User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.8466 seconds
82 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Friday, June 26, 2009NBC Sports/Gleeman: Frank Thomas is the most underrated hitter of all time
Coot Veal and Cot Deal
Posted: June 26, 2009 at 10:53 PM | 49 comment(s)
Related News: General, History, Hall of Fame, Chi White Sox, Oakland |
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Hardball Talk: Gleeman: Lenny Dykstra is back with some more can't miss investment advice (116 - 7:51pm, Feb 09) Last: Hugh Jorgan Newsblog: Joe Torre on "Castle" (11 - 7:36pm, Feb 09) Last: B.G. Gamesh Reeks of Anti-Yankee Bias (w/Zombies) Newsblog: Former Lotte Giants catcher dies (after 10 years in a coma after collapsing during a game) (7 - 7:20pm, Feb 09) Last: Trevor Crowe T. Robot (Dan Lee) Newsblog: NYBD: Silva: Bill James Accused Elias of Being “About Money” (56 - 7:13pm, Feb 09) Last: Monty Newsblog: Kansas City Kansan: Sloan: It's time to trade Greinke, Soria
(52 - 7:11pm, Feb 09) Last: snapper |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.8466 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
His competition, among greats: Mel Ott, Rogers Hornsby, Frank Robinson, Johnny Mize, Honus Wagner are some good ones.
Of course, the fact that it took 28 years for the Hall of Fame to figure out that Mize deserved enshrinement is probably a point in his favour.
But most underrated hitter of the last 30 years?
He's got a great case. I've always felt he and Pujols were kindred hitting spirits.
Albert's glove is just overkill - like if Jessica Alba had a physics degree or something.
Ditto.
Or Mathews, of course. There's a respectable argument that Mathews might have been as good as Schmidt as a hitter - maybe even a hair better. (Schmidt was the better overall player, primarily because of his glove.)
Wouldn't that say more about you than Billy Williams?
Can we call Thomas under-rated? He won 2 MVPs, finished 2nd another time and 3rd twice more during that great run. He did deserve a lot more AS appearances but he was hardly ignored. I guess you could claim he's ignored in an 'all-time' sense but then the comparison to Pujols doesn't make sense plus you have to take note of his excellent but not great post-29 career (this was probably his under-rated period in my opinion).
Am I the only heterosexual male on the planet who doesn't think Jessica Alba is hot?
Never got that one.
http://thetrawbros.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/jessica-alba-bikini-07.jpg
No, youre not.
what he was not able to accomplish was the padding of his counting stats at the end of his career, thus falling short of 3000 hits, 500 homers, and other round number notables.
i've never thought of Musial or Ott as underrated. even now, i can visualize their batting stances from pictures seen as a boy. when you think "national league in the 1930s", isn't Ott one of the players you come up with? Same for Musial in the 40s and early 50s.
TMYK.
Interesting tidbit: This Frank Thomas held the White Sox record for single-season home runs from 1993 to 1997. The other Frank Thomas held the Mets record for single-season home runs from 1962 through 1974. That's got to be the only time two same-named players held team single-season records in the same category...
Since Gleeman is looking at an historical context and not contemporary, MVP isn't a significant measure. His aim is at 'perception is reality' thinking: do you view Thomas as a hitting peer to Williams, Ruth and Aaron, or is he just one of those 90s sluggers? Gleeman's take is that most will see him as the later, and de facto that becomes Thomas's historical reality.
Dick Allen
Home Run Baker
Willie McCovey
Gene Tenace
Judge that for yourself. Here's what you get if you neutralize various players' stats to a 2008 NL neutral park, listed in the order of OPS. Of course you also have to take longevity into account, but as we might have suspected, Thomas and Musial stand out pretty distinctly.
Frank Thomas: .308 BA, 38 HR, 121 RBI, .998 OPS
Stan Musial .332 BA, 25 HR, 105 RBI, .977 OPS
Mel Ott: .305 BA, 30 HR, 102 RBI, .949 OPS
Willie McCovey: .287 BA, 36 HR, 109 RBI, .942 OPS
Dick Allen: .310 BA, 35 HR, 119 RBI, .939 OPS
Eddie Mathews: .289 BA, 38 HR, 109 BA, .939 OPS
Gene Tenace: .277 BA, 25 HR, 84 RBI, .920 OPS (124 walks don't hurt that)
Billy Williams: .298 BA, 29 HR, 102 RBI, .875 OPS
Carl Yastrzemski: .293 BA, 23 HR, 95 RBI, .862 OPS
Home Run Baker: .324 BA, 10 HR**, 115 BA, .844 OPS
**which seems to show a lack of adjustment for dead ball era conditions
[edit] i'd like to see Aaron, Williams and Ruth included for good measure
Depending on which you're talking about, I don't think one should. Spitball/not, switching out balls more, sure. Adjusting rate stats, sure. "Approach" or "mindset" or anything like that, as related to counting stats? Not for me. I don't like it any more than I'd like someone running numbers on what Ichiro would hit if he decided to approach PAs like a typical MLB player.
No. This is a common misconception. The Polo Grounds obviously greatly inflated Ott's HR totals -- but at least as severely depressed his singles and doubles totals (and thus his batting average) and his overall offensive production. The Polo Grounds was a great home run park, but a neutral-to-slight-pitchers'-park overall.
That's my (poorly made) point. His inflated HRs overrated him while other factors underrated him, putting him in his proper context--a certain HOF/all-time great. One of my Dad's favorites too, so there's that to consider.
OK, I see what you're saying. Still, though, I'd say that Ott's home park distorted him, but didn't make him overrated in his time. And in the current era, most of the discussion of Ott that I see (and there isn't much; he has been sort of forgotten) tends to dismiss his HR total as a ballpark artifact, without taking into proper consideration how the ballpark shaped his entire stat line, not just the HR column.
well stated on multiple levels.
my favorite birthday trivia is "Ken Griffey Jr is the second best baseball player born on November 21st in Donora Pa, who is the best?"
Since Gleeman is looking at an historical context and not contemporary, MVP isn't a significant measure. His aim is at 'perception is reality' thinking: do you view Thomas as a hitting peer to Williams, Ruth and Aaron, or is he just one of those 90s sluggers? Gleeman's take is that most will see him as the later, and de facto that becomes Thomas's historical reality.
but he is also comparing Thomas to Pujols in the same article, and comparing Pujols perception at 29 and not Thomas perception at 29 but when his career ended. It's a weird argument in this case. At 29 Thomas was viewed pretty similar to how Pujols is now perceived. He is more or less arguing that Thomas should be remembered in that context, even though he had a decline phase.
That's some excellent trivia. I'm going to start using it.
That's some excellent trivia. I'm going to start using it.
of course the fans only voted one of them into the all century team.
No, sorry, not even really that close. Rey Ordonez was looking like he'd be a reasonable contender, but he was properly valued long before he could enter the area.
Actually, and this isn't systemic or anything (I didn't start with the notion that it'd be someone who was still great), but it's much, much, much more likely that Nolan Ryan is the most overrated player of all time.
Clemente over Frank Robinson?
George Sisler over Mel Ott?
Lou Brock over Joe Morgan?
He's probably historically the very most underrated player ... top 5-or-so all-time at the most crucial and demanding defensive position other than pitcher/catcher, yet nobody realized it then, virtually nobody does to this day, and the Hall of Fame took half a centry to elect him, while the entire time electing inferior shortstop after inferior shortstop.
Incidentally, randomness is wondering how the hell he got 512 PAs in 122 games with Cleveland in 1914. Now that I do the math that only extrapolates to 679 PA/162 and is not quite as insane as I thought, but it's still impressive for a hitter of his style rather than those who litter the top of that leaderboard.
/seriously, that long?
[edit] i'd like to see Aaron, Williams and Ruth included for good measure
I was out all day, but belatedly, here are those three along with the others I'd already posted.
Ruth: .334 BA, 44 HR, 138 RBI, 1.137 OPS
Williams: .338 BA, 36 HR, 123 RBI, 1.097 OPS
Aaron: .317 BA, 39 HR, 125 BA, .963 OPS
(from before)
Frank Thomas: .308 BA, 38 HR, 121 RBI, .998 OPS
Stan Musial .332 BA, 25 HR, 105 RBI, .977 OPS
Mel Ott: .305 BA, 30 HR, 102 RBI, .949 OPS
Willie McCovey: .287 BA, 36 HR, 109 RBI, .942 OPS
Dick Allen: .310 BA, 35 HR, 119 RBI, .939 OPS
Eddie Mathews: .289 BA, 38 HR, 109 BA, .939 OPS
Gene Tenace: .277 BA, 25 HR, 84 RBI, .920 OPS (124 walks don't hurt that)
Billy Williams: .298 BA, 29 HR, 102 RBI, .875 OPS
Carl Yastrzemski: .293 BA, 23 HR, 95 RBI, .862 OPS
Home Run Baker: .324 BA, 10 HR**, 115 BA, .844 OPS
**which seems to show a lack of adjustment for dead ball era conditions
-------------
SABR list
While I realize that that list is from 1999, doesn't it still seem to have some really weird choices on it? It seems totally weighted towards older generations of players, and doesn't seem to factor the competition level in at all.
Through its 1999 election the Hal of Merit had chosen (I think) 202 members.
The following people on the SABR list weren't in the Hall of Merit in 1999:
1. Rollie Fingers, Ryne Sandberg, Eddie Murray, Paul Molitor, Wade Boggs, Dennis Eckersley, Mark McGwire, Rickey Henderson, Ozzie Smith, Nolan Ryan, Cal Ripken, Tony Gwynn.
They weren't eligible for the HoM in 1999 but have been elected in the 10 years since then, Most of them didn't have to wait for long, except for Fingers, who spent 11 years on the ballot.
2. Barry Bonds, Ken Griffey, Greg Maddux, Roger Clemens.
Not HoM eligible even now. None of them will have to wait, once their turn comes. (But seriously - what kind of 1999 list ranks Bonds below Griffey??)
- so far that's 16 people out just by retirement timing. That leaves 84 on the SABR list to compare to our 202. That brings up the rest of the list on non-HoMers on this list:
3. Addie Joss, Kirby Puckett, Luis Aparicio, Dizzy Dean, Lou Brock, Pie Traynor.
These guys? Not in the top 200 as far as we're concerned.
I could pick out a few more who are in the HoM but pretty clearly not in our top 100, just by our voting patterns.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main