User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.4717 seconds
40 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Wait, so Saunders is angry that the Phillies followed through on their threat?
We all know how those "take it or leave it" offers are really take it or leave it.
If, as Saunders claims, it was presented as "take it or leave it," why would they counter or call back? They would have thought the Phillies weren't open to a counter-offer or negotiations. I'd say the ball was in the Phillies' court to give some indication that they were more flexible than their opening hardball stance gave him reason to believe.
Now, maybe you can say they should've been more savvy to how the game is played, and that they should have known an opening offer is just that, even if it's accompanied by "take it or leave it" bluster. But if the Phillies are going to play it that way, they are taking the risk that some percentage of their draftees are going to take them at their word and believe take it or leave it means just that, and assume that if they aren't willing to take it, they are left with only the option of leaving it.
I agree with this completely. It is just absurd for an MLB team to not sign someone, or even mildly piss off a guy you do sign, over $25 or $50 G.
I imagine part of this might be that MLB underpays pretty much all their front-office employees except the GM. I could definitely see some underpayed scouts or assistants getting pissy with young players.
Is $150K unreasonable for that level? I honestly don't have the slightest idea.
(P.S. look what retard was the team's #1 that year)
This year 150k is the slot for the last pick of the 5th rd so that was a very competitive offer in 1999.
We don't say "retard" anymore, we say "differently abled" or, "what a Jeter".
Yes. The playoffs, when the A's are in them.
Had Saunders dropped because of signability concerns? I have no idea where he was generally ranked among prospects at the time. But I can understand wanting further negotiations if there'd been a couple of round drop, and not being happy with a take it or leave it offer.
Frankly, it's asinine to say "take it or leave it" for the first offer. There's going to be too many people who are offended, and decide to leave it - especially when the player has a full ride scholarship offer anyway.
How come Saunders doesn't get a link to his BB-ref page like the other major leaguers do?
I suspect it was because he wasn't signed. I checked a couple of other drafts and noticed the same thing about players who went back into the draft pool, even if they made the majors later on.
You're probably right, but Kameron Loe gets a link on that very page, even though he went back into the draft and got picked by the Rangers 3 years later. It's probably a pain in the ass to maintain consistency one way or the other.
I would say that any draft you get a Brett Myers-caliber pitcher out of was a pretty good one. You're basically knocking them for not developing a utility player or two that year.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main