Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Friday, May 09, 2008

N.Y. Sun: Marchman: Where Have All the Bad GMs Gone?

When will they ever learn? When will they ever learn?...Although Marchman does pick out a king stoned trio.

To cast the problem another way, try to name a terrible GM in baseball other than Sabean. There are, to be sure, uninspired executives. Toronto’s J.P. Ricciardi, Houston’s Ed Wade, and Seattle’s Bill Bavasi, for instance, all frequently make laughable moves. They trade valuable prospects for expensive veterans even though they have little chance of winning, sign free agents for too much money, release strong hitters for no reason, and so on. But none among them are so bad that you almost feel sorry for them. They’re merely unimaginative, and predisposed to take the safe bet. None are truly easy prey for shrewd operators in the Veeck tradition. None are inclined to do something such as signing a backup shortstop to a four-year contract, or making a washed-up Mo Vaughn their starting first baseman.

This depressing paucity of genuine, flagrant ineptitude likely has something to do with the alarming outbreak of parity in the league. Epstein, Byrnes, Oakland’s Billy Beane, and their peers may be sharp as all get-out, as truly an improvement on their predecessors as Utley and Fukudome are on theirs. But without true nitwits upon whom they can practice their dark arts, there’s no way for them to display the full range of their talents. Forty years ago, a canny executive could run a team near the top of the league just by getting a rival near an open bottle of whiskey. Today, he has to work for it. There’s always the hope of tomorrow, at least: Sooner or later some GM will be fired, and one can presume that Steve Phillips would not turn down a job if one was offered to him.

Repoz Posted: May 09, 2008 at 11:12 AM | 64 comment(s)
  Related News: General

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages
   1. J. Sosa Posted: May 09, 2008 at 11:52 AM (#2774618)
I enjoyed the article.

One minor quibble though. The line about four year deals for a backup shortstop brought to mind the alleged wife beater in Boston. That's likely to end up being as ugly or worse than the Meares contract.
   2. kevin Posted: May 09, 2008 at 11:55 AM (#2774620)
But without true nitwits upon whom they can practice their dark arts, there’s no way for them to display the full range of their talents.


Hehe. That's a great line, Tim. Kudos, my man.
   3. The Good Face Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:02 PM (#2774628)
Jon Daniels is still kicking!

That's probably a little unfair to the guy, but until/unless some of the talent he picked up in last year's fire sale pans out, his record is awfully shaky right about now. I still think the Adam Eaton fiasco was the worst trade in MLB since Jeff Bagwell.
   4. kevin Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:05 PM (#2774633)
Forty years ago, a canny executive could run a team near the top of the league just by getting a rival near an open bottle of whiskey.


This is a good one, too. Marchman's on a roll.

He's right, though. I think of some of the deals that Haywood Sullivan used to execute. I was only in my early twenties at the time and I knew I could kick his ass at the poker table. So you can imagine how the other execs would ejaculate all over the Rolodex when the secretary would call in: "Mr. Sullivan from Boston is on line 1, sir.".
   5. something clever Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:08 PM (#2774637)
a canny executive could run a team near the top of the league just by getting a rival near an open bottle of whiskey


I think a fantastic change to the winter meetings would involve mandatory drinking games followed by lightning round trade sessions. The draft should probably be held at that point as well. Also, allow the trading of draft picks.
   6. So's my mom! Oh wait...(Met Fan Charlie) Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:09 PM (#2774640)
President of any NL Team, 1956, speaking to his GM: "Call the Giants right now. Horace is drinking..."
   7. Petunia Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:11 PM (#2774641)
I'm really starting to like Ricciardi as my horse in the "worst GM" race. How do you release Reed Johnson and Frank Thomas and then sign Brad Wilkerson because you need someone to hit lefties?

Whatever happened to that "worst GM" poll anyway?
   8. JPWF13 Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:12 PM (#2774643)
President of any NL Team, 1956, speaking to his GM: "Call the Giants right now. Horace is drinking..."


I think Durocher claimed that Horace worked best WRT swindling other teams when Horace was drunk.
   9. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:16 PM (#2774649)
Whatever happened to that "worst GM" poll anyway?


Maybe people decided that, since all GMs make some good and some bad moves (the "sharp" GMs cited in the article being no exception), it's a ridiculous thing to write about?
   10. Ryan Jones Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:18 PM (#2774651)
How do you release Reed Johnson and Frank Thomas and then sign Brad Wilkerson because you need someone to hit lefties?


Well, you start by taking the advice of your medical staff from last year and this year that Reed Johnson's back injury is going to interfere with him being an effective player, and then realizing that if you cut him before opening day you're only responsible for about 20% of his salary, thus saving about $3M.

Then you look at Frank Thomas' vesting option for $10M, and how it seems to take him longer each season to heat up, and how he's currently hitting 0.167, and has no value other than as a hitter. Incidentally, Frank is still slugging less than 0.350 on the season.

Also, Wilkerson will cost the Jays the same amount as Frank Thomas is costing Oakland, so it's not like JP lost money in the deal either.

[To clarify - hitting 0.167 at the time of his release]
   11. bibigon Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:19 PM (#2774654)
I think Bill Bavasi is really not getting enough credit in this article.
   12. jwb Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:31 PM (#2774663)
None are inclined to do something such as signing a backup shortstop to a four-year contract
Right. McDonald only has a two year deal.
   13. Shooty misses Bill King Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:34 PM (#2774666)
I think Bill Bavasi is really not getting enough credit in this article.

A bottle of whiskey is the only thing that explains signing Jose Vidro to an EXTENSION to be your DH. I feel like I'm picking on the M's lately, though I don't mean to. If the A's can't win, I pull for the M's because I like the town and my brother lives up there. It must be maddening rooting for a ball team that is run like the M's.
   14. Ryan Jones Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:34 PM (#2774667)
Right. McDonald only has a two year deal.


Which, at $1.9M a year, given the widely agreed upon value of his defense, is essentially an underpay - even as noted in BP2008.

Now, I don't particularly like the idea of signing backups to two year deals, but it's not like this is a "break the bank" issue.
   15. jmurph Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:40 PM (#2774670)
Ryan Jones- you're a Jays fan, I assume? I think it's interesting that the handful of Jays fans on here seem to defend JP quite a bit, while the rest of us think he's been pretty terrible. It seems like the reverse of the typical situation, where fans of a team are especially hard on their own GM.

(Hope this doesn't sound too judgemental; I actually do think it's interesting.)
   16. MSI Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:45 PM (#2774676)
I've accepted that JP is a bad GM. Old news.

About the topic, I think its because of the internet. You basically have a higher amount of discourse, access to research and amount of information, that it's hard for stupid GM's to be in the dark, not catch on quickly, or not learn from their mistakes.
   17. Ryan Jones Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:47 PM (#2774678)
I am a Jays fan, but I'm not an undying supporter of J.P. Rather, it just seems to me that it's a matter of things having shifted too far from the early days, where everyone here was convinced that J.P. was going to be part of the great sabermetric revolution, to now, where any move that he makes is criticized as a matter of reflex - people were too kind to him then and too critical of him now.
   18. Answer Guy Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:48 PM (#2774679)
The line about four year deals for a backup shortstop brought to mind the alleged wife beater in Boston.


I just looked it up. 4 years, $36 million. Ouch. That looks like a contract that is going to have to be written off before long.
   19. rfloh Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:49 PM (#2774681)
A bottle of whiskey is the only thing that explains signing Jose Vidro to an EXTENSION to be your DH. I feel like I'm picking on the M's lately, though I don't mean to.


Not really an extension; a vesting option.
   20. Shooty misses Bill King Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:51 PM (#2774684)
Not really an extension; a vesting option.

Good point. He must have been drinking the cheap stuff then.
   21. North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan Posted: May 09, 2008 at 12:56 PM (#2774692)
Yay! My team is number one! At having a shite GM. Great. FU Sabean.
   22. zenbitz Posted: May 09, 2008 at 01:01 PM (#2774694)
that it's hard for stupid GM's to be in the dark, not catch on quickly, or not learn from their mistakes.


That's why the Legendary Brian Sabean doesn't use a computer!
   23. Jimmy P Posted: May 09, 2008 at 01:24 PM (#2774716)
I just looked it up. 4 years, $36 million. Ouch. That looks like a contract that is going to have to be written off before long.

Yes, because we know how the Boston Red Sox are struggling for cash.
   24. smokhaus Posted: May 09, 2008 at 01:59 PM (#2774752)
As a Giants fan, I assumed the backup shortstop comment referred to Vizquel.
   25. The Piano Has Been Drinking (Not Esoteric) Posted: May 09, 2008 at 02:12 PM (#2774770)
A bottle of whiskey is the only thing that explains signing Jose Vidro to an EXTENSION to be your DH. I feel like I'm picking on the M's lately, though I don't mean to. If the A's can't win, I pull for the M's because I like the town and my brother lives up there. It must be maddening rooting for a ball team that is run like the M's.


It's a vesting option, actually. But if you want to really pick on Bavasi (and I agree that he and Sabean slug it out for the worst executive, what with Littlefield gone) look no further than the three year extension the M's just gave to Kenji Johjima. And then look to his batting line.
   26. J. Sosa Posted: May 09, 2008 at 02:13 PM (#2774771)
re: #24

I agree, I think he was referring to Omar as well, given the context of Sabean=bad. I just thought the Theo=good GM part looks odd given the line about a four year deal for a backup shortstop.
   27. Toolsy McClutch Posted: May 09, 2008 at 02:22 PM (#2774787)
I'm the JP apologist, MSI is the one who slaughters him for every move.
   28. PreservedFish Posted: May 09, 2008 at 02:23 PM (#2774788)
I thought the reference was to Pat Meares, one of the famously bad contracts from back in the day when Beane was the only "enlightened" GM and the land was trod by the likes of Cam Bonifay, Syd Thrift, Chuck LaMar, etc.
   29. Shooty misses Bill King Posted: May 09, 2008 at 02:29 PM (#2774800)
It's a vesting option, actually. But if you want to really pick on Bavasi (and I agree that he and Sabean slug it out for the worst executive, what with Littlefield gone) look no further than the three year extension the M's just gave to Kenji Johjima. And then look to his batting line.

Yep. I didn't understand the Johjima extension at all. He'd been good, but not that good and there wasn't much risk of just letting him play out the season and having him become a free agent. I mean, there WAS risk that he'd put up a Posada-like year and then you'd have to fight off half the league for him, but, considering his age and previous performance, the risk of that was less than inking him to the 3 year extension. Do baseball teams have risk management departments? Maybe they freakin should.
   30. Rich Rifkin Posted: May 09, 2008 at 03:38 PM (#2774883)
"They trade valuable prospects for expensive veterans even though they have little chance of winning, sign free agents for too much money, release strong hitters for no reason, and so on. But none among them are so bad that you almost feel sorry for them."

Dave Dombrowski of the Tigers is not a dumb GM. In fact, he may be the best GM in all of baseball. Yet he did just what Marchman describes when he dealt Jair Jurrjens and Gorkys Hernandez for Edgar Renteria.

What the hell did the Tigers need Renteria for? Seems to me, they sure could have used Jurrjens in their rotation. At this point in the season, if you were Jim Leyland, who would you rather have in your rotation:

Jurrjens or Kenny Rogers? Jurrjens or Nate Robertson?
   31. Charter Member of the Jesus Melendez Fanclub Posted: May 09, 2008 at 03:52 PM (#2774896)
The Tigers have little chance of winning? Huh.
   32. PreservedFish Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:00 PM (#2774906)
Right. #30 missed the important part of that sentence. And you knew you missed it too, because you didn't extend the underlining.
   33. Answer Guy Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:18 PM (#2774923)
Sabean gave Vizquel, at his age, 4 years?

Wow, that might be worse than Lugo, though I am sure it was significantly cheaper.
   34. The Jerry Royster Experience Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:20 PM (#2774924)
What the hell did the Tigers need Renteria for?

I thought that Carlos Guillen was no longer an option at shortstop?
   35. The Jerry Royster Experience Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:22 PM (#2774928)
Sabean gave Vizquel, at his age, 4 years?

It's worse than that, actually.

They gave him a three-year deal, then said after the 2007 season, "give me one more year of that, Omar!"
   36. Excel Hearts Choi Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:23 PM (#2774931)
but until/unless some of the talent he picked up in last year's fire sale pans out, his record is awfully shaky right about now.


David Murphy 2007: .343 .384 .552
David Murphy 2008: .265 .327 .462

Obviously the 2007 numbers were a bit high. Murphy may not be the end all be all of COF, but he is serviceable with the bat, and pretty good with the glove (depending on where he plays). Milton Bradley is off to a great start (.306 .405 .495). Some of his moves are paying off, but you are right. The players from the Teixeira trade need to live up to the start potential they are receiving. There is a lot to get excited about in the Rangers' minor league system (Max Ramirez who only cost Kenny Lofton), let's just see if they can produce in the majors.
   37. Petunia Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:23 PM (#2774933)
What the hell did the Tigers need Renteria for?


Um, to play shortstop?
   38. PreservedFish Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:27 PM (#2774938)
Vizquel was a solid starting shortstop for the first two years of that deal. An OBP heavy 720 OPS, good defense, $4 million per year ... that contract may have been wacky but it shouldn't enter the discussion about an article that celebrates the glory years of Bonifay and friends.
   39. The Jerry Royster Experience Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:30 PM (#2774941)
Vizquel was a solid starting shortstop for the first two years of that deal. An OBP heavy 720 OPS, good defense, $4 million per year ...

Interestingly, Ken Williams was on the verge of signing Omar Vizquel to a two-year deal on those terms when Brian Sabean jumped in and trumped him by adding the third year. That's when Williams bowed out.

Giving Vizquel the extension for '08 was pretty stupid, though.
   40. Gaelan Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:36 PM (#2774947)
I am a Jays fan, but I'm not an undying supporter of J.P. Rather, it just seems to me that it's a matter of things having shifted too far from the early days, where everyone here was convinced that J.P. was going to be part of the great sabermetric revolution, to now, where any move that he makes is criticized as a matter of reflex - people were too kind to him then and too critical of him now.


This is an exact description of the attitude around here. No GM inspires more irrational hate than JP. That being said while I think that JP is a decent to good GM, at some point you have to win. Odds are someone worse will be hired but I'd be willing to take the chance at getting someone with that little piece of magic JP doesn't have.
   41. Ludwig the Indestructible Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:38 PM (#2774948)
The players from the Teixeira trade need to live up to the start potential they are receiving.

Well, Salty has struggled in the majors, but he seems like he will come around. Andrus is doing his usual stuff, but he has the ARL thing.
Harrison has struggled after a strong showing in the Fall League. I am surprised. Figured he would be better when healthy.
But Feliz is already putting up great numbers. And many people thought he could be the potential steal in that trade. still looks so.
   42. PreservedFish Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:39 PM (#2774949)
re: 39

Well, it was a one year extension. It was probably stupid, but as we all know now the Giants didn't have a single shortstop in the organization capable of starting in AA, let alone the majors. Vizquel was garbage last year, and ancient, but he did have a long history of healthy and intelligent play, and was one of the only recognizable faces on a team so bad that it couldn't even market itself as rebuilding. Had the team, say, signed Eckstein to a 2-year deal, it would have been equally useless. The only attractive free agent name on the market was probably Cesar Izturis ... yipee! Which is to say, I think the Omar re-signing, although stupid, was a certain type of justifiable stupid. (Of course, Sabean himself created all of the miserable context that would justify such an uninspired signing)
   43. Wally Frostbackman (Walewander) Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:40 PM (#2774950)
What the hell did the Tigers need Renteria for?

I thought that Carlos Guillen was no longer an option at shortstop?


They were moving Guillen to 1B (he simply cannot be an everyday SS anymore, performance or health wise), so they needed an SS. I woulda held the prospects and gotten a FA, but they didn't know they were getting Cabrera and wanted to upgrade the O. Unfortunate but understandable.
   44. Vance W Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:57 PM (#2774967)
David Murphy 2007: .343 .384 .552
David Murphy 2008: .265 .327 .462

Obviously the 2007 numbers were a bit high. Murphy may not be the end all be all of COF, but he is serviceable with the bat, and pretty good with the glove (depending on where he plays). Milton Bradley is off to a great start (.306 .405 .495). Some of his moves are paying off, but you are right. The players from the Teixeira trade need to live up to the start potential they are receiving. There is a lot to get excited about in the Rangers' minor league system (Max Ramirez who only cost Kenny Lofton), let's just see if they can produce in the majors.


Not to mention that the Rangers also got Kason Gabbard who looks like a serviceable back of the rotation guy and Engel Beltre, a decent prospect, all for a rental of Eric Gagne. The Eaton deal was off-the-charts awful but Daniels has at least a mixed record and there's no indication that takes a congenitally bad approach to deals. Certainly Hamilton for Volquez looks like the proverbial "good deal for both teams." The recent drafts have also looked good.
   45. John Peterson Posted: May 09, 2008 at 04:58 PM (#2774969)
I think Ned Colletti should have his place in this discussion. To his credit, he didn't trade away Billingsley, Kershaw, Loney, Kemp, Ethier or Laroche in the offseason.

But trading Wilson Betemit for Scott Proctor, ugh. Signing Juan Pierre to that silly contact, ugh. Acquiring guys like Shea Hillennbrand, Nomar Garciaparra and Luis Gonzalez and using them over more qualified and younger players, ugh. Ugh.
   46. North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan Posted: May 09, 2008 at 05:02 PM (#2774972)
Which is to say, I think the Omar re-signing, although stupid, was a certain type of justifiable stupid. (Of course, Sabean himself created all of the miserable context that would justify such an uninspired signing)


That's exactly it, and that's the Sabean years in a nutshell. If Sabean had been fired, a new GM could have come in, signed Vizquel for another year, and simply thrown his hands up and said "WTF was I supposed to do?"

Sabean, on the other hand, has been asleep at the wheel so long that he did nothing to prevent the disaster. Signing Vizquel was probably an improvement - Sabean probably considered giving Izturis a 4-year deal or reanimating the corpse of Neifi! and giving Zombie Neifi a 2-year, $7m deal.
   47. Ludwig the Indestructible Posted: May 09, 2008 at 05:08 PM (#2774975)
And its not like Sabean hasn't had a chance to improve the roster. Gotay was put on waivers. Dan Johnson was put on waivers. Ben Broussard now.
I don't know what he is waiting for
   48. The Good Face Posted: May 09, 2008 at 05:08 PM (#2774977)
Obviously the 2007 numbers were a bit high. Murphy may not be the end all be all of COF, but he is serviceable with the bat, and pretty good with the glove (depending on where he plays). Milton Bradley is off to a great start (.306 .405 .495). Some of his moves are paying off, but you are right. The players from the Teixeira trade need to live up to the start potential they are receiving. There is a lot to get excited about in the Rangers' minor league system (Max Ramirez who only cost Kenny Lofton), let's just see if they can produce in the majors.


Yeah, the jury is still out for Daniels, but I'm not sure he'll last long enough to see those young guys blossom. I also like the Hamilton trade, despite Volquez doing a Cy Young impression for the Reds. Hamilton's performance has been outstanding, and between the scouting reports, last year, and this year, it's not crazy to think that his true talent level really may be a 140 OPS+ hitter.
   49. Bob Dernier Ressort Posted: May 09, 2008 at 05:11 PM (#2774980)
Yes, Daniels's record on acquisitions is far from uniformly awful. He seems to have contracted the same ailment as most other Ranger GMs: having almost no idea what to do with the starting rotation. Picking baseball cards out of a hat might have been more effective. But he has been pretty clever so far at taking chances on occasional FA position players (Catalanotto, Bradley, Byrd) and at not over-rewarding such players once they've had a good year or two for him (Little Sarge).
   50. SoSHially Unacceptable Posted: May 09, 2008 at 05:13 PM (#2774981)
I asked davey, why hire tracy, allard went and got a neifi,

jimmy gave a kazmir for z,

billy screamed and then he asked me,

"where have all the bad GMs gone?"
   51. The Good Face Posted: May 09, 2008 at 05:17 PM (#2774984)
He seems to have contracted the same ailment as most other Ranger GMs: having almost no idea what to do with the starting rotation. Picking baseball cards out of a hat might have been more effective.


Well, I do recall Texas developing a pretty good starting pitcher a few years back... tall fellow, name started with a Y...

Sigh.
   52. Roberto Petagine Posted: May 09, 2008 at 05:18 PM (#2774985)
Is it me, or that Brian Sabean guy looks like George Lucas.

Maybe they need to exchange who jobs. Maybe Sabean can make a decent Star Wars movie, and Lucas can make one decent trade.
   53. AJM Posted: May 09, 2008 at 05:32 PM (#2774996)
Sooner or later some GM will be fired, and one can presume that Steve Phillips would not turn down a job if one was offered to him.

I'm hoping for a NL East team he hasn't already GM'd for.
   54. Rich Rifkin Posted: May 09, 2008 at 06:04 PM (#2775035)
MARCHMAN: "They trade valuable prospects for expensive veterans even though they have little chance of winning..."

CHARTER: "The Tigers have little chance of winning? Huh."

I'm not sure how much their chance of winning at the time of this trade mattered, being that Detroit, in my opinion, has less of a chance of winning by giving up a needed starting pitcher for a shortstop.

It would have made far more sense, given the strength of their offense and weakness of their rotation, to have acquired a free agent shortstop much cheaper than Edgar Renteria and held on to Jurrjens. I'm not exactly sure who that free agent should have been, but I imagine that some of you have ideas.
   55. The Jerry Royster Experience Posted: May 09, 2008 at 06:43 PM (#2775062)
I'm not exactly sure who that free agent should have been, but I imagine that some of you have ideas.

To be fair, there was crap on the free agent market at that point. David Eckstein and Cesar Izturis were probably the best options at the time.

Now, if Dombrowski had been a little bit patient, he could have picked up Adam Everett for peanuts, but he had no way of knowing that at the time.
   56. North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan Posted: May 09, 2008 at 06:56 PM (#2775068)
To be fair, there was crap on the free agent market at that point. David Eckstein and Cesar Izturis were probably the best options at the time.


There was a fair bit of Jack Wilson trade talk, but I don't know whether that was mere rumor or if they were close...
   57. Rich Rifkin Posted: May 09, 2008 at 07:40 PM (#2775095)
"To be fair, there was crap on the free agent market at that point. David Eckstein and Cesar Izturis were probably the best options at the time."

I'm probably overstating my point, but I figured Detroit could have done fine with crap at shortstop, if they upgraded their rotation. As it was, by getting rid of Jurrjens, who I understood really was/is a talented pitcher (despite TINSTAAPP), they hurt their pitching, one thing they couldn't afford to do.

And speaking of crap, the A's were shopping Marco Scutaro (career OPS+ 86*), who could have handled the job, with Carlos Guillen filling in now and then. Guillen, after all, played 132 games at shortstop in 2007 for the Tigers.

* Eckstein has a career OPS+ of 88 by comparison. IOW, both are crap offensively.
   58. Ryan Jones Posted: May 09, 2008 at 10:23 PM (#2775447)
Eckstein has a career OPS+ of 88 by comparison. IOW, both are crap offensively.


As a question, what is the average OPS+ for a starting shortstop in modern baseball?
   59. kevin Posted: May 09, 2008 at 11:54 PM (#2775712)
Is it me, or that Brian Sabean guy looks like George Lucas.


He looks like Brian DePalma to me.

When Depalma still had hair.
   60. Carmona My House (Crispix Attacks) Posted: May 10, 2008 at 12:36 AM (#2775742)
He seems to have contracted the same ailment as most other Ranger GMs: having almost no idea what to do with the starting rotation. Picking baseball cards out of a hat might have been more effective.

Yeah, really. I think the last time I could name more than two Rangers starters was when they had John Burkett, Kenny Rogers and Rick Helling, or some combination like that.

BTW, the Rangers have been a lot less awful in the last 5 years than I had thought. All 4 of their seasons since trading ARod, they've won more games than in any of the 3 seasons with ARod.
   61. jwb Posted: May 10, 2008 at 04:34 AM (#2775772)
As a question, what is the average OPS+ for a starting shortstop in modern baseball?
From 1988-2007, it's 87.1. Not weighted by PAs.
   62. Work fast, throw strikes, change speeds Posted: May 10, 2008 at 05:18 AM (#2775777)
#50: I remember that one! Ted Leo Cardenas, wasn't it?
   63. Ryan Jones Posted: May 10, 2008 at 09:19 AM (#2775805)
From 1988-2007, it's 87.1. Not weighted by PAs.


So Eckstein has actually been a slightly above average offensive shortstop (before considering that OPS undervalues players with high OBP, blah, blah blah...). Interesting.
   64. SoSHially Unacceptable Posted: May 10, 2008 at 10:04 AM (#2775832)
#50: I remember that one! Ted Leo Cardenas, wasn't it?


Yup, on Hearts of Oakland.
Page 1 of 1 pages

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

My Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Vivid Seats is a sports ticket broker, concert ticket broker and theater ticket broker offering the best baseball tickets like Yankees tickets, Cubs tickets, and Red Sox tickets, as well as Police reunion tour tickets and Jersey Boys tickets.

Ticket Nest sells Braves, Cubs, Padres, Indians, Marlins, Nuts, Pirates, Rangers, Patriots, Royals, Stars, Tides, Tigers, Twins, Phillies, Wings, Mets, Yankees, Angels, Dodgers tickets, and Dragons tickets.

Live the Experience when you buy Yankees Tickets, Red Sox Tickets, Rockies Tickets, Cleveland Indian Tickets, Padres Tickets, all MLB Tickets, NFL Tickets, Wicked Tickets at Tickets3D.com

Tickets Made Simple when you buy Yankees Tickets, Red Sox Tickets, Rockies Tickets, Cleveland Indian Tickets, Mariners Tickets, MLB Tickets, Seahawks Tickets, and all at Seattletixx.com

Buy Cheap MLB Tickets

Concerts Theatre NFL Angels Dodgers MLB Celtics Theater NBA Tickets Venues NHL Lakers Tickets NFL Yankees NHL Phillies NBA Wicked Marlins MLB Concerts Cubs Mets Red Sox Wicked WWE Red Sox Mets Yankees Dodgers

Page rendered in 1.1367 seconds
81 querie(s) executed