Well, not actually your questions…but some other people.
How have new statistics and methods of analysis changed the Yankees scouting and evaluation methods since you became GM of the Yankees?
Brian Cashman: “I’d like to think that … (his phone rings) Excuse me a minute.”
(At this point, he walked out of the room with his phone and I was left standing in the clubhouse. After five minutes, I went looking and found him in the batting cage on the phone. He finished up and we continued the interview back in the clubhouse. No, I have no idea who was the phone.)
Back to Evan’s question: How have new statistics and methods of analysis changed the Yankees’ scouting and evaluation methods since you became GM of the Yankees?
Brian Cashman: “I’ve been educated. Sometimes your eyes can, you have a perception of a player or of a season or seasons that take place and statistics, there’s a number of statistics I believe, I have learned and been educated that can challenge your perceptions and that’s, if you come across some statistics that … I’m trying to think of the how the best way to say it, essentially the end game is there’s a number of statistics that I’ve learned through people like (Yankees director of quantitative analysis) Mike Fishman that have opened my eyes, that have led me to understand that certain players aren’t necessarily what you perceive them to be. And it’s prevented me from making acquisitions and saving me from losing a certain prospect as well as taking on money that would have been a waste that earlier in my career I would have done. I don’t want to name a player, but for instance, there’s a left-handed reliever with some arm strength that I know earlier in my career I would I have gravitated to more because he’s left-handed and the arm strength was there and he had a reputation. But when you walk through the statistical analysis of the actual consistent performance of that player it kind of broke down those perceptions and reality set it. It made me stand down and I saved more than a few million dollars and a player that was a young prospect who’s considered an asset. Early in my years that was something I probably would have finished off rather than did the extra time to study and dissect and then back down or stand down.”
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I don't understand the fascination with a prospect who projects to be a 4th OFer without any SLG.
From what I've read, my answer would have been Alan Horne, who supposedly had a great ST, showing improved command.
Have to admit this made me curious. Any ideas as to who was the unnamed lefty?
I was thinking Jeremy Affeldt at first, but he wouldn't have cost a prospect. My next guess is Damaso Marte.
Good point though. Brian Fuentes maybe?
A guy could be eye-catching without necessarily being of much value. I'm pretty sure Bo Jackson caught plenty of eyes when he first starting playing baseball, even though he took a couple years before he became a productive player. Of course, Gardner will probably never be more than a 4th outfielder, but that doesn't mean he's not fun/impressive to watch.
This was not me.
-- MWE
I'm fairly certain it's Mike Gonzalez.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main