User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.8064 seconds
81 querie(s) executed
|
| |||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Thursday, November 15, 2007NYTimes: Kepner: Yankees May Pay Rodriguez for Home Run Record (RR)
Maybe they’ll sport him the Hope Diamond for his first World Series ring. Jolly Old St. Nick (now, with Screen Name history)
Posted: November 15, 2007 at 06:22 PM | 40 comment(s)
Related News: General |
My BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: tampabay.com: Tampa Bay Rays minor-league affiliate's Ladies Night promotion causing a stir (25 - 5:04pm, Jul 05) Last: Jeff K. Newsblog: L.A. Times: Game (not) over for Gagne (3 - 5:04pm, Jul 05) Last: Esoteric can feel Strasburg slowly slipping away Newsblog: Madden: Omar Minaya's Mets have issues with injuries and inside the clubhouse (7 - 5:04pm, Jul 05) Last: Mike Emeigh Newsblog: washingtonpost.com: The Jerk Who Saved Baseball (9 - 5:03pm, Jul 05) Last: SoSHially Unacceptable Newsblog: Steve Kettman: A review of the unmaking of 'Moneyball: The Movie' (15 - 4:59pm, Jul 05) Last: Esoteric can feel Strasburg slowly slipping away Newsblog: Cincinnati Enquirer/Fay: Please don't mortgage future
(6 - 4:47pm, Jul 05) Last: greenback345397SM6 |
||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2008 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.8064 seconds | |||||||
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I guess this would be a concern with any statistical incentive, but this record is so far away, so hard to reach even if the rest of A-Rod's career is otherwise great, and has so much money attached to it (you obviously don't normally see $25M "incentives")... it seems like a special concern with respect to this one. I dunno.
Anyway, yes, these are prohibited by something - the CBA, I believe. I think the union will agree to make an exception for this one. Can you imagine? "Alex, we at the union have decided that letting the Yankees offer you a $300 million bonus would endanger other players' negotiations."
I am going to get my ARod jersey now.
Hilaripus.
Alex asked exactly that question through the bankers. The Yankees assured him that it was indeed very regal, and that his throne was being erected in the dugout.
I don't understand this middlemen/intermediaries ########.
AFAICT the Yankees are following on a wedge driven into Rule 3(b)(5) by the contract signed by Curt Schilling in 2003. Schilling had an extra season (2007, in fact) vest if the Red Sox won the 2004 World Series, and an extra $2M in that case, too. This was a blatant violation of 3(b)(5) but after the Sox won the Series MLB blinked and allowed the contract to proceed anyway. Bloody Sock and all, I guess.
Now the other half of 3(b)(5) will be eroded. The DA is exactly right in #6; the whole point of disallowing incentive clauses based on performance in the first place is that it has unintended consequences. It may seem fine to award someone money for hitting more homers, but if they start ignoring bunt or take signs because their financial interest lies in defying their manager, there's a problem. But I imagine that the Yankees and AROD will get their way.
Of course, it should have been nixed as soon as the contract agreed to, long before there was any bloody sock. But who cares about the actual rules, everybody is making gobs of money! It's been a long time since MLB has seemed to care much about anything that it didn't absolutely have to care about.
Evidently in a recent AROD thread the waggish Primate NJASDJDH started asking if various contract options were legal and then discovered he could ask on BTF if almost anything was legal and 10 or 12 lawyers would opine. But now it has gotten to the point where you can't ask a serious question about whether something is legal. Kind of like when Admiral Ackbar saw everything as a trap and people would wander into trap after trap because they thought he wasn't serious :)
waggish?
Gah. It took my wife and my brother-in-law a dozen phone calls this morning to figure out where, how, when, and with whom we were going to buy my in-laws a couple of Lay-Z-Boys for Christmas.
Does the "championship season" include the post-season? I don't have a copy of the CBA handy, but a former local NFL coach used the term "championship season" to refer to the regular season.
"During the term of this Agreement, each Club shall be scheduled to play 162 games during each championship season. Achampionship season will not be scheduled over a period of less than 178 days or more than 183 days. If, however, any Club’s championship season is scheduled to open with a game played outside of the United States and Canada, and the scheduling of such a game causes the championship season for those Clubs to be scheduled over a period of more than 183 days (an “International Opener”), then the championship season for all other Clubs shall commence on the date of the first regularly scheduled championship season game within the 183 days preceding the regularly scheduled end of the championship season. (See Article VI(C) and Article XV(J)(6), below.) Following completion of each championship season, eight Clubs shall engage in best of five (seven if the Division Series is expanded) Division Series."
It was the first "Yankees say Boras isn't allowed in the room" thread. There were a lot of serious "is this legal?" questions, to the point where people started asking that to mock the repeats. Then people kept taking every question seriously and lots of innocent fun was had.
Are they going to give him any bonuses if he has a big hit in the post season? That should pay off like O J Simpson's reward for finding his ex-wife's murderer.
Of course, the question needs to be asked if that's even legal?
The record is 762.
No matter how much the nations scribes try to say it isn't and demonize Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez is a baseball player, a competitor, who when he steps on that field, knows he needs 763. You can bet on it.
Of course, by the time Alex gets close, I whole heartedly expect the media and therefore public perception, to be so anti Alex, that they will probably boo him when he hits it.
I gotta tell ya.
Just a quick perception from my stay at BTF, I am not sure half the people who post here enjoy baseball.
They may understand the game, and for some sick reason they watch. But I don't think they enjoy it.
The thing is, I'm not so sure Rodriguez can do it, playing half his games in Yankee Stadium. When he has a great year, like 2004 and 2007, he hits 50, 55 home runs. When he doesn't, he only hits 35 or so. 35's a great total, but he needs to keep hitting 40+, preferably 45+ for a few more years to get all the way to 762. Yankee Stadium is a hard place for a right-handed hitter to hit home runs, and it's also a place that, when Rodriguez' power begins to decline, is going to really exacerbate the problem.
Knowing he'll be a Yankee the rest of his career, I would bet against Rodriguez breaking Bonds' record. Albert Pujols, the world's eyes are upon you.
They may understand the game, and for some sick reason they watch. But I don't think they enjoy it.
Let's see:
A sweeping generalization about a diverse group of people you know next to nothing about concerning their state of mind which is unknowable to you.
Welcome to the internet, son, you'll like it here!
He will mostly play in the new stadium.
Just a quick perception from my stay at BTF, I am not sure half the people who post here enjoy baseball.
Based on many of your recent posts, I'm sort of wondering which half you're in.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main