you guys fvckin' with me?
   62. Dewey, Local Boy and Soupuss  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 11:47 AM (#2484391)
What was funny was that it was the second time they've made that joke.

The jokes about Australia never get old, either. I loved how the episode with the racist fruit stand owner ended up with the band discovering the power of "the bird" and uniting with the fruit stand owner with their hatred of Australians.
   63. Andere Richtingen  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:02 PM (#2484416)
That's sort of my thinking - I'm all for research into the palliative properties of THC, but the pro-medicinal marijuana's insistence on allowing smokable marijuana is a bit puzzling. It's a bit like saying that morphine has medicinal purposes, so we should allow people with pain problems to smoke opium.

It is a bit like that, but when medical marijuana legalization occurred, there was no way to get the THC equivalent of morphine (and as far as I know, there still isn't). So selling it in its relatively unprocessed state was the only option, and the easiest thing to do with that is to smoke it. By the way, I'm not naive about the primary role that supporters of broad legalization had in getting medical marijuana legalized, nor am I naive about the fact that medical marijuana distributors turned, to some extent, into recreational marijuana sales operations, but this is a different case.

Years ago, shortly after the California legalization occurred, I got a call from an MD who ran a (I assume) legitimate medical marijuana distributor. He said he thought there was mold on their pot, and he brought some in, and sure enough, I found a number of potentially toxic fungi. He asked if the toxins would make it into the patient, and I could only say I had no idea. It made me wonder what one would find growing on the pot people buy for recreational use.
   64. DFA SILVA-clap-clap-clapclapclap, DFA SILVA-clap-c  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:13 PM (#2484434)
the only thing to do in that case is to smoke it and see what happens, better yet should of had your neighbor smoke it im sure she would have willingly done so
   65. Dewey, Local Boy and Soupuss  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:13 PM (#2484435)
So selling it in its relatively unprocessed state was the only option, and the easiest thing to do with that is to smoke it.

There's got to be a better way. Aren't we doing our damndest to eliminate tobacco from society? Isn't inhaling the smoke of anything a generally bad idea? No wonder the AMA doesn't want to endorse this.
   66. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:15 PM (#2484440)
There's got to be a better way. Aren't we doing our damndest to eliminate tobacco from society? Isn't inhaling the smoke of anything a generally bad idea? No wonder the AMA doesn't want to endorse this.

Brownies? I'm all for a gummy bear shaped marijuana conduit as well.
   67. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:17 PM (#2484445)
It made me wonder what one would find growing on the pot people buy for recreational use.

Only things like PCP.

Aren't we doing our damndest to eliminate tobacco from society?

tobacco is much worse for you than pot.
   68. Joey B.  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:18 PM (#2484447)
It is a bit like that, but when medical marijuana legalization occurred, there was no way to get the THC equivalent of morphine (and as far as I know, there still isn't).

Huh? Marinol (dronabinol) was approved for chemotherapy patients all the way back in 1985, and for AIDS suffers in 1992.
   69. Andere Richtingen  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:21 PM (#2484449)
There's got to be a better way.

Sure, but a better way wasn't going to happen. California passed medical marijuana in 1996, and it still hasn't as far as I know. In the meanwhile, people were dying painful deaths. Preventing a terminal AIDS or cancer patient from using what I am sure is an effective therapy because smoking might harm them seems very misguided.
   70. Dewey, Local Boy and Soupuss  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:23 PM (#2484454)
tobacco is much worse for you than pot.

Are you sure about this? What sorts of studies have been done about cannabis and lung cancer/emphysema?
   71. DFA SILVA-clap-clap-clapclapclap, DFA SILVA-clap-c  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:32 PM (#2484468)
well for one pot doesnt have all the chemical additaves to it, basicall its grown, dried sold smoked etc.
   72. blue  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:36 PM (#2484471)
Wear the eyepatch, Brett! Wear the funky funky eyepatch!
   73. aleskel  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:38 PM (#2484474)
Are you sure about this? What sorts of studies have been done about cannabis and lung cancer/emphysema?

its not entirely clear whether cannabis is "safer" than tobacco. Cannabis smoke contains more tar, but even the most devoted potheads don't inhale as much smoke as an average cigarette smoker. So in that sense, cannabis is somewhat safer, just because you don't smoke it as much (i.e., you don't need to smoke as much to get the desired effect as you would with tobacco and nicotine).
   74. Shredder  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:39 PM (#2484476)
Wear the eyepatch, Brett! Wear the funky funky eyepatch!
Oh, the media monkeys and their junkie junkies will invite you to the plastic pantomime. Throw their invites away!
   75. Confined to the Halls of Congers (formerly Y...)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:42 PM (#2484478)
Doesn't Marinol also have psychoactive effects? What's the argument for promoting its use over marijuana? If the only real distinction is smoke, that doesn't hold a lot of water. You can eliminate most of the smoke by vaporizing the marijuana.
   76. Dewey, Local Boy and Soupuss  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:49 PM (#2484487)
Nieporent's kid, that's who.

How do you rebel against the iconoclast? By joining the establishment.
   77. Shredder  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 12:50 PM (#2484488)
FYI - Apparently someone has started a (probably illegal) website where they're streaming all of the FotC episodes for free.
   78. RMc is the Commissioner of Baseball  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:09 PM (#2484503)
A few points:

*Marijuana's illegal, kids. Maybe it shouldn't be, but it is.
*Marijuana's addictive, kids. Maybe not as much as other drugs (or booze, or rooting for the Red Sox), but it is.
*Realizing the first two points doesn't make you the guy pounding the desk and screaming "TEACH YOUR CHILDREN!!" in Reefer Madness.
*Lay off the kid. He reported a guy who was breaking the law; isn't that what a good citizen is supposed to do? (Yes, I know, spitting on the sidewalk, blah blah blah.) When somebody finks on somebody committing a crime, it doesn't mean we're one step away from living in Oceania and/or Amerikkka.
*Kristen Schaal is awfully cute. So there.
   79. North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:11 PM (#2484504)
How do you rebel against the iconoclast? By joining the establishment.

"F### You, dad. I want MORE taxes! And jail time for potheads and prostitutes! And BIG MFin' government! You don't own me!"
   80. aleskel  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:13 PM (#2484507)

*Marijuana's illegal, kids. Maybe it shouldn't be, but it is.
*Marijuana's addictive, kids. Maybe not as much as other drugs (or booze, or rooting for the Red Sox), but it is.
*Realizing the first two points doesn't make you the guy pounding the desk and screaming "TEACH YOUR CHILDREN!!" in Reefer Madness.
*Lay off the kid. He reported a guy who was breaking the law; isn't that what a good citizen is supposed to do? (Yes, I know, spitting on the sidewalk, blah blah blah.) When somebody finks on somebody committing a crime, it doesn't mean we're one step away from living in Oceania and/or Amerikkka.
*Kristen Schaal is awfully cute. So there.


whoa. buzzkill.
   81. David Nieporent (now, with child)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:18 PM (#2484510)
if by "pro-legalization lobby" you mean "doctors" and "scientists" and "people who make a profession out of understanding how the human body operates", than you're dead on.
Well, I agree with you, but the caveat is that "addiction" is not a very rigorous term; it has so many possible usages that the statement "X is addictive" is probably true for some definition of "addictive." Politicians regularly exploit the ambiguity to promote confusion. It's better not to talk about "addiction," but about the various aspects of "addiction" -- tolerance, physical or psychological dependence, etc.

No drug is "addictive" if by "addictive" one means the most extreme "once you start, it is impossible to stop." Many drugs are "addictive" if by "addictive" one means the loosest "once you start, you may want to continue." Politicians and the drug treatment-industrial complex regularly exploit confusion over where one is on the spectrum to make absurd statements and promote their agenda.
   82. David Nieporent (now, with child)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:23 PM (#2484514)
And the beneficial compounds of cannabis such as THC can be obtained in legal FDA approved prescription drugs such as Marinol, without any of the negative effects of doing something as stupid as inhaling smoke and other toxins from a plant.

That's sort of my thinking - I'm all for research into the palliative properties of THC, but the pro-medicinal marijuana's insistence on allowing smokable marijuana is a bit puzzling. It's a bit like saying that morphine has medicinal purposes, so we should allow people with pain problems to smoke opium.
Well, of course we should, but that's a side issue. Smokable marijuana is deemed superior for medicinal uses because (a) Marinol is THC; marijuana has other ingredients, as well, and (b) one of the major uses of marijuana is to treat nausea that makes it difficult for ill people to eat; the problems with a delivery system in edible form for people who can't eat are left as an exercise to the reader.
   83. Cowboy Popup  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:27 PM (#2484520)
*Lay off the kid. He reported a guy who was breaking the law; isn't that what a good citizen is supposed to do? (Yes, I know, spitting on the sidewalk, blah blah blah.) When somebody finks on somebody committing a crime, it doesn't mean we're one step away from living in Oceania and/or Amerikkka.

No, that kid is a total piece of ####. No one gets hurt by some dumbass smoking a joint on the sidewalk, even if it is illegal. Was the guy stupid, did he deserve to lose his job? Probably. But that kid took part in ruining that guy's life. Why, I have no idea. Maybe he's a self righteous little prick who thinks he's making the world a better place. Doesn't excuse him for making things so hard for another human being who's committing a victimless crime. He should have his lunch money taken from him for as long as he's in grade school for being such a tool.
   84. andrewberg  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:28 PM (#2484522)
The David Bowie episode, especially the song, may have been the funniest part of the series so far. At first, I was annoyed that Brett is such a bad actor, but then I decided to embrace his bad acting, and that revelation made the song even funnier. Jermain also did a series of outback steakhouse commercials that are pretty absurd, which are all on youtube if you search of them.
   85. David Nieporent (now, with child)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:28 PM (#2484523)
*Lay off the kid. He reported a guy who was breaking the law; isn't that what a good citizen is supposed to do? (Yes, I know, spitting on the sidewalk, blah blah blah.) When somebody finks on somebody committing a crime, it doesn't mean we're one step away from living in Oceania and/or Amerikkka.
I think that people ought to learn the difference between legitimate and illegitimate laws, and, while civil disobedience isn't for everyone, people should at least not go out of their way to help the state enforce the illegitimate ones.

I don't think "good citizens" ruin other people's lives for no reason, no.
   86. Joey B.  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:34 PM (#2484531)
Marinol treats the nausea issue (that's what it was primarily invented for), and the plant is not considered superior for legitimate medicinal uses. Marijuana contains absolutely no beneficial or nutritional compounds that you can't get in the approved drug.
   87. strong silence  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:39 PM (#2484534)
I think that people ought to learn the difference between legitimate and illegitimate laws

Here is a loaded topic. What is the difference?

From Buddha, then Christ, to the Black Panthers, and now Aaron Watada, people have been trying to figure this out for a long time.
   88. Superunknown Gary Geiger Counter  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:45 PM (#2484540)
No, that kid is a total piece of ####. No one gets hurt by some dumbass smoking a joint on the sidewalk, even if it is illegal. Was the guy stupid, did he deserve to lose his job? Probably. But that kid took part in ruining that guy's life.


While it's too early to tell, maybe that kid helped turn the dude's life around. Why, in a couple of years, maybe he'll have straightened out and took over Dave Littlefield's job.
   89. andrewberg  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 01:59 PM (#2484550)
I think that people ought to learn the difference between legitimate and illegitimate laws

Here is a loaded topic. What is the difference?


That's definitely a philosophical question, one that starts with the difference between morals and ethics. For instance, a law cannot be deemed immoral based on personal morality because it leaves the door open for cults, mercy killings, and otherwise culturally unacceptable behaviors. That very concept of cultural acceptance begs a difficult question of relativity, one which is divisive enough that it probably shouldn't form the basis of legality, or even an ethical standard. There has to be some bright line between them, which means that we have to identify some materially significant difference not between an illegitimate and a legitimate law, but between the actions taken in response to the law (such as the disobedience). If the resistance entails some sort of material deprivation toward anyone at all, the quantifiable negative impact outweighs the ambiguous personal gain associated with a single act of disobedience. In other words, if the crime is demonstrably victimless, the morality of it has very little weight.
   90. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:01 PM (#2484553)
Marinol treats the nausea issue (that's what it was primarily invented for), and the plant is not considered superior for legitimate medicinal uses. Marijuana contains absolutely no beneficial or nutritional compounds that you can't get in the approved drug.

from wikipediaorg, which is of course 100% correct:

It takes over one hour for Marinol to reach full effect, compared to minutes for smoked or vaporized cannabis. Some patients accustomed to inhaling just enough cannabis smoke to manage symptoms have complained of too-intense intoxication via Marinol's predetermined dosages. This powerful psychoactive effect, however, has led to recreational use of Marinol. Many have said that Marinol produces a more acute psychedelic effect than cannabis and it has been speculated that this disparity can be explained by the moderating effect of the many non-THC cannibinoids present in cannabis.
   91. Shooty Did Not Kill McGurk  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:03 PM (#2484555)
Many have said that Marinol produces a more acute psychedelic effect than cannabis and it has been speculated that this disparity can be explained by the moderating effect of the many non-THC cannibinoids present in cannabis.

I'm not usually religious, but in this case I'll give God his due. He created a better version of marijuana than we have. We should just tip our cap and let it ride.
   92. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:03 PM (#2484556)
forgot this:

Some taking Marinol to manage nausea have stated that often the Marinol capsule is expelled before it can take effect.
   93. Pops Freshenmeyer  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:04 PM (#2484557)
For instance, a law cannot be deemed immoral based on personal morality because it leaves the door open for cults, mercy killings, and otherwise culturally unacceptable behaviors.

If the resistance entails some sort of material deprivation toward anyone at all, the quantifiable negative impact outweighs the ambiguous personal gain associated with a single act of disobedience. In other words, if the crime is demonstrably victimless, the morality of it has very little weight.

So are you a utilitarian or not?
   94. strong silence  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:04 PM (#2484558)
I'm doing a little search for what Gandhi wrote about laws. While I haven't found anything to the point, I found this:

"I DECLINE to be slave to precedents or practice I cannot understand or defend on a moral basis." (YI, 21-7-1921, p228)

I think the boy and Ray Zerba practiced the opposite; the boy submitted to a law he couldn't have fully understood and Zerba was a slave (as he saw it, an addict) to a morally bankrupt practice.
   95. Chris Dial  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:08 PM (#2484561)
I don't think "good citizens" ruin other people's lives for no reason, no.

So you aren't a "good citizen"?

Think this guy was going to drive home later? Under the influence? Of course, DMN doesn't think driving under the influence should be illegal - only actually injuring while under the influence should be (or property).

When you come up with an appropriate "breathalyzer" or equivalent, then you can have your legalized pot.
   96. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:11 PM (#2484562)
When you come up with an appropriate "breathalyzer" or equivalent, then you can have your legalized pot.

I would like the government to state this, then watch all the hippie scientists race in a modern day Manhattan Project.
   97. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:11 PM (#2484564)
Think this guy was going to drive home later? Under the influence?

Do you assume the same of all the people at a ballpark drinking beer?
   98. Sexy Lizard  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:12 PM (#2484565)
The first time I ever smelled pot was in Yankee Stadium at this game, my first. I was 9. I don't know what confused me more, my father's explanation of what the dudes in front of us (10 rows behind home plate!) were smoking, or the fact that Reggie Jackson failed to hit a home run each time up.
   99. Confined to the Halls of Congers (formerly Y...)  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:15 PM (#2484571)
When you come up with an appropriate "breathalyzer" or equivalent, then you can have your legalized pot.

What do you mean by "equivalent"? I think you could easily come up with a series of "recite the alphabet backwards"-type tests for pot use. If you're referring only to some sort of electronic device, does that mean that you think alcohol should have been illegal before the breathalyzer was invented?
   100. Superunknown Gary Geiger Counter  Posted: August 14, 2007 at 02:16 PM (#2484572)
People can drink without getting drunk. I don't see what the point of smoking a bone is unless your looking to get a buzz.
Page 1 of 9 pages  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Dayn
for his generous support.

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

We have baseball tickets, the NFL schedule, college football tickets and Cowboys tickets. We have NBA tickets like Celtics tickets and Lakers tickets. Plus, buy concert tickets, Patriots tickets and Colts tickets. Also check out our MLB baseball schedule

Baseball Bats

JustGreatTickets.com provides the best value for Chicago Cubs Tickets, MLB tickets including Red Sox Tickets, Yankees Tickets, SF Giants Tickets, LA Dodgers Tickets, Cleveland Indians Tickets. Get the best concert tickets like Jonas Brothers tickets and more Chicago Tickets.

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Major League Baseball: All Star Game, New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, LA Angels, Washington Nationals, Chicago White Sox, and the Chicago Cubs.

Find terrific deals on Yankees tickets for the new home, Cubs tickets for classic Wrigley, or Red Sox tickets for Fenway with OnlineSeats. We have seats for every baseball game, including Dodgers tickets.

Page rendered in 1.7844 seconds
82 querie(s) executed