User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.5456 seconds
40 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
RIP, Hal Woodeshick.
A quibble with TFA:
No, he was never considered "Houston's first real closer" by anyone. No pitcher appearing in 55 games and logging 10 saves (along with 11 wins and 9 losses), in 114 innings, no less, is being worked as a "closer." Neither the term nor the usage pattern had been invented in 1963; neither would appear until the late 1980s.
This is, of course, a pet peeve of mine. But to call Hal Woodeshick a "closer" is to drain the term of any useful meaning. Woodeshick wasn't a closer, he was an ace reliever, or, if you prefer, a fireman.
Moreover: not only wasn't Woodeshick "Houston's first real closer," he wasn't even their first ace reliever/fireman, as Don McMahon had put together a brilliant season for them in that role in 1962, presenting a 245 ERA+ in 51 games (40 games finished) in 77 innings.
/dorky rant
It was distinctive, that's for sure. How many other pro sports franchises use not just a firearm, but a particular make and model of a firearm as their nickname?
OTOH, "Colt .45s" is a mouthful, and almost no one at the time ever spoke it fully (just as no one today, other than those who are paid to do so, ever says "Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim"); everybody, including headline writers, just shortened it to "Colts." Which meant that many casual fans thought the team's nickname referred to juvenile horses, not sixguns.
True, he was far more similar to a closer that year. But still: he was at 1.28 IP per appearance, compared to the modern closer who's at around 1.05, and 23 saves is about half of what typically leads the league today.
Never would have made it...by the late 60's Peggy Charren and her Action for Children's Television groupies were all over the place and would have eventually put a stop to such violent thoughts for us kiddies!
Hey...for some reason they helped dump a sensitive show like The Super 6!
23 saves out of only 66 wins, and Houston only had 31 saves as a team.
Well, yes. And neither of these figures are typical of closers or teams in the modern era.
Winning those 66 games, the Colts threw 30 complete games, last in the NL that year, but a number that dwarves every modern staff. It was just a way different era, and to try a call Woodeshick a closer is to vastly misrepresent how different it was.
Which when I was in high school we called "skunk," and if you've ever taken a whiff, you know why.
Three reasons:
1) As mentioned earlier, no one other than PR flacks ever actually said it properly
2) I believe they were getting some trademark-infringement heat from the firearms company
3) Moving into the dome in 1965, Judge Hofheinz was looking to re-brand with a image more Space Age than Old West
Houston Rayguns would have been fine.
Ah, Nat Boheme. 50 cents a quart during my college years, cheapest in town.
Black Label
His brother was a respected leader at the Presbyterian Church I used to go to.
...that is all.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main