User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.4952 seconds
46 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Saturday, September 15, 2007NL Central ‘Race’ - September 15, 2007Those wacky keepers of the NL Central Leader Rules played it conservatively for once today - things turned out much like they appeared they would this morning: a doubleheader ends in a split (Cubs/Cards), and Kirk Saarloos and the Reds lose to the Brewers. Brewers (75-72) are one game back of the Cubs (77-72), and tied in the loss column.
|
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Joe Torre on "Castle" (17 - 10:14pm, Feb 09) Last: B.G. Gamesh Reeks of Anti-Yankee Bias (w/Zombies) Newsblog: Cashman: No new pacts for big three (14 - 10:01pm, Feb 09) Last: Kyle C welcomes back our OBP Savior Newsblog: Hardball Talk: Gleeman: Lenny Dykstra is back with some more can't miss investment advice (123 - 9:45pm, Feb 09) Last: Gold Star for Robothal Newsblog: Kansas City Kansan: Sloan: It's time to trade Greinke, Soria (57 - 9:41pm, Feb 09) Last: Gaelan Newsblog: Borzi: Upbeat Twins owner Jim Pohlad has lots to say but stays mum on the Mauer issue
(17 - 8:39pm, Feb 09) Last: J. Roberts |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.4952 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Cubs (Marquis) at Cards (Mulder)
Reds (Belisle) at Brewers (Villanueva)
SEASON:
CHC 77-72
MIL 75-72 (1 GB)
STL 70-77 (6 GB)
SEPTEMBER:
MIL 8-5
CHC 9-7
STL 5-11
PRINCE FIELDER'S SEPTEMBER SURGE FOR MVP:
.422/.509/.911
45 AB: 7 HR, 12 RBI, 8 BB, 1 SO
(.292/.389/.623, 46 HR, 109 RBI in 2007)
Leave the Cardinals in until at least tomorrow. If they lose that and drop to 7 back, they're done. If they win, they're probably done but could at least make the Cubs and Brewers sweat.
The Cubs will also have Zambrano and Lilly pitching on three days rest next week.
Between this and Howry and Dempster looking a bit winded earlier this week (although Dempster looked fine this afternoon), I worry that Lou's boys are going to run out of gas at the end. Then again, the way this race is going I wouldn't be at all surprised to see both the Cubs and Brewers lose out for the last week of the season.
Today went better than I feared. Given the way the NL Central 'race' (good use of quotes there, NTN) has gone, I fully expected the Cubs to get swept and the Brewers to climb back into a tie for the lead.
Primey!
MVP!
I hadn't even realized that he's not warming the Yankee bench.
I heard that Bud decreed that the winner get first dibs on the rolls in the postgame spreads when they play each other in 2008. So there's that.
This time it counts!
I know what Yost is thinking. He's thinking that Ben had "two months off" so he must be rested. Well, since Ben had no rehab stints coming back I still don't think Ben's arm is in game shape. He's velocity is ok but his location is awful. His walk rate is up, and Sheets is getting way too much of the strike zone when he does throw a strike.
And what the h*ll is the difference between 50 and 60 pitches? Honest question. Ten pitches and the guy hasn't been overextended?
Bah, what Yost is REALLY trying to do is get Ben two starts on the road trip thinking that gives the team a better shot. Though actually I doubt Yost can think that deeply. He's probably trying to have Ben avoid Oswalt who is due to pitch Wednesday and thereby improve Ben's chances of winning. Who knows with that guy.
It's a shame they couldn't've mustered any kind of offense the last 7 innings, because they got great work out of the garbageman portion of the bullpen.
I suppose I should take it as a positive that they lost by a run despite crapping the bed. And I should probably also settle down, since the Cubs really aren't in a bad position at all. They just need to take care of business over the next 13 games.
I believe that his ratio of outs recorded to runs allowed will be greater than 1.0-to-1 but equal to or less than 1.5-to-1.
Soriano now has the worst OBP in the lineup and the most HR. His .279 OBP since the All-Star break is roughly 70 points below the park-adjusted league average. Good thing he hits leadoff!
Couldn't Lou or someone tell him that the team needs his HR power in the middle of the lineup? That sounds much more favorable than saying that he's hurting the team with his horrible OBP at the top. Does anyone in the organization realize that his batting leadoff is killing his value?
I just realized that the Red Sox picked up Royce Clayton. Of course, I'm always a little shocked to remember that Royce Clayton is still in the league. Kind of sad that he's the last remaining starter from the 1996 Cardinals.
He's homered almost as often as he's walked. He's doubled more than he's walked. On pace for roughly 30 walks.
He's stolen bases with good success, but he's attempted steals less often than he's walked.
Could it be more obvious that he oughta be deployed further back in the lineup???
Gotta love them Cubs (from my perspective as a Cards fan).
The NL average for leadoff OBP is .341, Soriano is at .327. SLG is at .425, he is at .526. The average NL leadoff hitter has 81 runs and 48.5 RBI if we match Soriano's PA. Soriano has 87 runs and 58 RBI. Soriano isn't costing the Cubs runs by batting leadoff. Sure if he had a .327 OBP with a .340 SLG you can make that case. But because Soriano is hitting homers he is negating the low OBP. Sure you would love him to have a .350 OBP to go along with a .526 SLG and when he is healthy maybe we'll see another .340 to .350ish OBP.
Almost exclusively. He's got 40 PAs not at leadoff and 1 of them was as a pinch-hitter. He's led off in 113 of the 122 games he's started.
The argument espoused by the Cubs (I've heard Brenly use it - although I'm not sure he completely buys it, I get the sense he's just saying that's the excuse) is that Soriano is most comfortable leading off. For his career, his OPS is .883 (tOPS+ of 110)when he bats leadoff and .904 leading off an inning (tOPS+ of 115) vs. .838 overall. He also has an OPS of .860 w/ the bases empty (tOPS+ of 105) v. .800 w/ men on base (tOPS+ of 92).
I have no idea if any of those splits are real or if they're just sample-size issues, but they are consistent with the idea that Soriano's a better hitter when he's batting leadoff.
Oh and who would play the #1 spot for the Cubs. Theriot? DeRosa?
Realistically, it'd be Theriot and his OBP is a whopping .003 better than Soriano (.330 to .327) going into today.
Yes, they have six starters and they're starting a guy on three days rest--their most volatile, but best guy, who might be injured, who they just signed to a long-term contract.
He can't play second at ML quality. I see them dealing him to Atlanta (he's from the area) for a minor-league pitcher or backup infielder.
Soriano is actually a fairly ideal #3 hitter. It's a misconception to put your best overall hitter third, as he will much more frequently bat with none on and 2 out than any other player in the order. Walks have very little value in that situation, so a mediocre OBP power hitter is a good fit.
In contrast, OBP is tremendously more important in the leadoff spot than in any other lineup position. Leadoff hitters bat with none on and none out about 41% of the time, when merely reaching first base has a very high run expectancy. Here is a list of Cubs regulars with a 360+ OBP: Lee, Ramirez, Floyd, DeRosa, Kendall. Any of them would be better than Soriano at the top of the order. I wouldn't expect the Cubs to put Lee or Ramirez there, but a lineup with one of those last 3 followed by Lee, Soriano, and Ramirez would project to score quite a few more runs over the course of the season than the current batting order.
There's another variable at work there, though, because most of Soriano's non-leadoff time came in Texas -- and for whatever reason, he just didn't hit very well those two years in Texas.
At the risk of reading too much into those splits I quoted, might the "whatever reason" be that he wasn't batting leadoff? What I find interesting about those splits is that they all seem to tell the story that Soriano hits better with the bases empty. If that's true, then leadoff probably is the best position for him - he's a good enough hitter that he's the kind of guy you want to have get as many plate appearances as possible, he's fast, and leadoff will generate the highest proportion of at-bats with nobody on base.
Of course it might -- it's just that another variable aligns almost exactly with the one you pointed out. Might equally well have been two years with nagging injuries or bad attitude or heat prostration :)
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main