Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

MLB: Mets acquire catcher Johnny Estrada

It’s about time Guillermo Mota helped the team…oh, wait.

The New York Mets announced today that they have acquired catcher Johnny Estrada from the Milwaukee Brewers in exchange for righthanded pitcher Guillermo Mota.

“Johnny adds depth to our catching situation,” said Mets General Manager Omar Minaya. “He’s a former All-Star who switch-hits and has hit over .300 three times in his career.”

Repoz Posted: November 20, 2007 at 11:37 PM | 187 comment(s) | Login to Bookmark
  Related News: GeneralMilwaukeeNY Mets

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2
   101. J. Cross Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:44 AM (#2622139)
btw, I don't this should guarantee that there's no Lo Duca, Kendall or whoever. The Mets could just choose to view this as increasing their leverage in those negotiations. If they get someone that they like better than Estrada they can just non-tender him. Maybe this move forces Lo Duca to take a two-year deal. Who knows.
   102. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:45 AM (#2622140)
I can't believe this line hasn't gotten more attention.

I don't get it.

And by all accounts he fights dirty.

Did he knee his trainer in the groin?
   103. Perros Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:46 AM (#2622142)
Sounds to me like Estrada is worse than Lo Duca in every way.

Perhaps he's being brought aboard to knock off Willie.

Post headline writers are licking their chops.
   104. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:47 AM (#2622143)
By the way, this is the SECOND time during Yost's tenure that Doug Melvin has had to trade a guy whose personality was beyond Yost's ability to control. First Podsednik. Now Estrada.

Now neither player is or was a grade A talent but both had their moments on the diamond. But because they were a bit too much for Ned management had to find them a new home.

Just wanted to point that out................
   105. The District Attorney Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:48 AM (#2622145)
Like I said, my concern here isn't Estrada's character... it's that playing him seems like committing to another year where a sucking wound at catcher enfeebles everything that everyone else is trying to accomplish. Even without a change of heart, the same personality can play differently in different clubhouse environments.

However, those quotes do sound like how one would respond to accusations of being a d-bag if one were, in fact, a d-bag.
   106. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:48 AM (#2622146)
I don't get it.

"Wargames"
   107. Amit Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:49 AM (#2622148)
By the way, this is the SECOND time during Yost's tenure that Doug Melvin has had to trade a guy whose personality was beyond Yost's ability to control. First Podsednik. Now Estrada.


Coincidentally, it's also the second former Brewer whose character you're going to lengths to assassinate today.
   108. Amit Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:50 AM (#2622149)
Like I said, my concern here isn't Estrada's character, it's that playing him seems like committing to another year where a sucking wound at catcher enfeebles everything that everyone else is trying to accomplish. Even without a change of heart, the same personality can play differently in different clubhouse environments.


Yeah, we should trade for Joe Mauer and try to get Brian McCann too to back him up.
   109. Шĥy Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:53 AM (#2622154)
According to Heyman, there was discussion of deal that had Milledge as its centerpiece for Schneider and Church but he thinks it fell through because the Mets want to save their chits for a run at Santana.
   110. The District Attorney Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:55 AM (#2622157)
Yeah, we should trade for Joe Mauer and try to get Brian McCann too to back him up.
Killer material there! Oscar Wilde envies the creativity of your sarcasm. But no, I was thinking more like Ramon Hernandez, or one of several young catchers potentially expendable to their teams, ranging from Jeff Clement (actually good) to Jeff Mathis (probably sucks just as much, but at least young), and about 10 guys in between. And yes, even Kendall would be better.
   111. BeanoCook Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:57 AM (#2622159)
Cordero wants oodles of cash. That isn't Melvin's style.


Other than that small A-Rod deal of $250 million, (pinky to mouth)
   112. Amit Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:58 AM (#2622160)
Hernandez would cost a top prospect and was terrible last year, Clement isn't available, Mathis sucks and Kendall sucks. Any other brilliant ideas?
   113. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:58 AM (#2622163)
Well, in the end I hope it works for all involved.

Because nobody got nothing from nobody in 2007...............
   114. Crispix Attacks Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:59 AM (#2622164)
(probably sucks just as much, but at least young)

With catchers in particular, unlike other players, I think if you're comparing players who suck an equal amount, you should err on the side of the veteran rather than the young guy. Having an unproven player as the full-time catcher can lead to more nervousness among pitchers, unless he's a super-confident leader type like Russ Martin.
   115. The District Attorney Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:59 AM (#2622165)
Like I said, I have about 10 other guys in the Mathis vein. I'll mark you down for "sucks" on them too.

I'd give up the "top prospect" for R. Hernandez if it weren't Milledge, Gomez, F-Mart or Pelfrey, which I don't think it would be.
   116. Crispix Attacks Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:00 AM (#2622166)
Amit, you appear to be trying to start fights with people for no reason by being relentlessly sarcastic. Calm down.
   117. Amit Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:01 AM (#2622169)

Like I said, I have about 10 other guys in the Mathis vein. I'll mark you down for "sucks" on them too.


What doesn't suck about Mathis?

I'll mark you down as not having a better idea than 1 year of an Estrada/Castro platoon.
   118. Amit Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:02 AM (#2622170)
I'd give up the "top prospect" for R. Hernandez if it weren't Milledge, Gomez, F-Mart or Pelfrey, which I don't think it would be.


Yet, that's the chatter.
   119. NTNgod Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:06 AM (#2622176)
GMSpeak from MLB.com:
"We were willing to make the trade now, because it gave us a chance to add a bullpen arm," Melvin said. "We like Mota's arm, and they [Mota and Estrada] are both in the last year of their contract. We didn't see staying with Johnny going forward."
...
"He pitched two innings in a game 13 times last year," Melvin said. "That's something we've talked about, the fact that [in 2006] we were a club with a lot of one-inning guys. It's nice to have some pitchers who can give you two innings at a time.

"He's got a good arm, and he has good experience. We're hoping he can bounce back. Any reliever has good years and bad years. We're banking that he can bounce back next year."
...
Tuesday's trade left the Brewers with no proven in-house options to catch. Did that make Melvin nervous?

"I don't get nervous anymore," the GM joked. "If it doesn't work out [with Kendall], we'll figure something out."

The Brewers have two proposals out to Kendall, Melvin confirmed. He would not go into detail, but one presumably offers the security of a multi-year commitment while the other offers a higher salary for one year and would give Kendall, whose offensive numbers were down in 2007, an opportunity to boost his value for next year.

"We still haven't agreed on anything," Melvin said.
   120. thetailor Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:11 AM (#2622180)
"I don't really want to get into all of that," said Melvin. "It doesn't do any good to talk about negatives. We're just looking for more of an energy level and a catcher who works well with pitchers."

Wow, this is one of the funniest serious quotes I have seen in a long time.

"I don't want to get into that. It doesn't do any good to talk about negative. But he sucks. He really sucks. Big ball of suck he is. We want someone new, who won't suck. But let's stay off the negatives here."

Is Melvin six? Why is he assassinating Estrada's character? And why does he get the last word?
   121. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:12 AM (#2622185)
As Chross mentioned, just because Estrada is on the team right now doesn't mean he will be on opening day. This could be just getting some leverage with either Lo Duca (shudder) or with Baltimore regarding Ramon Hernandez.

That said, the Mets have a complete roster as of right now. The rest of the offseason will be attempting to upgrade.
   122. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:14 AM (#2622190)
And when exactly have the Braves let someone go who could REALLY play?
I could name some names, but that would detract from your main point: Estrada is a big time jerk. Bad news...

I do expect him to come back a little bit this season, as he played hurt for much of last year. What did he allow, like, the last 40 or so runners to make it successfully?
   123. Gaelan Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:35 AM (#2622225)
This is a funny thread. We have two fanbases who thinks that their team got better by subtraction. Score this a win for the Brewers because when they both suck Mota will suck in less playing time.

My prediction is that Estrada is released before the end of the season. Estrada can't hit well enough to be a starter and backup catchers who can't throw and nobody likes get released.
   124. J. Cross Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:38 AM (#2622227)
I don't shudder at Lo Duca, per say. I shudder at 3 or, especially, 4 years of Lo Duca. I actually think he's a solid player and would be fine with 1-2 years at a reasonable salary.

ZiPS

Estrada .269/.321/.368
Lo Duca .274/.320/.369
Castro .250/.318/.434

Barrett (SD) .254/.313/.385
Laird (Tex) .249/.305/.391

Seems like Castro is the best of these guys offensively and, you could argue, defensively. I think that Lo Duca is a better overall player than Estrada especially considering working with pitchers. So, the best (however unlikely) outcome in my mind is giving Lo Duca 2 years, non-tendering Estrada and having Lo Duca split (or even take the lesser share) time with Castro.
   125. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:43 AM (#2622237)
I don't shudder at Lo Duca, per say. I shudder at 3 or, especially, 4 years of Lo Duca. I actually think he's a solid player and would be fine with 1-2 years at a reasonable salary.

I'm ambivalent. I don't see Lo Duca as being >>> an Estrada/Castro split and I think I'd rather have the draft pick for Lo Duca and just go with those guys.
   126. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:47 AM (#2622241)
Lo Duca on a 2 year contract might be all right, but I don't like him, for all sorts of reasons, some his fault and some not his fault. And it would take a three year contract, at least. Let the Orioles sign him after they trade Hernandez to the Rockies or whatever.
   127. AJM Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:50 AM (#2622247)
According to Heyman, there was discussion of deal that had Milledge as its centerpiece for Schneider and Church

This sounds like something Steve Phillips would come up with.
   128. J. Cross Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:53 AM (#2622251)
"Johnny adds depth to our catching situation," Mets general manager Omar Minaya said. "He's a former All-Star who switch-hits and has hit over .300 three times in his career."

I like the sound of "adds depth." That almost makes it sound like Castro is the #1.

I'd rather have the draft pick for Lo Duca

Can we offer this man arbitration? He's a type B so it wouldn't discourage any team from signing him. He made $6.25M last year. What would he make through arbitration?

If the Mets offered him arbitration (by Dec. 1) Lo Duca has to accept (or not) by Dec. 7th and the Mets can still non-tender Estrada up until Dec. 12th. Sooo..... maybe that's the Mets "master plan." Offer Lo Duca arbitration, either you get him on a 1 year deal or, more likely since he'll want something longer, you at least get a supplemental pick with an estimated net $3M for his loss. Estrada gives them flexibility to be okay in either scenario.
   129. J. Cross Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:55 AM (#2622254)
According to Heyman, there was discussion of deal that had Milledge as its centerpiece for Schneider and Church

This sounds like something Steve Phillips would come up with.


Can Church pitch middle relief? Can he take the ball every day? By any chance, and this might be asking too much, does he have closing experience?

No? I think Phillips would prefer Jon Rauch.

Lo Duca on a 2 year contract might be all right, but I don't like him, for all sorts of reasons, some his fault and some not his fault.

Strangely enough between Lo Duca, Castro and Estrada it appears that Lo Duca is the *most* likeable. Castro appears to be the worst person but, on the other hand, probably the best teammate.
   130. SouthSideRyan Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:58 AM (#2622257)
The nl ran wild on Kendall while he was a Cub. 52/59 against in 50 starts.


I refuse to believe that Kendall threw out 7 baserunners as a Cub.
   131. AJM Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:00 AM (#2622259)
I think Phillips would prefer Jon Rauch.

Actually, I think Dimitri Young would have to be involved.
   132. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:04 AM (#2622263)
I refuse to believe that Kendall threw out 7 baserunners as a Cub.

You are absolutely right. He only threw out 5.
   133. NTNgod Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:10 AM (#2622267)
MLB.com (Mets.com):
The one-for-one exchange of unwanted players developed and was completed in one business day after Brewers general manager Doug Melvin contacted his Mets counterpart, Omar Minaya, and offered Estrada for any one of six players in return. Minaya, who last December bestowed a two-year, $5 million contract on Mota, chose to send the 34-year-old right-handed reliever to the Brewers
...
The general manager was not available Tuesday and didn't return calls made to his cellular phone.

The Mets didn't make Estrada available to the media.
...
Melvin, speaking by phone from Milwaukee, said he and Minaya never had discussed Estrada before Tuesday and that he hadn't spoken Minaya at the General Managers Meetings earlier this month.

Melvin indicated it was possible the Brewers would have non-tendered Estrada next month rather than go to salary arbitration with him... Melvin predicted Estrada's 2008 salary would "begin with a four," making him too expensive for the Brewers.
...
One of Mota's '07 teammates, contacted Tuesday night, suggested the trade will benefit Mota and the Mets. "He wasn't comfortable pitching at home. The booing got to him," the player said. "It wasn't going to work out."

Gee, given Estrada's quotes to the Milwaukee paper, I wonder why they didn't want Mr. Warm and Fuzzy to speak to the NY media? :P
   134. Perros Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:14 AM (#2622273)
Which team has the most fans on BBTF?

1. Red Sox
2. Yankees
3. Mets
4. Cubs
5. ???
   135. Lassus: Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:14 AM (#2622274)
I know it was a while ago, and I only skimmed, but I don't think anyone gave Harvey credit for his excellent Terminator II quote usage, something I would have expected to be picked up right away.

Good show! Even if someone did give you credit.
   136. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:15 AM (#2622277)
I look forward to Mota pitching lots and lots of high-leverage innings for the Brewers next year.
   137. Russ Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:15 AM (#2622278)
and he is not a dick.


He has, however, one of the biggest red-asses to walk the planet. And there were problems in Pittsburgh with him being, if not a dick, really immature...
   138. Perros Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:20 AM (#2622281)
Kendall's got to rate up there in the gross-out baseball injury category.

Matsui's wasn't too pretty, either.
   139. AJM Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:25 AM (#2622283)
offered Estrada for any one of six players in return.

I'd really like to know the other 5 players.
   140. Calvin Schiraldi Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:34 AM (#2622291)
This trade is great for the Brewers. If they're trying to get worse. Mota's a companion for the always flammable Derrick Turnbow and Jason Kendall is actually worse defensively than Estrada. How do they do it?
   141. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt) Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:38 AM (#2622293)
YES!

And if Estrada is such a cancer, well, he's an upgrade from Blow Duca.

This is an amazing day.
   142. NTNgod Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:47 AM (#2622298)
I refuse to believe that Kendall threw out 7 baserunners as a Cub.
You are absolutely right. He only threw out 5.

Some of the listed CS totals for catchers include pitcher pickoffs.
For example, Estrada threw out 6 of 79, if you don't include pickoffs.
(Damian Miller threw out 11 of 35, if you don't include pickoffs)
   143. Sam M. Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:51 AM (#2622301)
Harvey's, Russlan may not despise Mota, but I sure do. When the Mets acquired him, I flamed it from day one, never having forgiven or forgotten his punk-ass "confrontation" with Mike Piazza. There is no one this side of Roger Clemens I would less rather have seen in a Mets' uni, and no one I am more glad to see gone. The fact that he was putrid and pretty much single-handedly cost the Mets the NL East this year only made it worse -- as he exemplified precisely the same flaws of character and total gutlessness that lead a man to throw at a batter twice and then run away from that batter when he charges the mound. Guillermo Mota won't use the stuff he was born with to challenge a hitter, or to stand on a mound and face Mike Piazza. You will quickly learn how fatally flawed he is, and how much of a debacle turning over your season to him will be.

Whatever god-awful qualities Johnny Estrada may bring with him (and I don't doubt a word of what you described), the Mets' season is not going to turn on what he does. Of that I am sure. The Mets win this deal because Guillermo Mota cannot ruin another inning, another game, and another season of New York Mets' baseball. One is surely enough.
   144. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:55 AM (#2622306)
I was originally a temporary Mets rooter, for the duration of the Pedro contract. My time on BTF, however, has probably made me a more permanent "fan" at that.
   145. Benji Posted: November 21, 2007 at 05:06 AM (#2622312)
I'm willing to gamble that Estrada will get along in the Met clubhouse. He's better than throwing long term money at Yorvit, and cetainly better than Jason Kendall, or Mike DeFelice.

But what just plain stuns me is how Omar could get anything for Mota. I would have been happy with Chuck Estrada or Erik Estrada just to see that useless piece of #### gone.
   146. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: November 21, 2007 at 05:09 AM (#2622315)
I was originally a temporary Mets rooter, for the duration of the Pedro contract. My time on BTF, however, has probably made me a more permanent "fan" at that.

No one will blame you, Vaux. We are a lovable bunch.
   147. Sam M. Posted: November 21, 2007 at 05:12 AM (#2622317)
I'm willing to gamble that Estrada will get along in the Met clubhouse.

It's unlikely, given all the history. But the one thing working in the Mets' favor is that it is Estrada's walk year. He has an incentive to spend this year behaving in order to clean up his image -- to the extent he can -- for purposes of trying to get a decent contract, which given his age is probably the only one he has a chance to get. Same goes for having the maximum incentive to have a productive year. If ever you wouldn't see the lazy, bad-attitude Johnny Estrada, you would think 2008 would be the year. Don't get me wrong. I think this particular snake is unlikely to shed his skin. But if he's going to, the Mets should get the benefit of the one year in which he will do it.
   148. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: November 21, 2007 at 05:18 AM (#2622321)
Another thing in the Mets favor is that he is playing on a team with established star players who have been playing in the MLB for years. Bobby Cox tends to get the best out of players but I think it helps to have a core of veteran star players like Atlanta did at the time. The last two places he has played has lacked that dynamic.
   149. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 05:18 AM (#2622323)
I am not seeing it, guys. Estrada's TERRIBLE. .296 OBP terrible. Grounding into 22 DP per 162 games terrible. .366 offensive winning percentage terrible.

That's ONE year of data, DA -- a year in which Estrada was playing hurt (according to the article, post-season surgeries to both deal with a knee problem and remove bone spurs from his elbow). In 2006, Estrada had a .328 OBP.

And in 2005, he was at .303. Maybe he'll Saberhagen his way back to glory. Then again, he's in his 30s.

Let's see . . . A catcher who can't throw, whose offense is declining, and who creates controversy in the clubhouse with a bad attitude? Somehow that sounds familiar . . . I can't quite place it, though . . . hold on, it's on the tip of my tongue . . . .

Oh, yes! I know! Sounds pretty much like Estrada is a LoDuca clone if you ask me, except that he's younger, and doesn't have the ludicrous rep as a clubhouse "leader" that comes when the media finds a loudmouth, redass white guy with "heart" and "guts". The only difference? Resigning LoDuca would have been a multi-year commitment for a lot more money and it wouldn't have been gotten rid of Mota.

It's also Mike Barrett. Not the most likable bunch of aging catchers, are they? Jason Kendall might end up getting an extra million for not being those jag-offs. That Molina Family Catcher Mill will be doing boffo business for years to come.

I expect Castro to start about 80 games, Estrada 70

Wait, you expect them to pay a guy $5-6 million to play 70 games?

This is like changing horses on the crap-go-round.

My take exactly. Brewers fans are blasting their old junk. Mets fans blasting their old junk. Everyone's happy because they got rid of their old flavor of swill, even though some realize it's just a new swill line they got.
   150. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 05:35 AM (#2622331)
Baserunners picked off by Jason Kendall while with the Cubs:

August 11: Troy Tulowitzki. However, it's actually a pick-off play that doesn't involve Kendall at all. The play is scored: (P-1B-SS). Since Troy broke for second, Kendall gets an undeserved credit.

August 14: Throws out Ken Griffey Jr. This one is a real CS.

August 24: Chris Young. However, once again it's a PO that doesn't involve Kendall. (P-1B-SS). Clearly, Sean Forman's info credits catchers with all PO at 2nd base, deserving or not.

September 4: Matt Kemp. (P-1B-SS)

September 9: Njger Morgan. Actually thrown out.

So Kendall nabbed 2 of the 54 runners who ran on him. HOLY FARKING SHIITE!!!
   151. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:01 AM (#2622341)
As long as I'm looking it up for Kendall, I may as well look it up for Estrada - after all, his SB/CS sucked, also. Let's see how many P-1B-SS "caught steals" he had.

On the year 73/84 stole on him officially - 86.9%.

1) April 23 - catches Derrek Lee (?) trying to steal third base (?!?!?). Um, botched hit-and-run? Rameriz was batting, and he is good at making contact.

2) April 28 - catches Carlos Lee.

3) May 4 - nabs Adam LaRouche.

4) May 19 - Torii Hunter - BUT, it's the Kendall classic - a pick off play where he broke for second.

5) May 23 - Russell Martin.

6) May 23 (yes, that's right, he got two in one day) - Jeff Kent (?!??!?!?) at third base. Again, this must've been a blown hit-and-run. Or something.

7) May 26 - Rob Bowen at - can you guess - third base. Bowen is a back up catcher with one steal in four seasons. Again, this could only have been a blown hit-and-run.

8) June 15 - Luis Castillo.

9) June 23 - David DeJesus.

10) July 4 - Ryan Doumit - in a pick off where he broke for second.

11) July 19 - Chris Young.

Eleven CS - 9 actual CSs, so much better than Barrett. Then again, 3 were at third base on slow baserunners in foiled hit-and-runs.

After June 23, he had one real pick off. He played 61 games in that stretch. 50 complete games.

In checking, baserunners were 41/42 after June 23, not including pick off plays he wasn't involved in. That's worse than Jason Kendall.

I'd pay money to see the jump Chris Young got on 7/19. Musta really sucked.
   152. J. Cross Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:17 AM (#2622343)
PrOPS suggests that most of Estrada's inconsistency over the last 4 years is just randomness:

OPS

04 - 828
05 - 670
06 - 772
07 - 699

average: 742; stdev: 71

PrOPS

04 - 776
05 - 747
06 - 763
07 - 732

average: 755; stdev: 19

According to PrOPS this guy has actually been remarkably consistent and doesn't really need to "bounce back" at all.
   153. J. Cross Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:20 AM (#2622344)
btw, Josh Phelps was DFAed. If the Mets had some balls they'd bring him in to platoon with Delgado.
   154. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:22 AM (#2622345)
Well, Estrada did have a bone spur removed from his elbow and a torn meniscus. There is reason to expect him to be adequate at throwing runners as he has been so recently. There's no real reason to expect that of Kendall.
   155. J. Cross Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:27 AM (#2622346)
and a torn meniscus

I think the torn meniscus happened with a week left in the season and he hasn't played a game since, right? So, that probably wasn't affecting his throwing.
   156. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:28 AM (#2622347)
Russian,

I know. That's why I checked Kendall first. Still, ya gotta admit, 1/42 is BAD.
   157. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:34 AM (#2622349)
As for other catchers mentioned in this thread:

Barrett tossed out 14 of 86 baserunners.

LoDuca got 22 of 94.

In the AL, Kendall nailed 15 of 74.

And a special hand for Josh Bard. Not mentioned here yet, but he tossed out 10 of the 131 runners who ran on him. Wow, that's bad. And that's without checking for any pick offs or blown hit-and-runs.
   158. Sam M. Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:44 AM (#2622352)
I'm sorry, but there is just way, way too much focus on Estrada suckitude in this thread and not nearly enough on Mota's. Riddle me this, Batman: How does a guy post an 18/47 BB/K ratio in 59.3 IP, while giving up a poor 63 hits but a not all that atrocious 8 HR, and yet walk away with a 5.76 ERA and a 74 ERA+?

I'll tell you how: he is absolutely spineless and gutless turd who completely melts in the face of the slightest adversity. He piles up the nice K's when he sails through an easy inning on his natural ability, and then turns around and gets lit up the very next inning (or the next night) after falling behind a hitter and loses it completely. He's a 33 year old veteran with absolutely no poise whatsoever.

He is a documented cheater and a coward. Other than that, he's just what you want in a bullpen cog.
   159. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:59 AM (#2622354)
I gotta check Josh Bard . .

With Chris Young pitching and Josh Bard catching, baserunners were 30/30. Nice!

Josh Bard's big ten:

1) May 15 - Brandon Phillips BUT it was a Kendall Klassic: (PO) 3B (P-SS-3B). No credit there.

2) May 15 (yup, 2 in one game) - Brandon Phillips (yup, the same guy twice in one game). This one was a real CS.

3) May 16 - (yup, 3 in 2 days) - Josh Hamilton, on a strike-'em-out-throw-'em-out DP. He only had 6 stolen base opporunities on the year, so likely hit-and-run.

4) May 20 (nice week) - Ichiro! Going for third, sure, but it's Ichiro!, so Bard gets full credit. (though it did happen right after he stole second)

5) June 1 - Robert Fick - a Jason Kendall special - pick off - (P-SS)

6) June 7 - Russell Martin.

7) June 22 - Coco Crisp.

8) August 17. Jason Lane. Happened in the ninth inning. One of his only 2 SBA of the year. Possible hit-and-run gone awry.

9) September 4. Chris Snyder. Arizona's catcher. It was his only stolen base attempt of the year. Sounds like a botched hit-and-run. Oh wait - it was the back half of a double-steal. Well . . . I guess it counts. Kinda weak letting the lead runner take third, thoguh.

10) 9/25. Ken Frandsen.

2 Kendalls, and 2 probable hit-and-runs with slow runners. Plus he nailed a slow-footed catcher in the back half of a double steal.

The big one is after June 22, he only nailed 3.

After June 23, Estrada only nailed one.

On July 17, the Cubs aquired Kendall.

It was a glory time to be a baserunner in the NL. Holy crap, three historically dreadful performances going after baserunners all going on at the same time. Je-sus.
   160. NTNgod Posted: November 21, 2007 at 07:00 AM (#2622355)
I'm sorry, but there is just way, way too much focus on Estrada suckitude in this thread and not nearly enough on Mota's.

You don't see many contentions in this thread that Mota's likely to be good next season, do you?
(he is a reliever, so I suppose youneverknow when it comes to a single season, but if Mota never threw an inning for the Brewers, that would be OK, too)

On the contrary, there was much early pro-Estrada sentiment.
(Actually, the NY Times has a wonderfully anti-Mota, pro-Estrada PR fluffy piece, and how Estrada's got such a stellar reputation working with pitchers - nevermind that's one of the reasons he's getting run out of Milwaukee - and no mention of the baggage he's carrying along from his prior employers)
   161. thetailor Posted: November 21, 2007 at 07:04 AM (#2622356)
Sam, I'm so tired of you being on the fence about Mota. Are you for or against this trade or what? I can't be picking through your posts for your actual opinion all night.

:)
   162. PreservedFish Posted: November 21, 2007 at 07:34 AM (#2622359)
Good trade for the Mets. That's all I had to say.

I understand that both teams are happy about getting rid of their garbage. But I think the Mets do genuinely win on talent.
   163. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 12:52 PM (#2622384)
The Brewers have two proposals out to Kendall, Melvin confirmed.

Wow. And I thought the Brewers' picking up Mota rocked. Are they TRYING to make sure the Cubs win the division next year?
   164. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 12:56 PM (#2622386)
I refuse to believe that Kendall threw out 7 baserunners as a Cub.

Ditto. That 52/59 can't be right. I remember at one point, NL runners were something like 42 of 43 against him, and that "one" was a fluke play in which he threw Pujols out at home after getting a good bounce off the brick backstop (scored as a failed attempt to steal home).
   165. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 12:57 PM (#2622387)
And an editorial comment: The market for starting pitchers may be paper-thin, but between LoDuca, Castro, Estrada, Barrett (etc.?), the market for suckass d00shbag catchers appears pretty ripe.
   166. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 01:01 PM (#2622390)
So Kendall nabbed 2 of the 54 runners who ran on him. HOLY FARKING SHIITE!!!

And see my post above--one of those was Pujols, as I described. He only had one "real" caught stealing as a Cub.

Which jibes with my memory. I play first base in a coed softball league (largely because, well, I don't exactly have the arm to play short or center, even at that level of competition), and I'm almost completely serious when I say I probably throw better than Kendall does.
   167. salfino Posted: November 21, 2007 at 01:35 PM (#2622405)
several young catchers potentially expendable to their teams, ranging from Jeff Clement (actually good) to Jeff Mathis (probably sucks just as much, but at least young)


Clement, according to scouts I've talked to, can't throw well enough (at all, really) to catch. The best young catcher available according them is the DB's Miguel Montero, but Arizona is a smart organization and will want A LOT in return.
   168. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 01:44 PM (#2622409)
So Kendall nabbed 2 of the 54 runners who ran on him. HOLY FARKING SHIITE!!!

And see my post above--one of those was Pujols,

No. I went through them one-by-one in my post. They were Griffey and Morgan, both nabbed at second. Pujols might be listed by other sites as a caught steal, but b-ref doesn't recognize him as such.
   169. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: November 21, 2007 at 01:47 PM (#2622412)
The best young catcher available according them is the DB's Miguel Montero, but Arizona is a smart organization and will want A LOT in return.


Smart scouts.

I wrote my thoughts on this trade in the "Estrada gets his say (and it rhymes)" thread, but basically, I'm actually thinking Mota is the better player exchanged in this trade--and the guy sucks. That says it all.

From Estrada, I expect.290 OBP, 7 homers, 6 unintentional walks, 400 plate appearances (5 AB after September 1st), three fights with Rick Petereson and a couple of whiny tirades against Omar Minaya.
   170. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 01:50 PM (#2622418)
retro, what you're referring to happened in this game. Listed as out advancing, not a caught steal.
   171. Quiet Flows the Don Taussig Avenger (Edmundo) Posted: November 21, 2007 at 01:52 PM (#2622421)
Is there a dick quotient?

Sorry, couldn't let this one pass. I believe the equation starts with the "Angle of the Dangle..."

Maybe you meant that question for the Ordonez "Questions Only" thread?
   172. bunyon Posted: November 21, 2007 at 01:55 PM (#2622426)
Someone said this is a challenge trade. I agree. But it goes like this:

GM 1: Our guy sucks worse and is more of a cancer than your guy.

GM 2: BS. Our guy blew our entire season!

GM 1: Trade!
   173. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:03 PM (#2622433)
Pujols might be listed by other sites as a caught steal, but b-ref doesn't recognize him as such.

I don't remember the source, but I distinctly recall that play being noted as Kendall's first caught stealing as a Cub. Regardless, the broader point (Kendall couldn't throw out Grandma Moses, despite her being long deceased) stands.
   174. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:04 PM (#2622435)
Hm. "Caught trying to advance." Didn't realize there was such a category.
   175. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:09 PM (#2622439)
Me neither. But who are we to question the ways of Sean Forman?
   176. Win one for Agrippa (haplo53) Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:12 PM (#2622440)
Rubin in the DN thinks there's a good chance the Mets non-tender Estrada.
   177. Oriole Tragic is totally awesome in the postseason Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:14 PM (#2622442)
The link in #99 contains a comment that links to this MLB.com article claiming the following:

Fosse keeps a book and said that Kendall saves about as many runs over the course of a season as he does knock in runs while batting.

Can that be possible, without a fanciful definition of what catchers can actually do to save runs?
   178. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:14 PM (#2622443)
Me neither. But who are we to question the ways of Sean Forman?

Well, better Forman than Elias, I suppose.

The stat makes sense, I guess--it's not like Albert Pujols is actually gonna be making a whole lot of "real" attempts to steal home.

That said--if a pitch in the dirt skips away from the catcher and the runner on first tries to take second and is thrown out, I could swear that's a CS, but I could be wrong. Is the determinant whether the pitch would, if the runner had been safe, have been scored a PB or WP?
   179. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:15 PM (#2622444)
Fosse keeps a book and said that Kendall saves about as many runs over the course of a season as he does knock in runs while batting.

Can that be possible, without a very fanciful definition of what a C could actually do to save a run?


Perhaps the between-the-lines reading is that Kendall's offense has negative value.
   180. Gern Blanston Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:18 PM (#2622447)
In all seriousness--unless there's some serious pitcher-handling (spare the wise remarks, pervs) going on when Kendall's behind the plate that I'm missing, there's no way his defense can possibly equal even his meager offense. At least at the plate, he'll go through stretches where his lollipop BBIP fall in regularly, which combined with his legitimately very good batting eye means he's at least a pretty good OBP guy for limited periods. (Not that this makes him a good offensive player, given his total lack of power. Kendall's bat speed makes the current version of Jim Edmonds look like vintage Gary Sheffield.)
   181. Famous Original Joe C Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:47 PM (#2622475)
Not much to add here that hasn't already been said. Estrada's not much of a player, but he'll make a fine platoon/backup guy, and not cost the Mets much.

On the flip side, got to be happy for Mets fans that they got rid of Mota, much less got something useful in return.
   182. Dag Nabbit and his imaginary friends Posted: November 21, 2007 at 02:56 PM (#2622487)
My guess:

A steal attempt comes when the pitch is being thrown. Pujols tried to advance after the ball had arrived at the plate. If a batter goes to second on a wild pitch/passed ball, it ain't a steal.
   183. CrosbyBird Posted: November 21, 2007 at 03:58 PM (#2622585)
I understand that both teams are happy about getting rid of their garbage. But I think the Mets do genuinely win on talent.

I don't think there's a chance the Mets win on talent. Mota has great stuff. He just struggles to put it together. Mota's high point was dominance as a reliever. Estrada's high point was a good offensive season for a catcher with lousy defense.

The #1 bonus is that Mota's money is guaranteed and Estrada's isn't if the Mets can find something better. If there's something good Minaya can pick up in the next week or so, this trade was Mota for nothing, or simply +$3.2M for the Mets. Mota wasn't pitching an inning for the 2008 Mets.

Whatever god-awful qualities Johnny Estrada may bring with him (and I don't doubt a word of what you described), the Mets' season is not going to turn on what he does.

I don't hate Mota like Sam does, but I agree with this. Mota pitched in high-leverage situations. Randolph would use him again and again and watch games get completely out of reach.

According to b-pro, Mota was about half a win worse than a replacement level reliever last year. Look at all the really terrible catchers out there. Is Estrada worse than replacement level?
   184. Kyle S Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:16 PM (#2622613)
Say Estrada gets $5m next year. How much will Castro get? The Mets could end up paying their catcher position like 9 million bucks to be pretty bad.
   185. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:24 PM (#2622625)
Castro just signed a new 2 year $4.2MM deal.
   186. Van Lingle Mungo Jerry Posted: November 21, 2007 at 04:29 PM (#2622641)
Castro signed for $$ million for two years, if I'm not mistaken. Also, given that this is Estrada's contract year, is it unreasonable to think that the instinct for self-preservation, combined with his understanding that he's burned a lot of bridges elsewhere, combined with the aforementioned surgical tune-ups promise a better or at least more tranquil season from him?
   187. _ Posted: November 21, 2007 at 06:09 PM (#2622777)
Which team has the most fans on BBTF?

1. Red Sox
2. Yankees
3. Mets
4. Cubs
5. ???


Either Giants or Cards. A lot of A's, too.

For all the good reasons the Brewers had to jettison Estrada, with the dearth of catching it seems they could have gotten more for him. I think there's a very good chance Estrada bounces back in his walk year and hits around .300 like he's capable. The elbow and knee surgeries might improve his throwing problems. As for Mota, there is almost no chance that he bounces back, or helps the team as anything other than fodder. It's amazing how some players can make careers on one big year. He hasn't posted an ERA under 4.50 since 2004. In nine big league seasons he's put up an ERA better than 4.00 three times. His propensity for the longball will kill him in Miller Park, especially against lefthanded hitters. Really the best hope for us is that he doesn't make the team, and that Kendall doesn't play more than half the time. I mean, good riddance to Estrada, but they did not improve the team with this.
   188. manchestermets Posted: November 21, 2007 at 11:19 PM (#2623057)
In terms of talent, I think Estrada can definitely help the Mets. Estrada and Castro's career platoon splits:

Estrada:

vs RHP: .283/.328/.412
vs LHP: .269/.295/.387

Castro:

vs RHP: .228/.303/.411
vs LHP: .258/.340/.419


Is there any reason why this shouldn't be a straightforward platoon, and if so very possibly a good one?
Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
HowardMegdal
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogMets owners knew about Maddoff
(29 - 7:49pm, Feb 10)
Last: Esoteric

NewsblogMLB: Hall of Fame worthy? Furthest thing from Schilling's mind
(40 - 7:44pm, Feb 10)
Last: Daunte Vicknabbit!

NewsblogCurt Schilling Says Manny 'Quit on the Field,' Teammates Stopped Him From Confronting Slugger
(22 - 7:43pm, Feb 10)
Last: SteveF

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012
(415 - 7:30pm, Feb 10)
Last: NJ is feeling better

NewsblogSources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault
(6128 - 7:22pm, Feb 10)
Last: JPWF1313

Transaction Oracle2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's
(55 - 7:09pm, Feb 10)
Last: rynoman7

NewsblogGrantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans
(45 - 6:59pm, Feb 10)
Last: Ron J

NewsblogESPN: Law: Top 100 Prospects (paywalled)
(11 - 6:54pm, Feb 10)
Last: Crispix Attacks

Newsblog'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s
(298 - 6:51pm, Feb 10)
Last: rfloh

NewsblogFSKC announces on-air lineup for Royals - Rex Hudler and Steve Physioc to join
(12 - 6:32pm, Feb 10)
Last: Robert in Manhattan Beach

Sox TherapyOffseason Minor League Thread
(3 - 6:11pm, Feb 10)
Last: Dan

NewsblogJeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected?
(67 - 6:00pm, Feb 10)
Last: Eric J is Financed by a Rich Grandpa

NewsblogBluetales blog: JetBlue’s 605 Wears Red Sox Colors!
(8 - 5:56pm, Feb 10)
Last: JE (Jason Epstein)

NewsblogTom Brady getting new bro-in-law: Red Sox’ Kevin Youkilis!
(17 - 4:43pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogKnobler: Stay away from steroids -- but vote how you want
(23 - 4:36pm, Feb 10)
Last: Something Other

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 1.7618 seconds
40 querie(s) executed