|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Should Topps have produced the 1973 Clemente card? For my money…they should have junk-dumped the whole strabismustingly dull set. Why, why…you’d have to be a total Breazealot to love them!
With Jeter and Clemente sharing so many common character attributes—loyalty, leadership, and reliability come to mind—it seems appropriate to put the spotlight on Clemente’s final Topps card, which came out over 35 years ago. It is a card that always stirs sadness, fond reflection, and moral debate in this writer’s mind.
At the time that Clemente died so horrifically and unexpectedly in a New Year’s Eve plane crash in 1972, the Topps Company had already produced his baseball card for the 1973 season. The tragically untimely passing of one of the game’s superstars placed Topps in an especially difficult quandary: should the company continue its original plan and issue a card for a venerable player who was deceased, or should it pull the card from distribution out of respect for the loss of a revered legend?
After some internal debate and discussion, Topps opted to publish the card, which had been assigned No. 50 in the series. Topps certainly had precedence on its side, having issued a 1964 “In Memoriam” card for Ken Hubbs after the young Chicago Cubs second baseman who died while piloting his own plane. On a subjective note, I have to say that I heartily endorsed the decision. As one of the few Topps card that depicts Clemente in action, it’s an inherently aesthetic card. Clemente’s beloved status also mandated the publication of the card. As a player so revered, his fans deserved to have one last memento of Clemente. On all fronts, this seemed like the right decision by the folks at Topps.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: 'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s (144 - 12:12am, Feb 08)Last:  Ron JNewsblog: WHALEN: Erstad talks big game, but let’s see if Huskers deliver (1 - 11:57pm, Feb 07)Last: Jim (jimmuscomp)Newsblog: Sources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault (5526 - 11:56pm, Feb 07)Last:  McCoyHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player : 1969 Discussion (61 - 11:55pm, Feb 07)Last: lieiamNewsblog: L.A. Times: Dodgers sign Clayton Kershaw to two-year, $19-million deal (2 - 11:48pm, Feb 07)Last: TuqueNewsblog: DJF: Decipher the Mind of Brett Lawrie with Translawrieate (8 - 11:39pm, Feb 07)Last: Yankee Redneck is a Pinhead.Newsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012 (226 - 11:29pm, Feb 07)Last:  Athletic Supporter leads the nation in driftersNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread: January 2012 (719 - 11:26pm, Feb 07)Last:  Swedish ChefNewsblog: MONEYBALL~ Oscar Nominations 2012: Academy Award Nominees List ~ MONEYBALL (556 - 11:07pm, Feb 07)Last:  Dock Ellis on AcidNewsblog: BASN: The MLB FRAUD - Oakland, Los Angeles, and New York (45 - 11:02pm, Feb 07)Last: Yankee Redneck is a Pinhead.Newsblog: Edwin Jackson turned down three-year offer from Pirates (57 - 10:53pm, Feb 07)Last: The District AttorneyNewsblog: Trump's Son-In-Law Seeks To Buy Dodgers (13 - 9:35pm, Feb 07)Last: AndrewJNewsblog: Beane To Sign Extension Through 2019 (8 - 9:07pm, Feb 07)Last: Bitter Calculus InstructorNewsblog: NYBD: Silva: Yankees Fragrance and 1996? (2 - 8:21pm, Feb 07)Last: Mayor BlombergTransaction Oracle: 2012 ZiPS Projections - Miami Marlins (31 - 8:16pm, Feb 07)Last: Misirlou's got a busy day, he's wearing a vest
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I was given a giant box of '73 Topps when I was a kid and I put together a set out of it so I have a soft spot for it. There were a lot of good pitchers in 1972 is what I learned from it.
Many years ago I ordered a complete '73 Topps set from a company (cough..gurgle...renatagalasso...hurl mega-Oreo soup splash) that turned out to be an O-Pee-Chee set that looked like the card cuts were made by Richard Cottingham on another Jersey shore torso gutting extravagansi!
So...this might have something to do with my dislike of the set.
O-Pee-Chee's were rare and exotic when I was a kid. They would pop up mysteriously and beguile my friends and I with its weird texture and indecipherable French...
I hated the 1971 set, those black borders chipped and flaked off like crazy.
Gimmie the clean lines of 1967, now that's a baseball card!
repoz - renata galasso was always selling stuff...what ever happened to them?
The colored silhouettes of the player's position on the front of the card made them ideal for matching when flipping.
Also, the set had loads of action shots, far more than Topps had ever before done.
The one drawback to the set, however, involved some of those same action shots. Some of them were photographed from so far away that it seemed like the cameraman was situated in the parking lot across the street from the ballpark.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main