Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Pettitte told Congress Clemens admitted to using human growth hormone

Roger Clemens told Yankees teammate Andy Pettitte nearly 10 years ago that he used human growth hormone, Pettitte said in a sworn affidavit to Congress, the Associated Press learned Tuesday.

Pettitte disclosed the conversation to the congressional committee holding Wednesday’s hearings on drug use in baseball, a person familiar with the affidavit said. The person spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity because the document had not been made public.

According to the person familiar with the affidavit, who said it was signed Friday night, Pettitte also said Clemens backtracked when the subject of HGH came up again in conversation in 2005, before the same House committee held the first hearing on steroids in baseball.

Pettitte said in the affidavit that he asked Clemens in 2005 what he would do if asked by the media about HGH, given his admission years earlier. According to the account told to the AP, the affidavit said Clemens responded by saying Pettitte misunderstood the previous exchange in 1999 or 2000 and that, in fact, Clemens had been talking about HGH use by his wife in the original conversation.

Thanks to Howie Menckel for pointing this out…

Repoz Posted: February 13, 2008 at 02:09 PM | 983 comment(s) | Login to Bookmark
  Related News: GeneralSpecial TopicsSteroidsNY Yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 3 of 9 pages  < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >  Last ›
   201. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 04:56 PM (#2689933)
You know, this makes me long for the ESPN Pete Rose mock trial. At least that was less ridiculous.
   202. gef the talking mongoose Posted: February 13, 2008 at 04:56 PM (#2689934)
Racism rears its ugly head. It was only a matter of time.
   203. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: February 13, 2008 at 04:56 PM (#2689935)
McNamee should be pumping gas somewhere.
   204. Fat Al Posted: February 13, 2008 at 04:56 PM (#2689936)
So far, my evaluation is that this certainly isn't an exoneration of Clemens; he doesn't look good. At best, he's a terrible witness; at worst, he's lying. But at the same time, anybody who would take a case to trial with McNamee as star witness is insane; he's got less credibility than George Bush would have at a DailyKos meetup.


I have the exact same reaction. These are two of the least credible witnesses I've ever seen.
   205. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 04:58 PM (#2689939)
I would recall Clemens Buttocks.

This whole thing proves nothing.
   206. Gambling Rent Czar Posted: February 13, 2008 at 04:58 PM (#2689940)
20 minutes and we are still talking about rogers ass.
   207. gef the talking mongoose Posted: February 13, 2008 at 04:59 PM (#2689942)
you don't think he is well prepared..
i missed the first half hour, but he has handled himself very well in my biased opinion


Undoubtedly our respective perceptions are very much colored by our own biases, but based on my viewing of much of the first half-hour, no, I don't think he came off well at all.

He might've done better since you started watching, but I haven't had a chance to watch any of that.

McNamee hasn't done well, either. A pox on the house of everyone involved, the legislators very much included.
   208. HGM Posted: February 13, 2008 at 04:59 PM (#2689943)
This is great TV. GREAT TV!
   209. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:00 PM (#2689944)
McNamee now calls some more people liars.
   210. Fat Al Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:00 PM (#2689945)
McNamee isn't ideal but I've seen people get convicted with far worse "star" witnesses. The problem for Clemens is if the evidence corroborates what McNamee's testimony is. You may not like his methods, but if those gauze pads have extensive DNA from a few years ago, that's still pretty damning evidence. The revelations about Roger's wife also are pretty compelling as well.


They would have to be able to date both the blood and the steroids and even if they did they would still have huge chain-of-custody issues. That physical evidence may be strong on the back pages but it strikes me as pretty weak in proving anything beyond a reasonable doubt.

And I've really heard everything I need to hear about Clemens's buttocks.
   211. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:00 PM (#2689946)
DosRafaels: yes, the gauze pads would help McNamee's credibility a lot. But right now there isn't any DNA evidence, so it can't be a point against Clemens yet. I'm evaluating the actual evidence, not hypothetical evidence.
   212. E., Hinske Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:02 PM (#2689948)
I'm torn, and it's close, but I think McNamee is a worse witness. Clemens at least seems to generally understand what the question means.
   213. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:02 PM (#2689949)
"we were in the closet"

"palpable mass on his buttocks"

"He traveled with those little band-aids for his butt if he bled."

Where's a Mike Piazza post when you need one?
   214. Andere Richtingen Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:03 PM (#2689950)
Rep. Davis: "Mr. Clemens, do you recall bleeding through your pants in 2001?"

Clemens: "I do not. However, I am sitting in a pool of blood following Rep. Waxman's questioning. "
   215. bunyon Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:03 PM (#2689951)
"we were in the closet"

"palpable mass on his buttocks"

"He traveled with those little band-aids for his butt if he bled."

Where's a Mike Piazza post when you need one?


Maybe the bat was a lover's quarrel?
   216. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:05 PM (#2689953)
Why is Abe Vigoda questioning this fella, and who is this guy?
   217. Fat Al Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:07 PM (#2689954)
How can Kanjorski not know how to pronounce Canseco?
   218. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:07 PM (#2689955)
Whoa, Mitchell Report Lawyer. "Its not our role to judge."

what? not our role to judge whether the facts are correct or not?
   219. Gambling Rent Czar Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:08 PM (#2689957)
congress is attacking the Mitchell report.

am i hearing this right?
   220. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:08 PM (#2689958)

what? not our role to judge whether the facts are correct or not?


They report, you decide!
   221. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:08 PM (#2689959)
I'm torn, and it's close, but I think McNamee is a worse witness. Clemens at least seems to generally understand what the question means.
Assuming Clemens is telling the truth, Clemens is a bad witness in the way many (perhaps most) people are bad witnesses: he's so afraid to give a simple "bad" answer like "I don't know," so he'd rather ramble in response to a question he can't answer. For instance, that whole discussion about Pettitte, he kept making an argument that made no sense and didn't help his case. "If Pettitte thought I were using, he would have talked to me before he used." But Pettitte did think you were using, Roger, and didn't talk to you, so what's your point? The bottom line that Roger should have stuck with (whether he's telling the truth or lying) is, "Andy never saw me take a PED and never heard me talk about my having taken PEDs, because I didn't, so he must have misunderstood something I said. I don't have anything else to add about Andy's testimony."
   222. E., Hinske Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:11 PM (#2689964)
I tend to agree with you David. I've never seen so many people who remember what they were doing ten years ago.

This examination of Mitchell's guy is boring. Good, back to McNamee!
   223. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:11 PM (#2689965)
Assuming Clemens is telling the truth, Clemens is a bad witness in the way many (perhaps most) people are bad witnesses: he's so afraid to give a simple "bad" answer like "I don't know,"

Exactly. Both Clemens and McNamee are making that mistake. I think Davis asked McNamee something like "wouldn't other people who knew about the star player of the Jays getting injections have made a big deal about this?" McNamee should have just said "I can't speak to other people's opinions and motives" instead of rambling on and weaving a bigger web of lies.

Both are just morons and have been poorly prepped by their attorney. Keep your answers short and simple. If you don't know, say so.
   224. Oriole Tragic is totally awesome in the postseason Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:12 PM (#2689966)
The "Mitchell Report Lawyer" sure sounded like he had a Baltimore accent.
   225. CiC Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:14 PM (#2689968)
what color is uh the uh air *rubs head* that mr. clemens is um breathing?
   226. Famous Original Joe C Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:14 PM (#2689969)
"and milky white."
   227. CiC Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:16 PM (#2689970)
that 5 minutes was sure mailed in
   228. ronh Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:17 PM (#2689971)
Why did Clemens have McNamee give him B-12 and Lidocaine and not the team's doctors?
   229. Oriole Tragic is totally awesome in the postseason Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:18 PM (#2689972)
The acoustics in there must suck. McNamee and Clemens keep having to ask for panelists to repeat themselves.

Of course, I don't really believe it's the acoustics.
   230. HGM Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:19 PM (#2689974)
Yeah, it's hard hearing people talk that have their heads up their ass.
   231. Oriole Tragic is totally awesome in the postseason Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:21 PM (#2689975)
"A New York minute, if you will."

Smooth.
   232. Repoz Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:21 PM (#2689976)
What a horrid toupe on that Congressman!

I demand an investigation!
   233. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:21 PM (#2689977)
Why did Clemens have McNamee give him B-12 and Lidocaine and not the team's trainers?
Can't answer for him of course, but Canseco answered that question in the abstract on the radio a month or so ago: players wouldn't always tell the trainers because they didn't want to let the team know they weren't feeling well. (Either because they didn't want to be seen as a whiner or because they didn't want the manager to hold them out of a game.)
   234. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:23 PM (#2689978)
Why is the Mitchell report lawyer even there? He has no firsthand knowledge of anything except the way the Mitchell investigation was conducted. So why are they asking him substantive questions about the facts?

Plus, his answer is... lawyerly. (Handles himself much better than Clemens or McNamee, not surprisingly.) He's quite correct that the MR doesn't explicitly state that steroids were discussed at the Canseco luncheon -- but that's the only possible reason to put it in the report.


Got to like the senile Congressman who can't even remember Canseco's name.
   235. CiC Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:24 PM (#2689979)
Why is the Mitchell report lawyer even there? He has no firsthand knowledge of anything except the way the Mitchell investigation was conducted. So why are they asking him substantive questions about the facts?

To put someone between the two of them
   236. E., Hinske Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:25 PM (#2689982)
I'd like thank whoever the current congressman is for saying that the depositions are devastating and then not saying for whom.
   237. CiC Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:26 PM (#2689983)
i want to park my car in waxman's nostrils
   238. Oriole Tragic is totally awesome in the postseason Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:27 PM (#2689984)
Oh nice, someone finally asks some questions about complicity on the part of MLB ownership.
   239. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:29 PM (#2689987)

Got to like the senile Congressman who can't even remember Canseco's name.


They named a Fieldhouse in Indianapolis after him for heavens sake!
   240. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:29 PM (#2689988)
Gotta love the Congressman representing St. Louis to make fun of Sammy Sosa! I actually ran into Rep. Clay a few weeks ago at a press conference to support Obama. I didn't know who he was, and he asked me for some matches. Now he's on my TV.
   241. Famous Original Joe C Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:30 PM (#2689989)
Back to the children. Yeah, the government is the solution here, you self-righteous *****.
   242. Greg (U)K Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:31 PM (#2689992)
I missed that last bit
It sounded like Clemens forgot how many Cy Young's he has
   243. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:31 PM (#2689993)
Gotta love the Congressman representing St. Louis to make fun of Sammy Sosa! I actually ran into Rep. Clay a few weeks ago at an Obama rally. I didn't know who he was, and he asked me for some matches.
Nepotism. His father was in Congress forever.
   244. Oriole Tragic is totally awesome in the postseason Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:32 PM (#2689994)
Souder is out of control.

Comparing Baltimore's "stop snitchin'" crime culture to MLB locker-room codes...please.
   245. NJ is feeling better Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:32 PM (#2689995)
LMAO at Clemens talking about his work ethic. Still, I'm on The Rocket's side thus far.
   246. Shredder Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:32 PM (#2689996)
"Mr. Clemens, can I tell my children that you always played the game with integrity?"

This reminds of that Kids in the Hall episode where Dave Foley is on trial for murder, and the prosecutor asks "Did you kill (the victim)?", and he responds "No. This is so easy!"
   247. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:32 PM (#2689997)
Roger, you'd have nine Cy Youngs if the stupid sportswriters hadn't jobbed you in 2005 and 1992.
   248. CiC Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:33 PM (#2689998)
has clemens caught on and is he now trying to talk for 5 straight minutes after the first question?
   249. nothing_but_truth Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:37 PM (#2690006)
I think there are independent lines of evidence that are taken together damning to Clemens here, even if individually none is a smoking gun. To believe Clemens we have to believe that

i) McNamee is a psycho who lied (plausible),.
ii) Pettitte misheard or misunderstood that Clemens took HGH. Coincidentally, he ends up getting HGH from the same psycho who is framing Clemens. Also, Debbie Clemens takes HGH from the same guy!
iii) The abscess could well have been from B-12, but is more consistent with winstrol.

Probably not enough for a perjury trial, but enough for conviction in the court of public opinion.

btw, any theories on the party-line split here? GOP congreessmen dont like Mitchell? Clemens donates to the GOP? Dems just dont like Texans?
   250. Bunny Vincennes Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:39 PM (#2690008)
I'm as confused as Clemens on what the hell Waxman is talking about.
   251. Hack Wilson Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:39 PM (#2690009)
Chicago Tribune blog:
This hearing is taking on more and more of a partisan feel. Largely, the Republican members of the Government Reform Committee seem more sympathetic to Clemens, the Democrats more skeptical. Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina just passed around a statement accusing Democrats in the House of wasting time on baseball instead of focusing on issues like immigration and the economy.
   252. CiC Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:41 PM (#2690012)
RUSTY'S ALL RILED UP!
   253. marko Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:41 PM (#2690013)
the nanny...
   254. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:42 PM (#2690014)
Mark Souder is one of the dimmer bulbs in Congress. "The locker room would be your neighborhoods." But he's an ardent drug warrior.
   255. E., Hinske Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:42 PM (#2690015)
This a) makes Clemens look bad and b) is completely understandable.
   256. gef the talking mongoose Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:42 PM (#2690016)
Patrick McHenry of North Carolina


Give me mcliberty or give me mcdeath!
   257. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:42 PM (#2690017)
Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina just passed around a statement accusing Democrats in the House of wasting time on baseball instead of focusing on issues like immigration and the economy.

Or gay marriage, or flag burning, or censuring Moveon.org....
   258. Smelly is so fluffy he's gonna die Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:43 PM (#2690018)
i missed the beginning of this line of questioning regarding the nanny. Anyone want to fill me in?
   259. E., Hinske Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:43 PM (#2690019)
Hey, Rusty Hardin is playing the role of Tom Hagen.
   260. Bunny Vincennes Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:44 PM (#2690021)
I have to agree with Clemens attorney's here.
   261. Greg (U)K Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:44 PM (#2690022)
Holmes-Norton?
But she's not even an American citizen
   262. Gambling Rent Czar Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:44 PM (#2690023)
excuse me but did waxman just get ############ by rogers lawyers ..
   263. Bunny Vincennes Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:46 PM (#2690024)
Smelly,

Basically, Waxman was accusing Clemens of tamporing with the evidence of the nanny. Because he was asked to find her, on a Friday, he met with her on Sunday, and then she testified. Clemens basically said, "Dude, I found the nanny for you, what more do want?"
   264. E., Hinske Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:47 PM (#2690026)
Boy, this is an astounding line of questioning that proves nothing: "But Mr. Clemens, you were on good terms with him until the Mitchell Report?"

"Well, until he lied and said I took steroids, I didn't have a problem with him."
   265. The_Ex Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:49 PM (#2690028)
This definitely is way up there on the entertainment front, who says these are always boring. The Mitchell lawyer's facial expressions are great.

Lost in the nanny tampering confrontation is that the nanny basically gave supporting evidence to the McNamee allegations.
   266. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:49 PM (#2690029)
This hearing is taking on more and more of a partisan feel. Largely, the Republican members of the Government Reform Committee seem more sympathetic to Clemens, the Democrats more skeptical. Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina just passed around a statement accusing Democrats in the House of wasting time on baseball instead of focusing on issues like immigration and the economy.
Yes, I noticed that too. With the exception of Souder, the GOP members seems to be more sympathetic to Clemens and the Democrats seem to be more hostile. Waxman is also an ardent drug warrior (although he does it from the supposedly liberal side of the aisle, so he's doing it to help people), so perhaps they're taking their cues from him.
   267. E., Hinske Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:50 PM (#2690030)
Well, except for the part where she says that there was no party, which contradicts everyone.
   268. Oriole Tragic is totally awesome in the postseason Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:51 PM (#2690031)
Do you think Clemens' lawyers actually had to tell him to say, "I'm a forgiving person"?
   269. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:52 PM (#2690033)
Clemens is going to heaven! It must be rigged.
   270. Boots Day Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:52 PM (#2690034)
Against some very stiff competition, Patrick McHenry is probably the worst member of Congress: An amoral, ignorant thug who cares about nothing other than his own personal aggrandizement. His lack of knowledge is matched only by his lack of principles. If you've been waiting for someone to bring the personal destruction and petty power plays of the College Republicans to the U.S. Congress, he's your man. He makes Karl Rove look statesmanlike.

If McHenry is somehow right on an issue, as appears to be the case here, rest assured it's purely coincidental.
   271. Bunny Vincennes Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:52 PM (#2690035)
I'm sure your going to heaven?

WTF is that all about?
   272. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:53 PM (#2690036)
so, what has happened since senator burton, can I get a recap?
   273. Gambling Rent Czar Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:53 PM (#2690037)
if Bob Ley ever did steroids, then i would be disappointed.
   274. Bunny Vincennes Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:54 PM (#2690038)
Has there ever been a collection of douches better at ############# than the College Republicans?
   275. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:55 PM (#2690040)
The congresspeople need name tags. Who is the african-american woman?
   276. Smelly is so fluffy he's gonna die Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:56 PM (#2690041)
Basically, Waxman was accusing Clemens of tamporing with the evidence of the nanny. Because he was asked to find her, on a Friday, he met with her on Sunday, and then she testified. Clemens basically said, "Dude, I found the nanny for you, what more do want?"


Thanks. So it really was as ridiculous as it sounded.
   277. Bunny Vincennes Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:56 PM (#2690042)
Really, this thing makes me think that MLB should for a committee and interrogate Congress. Jeez.
   278. Shredder Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:56 PM (#2690043)
You said it, Boots. Probably the best description of him I've heard yet. Although "demagoguery" is usually somewhere in there as well.
   279. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:57 PM (#2690044)
Eleanor Holmes Norton just asked the question I was waiting for, "what standard of evidence did you use when naming players?"
   280. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:57 PM (#2690046)
Really, this thing makes me think that MLB should for a committee and interrogate Congress. Jeez.
How can anybody watch this fiasco and not be libertarian? And homicidal?
   281. Devin has a deep burning passion for fuzzy socks Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:58 PM (#2690047)
I just want to say, this excerpt from the Daily News liveblog does not match up with what I'm reading here:

11:44 A.M.: McNamee received his harshest questioning from Rep. Dan Burton. He described Clemens as a baseball icon and accused McNamee of trying to tear him down. He said the hearing is a trial by media.

In a hostile, almost mocking tone, Burton asked McNamee why he kept Clemens' used syringes and bloody gauze pads.

"I distrusted him to a degree," McNamee replied, sounding pretty cool and collected.

When Burton asked McNamee why he worked for somebody he distrusted to such a degree, McNamee said, "He was my employer."

McNamee also admitted he kept needles from Knoblauch, which he recently passed on to federal investigators.

Burton clearly has no love for McNamee. He brought up repeated examples that McNamee was not honest with investigators or the press. "You just lie when it's convenient for you?"

Perhaps the most shocking admission: McNamee said he lied to two Daily News reporters when he was quoted in a story as saying he never obtained steroids or HGH for Clemens and Pettitte.

Burton chomped on McNamee like a pitbull, but McNamee has not cracked. He kept his cool under a pretty hostile onslaught from the Indiana Republican.


The "most shocking admission" part really kills me, but these guys are not even trying to be evenhanded, unlike Jayson Stark.
   282. Russ Posted: February 13, 2008 at 05:59 PM (#2690050)
Eleanor Holmes Norton just asked the question I was waiting for, "what standard of evidence did you use when naming players?"


"We ranked players by OPS, Madame Senator. Oversized-headness Plus Star-power. We did not adjust for park or era. "
   283. gef the talking mongoose Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:00 PM (#2690051)
How can anybody watch this fiasco and not be libertarian?


You misspelled "anarchist."
   284. HGM Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:02 PM (#2690054)
I'm confused about that heaven quote too...
   285. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:02 PM (#2690055)
You misspelled "anarchist."
I can see that, too.
   286. gef the talking mongoose Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:05 PM (#2690059)
Mommy, I'm scared.
   287. NJ is feeling better Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:06 PM (#2690061)
Clemens must be going to heaven because he's so forgiving of McNamee as evidenced by continued use of him despite the ###### up #### he was doing...c'mon guys, keep up.
   288. HGM Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:07 PM (#2690063)
Ah. That was obvious.
   289. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:07 PM (#2690064)
Clemens has done much better as the hearing has gone on, once they got past questions about Pettitte's recollections. He still doesn't answer questions well -- Eleanor Holmes Norton's questions about why he continued to employ McNamee, for instance -- but they haven't been such tough questions.
   290. Andere Richtingen Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:10 PM (#2690067)
From Stark's blog:

Rep. Stephen Lynch turned his attention to an issue I thought I'd never see discussed on national television, from the floor of Congress -- a "palpable mass" on Clemens' buttock.


Sorry Jason, but Orrin Hatch uttering the name "Long Dong Silver" during the Thomas hearings sets a pretty high standard in this regard.
   291. Gambling Rent Czar Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:10 PM (#2690068)
Clemens has done much better as the hearing has gone on, once they got past questions about Pettitte's recollections. He still doesn't answer questions well -- Eleanor Holmes Norton's questions about why he continued to employ McNamee, for instance -- but they haven't been such tough questions.


that must have been in the beginning ..
I thought roger has done a bang up job up to this point, from what i have seen.
   292. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:13 PM (#2690071)
So, I am done with this, they both seem pretty shaky, but I will reserve my final condemnation until I see the results of an espn.com poll.
   293. nothing_but_truth Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:15 PM (#2690076)

Clemens has done much better as the hearing has gone on, once they got past questions about Pettitte's recollections


Uh, isnt that because Pettitte's recollections are the single most damning thing to come out of this hearing? And his explanations are totally implausible.
   294. Gambling Rent Czar Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:17 PM (#2690079)
i thought this was just a five minute break ..

come on already .. i need my sleaze ..

i need to hear about Rogers ass ..
what kind of bog biscuits his cat eats .. and why? does his dog lift his left or right leg when he licks his ass, and what color is the ass ??

i need to know these things ...

whats the hang up.
   295. HGM Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:17 PM (#2690081)
Why is Burton the one going after Mcnamee? do they decide beforehand who's going to be the grand inquisitor, in the interest of balance?

Because most of the politicians have their mind made up and then go after the person they don't believe. Is it that hard of a concept to understand? Nearly everyone else has talked to Clemens. Why is somebody grilling McNamee a bad thing?
   296. Big Train Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:18 PM (#2690082)
Why is Burton the one going after Mcnamee?

Several congressman went after mcnamee.

They went after him because his story is just as fully of holes as Clemens. Most people realize this.
   297. Bunny Vincennes Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:18 PM (#2690083)
Uh, isnt that because Pettitte's recollections are the single most damning thing to come out of this hearing? And his explanations are totally implausible.

I think Clemens could have said, "I have no idea what Andy is talking about it," and it would have played out better.
   298. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:19 PM (#2690086)
Why is Burton the one going after Mcnamee? do they decide beforehand who's going to be the grand inquisitor, in the interest of balance?
No. Each one does whatever he or she wants.

Uh, isnt that because Pettitte's recollections are the single most damning thing to come out of this hearing? And his explanations are totally implausible.
Well, yes, Pettitte's recollections are the only really damaging thing so far, but it looked bad, as I said earlier, because Clemens couldn't just stick to the short answer, "Andy must have misunderstood me." You can believe that or not, but Pettitte doesn't claim to have witnessed actual PED use -- only a statement from 1999 or 2000 or whatever year that was. We know that at least as early as 2005, Clemens told Pettitte that he hadn't used steroids, so it's not an excuse he just made up.
   299. RayDiPerna Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:20 PM (#2690087)
Watched until 12:15 or so, and now I'm way behind. Just on presentation alone, McNamee appears better to me. He's more calm and collected, for one thing. I thought Clemens seemed too angry in his opening statement, although it's hard to fault him because this simply isn't his arena. He's done better with some questions.

I thought Clemens came off much better in his press conference than he is here, for the most part.

And let me just add: these hearings are retarded.
   300. DosRafaels Posted: February 13, 2008 at 06:21 PM (#2690088)
I'm done as well. I respect the opinion of people who can come out on either side, but to me Clemens denials just don't seem plausible. McNamee is obviously a scumbag but too much of what he says seems to hold up. I just can't discount that now you have two of Clemens closest friends at a point saying that he took HGH, with little motive to lie or a much lesser motive to lie. Pettite has no reason to lie about Clemens, and I haven't heard one bit of testimony that McNamee either did or thought that he would benefit from lying about Clemens. Add that with the unbelievable a week ago, but now substantiated claim that Debbie took HGH from McNamee and I just can't see how Clemens isn't guilty of taking HGH even if there are some discrepancies about when and how many times.
Page 3 of 9 pages  < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >  Last ›

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Guts
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogJeff Sullivan: The Worst Team Ever Projected?
(67 - 6:00pm, Feb 10)
Last: Eric J is Financed by a Rich Grandpa

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012
(410 - 5:59pm, Feb 10)
Last: Matt H.

Transaction Oracle2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's
(52 - 5:57pm, Feb 10)
Last: A triple short of the cycle

NewsblogGrantland/Bill James: An Open Letter to the Hall of Fame About Dwight Evans
(44 - 5:57pm, Feb 10)
Last: lieiam

NewsblogBluetales blog: JetBlue’s 605 Wears Red Sox Colors!
(8 - 5:56pm, Feb 10)
Last: JE (Jason Epstein)

NewsblogMets owners knew about Maddoff
(25 - 5:52pm, Feb 10)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogSources: Cubs’ Starlin Castro Accused Of Sexual Assault
(6121 - 5:51pm, Feb 10)
Last: billyshears

NewsblogCurt Schilling Says Manny 'Quit on the Field,' Teammates Stopped Him From Confronting Slugger
(12 - 5:43pm, Feb 10)
Last: Tricky Dick

NewsblogESPN: Law: Top 100 Prospects (paywalled)
(9 - 5:36pm, Feb 10)
Last: AROM

NewsblogFSKC announces on-air lineup for Royals - Rex Hudler and Steve Physioc to join
(9 - 5:32pm, Feb 10)
Last: TerpNats

Newsblog'Duk: Tim Lincecum slims down with swim routine, loses appetite for McDonald’s
(292 - 5:23pm, Feb 10)
Last: Moe Greene

NewsblogMLB: Hall of Fame worthy? Furthest thing from Schilling's mind
(38 - 5:04pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Good Face

NewsblogTom Brady getting new bro-in-law: Red Sox’ Kevin Youkilis!
(17 - 4:43pm, Feb 10)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

Sox TherapyOffseason Minor League Thread
(2 - 4:39pm, Feb 10)
Last: ellsbury my heart at wounded knee

NewsblogKnobler: Stay away from steroids -- but vote how you want
(23 - 4:36pm, Feb 10)
Last: Something Other

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 1.6206 seconds
40 querie(s) executed